Conflicting parties experience threats to both their agency and morality, but the experience of agency-threat exerts more influence on their behavior, leading to relationship-destructive tendencies. Whereas high-commitment relationships facilitate constructive tendencies despite the conflict, we theorized that in low-commitment relationships, affirming the adversary’s agency is a prerequisite for facilitating more constructive tendencies. Focusing on sibling conflicts, Study 1 found that when commitment was low (rather than high), agency-affirmation increased participants’ constructive tendencies toward their brother/sister compared with a control/no-affirmation condition. A corresponding morality-affirmation did not affect participants’ tendencies. Study 2 replicated these results in workplace conflicts and further found that the positive effect of agency-affirmation in low-commitment relationships was mediated by participants’ wish to restore their morality. Study 3 induced a conflict between lab participants and manipulated their commitment. Again, in the low- (rather than high-) commitment condition, agency-affirmation increased participants’ wish to restore their morality, leading to constructive behavior.
AbeleA. E.WojciszkeB. (2013). The Big Two in social judgment and behavior. Social Psychology, 44, 61-62.
2.
BaumeisterR. F. (1996). Evil: Inside human cruelty and violence. New York, NY: Henry Holt.
3.
BursonA.CrockerJ.MischkowskiD. (2012). Two types of value-affirmation: Implications for self-control following social exclusion. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 3, 510-516.
4.
ChartrandT. L.BarghJ. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 893-910.
5.
CohenG. L.GarciaJ.Purdie-VaughnsV.ApfelN.BrzustoskiP. (2009). Recursive processes in self-affirmation: Intervention to close the minority achievement gap. Science, 324, 400-403.
6.
CohenG. L.ShermanD. K. (2014). The psychology of change: Self-affirmation and social psychological intervention. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 333-371.
7.
CohenJ. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.
8.
DavidN.NewenA.VogeleyK. (2008). The “sense of agency” and its underlying cognitive and neural mechanisms. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 523-534.
9.
DavisJ. L.RusbultC. E. (2001). Attitude alignment in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 65-84.
10.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA. G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191.
11.
FiskeA. P. (1991). Structures of social life: The four elementary forms of human relations. New York, NY: Free Press.
12.
FrijdaN. H. (1994). The Lex Talionis: On vengeance. In Van GoozenS. H. M.Van de PollN. E.SergeantJ. A. (Eds.), Emotions: Essays on emotion theory (pp. 263-289). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
GalinskyA. D.GruenfeldD. H.MageeJ. C. (2003). From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 453-466.
14.
GopinM. (2004). Healing the heart of conflict: 8 crucial steps to making peace with yourself and others. Emmaus, PA: Rodale Books.
15.
GuinoteA. (2016). How power affects people: Activating, wanting and goal seeking. Annual Review of Psychology. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044153
16.
HaidtJ. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316, 998-1002.
17.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
18.
HolmesJ. G.RempelJ. K. (1989). Trust in close relationships. In HendrickC. (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (pp. 187-220). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
19.
HoytW. T.FinchamF.McCulloughM. E.MaioG.DavilaJ. (2005). Responses to interpersonal transgressions in families: Forgivingness, forgivability, and relationship-specific effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 375-394.
20.
IsenA. M. (1999). Positive affect. In DalgleishT.PowerM. (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 521-539). New York, NY: Wiley.
21.
KarremansJ. C.SmithP. K. (2010). Having the power to forgive: When the experience of power increases interpersonal forgiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1010-1023.
22.
KearnsJ. N.FinchamF. D. (2005). Victim and perpetrator accounts of interpersonal transgressions: Self-serving or relationship-serving biases?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 321-333.
23.
KipnisD. (1972). Does power corrupt?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 33-41.
24.
KnowlesM. L.LucasG. M.MoldenD. C.GardnerW. L.DeanK. K. (2010). There’s no substitute for belonging: Self-affirmation following social and nonsocial threats. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 173-186.
25.
KrautR. E. (1973). Effects of social labeling on giving to charity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9, 551-562.
26.
KurdekL. A. (1994). Conflict resolution styles in gay, lesbian, heterosexual nonparent, and heterosexual parent couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 56, 705-722.
27.
LeunissenJ. M.De CremerD.Reinders FolmerC. P. (2012). An instrumental perspective on apologizing in bargaining: The importance of forgiveness to apologize. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33, 215-222.
28.
MaioG. R.ThomasG.FinchamF. D.CarnelleyK. (2008). Unraveling the role of forgiveness in family relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 307-319.
29.
MaslowA. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370-396.
30.
McClellandG. H. (2000). Nasty data: Unruly, ill-mannered observations can ruin your analysis. In ReisH. T.JuddC. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 3-16). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
31.
McCulloughM. E.KurzbanR.TabakB. A. (2013). Cognitive systems for revenge and forgiveness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 1-58.
32.
McCulloughM. E.RachalK. C.SandageS. J.WorthingtonE. L.BrownS. W.HightT. L. (1998). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships: II. Theoretical elaboration and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1586-1603.
33.
McCulloughM. E.RootL. M.CohenA. D. (2006). Writing about the benefits of an interpersonal transgression facilitates forgiveness. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74, 887-897.
34.
McCulloughM. E.WorthingtonE. L.Jr.RachalK. C. (1997). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 321-336.
35.
MerrittA. C.EffronD. A.MoninB. (2010). Moral self-licensing: When being good frees us to be bad. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 344-357.
36.
NoorM.ShnabelN.HalabiS.NadlerA. (2012). When suffering begets suffering: The psychology of competitive-victimhood between adversarial groups in violent conflicts. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 351-74.
37.
OverallN. C.HammondM. D.McNultyJ. K.FinkelE. J. (2016). When power shapes interpersonal behavior: Low relationship power predicts men’s aggressive responses to low situational power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 195-217.
38.
PreacherK. J.CurranP. J.BauerD. J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interaction effects in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 437-448.
39.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717-731.
40.
PreacherK. J.RuckerD. D.HayesA. F. (2007). Assessing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185-227.
41.
RusbultC. E.AgnewC. R.ArriagaX. B. (2011). The investment model of commitment processes. In Van LangeP. A.KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 218-231). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
42.
RusbultC. E.MartzJ. M.AgnewC. A. (1998). The Investment Model Scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357-391.
43.
RusbultC. E.Van LangeP. A. M. (2003). Interdependence, interaction, and relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 351-375.
44.
ShnabelN.NadlerA. (2008). A needs-based model of reconciliation: Satisfying the differential emotional needs of victim and perpetrator as a key to promoting reconciliation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 116-132.
45.
ShnabelN.NadlerA.DovidioJ. F. (2014). Beyond need satisfaction: Empowering and accepting messages from third parties ineffectively restore trust and consequent reconciliation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 126-140.
46.
SimanTov-NachlieliI.ShnabelN. (2014). Feeling both victim and perpetrator: Investigating duality within the needs-based model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 301-314.
47.
SmithP. K.JostmannN. B.GalinskyA. D.van DijkW. W. (2008). Lacking power impairs executive functions. Psychological Science, 19, 441-447.
48.
SteeleC. M. (1988). The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 261-302). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
49.
TavuchisN. (1991). Mea culpa: A sociology of apology and reconciliation. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
50.
Van DijkeM.PoppeM. (2006). Striving for personal power as a basis for social power dynamics. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 537-556.
51.
WarburtonW. A.WilliamsK. D.CairnsD. R. (2006). When ostracism leads to aggression: The moderating effects of control deprivation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 213-220.
52.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
53.
WenzelM.OkimotoT. G. (2010). How acts of forgiveness restore a sense of justice: Addressing status/power and value concerns raised by transgressions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 401-417.
54.
WojciszkeB. (2005). Morality and competence in person- and self-perception. European Review of Social Psychology, 16, 155-188.
55.
WoodyattL.WenzelM. (2014). A needs-based perspective on self-forgiveness: Addressing threat to moral identity as a means of encouraging interpersonal and intrapersonal restoration. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 125-135.
56.
YumY.CanaryD. J.BaptistJ. (2015). The roles of culture and fairness in maintaining relationships: A comparison of romantic partners from Malaysia, Singapore, and the United States. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 44, 100-112.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
