Across six studies, this research found consistent evidence for motivated implicit theories about personality malleability: People perceive their weaknesses as more malleable than their strengths. Moreover, motivation also influences how people see themselves in the future, such that they expect their present strengths to remain constant, but they expect their present weaknesses to improve in the future. Several additional findings suggest the motivational nature of these effects: The difference in perceived malleability for strengths versus weaknesses was only observed for the self, not for other people. When the desirability of possessing a certain trait was manipulated, that trait was perceived to be more malleable when it was depicted as undesirable. And these different beliefs that people have about how malleable their traits are, and how they will develop in the future, were associated with their desire for change, which is higher for weaknesses versus strengths.
AlickeM. D. (1985). Global self-evaluation as determined by the desirability and controllability of trait adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1621-1630. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.49.6.1621
2.
AlickeM. D.SedikidesC. (2009). Self-enhancement and self-protection: What they are and what they do. European Review of Social Psychology, 20, 1-48. doi:10.1080/10463280802613866
3.
AugustinovaM.CollangeJ.SanitiosoR. B.MuscaS. C. (2011). Power of the desired self: Influence of induced perceptions of the self on reasoning. Cognition, 121, 299-312. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.08.004
4.
BlackwellL. S.TrzesniewskiK. H.DweckC. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78, 246-263. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x
5.
BradleyG. W. (1978). Self-serving biases in the attribution process: A reexamination of the fact or fiction question. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 56-71. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.36.1.56
6.
BreinesJ. G.ChenS. (2012). Self-compassion increases self-improvement motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1133-1143. doi:10.1177/0146167212445599
7.
BurnetteJ. L. (2010). Implicit theories of body weight: Entity beliefs can weigh you down. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 410-422. doi:10.1177/0146167209359768
8.
CampbellW.SedikidesC. (1999). Self-threat magnifies the self-serving bias: A meta-analytic integration. Review of General Psychology, 3, 23-43. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.3.1.23
9.
ChiuC.HongY.DweckC. S. (1997). Lay dispositionism and implicit theories of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 19-30. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.19
10.
DunningD. (1999). A newer look: Motivated social cognition and the schematic representation of social concepts. Psychological Inquiry, 10, 1-11. doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1001_1
11.
DunningD.LeuenbergerA.ShermanD. A. (1995). A new look at motivated inference: Are self-serving theories of success a product of motivational forces?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 58-68. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.1.58
12.
DunningD.PerieM.StoryA. L. (1991). Self-serving prototypes of social categories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 957-968. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.61.6.957
13.
DweckC. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
14.
DweckC. S. (2008). Can personality be changed? The role of beliefs in personality and change. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 391-394. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00612.x
15.
DweckC. S. (2012). Mindsets and human nature: Promoting change in the Middle East, the schoolyard, the racial divide, and willpower. American Psychologist, 67, 614-622. doi:10.1037/a0029783
16.
DweckC. S.ChiuC.-Y.HongY.-Y. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A world from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 267-285. doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0604_1
17.
DweckC. S.HongY.ChiuC. (1993). Implicit theories: Individual differences in the likelihood and meaning of dispositional inference. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 644-656. doi:10.1177/0146167293195015
18.
DweckC. S.LeggettE. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256-273. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256
19.
EpleyN.DunningD. (2000). Feeling “holier than thou”: Are self-serving assessments produced by errors in self- or social prediction?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 861-875. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.861
20.
FazioR. H.EffreinE. A.FalenderV. J. (1981). Self-perceptions following social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 232-242. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.41.2.232
21.
FriezeI.WeinerB. (1971). Cue utilization and attributional judgments for success and failure. Journal of Personality, 39, 591-605. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1971.tb00065.x
22.
GoslingS. D.RentfrowP. J.SwannW. B.Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504-528. doi:10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1
23.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
24.
HayesA. F. (2015). An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50, 1-22. doi:10.1080/00273171.2014.962683
25.
HigginsE. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319-340. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.94.3.319
26.
HigginsE. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280-1300. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.52.12.1280
27.
HigginsE. T.BondR. N.KleinR.StraumanT. (1986). Self-discrepancies and emotional vulnerability: How magnitude, accessibility, and type of discrepancy influence affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 5-15. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.1.5
28.
HigginsE. T.RoneyC. R.CroweE.HymesC. (1994). Ideal versus ought predilections for approach and avoidance distinct self-regulatory systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 276-286. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.2.276
29.
HigginsE. T.ShahJ.FriedmanR. (1997). Emotional responses to goal attainment: Strength of regulatory focus as moderator. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 515-525. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.3.515
30.
HongY.ChiuC.DweckC. S.LinD.WanW. (1999). Implicit theories, attributions, and coping: A meaning system approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 588-599. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.588
31.
JobV.DweckC. S.WaltonG. M. (2010). Ego depletion—Is it all in your head? Implicit theories about willpower affect self-regulation. Psychological Science, 21, 1686-1693. doi:10.1177/0956797610384745
32.
KaminsM. L.DweckC. S. (1999). Person versus process praise and criticism: Implications for contingent self-worth and coping. Developmental Psychology, 35, 835-847. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.35.3.835
33.
KammrathL. K.DweckC. S. (2006).Voicing conflict: Preferred conflict strategies among incremental and entity theorists. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1497-1508. doi:10.1177/0146 167206291476
34.
KrayL. J.HaselhuhnM. (2007). Implicit negotiation beliefs and performance: Experimental and longitudinal evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 49-64. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.49
35.
KundaZ. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480-498. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
36.
KundaZ.SanitiosoR. (1989). Motivated changes in the self-concept. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 272-285. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(89)90023-1
37.
LeithS. A.WardC. P.GiacominM.LandauE. S.EhrlingerJ.WilsonA. E. (2014). Changing theories of change: Strategic shifting in implicit theory endorsement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 597-620. doi:10.1037/a0037699
38.
LevyS. R.StroessnerS. J.DweckC. S. (1998). Stereotype formation and endorsement: The role of implicit theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1421-1436. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1421
39.
MarkusH.NuriusP. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41, 954-969. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.41.9.954
40.
MoldenD. C.DweckC. S. (2006). Finding “meaning” in psychology: A lay theories approach to self-regulation, social perception, and social development. American Psychologist, 61, 192-203. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.61.3.192
41.
MoldenD. C.HigginsE. T. (2005). Motivated thinking. In HolyoakK. J.MorrisonR. G. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 295-317). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
42.
MoldenD. C.PlaksJ. E.DweckC. S. (2006). “Meaningful” social inferences: Effects of implicit theories on inferential processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 738-752. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.11.005
43.
MorettiM. M.HigginsE. T. (1990). Relating self-discrepancy to self-esteem: The contribution of discrepancy beyond actual-self ratings. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 108-123. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(90)90071-S
44.
MorrisS. B.DeShonR. P. (2002). Combining effect size estimates in meta-analysis with repeated measures and independent-groups designs. Psychological Methods, 7, 105-125. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.105
45.
MuellerC. M.DweckC. S. (1998). Praise for intelligence can undermine children’s motivation and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 33-52. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.33
46.
MullerD.JuddC. M.YzerbytV. Y. (2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 852-863. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.852
47.
OmmundsenY. (2003). Implicit theories of ability and self-regulation strategies in physical education classes. Educational Psychology, 23, 141-157. doi:10.1080/01443410303224
48.
QuoidbachJ.GilbertD. T.WilsonT. D. (2013). The end of history illusion. Science, 339, 96-98. doi:10.1126/science.1229294
49.
RenaudJ. M.McConnellA. R. (2007). Wanting to be better but thinking you can’t: Implicit theories of personality moderate the impact of self-discrepancies on self-esteem. Self and Identity, 6, 41-50. doi:10.1080/15298860600764597
50.
RobinsR. W.PalsJ. L. (2002). Implicit self-theories in the academic domain: Implications for goal orientation, attributions, affect, and self-esteem change. Self and Identity, 1, 313-336. doi:10.1080/15298860290106805
51.
SanitiosoR.KundaZ.FongG. T. (1990). Motivated recruitment of autobiographical memories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 229-241. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.2.229
52.
SpinathB.SpinathF. M.RiemannR.AngleitnerA. (2003). Implicit theories about personality and intelligence and their relationship to actual personality and intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 939-951. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00310-0
53.
YeagerD. S.TrzesniewskiK. H.DweckC. S. (2013). An implicit theories of personality intervention reduces adolescent aggression in response to victimization and exclusion. Child Development, 84, 970-988. doi:10.1111/cdev.12003
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
