Individuals differ in how they deploy attention to their physical and social environments. These differences have been recognized in various forms as orientations, interests, and preferences, but empirical work examining these differences at a cognitive level is scarce. To address this gap, we conducted two studies to explore the links among attentional processes and interests in people and things. The first study measured selective visual attention toward person- and thing-related image content. In the second study, participants were randomly assigned to describe visually presented scenes using either an observational or narrative story format. Linguistic analyses were conducted to assess attentional bias toward interest-congruent content. Outcomes from both studies suggest that attention and motivational processes are linked to differential interests in physical and social environments.
AinleyM. D. (2006). Connecting with learning: Motivation, affect and cognition in interest processes. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 391-405.
2.
AinleyM. D.HidiS.BerndorffD. (2002). Interest, learning, and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 1-17.
3.
ArbelaezP.MaireM.FowlkesC.MalikJ. (2011). Contour detection and hierarchical image segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 33, 898-916.
4.
BradleyM. M. (2009). Natural selective attention: Orienting and emotion. Psychophysiology, 46, 1-11.
5.
BradleyM. M.LangP. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: The Self-Assessment Manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25, 49-59.
6.
BranchS. E.WoodcockA.GrazianoW. G. (2015). Person orientation and encouragement: Predicting interest in engineering research. Journal of Engineering Education, 104, 119-138.
7.
CarlstonD. E. (2013). On the nature of social cognition. In CarlstonD. E. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of social cognition (pp. 3-15). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
8.
CarrascoM. (2011). Visual attention: The past 25 years. Vision Research, 51, 1484-1525.
9.
CattellR. B.DrevdahlJ. E. (1955). A comparison of the personality profile (16 P.F.) of eminent researchers with that of eminent teachers and administrators, and of the general population. British Journal of Psychology, 46, 248-261.
10.
ChungC.PennebakerJ. W. (2007). The psychological functions of function words. In FiedlerK. (Ed.), Frontiers of Social Psychology: Social communication (pp. 343-359). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
11.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
DikB. J.RottinghausP. J. (2013). Assessment of interests. In GeisingerK. F. (Ed.), APA handbook of testing and assessment in psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 325-348). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
13.
GrazianoW. G.HabashiM. M.EvangelouD.NgambekiI. (2012). Orientations and motivations: Are you a “people person,” a “thing person,” or both?Motivation and Emotion, 36, 465-477.
14.
GrazianoW. G.HabashiM.WoodcockA. (2011). Exploring and measuring differences in person-thing orientations. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 28-33.
15.
HampsonS. E. (2012). Personality processes: Mechanisms by which personality traits “get outside the skin.”Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 315-339.
16.
HeinkeD.HumphreysG. W. (2005). Computational models of visual selective attention: A review. Connectionist Models in Cognitive Psychology, 1, 273-312.
17.
HidiS. (2006). Interest: A unique motivational variable. Educational Research Review, 1, 69-82.
18.
HidiS.RenningerK. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41, 111-127.
19.
HidiS.RenningerK. A.KrappA. (2004). Interest, a motivational variable that combines affective and cognitive functioning. In DaiD. Y.SternbergR. J. (Eds.), Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development (pp. 89-115). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20.
HillsA. M. (1989). The relationship between thing-person orientation and the perception of animals. Anthrozoos: A Multidisciplinary Journal of the Interactions of People and Animals, 3, 100-110.
21.
HollandJ. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
22.
JohnO. P.SrivastavaS. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In PervinL.JohnO. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102-138). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
23.
KahnemanD. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
24.
LangP. J.BradleyM. M.CuthbertB. N. (1997). Motivated attention: Affect, activation, and action. In LangP. J.SimonsR. F.BalabanM. T. (Eds.), Attention and orienting: Sensory and motivational processes (pp. 97-135). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25.
LangP. J.BradleyM. M.CuthbertB. N. (2008). International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual (Technical Report No. A-8). Gainesville: University of Florida.
26.
LippaR. (1998). Gender-related individual differences and the structure of vocational interests: The importance of the people-things dimension. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 996-1009.
27.
LittleB. R. (1968). Psychospecialization: Functions of differential orientation towards persons and things. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 21, 113.
28.
LittleB. R. (1972). Psychological man as scientist, humanist, and specialist. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 6, 95-118.
29.
LittleB. R. (1974). Person-thing orientation: Manual for the T-P scale (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Department of Psychology, Oxford University.
30.
LittleB. R. (1983). Personal projects: A rationale and method for investigation. Environment & Behavior, 15, 273-309.
31.
McDanielM. A.WaddillP. J.FinstadK.BourgT. (2000). The effects of text-based interest on attention and recall. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 492-502.
32.
MehlM. R.PennebakerJ. W. (2003). The sounds of social life: A psychometric analysis of students’ daily social environments and natural conversations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 857-870.
33.
MoleC. (2013). Attention is cognitive unison: An essay in philosophical psychology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
34.
National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. (2013). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2013 (Special Report NSF 13-304). Arlington, VA. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/
35.
NewmanM. L.GroomC. J.HandelmanL. D.PennebakerJ. W. (2008). Gender differences in language use: An analysis of 14,000 text samples. Discourse Processes, 45, 211-236.
36.
PashlerH. (1998). Selective attention. In PashlerH. (Ed.), The psychology of attention (pp. 37-99). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37.
PennebakerJ. W. (2011). The secret life of pronouns: What our words say about us. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Press.
38.
PennebakerJ. W.BoothR. J.FrancisM. E. (2007). Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC2007): A text analysis program. Austin, TX: Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count.
39.
PennebakerJ. W.ChungC. K.IrelandM. E.GonzalesA. L.BoothR. J. (2007). The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2007. Retrieved from http://www.liwc.net/LIWC2007LanguageManual.pdf
40.
PennebakerJ. W.MehlM. R.NiederhofferK. G. (2003). Psychological aspects of natural language use: Our words, our selves. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 547-577.
41.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717-731.
42.
PredigerD. J. (1982). Dimensions underlying Holland’s hexagon: Missing link between interests and occupations?Journal of Vocational Behavior, 21, 259-287.
43.
RoundsJ. (1995). Vocational interests: Evaluating structural hypotheses. In LubinskiD.DawisR. V. (Eds.), Assessing individual differences in human behavior (pp. 177-232). Palo Alto, CA: Davies-Black.
44.
SchollB. J. (2001). Objects and attention: The state of the art. Cognition, 80, 1-46.
45.
SilviaP. J. (2001). Interest and interests: The psychology of constructive capriciousness. Review of General Psychology, 5, 270-290.
46.
SmilekD.FrischenA. (2013). The “cold” and “hot” sides of attention. In CarlstonD. E. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of social cognition (pp. 313-328). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
47.
SpellmanB. A.SchauerF. (2013). Law and social cognition. In CarlstonD. E. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of social cognition (pp. 829-850). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
48.
SuR.RoundsJ. (2015). All STEM fields are not created equal: People and things interests explain gender disparities across STEM fields. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1-20.
49.
SuR.RoundsJ.ArmstrongP. I. (2009). Men and things, women and people: A meta-analysis of sex differences in interests. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 859-884.
50.
TausczikY. R.PennebakerJ. W. (2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29, 24-54.
51.
TayL.SuR.RoundsJ. (2011). People-things and data-ideas: Bipolar dimensions?Journal of Counseling Psychology, 58, 424-440.
52.
ThorndikeE. L. (1911). Individuality. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
53.
TreismanA. M. (1969). Strategies and models of selective attention. Psychological Review, 76, 282-299.
54.
WolfradtU.PretzJ. E. (2001). Individual differences in creativity: Personality, story writing, and hobbies. European Journal of Personality, 15, 297-310.
55.
WoodcockA.GrazianoW. G.BranchS. E.HabashiM.NgambekiI.EvangelouD. (2012). Person and thing orientation: Psychological correlates and predictive utility. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 4, 116-123.
56.
YangY.BarthJ. M. (2015). Gender differences in STEM undergraduates’ vocational interests: People-thing orientation and goal affordances. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 91, 65-75.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
