Although studies have shown that sexual orientation can be judged from faces, this research has not considered how age-related differences in perceivers or targets affect such judgments. In the current work, we evaluated whether accuracy differed among young adults (YA) and older adults (OA) for young and old men’s faces by recruiting a sample of YA and OA in the lab, a community sample of sexual minority men, and a sample of online participants. We found that OA and YA judged sexual orientation with similar accuracy. Perceptions of gender atypicality mediated the difference in judging older and younger targets’ sexual orientation. Although participants used positive affect to correctly discern sexual orientation regardless of target age, perceptions of masculinity were valid only for judgments of YA.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
3.
BeckerD. V.KenrickD. T.NeubergS. L.BlackwellK. C.SmithD. M. (2007). The confounded nature of angry men and happy women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 179-190.
4.
BerryD. S.McArthurL. (1985). Some components and consequences of a babyface. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 312-323.
5.
BerryD. S.McArthurL. Z. (1986). Perceiving character in faces: The impact of age-related craniofacial changes on social perception. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 3-18.
6.
BoothroydL. G.JonesB. C.BurtD. M.CornwellR. E.LittleA. C.TiddemanB. P.PerrettD. I. (2005). Facial masculinity is related to perceived age but not perceived health. Evolution & Human Behavior, 26, 417-431.
7.
BoshyanJ.ZebrowitzL. A.FranklinR. G.Jr.McCormickC. M.CarréJ. M. (2014). Age similarities in recognizing threat from faces and diagnostic cues. Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences, 69, 710-718.
8.
BrambillaM.RivaP.RuleN. O. (2013). Familiarity increases the accuracy of categorizing male sexual orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 193-195.
9.
BronskiM. (1998). Behind the sex panic! Debate. The Gay & Lesbian Review Worldwide, 5, 29-32.
CollinsM. A.ZebrowitzL. A. (1995). The contributions of appearance to occupational outcomes in civilian and military settings. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 129-163.
12.
DotschR.WigboldusD. H.LangnerO.van KnippenbergA. (2008). Ethnic out-group faces are biased in the prejudiced mind. Psychological Science, 19, 978-980.
EnlowD. H.HansM. G. (1996). Essentials of facial growth. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders.
15.
FolsteinM.FolsteinS.McHughP. (1975). “Mini-mental state”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189-198.
16.
FranklinR. G.Jr.ZebrowitzL. A. (2016). The influence of political candidates’ facial appearance on older and younger adults’ voting choices and actual electoral success. Cogent Psychology, 3, 1151602. doi:10.1080/23311908.2016.1151602
17.
FreemanJ. B.JohnsonK. L.AmbadyN.RuleN. O. (2010). Sexual orientation perception involves gendered facial cues. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1318-1331.
18.
GonsalkoraleK.ShermanJ. W.KlauerK. C. (2009). Aging and prejudice: Diminished regulation of automatic race bias among older adults. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 410-414.
19.
GreenwaldA. G.McGheeD. E.SchwartzJ. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.
JohnsonK. L.GhavamiN. (2011). At the crossroads of conspicuous and concealable: What race categories communicate about sexual orientation. PLoS ONE, 6, e18025.
22.
JohnsonK. L.GillS.ReichmanV.TassinaryL. G. (2007). Swagger, sway, and sexuality: Judging sexual orientation from body motion and morphology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 321-334.
23.
JuddC. M.WestfallJ.KennyD. A. (2012). Treating stimuli as a random factor in social psychology: A new and comprehensive solution to a pervasive but largely ignored problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 54-69.
KiteM. E.DeauxK. (1987). Gender belief systems: Homosexuality and the implicit inversion theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 83-96.
26.
KrendlA. C.AmbadyN. (2010). Older adults’ decoding of emotions: Role of dynamic versus static cues and age-related cognitive decline. Psychology and Aging, 25, 788-793.
27.
KrendlA. C.HeathertonT. F.KensingerE. A. (2009). Aging minds and twisting attitudes: An fMRI investigation of age differences in inhibiting prejudice. Psychology and Aging, 24, 530-541.
28.
KrendlA. C.RuleN. O.AmbadyN. (2014). Does aging impair first impression accuracy? Differentiating emotion recognition from complex social inferences. Psychology and Aging, 29, 482-490.
29.
KrendlA. C.WolfordG. (2013). Cognitive decline and older adults’ perception of stigma controllability. Journal of Gerontology B Series: Psychological Sciences, 68, 333-336.
30.
MarshA. A.AdamsR. B.KleckR. E. (2005). Why do fear and anger look the way they do? Form and social function in facial expressions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 73-86.
31.
McArthurL. Z.BaronR. M. (1983). Toward an ecological theory of social perception. Psychological Review, 90, 215-238.
32.
MullerD.JuddC. M.YzerbytV. Y. (2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 852-863.
MuthénB.AsparouhovT. (2012). Bayesian structural equation modeling: A more flexible representation of substantive theory. Psychological Methods, 17, 313-335.
35.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2011). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
36.
Penton-VoakI. S.PoundN.LittleA. C.PerrettD. I. (2006). Personality judgments from natural and composite facial images: More evidence for a “kernel of truth” in social perception. Social Cognition, 24, 607-640.
37.
PerrettD. I.LeeK. J.Penton-VoakI.RowlandD.YoshikawaS.BurtD. M.AkamatsuS. (1998). Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature, 394, 884-887.
38.
PerrettD. I.ReD.WhiteheadR.StephenI.CoetzeeV.LefevreC.. (2011). Face colour, health, lifestyle and attractiveness. Perception, 40, 23.
39.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717-731.
40.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891.
41.
PreacherK. J.ZhangZ.ZyphurM. J. (2011). Alternative methods for assessing mediation in multilevel data: The advantages of multilevel SEM. Structural Equation Modeling, 18, 161-182.
42.
PreacherK. J.ZyphurM. J.ZhangZ. (2010). A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychological Methods, 15, 209-233.
43.
RhodesG.ChanJ.ZebrowitzL. A.SimmonsL. W. (2003). Does sexual dimorphism in human faces signal health?Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 270, S93-S95.
44.
RichardF. D.BondC. F.Jr.Stokes-ZootaJ. J. (2003). One hundred years of social psychology quantitatively described. Review of General Psychology, 7, 331-363.
45.
RiegerG.LinsenmeierJ. A.GygaxL.BaileyJ. M. (2008). Sexual orientation and childhood gender nonconformity: Evidence from home videos. Developmental Psychology, 44, 46-58.
46.
RiegerG.LinsenmeierJ. A.GygaxL.GarciaS.BaileyJ. M. (2010). Dissecting “gaydar”: Accuracy and the role of masculinity–femininity. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 124-140.
47.
RuffmanT.HenryJ. D.LivingstoneV.PhillipsL. H. (2008). A meta-analytic review of emotion recognition and aging: Implications for neuropsychological models of aging. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 32, 863-881.
48.
RuleN. O. (2011). The influence of target and perceiver race in the categorization of male sexual orientation. Perception, 40, 830-839.
49.
RuleN. O.AmbadyN. (2008). Brief exposures: Male sexual orientation is accurately perceived at 50 ms. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1100-1105.
50.
RuleN. O.AmbadyN. (2010). First impressions of the face: Predicting success and behavior. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 506-516.
51.
RuleN. O.AmbadyN.AdamsR. B.Jr.MacraeC. N. (2008). Accuracy and awareness in the perception and categorization of male sexual orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1019-1028.
52.
RuleN. O.AmbadyN.HallettK. C. (2009). Female sexual orientation is perceived accurately, rapidly, and automatically from the face and its features. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1245-1251.
53.
RuleN. O.IshiiK.AmbadyN.RosenK. S.HallettK. C. (2011). Found in translation: Cross-cultural consensus in the accurate categorization of male sexual orientation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1449-1507.
54.
RuleN. O.MacraeC. N.AmbadyN. (2009). Ambiguous group membership is extracted automatically from faces. Psychological Science, 20, 441-443.
55.
RuleN. O.TskhayK. O.BrambillaM.RivaP.AndrzejewskiS. A.KrendlA. C. (2015). The relationship between anti-gay prejudice and the categorization of sexual orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 77, 74-80.
56.
SkorskaM. N.GenioleS. N.VrysenB. M.McCormickC. M.BogaertA. F. (2015). Facial structure predicts sexual orientation in both men and women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 1377-1394.
57.
StewartB. D.von HippelW.RadvanskyG. A. (2009). Age, race, and implicit prejudice. Psychological Science, 20, 164-168.
58.
TskhayK. O.RuleN. O. (2013). Accuracy in categorizing perceptually ambiguous groups a review and meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 72-86.
59.
TskhayK. O.RuleN. O. (2015a). Emotions facilitate the communication of ambiguous group memberships. Emotion, 15, 812-826.
60.
TskhayK. O.RuleN. O. (2015b). Internalized homophobia influences perceptions of men’s sexual orientation from photos of their faces. Archives of Sexual Behavior. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s10508-015-0628-8
61.
ValentovaJ.RiegerG.HavlicekJ.LinsenmeierJ. A.BaileyJ. M. (2011). Judgments of sexual orientation and masculinity–femininity based on thin slices of behavior: A cross-cultural comparison. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 1145-1152.
62.
von HippelW.SilverL. A.LynchM. E. (2000). Stereotyping against your will: The role of inhibitory ability in stereotyping and prejudice among the elderly. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 523-532.
63.
WestfallJ.KennyD. A.JuddC. M. (2014). Statistical power and optimal design in experiments in which samples of participants respond to samples of stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 2020-2045.
64.
YamaguchiM. K.KatoT.AkamatsuS. (1996). Relationships between physical traits and subjective impressions of faces-age and gender information. Electronics and Communications in Japan (Part III: Fundamental Electronic Science), 79, 23-34.
65.
ZebrowitzL. A. (1997). Reading faces: Window to the soul?Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
66.
ZebrowitzL. A.CollinsM. A. (1997). Accurate social perception at zero acquaintance: The affordances of a Gibsonian approach. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 204-223.
67.
ZebrowitzL. A.FranklinR. G.Jr.HillmanS.BocH. (2013). Older and younger adults’ first impressions from faces: Similar in agreement but different in positivity. Psychology and Aging, 28, 202-212.
68.
ZebrowitzL. A.KikuchiM.FellousJ. M. (2010). Facial resemblance to emotions: Group differences, impression effects, and race stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 175-189.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
