Jumping to negative conclusions about other people’s traits is judged as morally bad by many people. Despite this, across six experiments (total N = 2,151), we find that multiple types of moral evaluations—even evaluations related to open-mindedness, tolerance, and compassion—play a causal role in these potentially pernicious trait assumptions. Our results also indicate that moralization affects negative—but not positive—trait assumptions, and that the effect of morality on negative assumptions cannot be explained merely by people’s general (nonmoral) preferences or other factors that distinguish moral and nonmoral traits, such as controllability or desirability. Together, these results suggest that one of the more destructive human tendencies—making negative assumptions about others—can be caused by the better angels of our nature.
AlickeM. D.ZerbstJ. I.LoSchiavoF. M. (1996). Personal attitudes, constraint magnitude, and correspondence bias. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 18, 211-228.
2.
AppelbaumL. D. (2001). The influence of perceived deservingness on policy decisions regarding aid to the poor. Political Psychology, 22, 419-442.
3.
BanduraA.BarbaranelliC.CapraraG. V.PastorelliC. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 364-374.
4.
BassiliJ. N.SmithM. C. (1986). On the spontaneity of trait attribution: Converging evidence for the role of cognitive strategy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 239-245.
5.
BrambillaM.RusconiP.SacchiS.CherubiniP. (2011). Looking for honesty: The primary role of morality (vs. sociability and competence) in information gathering. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 135-143.
6.
BrambillaM.SacchiS.PagliaroS.EllemersN. (2013). Morality and intergroup relations: Threats to safety and group image predict the desire to interact with outgroup and ingroup members. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 811-821.
7.
BrambillaM.SacchiS.RusconiP.CherubiniP.YzerbytV. Y. (2012). You want to give a good impression? Be honest! Moral traits dominate group impression formation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 149-166.
8.
BridgesG. S.SteenS. (1998). Racial disparities in official assessments of juvenile offenders: Attributional stereotypes as mediating mechanisms. American Sociological Review, 63, 554-570.
9.
BryczH.WojciszkeB. (1992). Personality impressions on ability and morality trait dimensions. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 23, 223-236.
10.
CarrollJ. S.PerkowitzW. T.LurigioA. J.WeaverF. M. (1987). Sentencing goals, causal attributions, ideology, and personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 107-118.
11.
CushmanF. (2008). Crime and punishment: Distinguishing the roles of causal and intentional analyses in moral judgment. Cognition, 108, 353-380.
12.
DovidioJ. F.BrighamJ. C.JohnsonB. T.GaertnerS. L. (1996). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination: Another look. In MacraeN.StangorC.HewstoneM. (Eds.), Foundations of stereotypes and stereotyping (pp. 276-319). New York, NY: Guilford.
13.
FiskeA. P.RaiT. S. (2014). Virtuous violence: Hurting and killing to create, sustain, end, and honor social relationships. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
14.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J.GlickP.XuJ. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902.
15.
FongG. T.MarkusH. (1982). Self-schemas and judgments about others. Social Cognition, 1, 191-204.
16.
GoodwinG. P. (2015). Moral character in person perception. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 38-44.
17.
GoodwinG. P.PiazzaJ.RozinP. (2014). Moral character predominates in person perception and evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 148-168.
18.
GrahamJ.HaidtJ.KolevaS.MotylM.IyerR.WojcikS.DittoP. H. (2013). Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 55-130.
19.
GrahamJ.HaidtJ.NosekB. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1029-1046.
20.
GrahamJ.NosekB. A.HaidtJ.IyerR.KolevaS.DittoP. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 366.
21.
HaidtJ.KesebirS. (2008). In the forest of value: Why moral intuitions are different from other kinds. In PlessnerH.BetschC.BetschT. (Eds), Intuition in judgment and decision making (pp. 209-229). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22.
Janoff-BulmanR.CarnesN. C. (2013). Surveying the moral landscape: Moral motives and group-based moralities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 219-236.
23.
JonesE. E.HarrisV. A. (1967). The attribution of attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3, 1-24.
24.
JonesE. E.WorchelS.GoethalsG. R.GrumetJ. F. (1971). Prior expectancy and behavioral extremity as determinants of attitude attribution. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 7, 59-80.
25.
KnobeJ. (2003). Intentional action and side effects in ordinary language. Analysis, 63, 190-193.
26.
KundaZ.ThagardP. (1996). Forming impressions from stereotypes, traits, and behaviors: A parallel-constraint-satisfaction theory. Psychological Review, 103, 284-308.
27.
LeachC. W.EllemersN.BarretoM. (2007). Group virtue: The importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of in-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 234-249.
28.
LiebermanM. D. (2007). Social cognitive neuroscience: A review of core processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 259-289.
29.
McGrawK. M. (1985). Subjective probabilities and moral judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 501-518.
30.
MorganG. S.MullenE.SkitkaL. J. (2010). When values and attributions collide: Liberals’ and conservatives’ values motivate attributions for alleged misdeeds. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1241-1254.
31.
PellegriniR. J.QueiroloS. S.MonarrezV. E.ValenzuelaD. M. (1997). Political identification and perceptions of homelessness: Attributed causality and attitudes on public policy. Psychological Reports, 80, 1139-1148.
32.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavioral Research Methods, 40, 879-891.
33.
RaiT. S.FiskeA. P. (2011). Moral psychology is relationship regulation: Moral motives for unity, hierarchy, equality, and proportionality. Psychological Review, 118, 57-75.
34.
ReederG. D. (1993). Trait-behavior relations and dispositional inference. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 586-593.
35.
ReederG. D.BrewerM. B. (1979). A schematic model of dispositional attribution in interpersonal perception. Psychological Review, 86, 61-79.
36.
ReederG. D.CoovertM. D. (1986). Revising an impression of morality. Social Cognition, 4, 1-17.
37.
ReederG. D.SporesJ. M. (1983). The attribution of morality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 736-745.
38.
RothbartM.ParkB. (1986). On the confirmability and disconfirmability of trait concepts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 131-142.
39.
SkitkaL. J.WashburnA. (in press). Are conservatives from Mars and liberals from Venus? Maybe not so much. In ValdesoloP.GrahamJ. (Eds.), Bridging ideological divides: The Claremont Symposium for Applied Social Psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
40.
SkowronskiJ. J.CarlstonD. E. (1987). Social judgment and social memory: The role of cue diagnosticity in negativity, positivity, and extremity biases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 689-699.
41.
SkowronskiJ. J.CarlstonD. E. (1989). Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 131-149.
42.
SmithK. D.SmithS. T.ChristopherJ. C. (2007). What defines the good person? Cross-cultural comparisons of experts’ models with lay prototypes. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 333-360.
43.
SnyderM.JonesE. E. (1974). Attitude attribution when behavior is constrained. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 585-600.
44.
SommersS. R.EllsworthP. C. (2000). Race in the courtroom: Perceptions of guilt and dispositional attributions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1367-1379.
45.
TauschN.KenworthyJ. B.HewstoneM. (2007). The confirmability and disconfirmability of trait concepts revisited: Does content matter?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 542-556.
46.
TrafimowD.TrafimowS. (1999). Mapping perfect and imperfect duties onto hierarchically and partially restrictive trait dimensions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 687-697.
47.
UlemanJ. S. (1999). Spontaneous versus intentional inferences in impression formation. In ChaikenS.TropeY. (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 161-178). New York, NY: Guilford.
48.
Van LangeP. A.SedikidesC. (1998). Being more honest but not necessarily more intelligent than others: Generality and explanations for the Muhammad Ali effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 675-680.
49.
WalkerL. J.PittsR. C. (1998). Naturalistic conceptions of moral maturity. Developmental Psychology, 34, 403-419.
50.
WillisJ.TodorovA. (2006). First impressions making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17, 592-598.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
