According to optimal distinctiveness theory, sufficiently small minority groups are associated with greater membership trust, even among members otherwise unknown, because the groups are seen as optimally distinctive. This article elaborates on the prediction’s motivational and cognitive processes and tests whether sufficiently small minorities (defined by relative size; for example, 20%) are associated with greater membership trust relative to mere minorities (45%), and whether such trust is a function of optimal distinctiveness. Two experiments, examining observers’ perceptions of minority and majority groups and using minimal groups and (in Experiment 2) a trust game, revealed greater membership trust in minorities than majorities. In Experiment 2, participants also preferred joining minorities over more powerful majorities. Both effects occurred only when minorities were 20% rather than 45%. In both studies, perceptions of optimal distinctiveness mediated effects. Discussion focuses on the value of relative size and optimal distinctiveness, and when membership trust manifests.
AbramsD. (2009). Social identity on a national scale: Optimal distinctiveness and young people’s self-expression through musical preference. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12, 303-317. doi:10.1177/1368430209102841
2.
AllportG. W. (1954). The historical background of modern social psychology. In LindzeyG. (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 3-56). Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3.
BadeaC.JettenJ.CzukorG.Askevis-LeherpeuxF. (2010). The bases of identification: When optimal distinctiveness needs face social identity threat. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 21-41. doi:10.1348/000712608x397665
4.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
5.
BearmanP. S.BrücknerH. (2001). Promising the future: Virginity pledges and first intercourse. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 859-912. doi:10.1086/320295
6.
BergJ.DickhautJ.McCabeK. (1995). Trust, reciprocity, and social-history. Games and Economic Behavior, 10, 122-142. doi:10.1006/game.1995.1027
7.
BernardoF.Palma-OliveiraJ. M. (2012). Place identity: A central concept in understanding intergroup relationships in the urban context. In CasakinH.BernardoF. (Eds.), The role of place identity in the perception, understanding, and design of built environments (pp. 45-62). Dubai, UAE: Bentham Science.
8.
BlanzM.MummendeyA.OttenS. (1995). Positive-negative asymmetry in social discrimination: The impact of stimulus valence and size and status differentials on intergroup evaluations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 409-419. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1995.tb01074.x
9.
BoydR.RichersonP. J. (1988). The evolution of reciprocity in sizable groups. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 132, 337-356. doi:10.1016/s0022-5193(88)80219-4
10.
BrewerM. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475-482. doi:10.1177/0146167291175001
11.
BrewerM. B. (2003). Optimal distinctiveness, social identity, and the self. In LearyM. R.TangneyJ. P. (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 480-491). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
12.
BrewerM. B.KramerR. M. (1986). Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group-size, and decision framing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 543-549. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.3.543
13.
BrewerM. B.ManziJ. M.ShawJ. S. (1993). In-group identification as a function of depersonalization, distinctiveness, and status. Psychological Science, 4, 88-92. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00466.x
14.
BrewerM.B.RoccasS. (2001). Individual values, social identity, and optimal distinctiveness. In SedikidesC.BrewerM.B. (Eds.), Individual self, relational self, collective self (pp. 219-237). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
15.
BrunerJ. S. (1957). On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 64, 123-152. doi:10.1037/h0043805
16.
CampbellD. T. (1958). Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioral Science, 3, 14-25. doi:10.1002/bs.3830030103
17.
CaporaelL. R. (1997). The evolution of truly social cognition: The core configurations model. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 276-298. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0104_1
18.
CodolJ.-P. (1984). Social differentiation and nondifferentiation. In TajfelH. (Ed.), The social dimension (Vol. 1, pp. 314-337). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19.
CottrellC. A.NeubergS. L.LiN. P. (2007). What do people desire in others? A sociofunctional perspective on the importance of different valued characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 208-231. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.2.208
20.
DunbarR. I. (1993). Coevolution of neocortical size, group size and language in humans. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 681-693.
21.
EllemersN.KortekaasP.OuwerkerkJ. W. (1999). Self-categorization, commitment to the group and group self-esteem as related but distinct aspects of social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 371-389. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199903/05)29:2/3<371::AID-EJSP932>3.0.CO;2-U
22.
EllemersN.Van RijswijkW. (1997). Identity needs versus social opportunities: The use of group-level and individual-level identity management strategies. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60, 52-65. doi:10.2307/2787011
23.
FeatherN. T. (1995). National identification and ingroup bias in majority and minority groups: A field study. Australian Journal of Psychology, 47, 129-136. doi:10.1080/00049539508257513
24.
FoddyM.PlatowM. J.YamagishiT. (2009). Group-based trust in strangers: The role of stereotypes and expectations. Psychological Science, 20, 419-422. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02312
25.
HackmanJ. R. (1987). The design of work teams. In LorschJ. W. (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 315-342). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
26.
HamiltonW. D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behavior. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1-52. doi:10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4
27.
HardinG. (1988). Common failing. New Scientist, 120(1635), p. 76.
28.
HartC. M.Van VugtM. (2006). From fault line to group fission: Understanding membership changes in small groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 392-404. doi:10.1177/0146167205282149
HoggM. A.TurnerJ. C. (1987). Intergroup behaviour, self-stereotyping and the salience of social categories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 325-340. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1987.tb00795.x
31.
HornseyM. J.HoggM. A. (1999). Subgroup differentiation as a response to an overly-inclusive group: A test of optimal distinctiveness theory. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 543-550.
32.
HornseyM. J.JettenJ. (2004). The individual within the group: Balancing the need to belong with the need to be different. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 248-264. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_2
33.
LauR. R. (1989). Individual and contextual influences on group identification. Social Psychology Quarterly, 52, 220-231. doi:10.2307/2786717
34.
LeachC. W.EllemersN.BarretoM. (2007). Group virtue: The importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of in-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 234-249. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.2.234
35.
LemaineG. (1974). Social differentiation and social originality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 4, 17-52. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420040103
36.
LeonardelliG. J.BrewerM. B. (2001). Minority and majority discrimination: When and why. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 468-485. doi:10.1006/jesp.2001.1475
37.
LeonardelliG. J.PickettC. L.BrewerM. B. (2010). Optimal distinctiveness theory: A framework for social identity, social cognition and intergroup relations. In ZannaM.OlsonJ. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 43, pp. 65-115). New York, NY: Elsevier.
38.
LeonardelliG. J.PickettC. L.JosephJ. E.HessY. D. (2011). Optimal distinctiveness theory in nested categorization contexts: Moving from dueling identities to a dual identity. In KramerR. M.LeonardelliG. J.LivingstonR. W. (Eds.), Psychology Press Festschrift Series. Social cognition, social identity, and intergroup relations: A festschrift in honor of Marilynn Brewer (pp. 103-125). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
39.
LeonardelliG. J.TohS. M. (2015). Social categorization in intergroup contexts: Three kinds of self-categorization. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 9, 69-87. doi:10.1111/spc3.12150
40.
LountR. B.Jr. (2010). The impact of positive mood on trust in interpersonal and intergroup interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 420-433. doi:10.1037/a0017344
41.
LückenM.SimonB. (2005). Cognitive and affective experiences of minority and majority members: The role of group size, status, and power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 396-413. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2004.08.006
42.
MalthusT. R. (1826). An essay on the principle of population (6th ed.). London, England: John Murray.
43.
MaslachC. (1974). Social and personal bases of individuation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 411-425. doi:10.1037/h0036031
44.
McGartyC. (1999). Categorization in social psychology. London, England: SAGE.
45.
McGuireW. J.McGuireC. V. (1988). Content and process in the experience of the self. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 97-144). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
46.
NelsonL. J.MillerD. T. (1995). The distinctiveness effect in social categorization: You are what makes you unusual. Psychological Science, 6, 246-249. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00600.x
47.
PickettC. L.BonnerB. L.ColemanJ. M. (2002). Motivated self-stereotyping: Heightened assimilation and differentiation needs result in increased levels of positive and negative self-stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 543-562. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.4.543
48.
RonceO. (2007). How does it feel to be like a rolling stone? Ten questions about dispersal evolution. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 38, 231-253. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095611
49.
RoschE. (1978). Principles of categorization. In RoschE.LloydB. B. (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 27-48). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
50.
SimonB.BrownR. (1987). Perceived intragroup homogeneity in minority-majority contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 703-711. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.4.703
51.
SimonB.HamiltonD. L. (1994). Self-stereotyping and social context: The effects of relative in-group size and in-group status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 699-711. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.699
52.
SnyderC. R.FromkinH. L. (1980). Uniqueness: The human pursuit of difference. New York, NY: Plenum.
53.
TajfelH.BilligM. G.BundyR. P.FlamentC. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149-178. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420010202
54.
TurnerJ. C. (1987). A self-categorization theory . In TurnerJ. C.HoggM. A.OakesP. J.ReicherS. D.WetherellM. S. (Eds.), Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory (pp. 42-67). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
55.
TverskyA.GatiI. (1978). Studies of similarity. In RoschE.LloydB. B. (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 79-98). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
56.
VignolesV. L.MoncasterN. J. (2007). Identity motives and in-group favouritism: A new approach to individual differences in intergroup discrimination. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 91-113. doi:10.1348/014466605X85951
57.
WestS. A.El MoudenC.GardnerA. (2011). Sixteen common misconceptions about the evolution of cooperation in humans. Evolution & Human Behavior, 32, 231-262. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.08.001
58.
WilderD. A. (1981). Perceiving persons as a group: Categorization and intergroup relations. In HamiltonD. L. (Ed.), Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup behavior (pp. 213-257). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
59.
ZillerR. C. (1964). Individuation and socialization: A theory of assimilation in large organizations. Human Relations, 17, 341-360. doi:10.1177/001872676401700403
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
