Sometimes physicians need to provide patients with potentially upsetting advice. For example, physicians may recommend hospice for a terminally ill patient because it best meets their needs, but the patient and their family dislike this advised option. We explore whether regulatory non-fit could be used to improve these types of situations. Across five studies in which participants imagined receiving upsetting advice from a physician, we demonstrate that regulatory non-fit between the form of the physician’s advice (emphasizing gains vs. avoiding losses) and the participants’ motivational orientation (promotion vs. prevention) improves participants’ evaluation of an initially disliked option. Regulatory non-fit de-intensifies participants’ initial attitudes by making them less confident in their initial judgments and motivating them to think more thoroughly about the arguments presented. Furthermore, consistent with previous research on regulatory fit, we showed that the mechanism of regulatory non-fit differs as a function of participants’ cognitive involvement in the evaluation of the option.
AjzenI. (2011). Theory of planned behavior. In Van LangeP. A.KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 438-459). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
2.
AvnetT.HigginsE. T. (2003). Locomotion, assessment, and regulatory fit: Value transfer from “how” to “what.”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 525-530. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00027-1
3.
AvnetT.HigginsE. T. (2006). How regulatory fit affects value in consumer choices and opinions. Journal of Marketing Research, 43, 1-10. doi:10.1509/jmkr.43.1.1
4.
AvnetT.LauferD.HigginsE. T. (2013). Are all experiences of fit created equal? Two paths to persuasion. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23, 301-316. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2012.10.011
5.
BarnatoA. E.HerndonM. B.AnthonyD. L.GallagherP. M.SkinnerJ. S.BynumJ. P.FisherE. S. (2007). Are regional variations in end-of-life care intensity explained by patient preferences? A study of the US Medicare population. Medical Care, 45, 386-400. doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000255248.79308.41
6.
BosoneL.MartinezF.KalampalikisN. (2015). When the model fits the frame: The impact of regulatory fit on efficacy appraisal and persuasion in health communication. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 526-539. doi:10.1177/0146167215571089
7.
BriñolP.PettyR. E.BardenJ. (2007). Happiness versus sadness as a determinant of thought confidence in persuasion: A self-validation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 711-727. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.711
8.
BuhrmesterM.KwangT.GoslingS. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3-5. doi:10.1177/1745691610393980
9.
CacioppoJ. T.PettyR. E. (1984). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Consumer Research, 11, 673-675.
10.
CagleJ. G.PekJ.CliffordM.GuralnikJ.ZimmermanS. (2015). Correlates of a good death and the impact of hospice involvement: Findings from the national survey of households affected by cancer. Supportive Care in Cancer, 23, 809-818. doi:10.1007/s00520-014-2404-z
11.
CamachoC. J.HigginsE. T.LugerL. (2003). Moral value transfer from regulatory fit: What feels right is right and what feels wrong is wrong. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 498-510. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.3.498
12.
CesarioJ.CorkerK. S.JelinekS. (2013). A self-regulatory framework for message framing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 238-249. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.10.014
13.
CesarioJ.GrantH.HigginsE. T. (2004). Regulatory fit and persuasion: Transfer from “feeling right.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 388-404. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.3.388
14.
CesarioJ.HigginsE. T.ScholerA. A. (2008). Regulatory fit and persuasion: Basic principles and remaining questions. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 444-463. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00055.x
15.
ChaikenS. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752-766. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752
16.
ChenA. B.CroninA.WeeksJ. C.ChrischillesE. A.MalinJ.HaymanJ. A.SchragD. (2013). Expectations about the effectiveness of radiation therapy among patients with incurable lung cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 31, 2730-2735. doi:10.1200/JCO.2012.48.5748
17.
CloreG. L.WyerR. S.DienesB.GasperK.GohmC.IsbellL. (2001). Affective feelings as feedback: Some cognitive consequences. In MartinL. L.CloreG. L. (Eds.), Theories of mood and cognition (pp. 27-62). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
CooperbergM. R.CarrollP. R.KlotzL. (2011). Active surveillance for prostate cancer: Progress and promise. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 29, 3669-3676. doi:10.1200/JCO.2011.34.9738
19.
CummingG. (2013). The new statistics: Why and how. Psychological science, 25, 7-29. doi:10.1177/0956797613504966
20.
DavisonB. J.BreckonE. (2012). Factors influencing treatment decision making and information preferences of prostate cancer patients on active surveillance. Patient Education & Counseling, 87, 369-374. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2011.11.009
21.
DowL. A.MatsuyamaR. K.RamakrishnanV.KuhnL.LamontE. B.LyckholmL.SmithT. J. (2010). Paradoxes in advance care planning: The complex relationship of oncology patients, their physicians, and advance medical directives. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 28, 299-304. doi:10.1200/JCO.2009.24.6397
22.
FagerlinA.Zikmund-FisherB. J.UbelP. A. (2005). How making a risk estimate can change the feel of that risk: Shifting attitudes toward breast cancer risk in a general public survey. Patient Education & Counseling, 57, 294-299. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2004.08.007
23.
FridmanI.EpsteinA. S.HigginsE. T. (2015). Appropriate use of psychology in patient-physician communication: Influencing wisely. JAMA Oncology, 1, 725-726. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.0980
HarringtonS. E.SmithT. J. (2008). The role of chemotherapy at the end of life: “When is enough, enough?”The Journal of the American Medical Association, 299, 2667-2678. doi:10.1001/jama.299.22.2667
26.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
27.
HigginsE. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280-1300. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.52.12.1280
28.
HigginsE. T. (1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. In ZanaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 1-46). London, England: Academic Press.
29.
HigginsE. T. (2000). Making a good decision: Value from fit. American Psychologist, 55, 1217-1230. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.11.1217
30.
HigginsE. T. (2006). Value from hedonic experience and engagement. Psychological Review, 113, 439-460. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.113.3.439
31.
HigginsE. T. (2012). 10 Motivation science in social psychology: A tale of two histories. In KruglanskiA. W.StroebeW. (Eds.), Handbook of the history of social psychology (pp. 199-214). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
32.
HigginsE. T. (2014). Promotion and prevention: How “0” can create dual motivational forces. In ShermanJ. W.GwronskiB.TropeY. (Eds.), Dual-process theories of the social mind (pp. 423-438). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
33.
HigginsE. T.IdsonL. C.FreitasA. L.SpiegelS.MoldenD. C. (2003). Transfer of value from fit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1140-1153. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.6.1140
34.
HigginsE. T.RoneyC. J.CroweE.HymesC. (1994). Ideal versus ought predilections for approach and avoidance distinct self-regulatory systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 276-286. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.2.276
35.
HoT. H.BarberaL.SaskinR.LuH.NevilleB. A.EarleC. C. (2011). Trends in the aggressiveness of end-of-life cancer care in the universal health care system of Ontario, Canada. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 29, 1587-1591. doi:10.1200/JCO.2010.31.9897
36.
HongJ.LeeA. Y. (2008). Be fit and be strong: Mastering self-regulation through regulatory fit. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 682-695. doi:10.1086/521902
37.
IdsonL. C.LibermanN.HigginsE. T. (2004). Imagining how you’d feel: The role of motivational experiences from regulatory fit. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 926-937. doi:10.1177/0146167204264334
38.
KlasterskyJ.PaesmansM. (2001). Response to chemotherapy, quality of life benefits and survival in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Review of literature results. Lung Cancer, 34, 95-101. doi:10.1016/S0169-5002(01)00383-X
39.
KoenigA. M.CesarioJ.MoldenD. C.KosloffS.HigginsE. T. (2009). Incidental experiences of regulatory fit and the processing of persuasive appeals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1342-1355. doi:10.1177/0146167209339076
40.
LabrooA. A.LeeA. Y. (2006). Between two brands: A goal fluency account of brand evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 43, 374-385. doi:10.1509/jmkr.43.3.374
41.
LeeA. Y.AakerJ. L. (2004). Bringing the frame into focus: The influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 205-218. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.205
42.
LinR. Y.LevineR. J.ScanlanB. C. (2012). Evolution of end-of-life care at United States hospitals in the new millennium. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 15, 592-601. doi:10.1089/jpm.2011.0432
43.
MotykaS.GrewalD.PuccinelliN. L.RoggeveenA. L.AvnetT.DaryantoA.. . . WetzelsM. (2014). Regulatory fit: A meta-analytic synthesis. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24, 394-404. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2013.11.004
44.
NSCLC Meta-Analyses Collaborative Group. (2008). Chemotherapy in addition to supportive care improves survival in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from 16 randomized controlled trials. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 26, 4617-4625. doi:10.1200/JCO.2008.17.7162
45.
PaolacciG.ChandlerJ. (2014). Inside the Turk: Understanding Mechanical Turk as a participant pool. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 184-188. doi:10.1177/0963721414531598
46.
PaolacciG.ChandlerJ.IpeirotisP. G. (2010). Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 411-419.
47.
PettyR. E.CacioppoJ. T.SchumannD. (1983). Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 135-146.
48.
QuillT. E.ArnoldR.BackA. L. (2009). Discussing treatment preferences with patients who want “everything.”Annals of Internal Medicine, 151, 345-349. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-5-200909010-00010
49.
ReynaV. F.NelsonW. L.HanP. K.PignoneM. P. (2015). Decision making and cancer. American Psychologist, 70, 105-118. doi:10.1037/a0036834
50.
SchwarzN.CloreG. L. (2003). Mood as information: 20 years later. Psychological Inquiry, 14, 296-303. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2003.9682896
51.
SeymourJ.GottM.BellamyG.AhmedzaiS. H.ClarkD. (2004). Planning for the end of life: The views of older people about advance care statements. Social Science & Medicine, 59, 57-68. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.10.005
52.
TamL.BagozziR. P.SpanjolJ. (2012). When planning is not enough: the selfregulatory effect of implementation intentions on changing snacking habits. Marketing Letters, 23, 93-107. doi:10.1007/s11002-011-9138-1
53.
TriceE. D.PrigersonH. G. (2009). Communication in end-stage cancer: Review of the literature and future research. Journal of Health Communication, 14(Suppl. 1), 95-108. doi:10.1080/10810730902806786
54.
van den BerghR. C.RoemelingS.RoobolM. J.AusG.HugossonJ.RannikkoA. S.. . . SchröderF. H. (2009). Outcomes of men with screen-detected prostate cancer eligible for active surveillance who were managed expectantly. European Urology, 55, 1-8. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2008.09.007
55.
VaughnL. A.MalikJ.SchwartzS.PetkovaZ.TrudeauL. (2006). Regulatory fit as input for stop rules. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 601-611. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.601
56.
VaughnL. A.O’RourkeT.SchwartzS.MalikJ.PetkovaZ.TrudeauL. (2006). When two wrongs can make a right: Regulatory nonfit, bias, and correction of judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 654-661. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.09.004
57.
VermaA. A.RazakF.DetskyA. S. (2014). Understanding choice: Why physicians should learn prospect theory. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 311, 571-572. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.285245
58.
VigE. K.StarksH.TaylorJ. S.HopleyE. K.Fryer-EdwardsK. (2010). Why don’t patients enroll in hospice? Can we do anything about it?Journal of General Internal Medicine, 25, 1009-1019. doi:10.1007/s11606-010-1423-9
59.
WeeksJ. C.CatalanoP. J.CroninA.FinkelmanM. D.MackJ. W.KeatingN. L.SchragD. (2012). Patients’ expectations about effects of chemotherapy for advanced cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 367, 1616-1625. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1204410
60.
WinterL.MossM. S.HoffmanC. (2009). Affective forecasting and advance care planning: Anticipating quality of life in future health statuses. Journal of Health Psychology, 14, 447-456. doi:10.1177/1359105309102201
61.
WoodW. (1982). Retrieval of attitude-relevant information from memory: Effects on susceptibility to persuasion and on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 798-810. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.42.5.798
62.
WrightA. A.ZhangB.RayA.MackJ. W.TriceE.BalboniT.. . . PrigersonH. G. (2008). Associations between end-of-life discussions, patient mental health, medical care near death, and caregiver bereavement adjustment. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 300, 1665-1673. doi:10.1001/jama.300.14.1665
63.
ZhaoG.PechmannC. (2007). The impact of regulatory focus on adolescents’ response to antismoking advertising campaigns. Journal of Marketing Research, 44, 671-687. doi:10.1509/jmkr.44.4.671
64.
Zikmund-FisherB. J.FagerlinA.UbelP. A. (2010). Risky feelings: Why a 6% risk of cancer does not always feel like 6%. Patient Education & Counseling, 81, 87-93. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2010.07.041
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
