In four experiments, we tested whether embodied triggers may reduce stereotype threat. We predicted that left-side sensorimotor inductions would increase cognitive performance under stereotype threat, because such inductions are linked to avoidance motivation among right-handers. This sensorimotor–mental congruence hypothesis rests on regulatory fit research showing that stereotype threat may be reduced by avoidance-oriented interventions, and motor congruence research showing positive effects when two parameters of a motor action activate the same motivational system (avoidance or approach). Results indicated that under stereotype threat, cognitive performance was higher when participants contracted their left hand (Study 1) or when the stimuli were presented on the left side of the visual field (Studies 2-4), as compared with right-hand contraction or right-side visual stimulation. These results were observed on math (Studies 1, 2, and 4) and Stroop (Study 3) performance. An indirect effect of congruence on math performance through subjective fluency was also observed.
AbelsonR. P.PrenticeD. A. (1997). Contrast tests of interaction hypotheses. Psychological Methods, 2, 315-328. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.2.4.315
2.
AckermanR.ZalmanovH. (2012). The persistence of the fluency–confidence association in problem solving. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 1187-1192. doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0305-z
3.
AlibaliM. W.NathanM. J. (2012). Embodiment in mathematics teaching and learning: Evidence from learners’ and teachers’ gestures. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21, 247-286. doi:10.1080/10508406.2011.611446
4.
AlterA. L.AronsonJ.DarleyJ. M.RodriguezC.RubleD. N. (2010). Rising to the threat: Reducing stereotype threat by reframing the threat as a challenge. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 166-171. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.09.014
5.
BarberS. J.MatherM. (2013). Stereotype threat can both enhance and impair older adults’ memory. Psychological Science, 24, 2522-2529. doi:10.1177/0956797613497023
6.
BarberS. J.MatherM.GatzM. (2015). How stereotype threat affects healthy older adults’ performance on clinical assessments of cognitive decline: The key role of regulatory fit. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences, 70, 891-900. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbv009
7.
BasselC.SchiffB. B. (2001). Effects of unilateral facial contractions on approach and withdrawal responses. Neuropsychologia, 39, 282-287.
8.
BeilockS. L.RydellR. J.McConnellA. R. (2007). Stereotype threat and working memory: Mechanisms, alleviation, and spillover. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 256-276. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.136.2.256
9.
BemD. J. (1967). Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. Psychological Review, 74, 183-200. doi:10.1037/h0024835
10.
BrodishA. B.DevineP. G. (2009). The role of performance–avoidance goals and worry in mediating the relationship between stereotype threat and performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 180-185. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.08.005
11.
CacioppoJ. T.PriesterJ. R.BerntsonG. G. (1993). Rudimentary determinants of attitudes: Arm flexion and extension have differential effects on attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 5-17. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.65.1.5
ChalabaevA.MajorB.SarrazinP.CuryF. (2012). When avoiding failure improves performance: Stereotype threat and the impact of performance goals. Motivation and Emotion, 36, 130-142. doi:10.1007/s11031-011-9241-x
14.
ChalabaevA.SarrazinP.StoneJ.CuryF. (2008). Do achievement goals mediate stereotype threat? An investigation on females’ soccer performance. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 30, 143-158.
15.
CohenJ.CohenP. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. doi:10.2307/2064799
16.
CretenetJ.DruV. (2004). The influence of unilateral and bilateral arm flexion versus extension on judgments: An exploratory case of motor congruence. Emotion, 4, 282-294. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.4.3.282
17.
CretenetJ.DruV. (2009). Influence of peripheral and motivational cues on rigid–flexible functioning: Perceptual, behavioral, and cognitive aspects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 201-217. doi:10.1037/a0015379
18.
CroizetJ. C.DesprésG.GauzinsM. E.HuguetP.LeyensJ. P.MéotA. (2004). Stereotype threat undermines intellectual performance by triggering a disruptive mental load. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 721-731. doi:10.1177/0146167204263961
19.
DavidsonR. J. (1992). Emotion and affective style: Hemispheric substrates. Psychological Science, 3, 39-43. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00254.x
20.
DruV.CretenetJ. (2011). Performing lateralized approach and avoidance behaviors: Effects on perceptual, affective and confidence judgments. Journal of the International Neuropsycho-logical Society, 17, 289-294. doi:10.1017/S1355617710001657
21.
EisingaR.te GrotenhuisM.PelzerB. (2013). The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown?International Journal of Public Health, 58, 637-642. doi:10.1007/s00038-012-0416-3
22.
EmersonK. T. U.MurphyM. C. (2015). A company I can trust? Organizational lay theories moderate stereotype threat for women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 295-307. doi:10.1177/0146167214564969
23.
EngleR. W. (2002). Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 19-23. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00160
24.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191. doi:10.3758/BF03193146
25.
FreitasA. L.HigginsE. T. (2002). Enjoying goal-directed action: The role of regulatory fit. Psychological Science, 13, 1-6. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00401
26.
FriedmanR. S.FörsterJ. (2000). The effects of approach and avoidance motor actions on the elements of creative insight. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 477-492. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.79.4.477
27.
FritzM. S.TaylorA. B.MacKinnonD. P. (2012). Explanation of two anomalous results in statistical mediation analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47, 61-87. doi:10.1080/00273171.2012.640596
28.
GrimmL. R.MarkmanA. B.MaddoxW. T.BaldwinG. C. (2009). Stereotype threat reinterpreted as a regulatory mismatch. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 288-304. doi:10.1037/a0013463
29.
Harmon-JonesE. (2006). Unilateral right-hand contractions cause contralateral alpha power suppression and approach motivational affective experience. Psychophysiology, 43, 598-603. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2006.00465.x
30.
Harmon-JonesE.PriceT. F.Harmon-JonesC. (2015). Supine body posture decreases rationalizations: Testing the action-based model of dissonance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 56, 228-234. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2014.10.007
31.
HigginsE. T. (2000). Making a good decision: Value from fit. American Psychologist, 55, 1217-1230. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.11.1217
32.
InzlichtM.McKayL.AronsonJ. (2006). Stigma as ego depletion: How being the target of prejudice affects self-control. Psychological Science, 17, 262-269. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01695.x
33.
John-HendersonN. A.RheinschmidtM. L.Mendoza-DentonR. (2015). Cytokine responses and math performance: The role of stereotype threat and anxiety reappraisals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 56, 203-206. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2014.10.002
34.
JostmannN. B.LakensD.SchubertT. W. (2009). Weight as an embodiment of importance. Psychological Science, 20, 1169-1174. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02426.x
35.
JuddC. M.YzerbytV. Y.MullerD. (2014). Mediation and moderation. In ReisH. T.JuddC. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 653-676). New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511996481.030
36.
KellerJ.BlessH. (2006). Regulatory fit and cognitive performance: The interactive effect of chronic and situational self-regulatory mechanisms on cognitive test performance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 393-405. doi:10.1002/ejsp.307
37.
LeeA. Y.AakerJ. L. (2004). Bringing the frame into focus: The influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 205-218. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.205
38.
LeysC.LeyC.KleinO.BernardP.LicataL. (2013). Detecting outliers: Do not use standard deviation around the mean, use absolute deviation around the median. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 764-766. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.03.013
39.
MarbleJ. G.ProctorR. W. (2000). Mixing location-relevant and location-irrelevant choice-reaction tasks: Influences of location mapping on the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1515-1533. doi:10.1037//0096-1523.26.5.1515
40.
MartensA.JohnsM.GreenbergJ.SchimelJ. (2006). Combating stereotype threat: The effect of self-affirmation on women’s intellectual performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 236-243. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.04.010
41.
MaxwellJ. S.DavidsonR. J. (2007). Emotion as motion: Asymmetries in approach and avoidant actions. Psychological Science, 18, 1113-1119. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02033.x
42.
MendesW. B.JamiesonJ. (2012). Embodied stereotype threat: Exploring brain and body mechanisms underlying performance impairments. In InzlichtM.SchmaderT. (Eds.), Stereotype threat: Theory, process, and application (pp. 51-68). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
43.
MiyakeA.FriedmanN. P.EmersonM. J.WitzkiA. H.HowerterA.WagerT. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49-100. doi:10.1006/cogp.1999.0734
44.
MrazekM. D.ChinJ. M.SchmaderT.HartsonK. A.SmallwoodJ.SchoolerJ. W. (2011). Threatened to distraction: Mind-wandering as a consequence of stereotype threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 1243-1248. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.05.011
45.
MullerD.JuddC.YzerbytV. (2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 852-863. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.852
46.
MulletE.CretenetJ.DruV. (2014). Motor influences on judgment: Motor and cognitive integration. British Journal of Psychology, 105, 69-91. doi:10.1111/bjop.12022
47.
NashK.McGregorI.InzlichtM. (2010). Line bisection as a neural marker of approach motivation. Psychophysiology, 47, 979-983. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.00999.x
48.
NiedenthalP. M.BarsalouL. W.WinkielmanP.Krauth-GruberS.RicF. (2005). Embodiment in attitudes, social perception, and emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 184-211. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0903_1
PetersonC. K.SchackmanA. J.Harmon-JonesE. (2008). The role of asymmetrical frontal activity in aggression. Psychophysiology, 45, 86-92. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00597.x
51.
PhafR. H.RotteveelM. (2009). Looking at the bright side: The affective monitoring of direction. Emotion, 9, 729-733. doi:10.1037/a0016308
52.
PoracC.CohenS. (1981). Lateral preferences and human behavior. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
53.
QuinnD. M.SpencerS. J. (2001). The interference of stereotype threat with women’s generation of mathematical problem-solving strategies. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 55-71. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00201
54.
RegenbergN.HäfnerM.SeminG. R. (2012). The groove move: Action affordances produce fluency and positive affect. Experimental Psychology, 59, 30-37. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000122
55.
RootJ. C.WongP. S.KinsbourneM. (2006). Left hemisphere specialization for response to positive emotional expressions: A divided output methodology. Emotion, 6, 473-483. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.6.3.473
56.
RydellR. J.Van LooK. J.BoucherK. L. (2014). Stereotype threat and executive functions: Which functions mediate different threat-related outcomes?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 377-390. doi:10.1177/0146167213513475
57.
SchiffB. B.LamonM. (1989). Inducing emotion by unilateral contraction of facial muscles: A new look at hemispheric specialization and the experience of emotion. Neuropsychologia, 21, 923-935. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(89)90068-7
58.
SchiffB. B.LamonM. (1994). Inducing emotion by unilateral contraction of hand muscles. Cortex, 30, 247-254. doi:10.1016/s0010-9452(13)80196-7
59.
SchmaderT.JohnsM.ForbesC. (2008). An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance. Psychological Review, 115, 336-356. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.336
60.
SchubertT. W. (2005). Your highness: Vertical positions as perceptual symbols of power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 1-21. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.1.1
61.
SeibtB.FörsterJ. (2004). Stereotype threat and performance: How self-stereotypes influence processing by inducing regulatory foci. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 38-56. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.1.38
62.
SlepianM. L.AmbadyN. (2012). Fluid movement and creativity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 625-629. doi:10.1037/a0027395
63.
StåhlT.Van LaarC.EllemersN. (2012). The role of prevention focus under stereotype threat: Initial cognitive mobilization is followed by depletion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 1239-1251. doi:10.1037/a0027678
64.
SteeleC. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613-629. doi:10.1037//0003-066X.52.6.613
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
