Five experiments investigated the war contagion phenomenon in the context of international relations, hypothesizing that reminders of past inter- (but not intra-) state war will increase support for future, unrelated interstate violence. After being reminded of the Korean War as an interstate rather than intrastate conflict, South Koreans showed stronger support for violent responses to new, unrelated interstate tensions (Study 1). Replicating this war contagion effect among Americans, we demonstrated that it was mediated by heightened perceived threat from, and negative images of, a fictitious country unrelated to the past war (Study 2), and moderated by national glorification (Study 3). Study 4, using another international conflict in the U.S. history, provided further conceptual replication. Finally, Study 5 included a baseline in addition to the inter- versus intrastate manipulation, yielding further support for the generalized effect of past interstate war reminders on preferences for aggressive approaches to new interstate tensions.
AlexanderM. G.BrewerM. B.HermannR. K. (1999). Images and affect: A functional analysis of out-group stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 78-93.
2.
AlexanderM. G.LevinS.HenryP. J. (2005). Image theory, social identity, and social dominance: Structural characteristics and individual motives underlying international images. Political Psychology, 26, 27-45.
3.
AlvaroE. M.CranoW. D. (1997). Indirect minority influence: Evidence for leniency in source evaluation and counter argumentation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 949-964.
4.
BakkerM.van DijkA.WichertsJ. M. (2012). The rules of the fame called psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 543-554.
5.
BanduraA. (1973). Aggression: A social learning analysis. Oxford, UK: Prentice Hall.
6.
BasabeN.ValenciaJ. (2007). Culture of peace: Sociostructural dimensions, cultural values, and emotional climate. Journal of Social Issues, 63(2), 405-419. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00516.x
7.
BerinskyA. J. (2007). Assuming the costs of war: Events, elites, and American public support for military conflict. Journal of Politics, 69, 975-997.
8.
BizumicB.StubagerR.MellonS.Van der LindenN.IyerR.JonesB. M. (2013). On the (in)compatibility of attitudes toward peace and war. Political Psychology, 34(5), 673-693. http://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12032
9.
BobowikM.PáezD.LiuJ. H.LicataL.KleinO.BasabeN. (2014). Victorious justifications and criticism of defeated: Involvement of nations in world wars, social development, cultural values, social representations of war, and willingness to fight. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 43, 60-73.
10.
BoumanT.ZomerenM.OttenS. (2014). Threat by association: Do distant intergroup threats carry-over into local intolerance?British Journal of Social Psychology, 53, 405-421.
11.
BranscombeN. R.EllemersN.SpearsR.DoosjeB. (1999). The context and content of social identity threat. In EllemersN.SpearsR.DoosjeB. (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 35-58). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science.
12.
CarnageyN. L.AndersonC. A. (2007). Changes in attitudes towards war and violence afterSeptember11, 2001. Aggressive Behavior, 33, 118-129.
13.
ChandlerJ.MuellerP.PaolacciG. (2014). Nonnaïveté among Amazon Mechanical Turk workers: Consequences and solutions for behavioral researchers. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 112-130.
14.
CohenJ. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (Rev. ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
CohenJ.CohenP.WestS. G.AikenL. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
CottamR. W. (1977). Foreign policy motivation: A general theory and a case study. Pittsburg, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
17.
CrescenziM. J. (2007). Reputation and interstate conflict. American Journal of Political Science, 51, 382-396.
18.
ErdfelderE.FaulF.BuchnerA. (1996). GPOWER: A general power analysis program. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 1-11.
19.
EssesV. M.DovidioJ. F.HodsonG. (2002). Public attitudes toward immigration in the United States and Canada in response to the September 11, 2001 “Attack on America.”Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 2, 69-85.
20.
FeyginaI.JostJ. T.GoldsmithR. E. (2010). System justification, the denial of global warming, and the possibility of “system-sanctioned change.”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 326-338.
21.
GaertnerL.SchoplerJ. (1998). Perceived ingroup entitativity and intergroup bias: An interconnection of self and others. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 963-980.
22.
GelfandM.ShteynbergG.LeeT.LunJ.LyonsS.BellC.. . . SoomroN. (2012). The cultural contagion of conflict. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 367, 692-703.
23.
GilovichT. (1981). Seeing the past in the present: The effect of associations to familiar events on judgments and decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 797-808. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.40.5.797
24.
GoldsteinJ. H.DavisR. W.HermanD. (1975). Escalation of aggression: Experimental studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 162-170.
25.
HerrmannR. K.TetlockP. E.VisserP. S. (1999). Mass public decisions to go to war: A cognitive-interactionist framework. American Political Science Review, 93, 553-573.
26.
HerrmannR. K.VossJ. F.SchoolerT. Y.CiarrochiJ. (1997). Images in international relations: An experimental test of cognitive schemata. International Studies Quarterly, 41, 403-433.
27.
HouwelingH. W.SiccamaJ. G. (1985). The epidemiology of war, 1816-1980. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 29, 641-663.
28.
HuesmannL. R. (2011). The contagion of violence: The extent, the processes, and the outcomes. In PatelD. M.TaylorR. M. (Eds.), Social and economic costs of violence: Workshop summary (pp. 63-69). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
29.
JentlesonB. W. (1992). The pretty prudent public: Post post-Vietnam American opinion on the use of military force. International Studies Quarterly, 36, 49-73.
30.
JuddC. M.ParkB. (1988). Out-group homogeneity: Judgments of variability at the individual and group levels. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 778-788. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.778
31.
KederaK. M. (1998). Transmission, barriers, and constraints: A dynamic model of the spread of war. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 42, 367-387.
32.
LeachC. W.SpearsR. (2009). Dejection at in-group defeat and schadenfreude toward second-and third-party out-groups. Emotion, 9, 659-665.
33.
LeachC. W.SpearsR.BranscombeN. R.DoosjeB. (2003). Malicious pleasure: Schadenfreude at the suffering of another group. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 932-943.
34.
LeidnerB. (2015). America and the age of genocide: Labeling a third-party conflict “genocide” decreases support for intervention among ingroup-glorifying Americans because they down-regulate guilt and perceived responsibility to intervene. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 1623-1645.
35.
LeidnerB.CastanoE. (2012). Morality shifting in the context of intergroup violence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 82-91.
36.
LeidnerB.CastanoE.ZaiserE.Giner-SorollaR. (2010). Ingroup glorification, moral disengagement, and justice in the context of collective violence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1115-1129.
37.
LeVineR. A.CampbellD. T. (1972). Ethnocentrism: Theories of conflict, ethnic attitudes, and group behavior. New York, NY: John Wiley.
38.
LevyJ. S. (1982). The contagion of great power war behavior. American Journal of Political Science, 26, 562-584.
39.
LickelB.HamiltonD. L.WieczorkowskaG.LewisA.ShermanS. J.NevilleA. (2000). Varieties of groups and the perception of group entitativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 223-246.
40.
LongW. J.BreckeP. (2003). War and reconciliation: Reason and emotion in conflict resolution. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
41.
MartinR.HewstoneM. (2008). Majority versus minority influence, message processing and attitude change: The source-context-elaboration model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 237-326.
42.
MoninB.OppenheimerD. M. (2014). The limits of direct replications and the virtues of stimulus sampling. Social Psychology, 45, 299-300.
43.
MostB. A.StarrH. (1990). Theoretical and logical issues in the study of international diffusion. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2, 391-412.
44.
PaezD.LiuJ. H. (2011). Collective memory of conflicts. In Bar-TalD. (Ed.), Intergroup conflicts and their resolution: A social psychological perspective (pp. 105-124). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
45.
PaezD.LiuJ. H.TechioE.SlawutaP.ZlobinaA.CabecinhasR. (2008). “Remembering” World War II and willingness to fight sociocultural factors in the social representation of historical warfare across 22 societies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39(4), 373-380. http://doi.org/10.1177/0022022108316638
46.
ParkB.RothbartM. (1982). Perception of out-group homogeneity and levels of social categorization: Memory for the subordinate attributes of in-group and out-group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 1051-1068.
47.
PatelD. M.SimonM. A.TaylorR. M. (2013). Contagion of violence: Workshop summary. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
48.
PettigrewT. F. (1997). Generalized intergroup contact effects on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 173-185.
49.
PettigrewT. F. (2009). Secondary transfer effect of contact. Social Psychology, 40, 55-65.
ReesJ. H.AllpressJ. A.BrownR. (2013). Nie wieder: Group-based emotions for in-group wrongdoing affect attitudes toward unrelated minorities. Political Psychology, 34(3), 387-407. http://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12003
52.
RiekB. M.ManiaE. W.GaertnerS. L. (2006). Intergroup threat and outgroup attitudes: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 336-353.
53.
RoccasS.KlarY.LiviatanI. (2006). The paradox of group-based guilt: Modes of national identification, conflict vehemence, and reactions to the in-group’s moral violations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 698-711.
54.
SeveranceL.Bui-WrzosinskaL.GelfandM. J.LyonsS.NowakA.BorkowskiW.. . . YamaguchiS. (2013). The psychological structure of aggression across cultures. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 835-865.
55.
SherifM.SherifC. W. (1953). Groups in harmony and tension; an integration of studies of intergroup relations. New York, NY: Harper.
56.
SherifM.SherifC. W. (1979). Research on intergroup relations. In AustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 24-29). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Inc.
57.
ShookN. J.FazioR. H.Richard EiserJ. (2007). Attitude generalization: Similarity, valence, and extremity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 641-647.
58.
SimonsD. J. (2014). The value of direct replication. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 76-80.
59.
SiversonR. M.StarrH. (1991). The diffusion of war: A study of opportunity and willingness. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
60.
SobelR. (2001). The impact of public opinion on U.S. foreign policy since Vietnam: Constraining the colossus. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
61.
StephanW. G.StephanC. W. (2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In OskampS. (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 23-45). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
62.
StephanW. G.YbarraO.BachmanG. (1999). Prejudice toward immigrants: An integrated threat theory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 2221-2237.
63.
StephanW. G.YbarraO.MartinezC.SchwarzwaldJ.Tur-KaspaM. (1998). Prejudice toward immigrants to Spain and Israel: An integrated threat theory analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 559-576.
64.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
65.
TauschN.HewstoneM.KenworthyJ. B.PsaltisC.SchmidK.PopanJ. R.. . . HughesJ. (2010). Secondary transfer effects of intergroup contact: Alternative accounts and underlying processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 282-302.
66.
TurnerJ. C.HoggM. A.OakesP. J.ReicherS. D.WetherellM. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory (Vol. 10). Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
67.
WalterB. F. (2004). Does conflict beget conflict? Explaining recurring civil war. Journal of Peace Research, 41, 371-388.
68.
WidomC. S. (1989a). Child abuse, neglect, and adult behavior: Research design and findings on criminality, violence, and child abuse. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 59, 355-367.
69.
WidomC. S. (1989b). Does violence beget violence? A critical examination of the literature. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 3-28.
70.
WohlM. J.BranscombeN. R. (2009). Group threat, collective angst, and ingroup forgiveness for the war in Iraq. Political Psychology, 30, 193-217.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
