Who is willing to expose himself or herself to narcissists on a long-term basis? Studies that address the interactions of narcissists focus mainly on their interactions with strangers. Hence, the aim of the present study was to investigate the extent to which two best friends’ similarity in narcissism would influence their similarities in other personality profiles. A total of 290 best friends’ dyads filled out measurements of the whole Dark Triad as well as the Big Five. For each personality domain, profile similarity and its dependence on the similarity in the Dark Triad were determined. Results showed that the friends’ similarity in narcissism significantly predicted similarity in all Big Five domains. For the general Big Five similarity as well as extraversion, the effect of narcissism similarity was stronger for male than female or mixed friends. Similarity in psychopathy and Machiavellianism significantly predicted all domains except for openness and extraversion, respectively.
BackM. D.KüfnerA. C. P.DufnerM.GerlachT. M.RauthmannJ. F.DenissenJ. J. A. (2013). Narcissistic admiration and rivalry: Disentangling the bright and dark sides of narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 1013-1037. doi:10.1037/a0034431
2.
BackM. D.SchmuckleS. C.EgloffB. (2010). Why are narcissists so charming at first sight? Decoding the narcissism-popularity link at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 132-145. doi:10.1037/a0016338
3.
BleidornW.KandlerC.RiemannR.AngleitnerA.SpinathF. M. (2012). Genetic and environmental influences on personality profile stability: Unraveling the normativeness problem. Journal of Personality, 80, 1029-1060. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00758.x
4.
BushmanB. J.BaumeisterR. F. (1998). Threatened egotism, narcissism, self-esteem, and direct and displaced aggression: Does self-love or self-hate lead to violence?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 219-229. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.219
5.
CampbellW. K. (1999). Narcissism and romantic attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1254-1270. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1254
6.
CampbellW. K.BrunellA. B.FinkelE. J. (2006). Narcissism, interpersonal self-regulation, and romantic relationships: An agency model approach. In FinkelE. J.VohsK. D. (Eds.), Self and relationships: Connecting intrapersonal and interpersonal processes (pp. 57-84). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
7.
CampbellW. K.CampbellS. M. (2009). On the self-regulatory dynamics created by the peculiar benefits and costs of narcissism: A contextual reinforcement model and examination of leadership. Self and Identity, 8, 214-232. doi:10.1080/15298860802505129
8.
CampbellW. K.FosterC. A.FinkelE. J. (2002). Does self-love lead to love for others? A story of narcissistic game playing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 340-354. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.83.2.340
9.
CampbellW. K.FosterJ. D. (2007). The narcissistic self: Background, a extended agency model, and ongoing controversies. In SedikidesC.SpencerJ. C. (Eds.), The self (pp. 115-138). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
10.
CampbellW. K.RudichE. A.SedikidesC. (2002). Narcissism, self-esteem, and the positivity of self-views: Two portraits of self-love. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 358-368. doi:10.1177/0146167202286007
11.
ChristieR.GeisF. L. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York, NY: Academic Press.
12.
CooperM. L.AgochaV. B.SheldonM. S. (2000). A motivational perspective on risky behaviors: The role of personality and affect regulatory processes. Journal of Personality, 68, 1059-1088. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.00126
13.
CronbachL. J. (1955). Processes affecting scores on “understanding of others” and “assumed similarity.”Psychological Bulletin, 52, 177-193. doi:10.1037/h0044919
14.
DilchertS.OnesD. S.DavisR. D.RostowC. D. (2007). Cognitive ability predicts objectively measured counterproductive work behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 616-627. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.616
15.
FehrB. (2012). Friendship. In RamachandranV. S. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (2nd ed., pp. 205-213). London, England: Elsevier.
16.
FosterJ. D.MisraT. A.ReidyD. E. (2009). Narcissists are approach-oriented toward their money and their friends. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 764-769. doi:10.1016/J.Jrp.2009.05.005
17.
FosterJ. D.ShriraI.CampbellW. K. (2006). Theoretical models of narcissism, sexuality, and relationship commitment. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23, 367-386. doi:10.1177/0265407506064204
18.
FuhrmanR. W.FunderD. C. (1995). Convergence between self and peer in the response-time processing of trait-relevant information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 961-974. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.961
19.
FunderD. C.KolarD. C.BlackmanM. C. (1995). Agreement among judges of personality: Interpersonal relations, similarity, and acquaintanceship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 656-672. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.656
20.
FurnhamA.RichardsS. C.PaulhusD. L. (2013). The Dark Triad of personality: A 10-year review. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 199-216. doi:10.1111/spc3.12018
21.
FurrR. M. (2008). A framework for profile similarity: Integrating similarity, normativeness, and distinctiveness. Journal of Personality, 76, 1267-1316. doi:10.1111/J.1467-6494.2008.00521.X
22.
FurrR. M.FunderD. C. (2004). Situational similarity and behavioral consistency: Subjective, objective, variable-centered, and person-centered approaches. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 421-447. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2003.10.001
23.
FurrR. M.WoodD. (2013). On the similarity between exchangeable profiles: A psychometric model, analytic strategy, and empirical illustration. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 233-247. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2013.01.009
24.
GauntR. (2006). Couple similarity and marital satisfaction: Are similar spouses happier?Journal of Personality, 74, 1401-1420. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00414.x
25.
GrazienD. (2007). The girl hunt: Urban nightlife and the performance of masculinity as collective activity. Symbolic Interaction, 30, 221-243. doi:10.1525/si.2007.30.2.221
26.
GüroğluB.HaselagerG. J. T.van LieshoutC. F. M.TakashimaA.RijpkemaM.FernándezG. (2008). Why are friends special? Implementing a social interaction simulation task to probe the neural correlates of friendship. NeuroImage, 39, 903-910. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.09.007
27.
HareR. D. (1985). Comparison of procedures for the assessment of psychopathy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 7-16.
28.
HartW.AdamsJ. M. (2014). Are narcissists more accepting of others’ narcissistic traits?Personality and Individual Differences, 64, 163-167. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.02.038
29.
HumanL. J.BiesanzJ. C. (2012). Accuracy and assumed similarity in first impressions of personality: Differing associations at different levels of analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 106-110. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2011.10.002
30.
JonasonP. K.LiN. P.TeicherE. A. (2010). Who is James Bond? The dark triad as an agentic social style. Individual Differences Research, 8, 111-120.
31.
JonasonP. K.SchmittD. P. (2012). What have you done for me lately? Friendship-selection in the shadow of the Dark Triad traits. Evolutionary Psychology, 10, 400-421.
32.
JonesD. N.PaulhusD. L. (2014). Introducing the Short Dark Triad (SD3): A brief measure of dark personality traits. Assessment, 21, 28-41.
33.
KammannR.SmithR.MartinC.McQueenM. (1984). Low accuracy in judgments of others’ psychological well-being as seen from a phenomenological perspective. Journal of Personality, 52, 107-123.
34.
KennyD. A.KashyD. A. (2000). The analysis of data from dyads and groups. In ReisH. T.JuddC. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 589-607). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
35.
KimR. S. (2011). Standardized regression coefficients as indices of effect sizes in meta-analysis (Paper 3109), Florida State University, Tallahassee.
36.
KlohnenE. C.MendelsohnG. A. (1998). Partner selection for personality characteristics: A couple-centered approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 268-278. doi:10.1177/0146167298243004
37.
LeeK.AshtonM. (2005). Psychopathy, Machiavellianism, and narcissism in the Five-Factor Model and the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1571-1582. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2004.09.016
38.
LuoS.KlohnenE. C. (2005). Assortative mating and marital quality in newlyweds: A couple-centered approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 304-326. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.2.304
39.
McHoskeyJ. (1999). Machiavellianism, intrinsic versus extrinsic goals, and social interest: A self-determination theory analysis. Motivation and Emotion, 23, 267-283. doi:10.1023/A:1021338809469
40.
McPhersonM.Smith-LovinL.CookJ. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415-444.
41.
MorfC. C.RhodewaltF. (2001). Unraveling the paradoxes of narcissism: A dynamic self-regulatory processing model. Psychology Inquiry, 12, 177-196. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1204_1
42.
NettleD.CleggH. (2008). Personality, mating strategies, and mating intelligence. In GeherG.MillerG. (Eds.), Mating intelligence: Sex, relationships, and the mind’s reproductive system (pp. 121-135). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
43.
OstendorfF.AngleitnerA. (2004). NEO-PI-R. NEO Persönlichkeitsinventar nach Costa und McCrae. Revidierte Fassung [NEO-PI-R. NEO Personality Inventory]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
44.
PaulhusD. L. (1998). Interpersonal and intrapsychic adaptiveness of trait self-enhancement: A mixed blessing?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1197-1208. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1197
45.
PaulhusD. L. (2001). Normal narcissism: Two minimalist accounts. Psychological Inquiry, 12, 228-230.
46.
PaulhusD. L.WilliamsK. M. (2002). The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556-563. doi:10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00505-6
47.
RaskinR.NovacekJ.HoganR. T. (1991). Narcissism, self-esteem, and defensive self-enhancement. Journal of Personality, 59, 19-38. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1991.tb00766.x
48.
RauthmannJ. F. (2012). The Dark Triad and interpersonal perception: Similarities and differences in the social consequences of narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 487-496. doi:10.1177/1948550611427608
49.
RauthmannJ. F.KolarG. P. (2013). The perceived attractiveness and traits of the Dark Triad: Narcissists are perceived as hot, Machiavellians and psychopaths not. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 582-586. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2012.11.005
50.
R Core Team. (2012). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available from http://www.R-project.org
51.
RushtonJ. P.BonsT. A. (2005). Mate choice and friendship in twins: Evidence for genetic similarity. Psychological Science, 16, 555-559. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01574.x
SchmittD. P.ShackelfordT. K. (2008). Big Five traits related to short-term mating: From personality to promiscuity across 46 nations. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 246-282.
54.
SchuetzA.MarcusB.SellinI. (2004). Psychometrische Eigenschaften einer Lang-und einer Kurzform des Deutschen NPI [Measuring narcissism as a personality construct: Psychometric properties of a long and of a short version of the German NPI]. Diagnostica, 50, 202-218. doi:10.1026/0012-1924.50.4.202
55.
SedikidesC.RudichE. A.GreggA. P.KumashiroM.RusbultC. (2004). Are normal narcissists psychologically healthy? Self-esteem matters. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 400-416. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.400
56.
TschanzB. T.MorfC. C.TurnerC. W. (1998). Gender differences in the structure of narcissism: A multi-sample analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory. Sex Roles, 38, 863-870. doi:10.1023/A:1018833400411
57.
ViechtbauerW. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36, 1-48.
58.
WatsonD.HubbardB.WieseD. (2000). Self-other agreement in personality and affectivity: The role of acquaintanceship, trait visibility, and assumed similarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 546-558. doi:10.I037//O022-3514.78.3.546
59.
WilliJ. (2012). Einführung in das Konzept der Kollusion [Introduction to the concept of collusion]. In Die Zweierbeziehung [The dyadic relationship]. Reinbek, Germany: Rowohlt Verlag GmbH.
60.
WinkP. (1991). Two faces of narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 590-597. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.61.4.590
61.
WoodD.HarmsP.VazireS. (2010). Perceiver effects as projective tests: What your perceptions of others say about you. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 174-190. doi:10.1037/a0019390
62.
YoungJ. T.RebellonC. J.BarnesJ.WeermanF. M. (2014). Unpacking the black box of peer similarity in deviance: Understanding the mechanisms linking personal behavior, peer behavior, and perceptions. Criminology, 52, 60-86.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
