The current research explores why people desire power and how that desire can be satisfied. We propose that a position of power can be subjectively experienced as conferring influence over others or as offering autonomy from the influence of others. Conversely, a low-power position can be experienced as lacking influence or lacking autonomy. Nine studies show that subjectively experiencing one’s power as autonomy predicts the desire for power, whereas the experience of influence over others does not. Furthermore, gaining autonomy quenches the desire for power, but gaining influence does not. The studies demonstrated the primacy of autonomy across both experimental and correlational designs, across measured mediation and manipulated mediator approaches, and across three different continents (Europe, United States, India). Together, these studies offer evidence that people desire power not to be a master over others, but to be master of their own domain, to control their own fate.
AlickeM. D. (1985). Global self-evaluation as determined by the desirability and controllability of trait adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1621-1630.
2.
AtkinsonJ. W. (1958). Motives in fantasy, action, and society: A method of assessment and study. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3.
BlauP. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York, NY: John Wiley.
4.
BrehmJ. W. (1993). Control motivation and social cognition. New York, NY: Springer.
5.
CartwrightD. (1959). Studies in social power. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
6.
ChenS.Lee-ChaiA.BarghJ. (2001). Relationship orientation as a moderator of the effects of social power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 173-187. http://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.80.2.173
7.
ChirkovV.RyanR. M.KimY.KaplanU. (2003). Differentiating autonomy from individualism and independence: A self-determination perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 97-110.
8.
CorneliusE. T.LaneF. B. (1984). The power-motive and managerial success in a professionally oriented service-industry organization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 32-39.
9.
CumminP. C. (1967). TAT-correlates of executive performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 78-81.
10.
DeCharmsR. (1968). Personal causation: The internal affective determinants of behaviour. New York, NY: Academic press.
11.
DeciE. L. (1971). Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, 105-115.
12.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268.
13.
DépretE.FiskeS. T. (1993). Social cognition and power: Some cognitive consequences of social structure as a source of control deprivation. In WearyG.GleicherF.MarshK. L. (Eds.), Control motivation and social cognition (pp. 176-202). New York, NY: Springer.
14.
EckhoffT. (1974). Justice: Its determinants in social interaction. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Rotterdam University Press.
15.
EmersonR. M. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27, 31-41.
16.
EntwisleD. R. (1972). To dispel fantasies about fantasy-based measures of achievement motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 77, 377-391.
17.
EriksonE. H. (1969). Gandhi’s truth: On the origins of militant nonviolence. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
18.
FiskeS. T.BerdahlJ. L. (2007). Social power. In Social psychology: A handbook of basic principles (pp. 678-692). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
19.
FiskeS. T.MorlingB.StevensL. E. (1996). Controlling self and others: A theory of anxiety, mental control, and social control. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 115-123.
20.
GalinskyA. D.GruenfeldD. H.MageeJ. C. (2003). From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 453-466. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.453
21.
GalinskyA. D.MageeJ. C.GruenfeldD. H.WhitsonJ. A.LiljenquistK. A. (2008). Power reduces the press of the situation: Implications for creativity, conformity, and dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1450-1466.
22.
GawronskiB. (2009). Ten frequently asked questions about implicit measures and their frequently supposed, but not entirely correct answers. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 50(3), 141-150. doi:10.1037/a0013848
23.
GladB. (2002). Why tyrants go too far: Malignant narcissism and absolute power. Political Psychology, 23, 1-2.
24.
GuinoteA. (2007). Power and the suppression of unwanted thoughts: Does control over others decrease control over the self?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 433-440. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.03.003
25.
GuinoteA.JuddC.BrauerM. (2002). Effects of power on perceived and objective group variability: Evidence that more powerful groups are more variable. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 708-721.
26.
HackmanJ. R.OldhamG. R. (1980). Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
27.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. A regression based approach. New York, NY: Guilford.
28.
HalevyN. Y.ChouE.GalinskyA. D. (2011). A functional model of hierarchy: Why, how, and when vertical differentiation enhances group performance. Organizational Psychology Review, 1, 32-52. doi:10.1177/2041386610380991
29.
HeideggerM. (1979). Nietzsche, Vol. I: The will to power as art (KrellD. F., Trans.). New York, NY: Harper & Row. (Original work published 1937)
30.
HeiderF. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York, NY: Wiley.
31.
HinkinT. R.SchriesheimC. A. (1994). An examination of subordinate-perceived relationships between leader reward and punishment behavior and leader bases of power. Human Relations, 47, 779-800. doi:10.1177/001872679404700702
32.
HofstedeG. (1984). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. New York, NY: SAGE.
33.
InesiM. E.BottiS.DuboisD.RuckerD. D.GalinskyA. D. (2011). Power and choice: Their dynamic interplay in quenching the thirst for personal control. Psychological Science, 22, 1042-1048. doi:10.1177/0956797611413936
34.
KaufmannW. A. (1950). Nietzsche, philosopher, psychologist, antichrist. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
KraigerK.HakelM. D.CorneliusE. T. (1984). Exploring fantasies of TAT reliability. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 365-370.
37.
LammersJ.GalinskyA. D.DuboisD.RuckerD. D. (2015). Power and morality. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 15-19. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.03.018
38.
LammersJ.StokerJ. I.StapelD. A. (2009). Differentiating social and personal power: Opposite effects on stereotyping, but parallel effects on behavioral approach tendencies. Psychological Science, 20, 1543-1549.
39.
LepperM. R.GreeneD.NisbettR. E. (1973). Undermining children’s intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: A test of the “overjustification” hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 129-137.
40.
LilienfeldS. O.WoodJ. M.GarbH. N. (2000). The scientific status of projective techniques. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 1, 27-66.
41.
MageeJ. C.GalinskyA. D. (2008). Chapter 8: Social Hierarchy: The Self-Reinforcing Nature of Power and Status. The Academy of Management Annals, 2, 351-398.
42.
McAdamsD. P.AubinE. (1992). A theory of generativity and its assessment through self-report, behavioral acts, and narrative themes in autobiography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 1003-1015.
43.
McArthurL. Z. (1980). Illusory causation and illusory correlation: Two epistemological accounts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 507-519.
44.
McArthurL. Z.BaronR. M. (1983). Toward an ecological theory of social perception. Psychological Review, 90, 215-238.
45.
McClellandD. C. (1981). Is personality consistent? In RubinA. I.AranoffJ.BarclayA. M.ZucherR. A. (Eds.), Further explorations in personality (pp. 87-113). New York, NY: John Wiley.
46.
McClellandD. C. (1988). Human motivation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
47.
McClellandD. C.BoyatzisR. E. (1982). Leadership motive pattern and long-term success in management. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 737-743.
48.
McClellandD. C.KoestnerR.WeinbergerJ. (1989). How do self-attributed and implicit motives differ?Psychological Review, 96, 690-712.
49.
NgS. H. (1980). The social psychology of power. London, UK: Academic Press.
50.
NietzscheF. (1967). The will to power (KaufmannW., Trans.). (Original work published 1888). New York, NY: Vintage Books.
51.
OverbeckJ.ParkB. (2001). When power does not corrupt: Superior individuation processes among powerful perceivers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 549-565.
52.
PangJ. S.SchultheissO. C. (2005). Assessing implicit motives in U.S. college students: Effects of picture type and position, gender and ethnicity, and cross-cultural comparisons. Journal of Personality Assessment, 85, 280-294.
53.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.
54.
SassenbergK.EllemersN.ScheepersD. (2012). The attraction of social power: The influence of construing power as opportunity versus responsibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 550-555.
55.
SassenbergK.JonasK. J.ShahJ. Y.BrazyP. C. (2007). Why some groups just feel better: The regulatory fit of group power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 249-267. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.2.249
56.
SchmidtS. (2009). Shall we really do it again? The powerful concept of replication is neglected in the social sciences. Review of General Psychology, 13, 90-100. doi:10.1037/a0015108
57.
SchultheissO. C. (2008). Implicit motives. In JohnO. P.RobinsR. W.PervinL. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 603-633). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
58.
SimmonsJ. P.NelsonL. D.SimonsohnU. (2013, January). Life after P-Hacking. Presentation at the 2013 Society for Personality and Social Psychology Meeting, New Orleans, LA.
59.
SpencerS. J.ZannaM. P.FongG. T. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 845-851. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.845
60.
SturmR. E.AntonakisJ. (2015). Interpersonal power: A review, critique, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 41, 136-163. doi:10.1177/0149206314555769
61.
TaylorS. E.FiskeS. T. (1978). Salience, attention, and attribution: Top of the head phenomena. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 249-288). New York, NY: Academic Press.
62.
TorelliC. J.ShavittS. (2010). Culture and concepts of power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 703-723. doi:10.1037/a0019973
63.
Van DijkeM.PoppeM. (2006). Striving for personal power as a basis for social power dynamics. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 537-556.
64.
VargaK. (1975). N-Achievement, n-power and effectiveness of research development. Human Relations, 28, 571-590.
65.
WeberM. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretative sociology (RothG.WittichC., Eds. & Trans.). Original: Wirtschafft und Gesellschaft, Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie, Tübingen, Germany: Winckelmann, 1914.
66.
WinterD. G. (1973). The power motive. New York, NY: Free Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
