Traditionally, researchers have focused on identity-congruent safety cues such as the effect of gender diversity awards on women’s sense of inclusion in organizations. The present studies investigate, for the first time, whether identity safety cues (e.g., organizational diversity structures) aimed at one stigmatized group transfer via perceptions of the organization’s ideology (social dominance orientation), resulting in identity safety for individuals with stigmatized identities incongruent with the cue. Across four studies, we demonstrate that White women experience identity safety from organizational diversity structures aimed at racial minorities (Studies 1 and 2), and men of color experience identity safety from organizational diversity structures aimed at women (Study 3). Furthermore, while White men similarly perceive the organization’s ideology, this does not promote identity safety (Study 4). Thus, we argue that individuals view organizations commended for diversity as promoting more egalitarian attitudes broadly, resulting in the transference of identity safety cues for stigmatized individuals.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
2.
AveryD. R. (2003). Reactions to diversity in recruitment advertising—Are differences black and white?Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 672-679. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.672
3.
CheryanS.PlautV. C.DaviesP. G.SteeleC. M. (2009). Ambient belonging: How stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1045-1060. doi:10.1037/a0016239
4.
ChoS.Mor BarakM. E. (2008). Understanding of diversity and inclusion in a perceived homogeneous culture: A study of organizational commitment and job performance among Korean employees. Administration in Social Work, 32(4), 100-126. doi:10.1080/03643100802293865
5.
CohenG. L.SteeleC. M. (2002). A barrier of mistrust: How negative stereotypes affect cross-race mentoring. In AronsonJ.(Ed.), Improving academic achievement: Impact of psychological factors on education (pp. 205-331). Oxford, England: Academic Press.
6.
CookJ. E.Purdie-VaughnsV.GarciaJ.CohenG. L. (2012). Chronic threat and contingent belonging: Protective benefits of values affirmation on identity development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 479-496. doi:10.1037/a0026312
7.
DaviesP. G.SpencerS. J.QuinnD. M.GerhardsteinR. (2002). Consuming images: How television commercials that elicit stereotype threat can restrain women academically and professionally. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(12), 1615-1628. doi:10.1177/014616702237644
8.
DaviesP. G.SpencerS. J.SteeleC. M. (2005). Clearing the air: Identity safety moderates the effects of stereotype threat on women’s leadership aspirations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 276-287. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.2.276
9.
DobbinF. (2009). Inventing equal opportunity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.
DoverT. L.MajorB.KaiserC. R. (2014). Diversity initiatives, status, and system-justifying beliefs: When and how diversity efforts de-legitimize discrimination claims. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 17, 485-493. doi:10.1177/1368430213502560
11.
DoverT. L.MajorB.KaiserC. R. (2016). Members of high-status groups are threatened by pro-diversity organizational messages. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 62, 58-67. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.006
12.
DowneyS. N.van der WerffL.ThomasK. M.PlautV. C. (2015). The role of diversity practices and inclusion in promoting trust and employee engagement. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 45, 35-44. doi:10.1111/jasp.12273
13.
DuckittJ.SibleyC. G. (2007). Right wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice. European Journal of Personality, 21, 113-130. doi:10.1002/per.614
14.
EdelmanL. B.FullerS. R.Mara-DritaI. (2001). Diversity rhetoric and the managerialization of law. American Journal of Sociology, 106(6), 1589-1641. doi:10.1086/321303
15.
HayesA. F.(2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf
16.
HoA. K.SidaniusJ.KteilyN.Sheehy-SkeffingtonJ.PrattoF.HenkelK. E.. . . StewartA. L. (2015). The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO 7 scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 1003-1028. doi:10.1037/pspi0000033
17.
JansenW. S.VosM. W.OttenS.PodsiadlowskiA.van der ZeeK. I. (2015). Colorblind or colorful? How diversity approaches affect cultural majority and minority employees. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 46, 81-93. doi:10.1111/jasp.12332
18.
KaiserC. R.Brooke VickS.MajorB. (2006). Prejudice expectations moderate preconscious attention to cues that are threatening to social identity. Psychological Science, 17, 332-338. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01707.x
19.
KaiserC. R.MajorB.JurcevicI.DoverT. L.BradyL. M.ShapiroJ. R. (2013). Presumed fair: Ironic effects of organizational diversity structures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 504-519. doi:10.1037/a0030838
20.
LogelC.WaltonG. M.SpencerS. J.IsermanE. C.von HippelW.BellA. E. (2009). Interacting with sexist men triggers social identity threat among female engineers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(6), 1089-1103. doi:10.1037/a0015703
21.
MajorB.O’BrienL. T. (2005). The social psychology of stigma. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 393-421. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070137
22.
MeeussenL.OttenS.PhaletK. (2014). Managing diversity: How leaders’ multiculturalism and colorblindness affect work group functioning. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 17, 629-644. doi:10.1177/1368430214525809
23.
Mor BarakM. E.LevinA. (2002). Outside of the corporate mainstream and excluded from the work community: A study of diversity, job satisfaction and well-being. Community, Work & Family, 5, 133-157. doi:10.1080/13668800220146346
24.
MorrisonA. M.Von GlinowM. A. (1990). Women and minorities in management. American Psychologist, 45, 200-208.
25.
PhillipsL. T.LoweryB. S. (2015). The hard-knock life? Whites claim hardships in response to racial inequity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 61, 12-18. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2015.06.008
26.
PlautV. C.(2002). Cultural models of diversity: The psychology of difference and inclusion. In ShwederR.MinowM.MarkusH. R. (Eds.), Engaging cultural differences: The multicultural challenge in liberal democracies (pp. 365-395). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
27.
PlautV. C.(2010). Diversity science: Why and how difference makes a difference. Psychological Science, 21(2), 77-99. doi:10.1080/10478401003676501
28.
PlautV. C.ThomasK. M.GorenM. J. (2009). Is multiculturalism or color blindness better for minorities?Psychological Science, 20, 444-446. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02318.x
29.
Purdie-VaughnsV.SteeleC. M.DaviesP. G.DitlmannR.CrosbyJ. R. (2008). Social identity contingencies: How diversity cues signal threat or safety for African Americans in mainstream institutions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 615-630. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.615
30.
Purdie-VaughnsV.WaltonG. M. (2011). Is multiculturalism bad for African Americans? Redefining inclusion through the lens of identity safety. In TroppL. R.MallettR. K. (Eds.), Moving beyond prejudice reduction: Pathways to positive intergroup relations (pp. 159-177). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/12319-008
31.
SanchezD. T.ChaneyK. E.ManuelS. K.WiltonL. S.RemediosJ. D. (2016). Stigma by prejudice transfer: Racism threatens White women and sexism threatens men of color. Manuscript submitted for publication.
32.
SettlesI. H.(2004). When multiple identities interfere: The role of identity centrality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(4), 487-500. doi:10.1177/0146147203261885
33.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (2001). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
34.
StevensF. G.PlautV. C.Sanchez-BurksJ. (2008). Unlocking the benefits of diversity: All-inclusive multiculturalism and positive organizational change. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 44, 116-133. doi:10.1177/0021886308314460
35.
StoutJ. G.DasguptaN.HunsingerM.McManusM. A. (2011). STEMing the tide: Using ingroup experts to inoculate women’s self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 255-270. doi:10.1037/a0021385
36.
TrianaM. D. C.GarciaM. F. (2009). Valuing diversity: A group-value approach to understanding the importance of organizational efforts to support diversity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(7), 941-962. doi:10.1002/job.598
37.
TylerT. R. (2001). Public trust and confidence in legal authorities: What do majority and minority group members want from the law and legal institutions?Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 19, 215-235. doi:10.1002/bsl.438
38.
Von HippelC.WalshA. M.ZouroudisA. (2011). Identity separation in response to stereotype threat. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(3), 317-324. doi:10.1177/1948550610390391
39.
WaltonG. M.CohenG. L. (2007). A question of belonging: Race, social fit, and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 82-96. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.82
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
