Three studies explored the connection between social perception processes and individual differences in the use of affective and cognitive information in relation to attitudes. Study 1 revealed that individuals high in need for affect (NFA) accentuated differences in evaluations of warm and cold traits, whereas individuals high in need for cognition (NFC) accentuated differences in evaluations of competent and incompetent traits. Study 2 revealed that individual differences in NFA predicted liking of warm or cold targets, whereas individual differences in NFC predicted perceptions of competent or incompetent targets. Furthermore, the effects of NFA and NFC were independent of structural bases and meta-bases of attitudes. Study 3 revealed that differences in the evaluation of warm and cold traits mediated the effects of NFA and NFC on liking of targets. The implications for social perception processes and for individual differences in affect–cognition are discussed.
AbeleA. E.UchronskiM.SuitnerC.WojciszkeB. (2008). Toward an operationalization of the fundamental dimensions of agency and communion: Trait content ratings in five countries considering valence and frequency of word occurrence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1202-1217.
2.
AbeleA. E.WojciszkeB. (2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 751-763.
3.
AlickeM. D. (1985). Global self-evaluation as determined by the desirability and controllability of trait adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1621-1630.
4.
AndersonN. H. (1968). Likeableness ratings of 555 personality-trait words. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7, 272-279.
5.
AppelM.GnambsT.MaioG. R. (2012). A short measure of the need for affect. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94, 418-426.
6.
BizerG. Y.TormalaZ. L.RuckerD. D.PettyR. E. (2006). Memory-based versus on-line processing: Implications for attitude strength. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 646-653.
7.
CacioppoJ. T.PettyR. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116-131.
8.
CacioppoJ. T.PettyR. E.FeinsteinJ. A.JarvisW. B. G. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 197-253.
9.
CacioppoJ. T.PettyR. E.GeenT. R. (1989). From the tripartite to the homeostasis model of attitudes. In PratkanisA.BrecklerS.GreenwaldA. (Eds.), Attitude structure and function (pp. 275-305). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
CacioppoJ. T.PettyR. E.KaoC. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 306-307.
11.
CarnevaleJ. J.InbarY.LernerJ. S. (2011). Individual differences in need for cognition and decision-making competence among leaders. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 274-278.
12.
ChemersM. M. (1997). An integrative theory of leadership. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
CritesS. L.FabrigarL. R.PettyR. E. (1994). Measuring the affective and cognitive properties of attitudes: Conceptual and methodological issues. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 619-634.
14.
CuddyA. J. C.FiskeS. T.GlickP. (2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The Stereotype Content Model and the BIAS map. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 40, pp. 61-149). New York, NY: Academic Press.
15.
CuddyA. J. C.FiskeS. T.KwanV. S. Y.GlickP.DemoulinS.LeyensJ. P.. . . ZieglerR. (2009). Stereotype Content Model across cultures: Towards universal similarities and some differences. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 1-33.
16.
CuddyA. J. C.GlickP.BeningerA. (2011). The dynamics of warmth and competence judgments, and their outcomes in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 31, 73-98.
17.
EaglyA. H.ChaikenS. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
18.
EdwardsK. (1990). The interplay of affect and cognition in attitude formation and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 202-216.
19.
EssesV. M.MaioG. R. (2002). Expanding the assessment of attitude components and structure: The benefits of open-ended measures. European Review of Social Psychology, 12, 71-101.
20.
FabrigarL. R.PettyR. E. (1999). The role of the affective and cognitive bases of attitudes in susceptibility to affectively and cognitively based persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 363-381.
21.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J. C.GlickP. (2002). Emotions up and down: Intergroup emotions result from perceived status and competition. In MackieD. M.SmithE. R. (Eds.), From prejudice to intergroup emotions: Differentiated reactions to social groups (pp. 247-264). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
22.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J. C.GlickP. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 77-83.
23.
FiskeS. T.GlickP.XuJ. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902.
24.
HaddockG.MaioG. R.ArnoldK.HuskinsonT. L. H. (2008). Should persuasion be affective or cognitive? The moderating effects of need for affect and need for cognition. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 769-778.
25.
HaddockG.ZannaM. P. (1999). Cognition, affect, and the prediction of social attitudes. European Review of Social Psychology, 10, 75-99.
26.
HaugtvedtC. P.PettyR. E.CacioppoJ. T. (1992). Need for cognition and advertising: Understanding the role of personality variables in consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 1, 239-260.
27.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
28.
HillC. A. (1991). Seeking emotional support: The influence of affiliative need and partner warmth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 112-121.
29.
HuskinsonT. L. H.HaddockG. (2004). Individual differences in attitude structure: Variance in the chronic reliance on affective and cognitive information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 82-90.
30.
JuddC. M.James-HawkinsL.YzerbytV.KashimaY. (2005). Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: Understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 899-913.
31.
KervynN.YzerbytV.JuddC. M. (2010). Compensation between warmth and competence: Antecedents and consequences of a negative relation between the two fundamental dimensions of social perception. European Review of Social Psychology, 21, 155-187.
32.
MaioG. R.EssesV. M. (2001). The need for affect: Individual differences in the motivation to approach or avoid emotions. Journal of Personality, 69, 583-614.
33.
MaioG. R.HaddockG. (2015). The psychology of attitudes and attitude change (2nd ed.). London, England: SAGE.
34.
MaioG. R.OlsonJ. M. (2000). Emergent themes and potential approaches to attitude function: The function-structure model of attitudes. In MaioG. R.OlsonJ. M. (Eds.), Why we evaluate: Function of attitudes (pp. 417-442). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35.
PeetersG. (2002). From good and bad to can and must: Subjective necessity of acts associated with positively and negatively valued stimuli. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 125-136.
36.
RosenbergM. J.HovlandC. I. (1960). Cognitive, affective, and behavioral components of attitudes. In HovlandC. I.RosenbergM. J. (Eds.), Attitude organization and change: An analysis of consistency among attitude components (pp. 1-14). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
37.
SeeY. H. M.PettyR. E.FabrigarL. R. (2008). Affective and cognitive meta-bases of attitudes: Unique effects on information interest and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 938-955.
38.
SeeY. H. M.PettyR. E.FabrigarL. R. (2013). Affective–cognitive meta-bases versus structural bases of attitudes predict processing interest versus efficiency. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1111-1123.
39.
TauschN.KenworthyJ. B.HewstoneM. (2007). The confirmability and disconfirmability of trait concepts revisited: Does content matter?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 542-556.
40.
TrapnellP. D.WigginsJ. S. (1990). Extension of the Interpersonal Adjective Scales to include the Big Five dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 781-790.
41.
WojciszkeB. (1994). Multiple meanings of behavior: Construing actions in terms of competence or morality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 222-232.
42.
WojciszkeB. (1997). Parallels between competence- versus morality-related traits and individualistic versus collectivistic values. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 245-256.
43.
WojciszkeB. (2005). Morality and competence in person-and self-perception. European Review of Social Psychology, 16, 155-188.
44.
WojciszkeB.AbeleA. E. (2008). The primacy of communion over agency and its reversals in evaluations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1139-1147.
45.
WojciszkeB.BazinskaR.JaworskiM. (1998). On the dominance of moral categories in impression formation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1251-1263.
46.
WojciszkeB.KlusekB. (1996). Moral and competence-related traits in political perception. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 27, 319-324.
47.
ZannaM. P.RempelJ. K. (1988). Attitudes: A new look at an old concept. In Bar-TalD.KruglanskiA. W. (Eds.), The social psychology of knowledge (pp. 315-334). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
