Throughout society, White people of low socioeconomic status (SES) face prejudice, often from racial ingroup members. The present research tested the ingroup distancing effect, which predicts that Whites’ negative reactions to low-SES ingroup members are motivated responses to perceived threats to their personal and group-level status. To cope with perceived status threats, White people psychologically and physically distance themselves from low-SES Whites. Four studies provide converging support for this theorizing. Among White participants, low-SES Whites elicited derogation, impaired racial categorization and memory, and inflated perceived personal status. White participants explicitly perceived low-SES Whites as greater status threats than low-SES Blacks, and these perceptions of threat predicted increased discomfort in anticipated social situations with low-SES White targets. Moreover, threatened status led Whites who strongly identified with their racial ingroup to physically distance themselves from a low-SES White partner. This research demonstrates that concerns with status motivate prejudice against ingroup members.
BertrandM.MullainathanS. (2004). Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. American Economic Review, 94, 991-1013.
3.
BerubeA.BerubeF. (1997). Sunset trailer park. In WrayM.NewitzA. (Eds.), White trash: Race and class in America (pp. 15-40). New York, NY: Routledge.
4.
BlumerH. (1958). Race prejudice as a sense of group position. Pacific Sociological Review, 1, 3-7.
5.
BoboL.KluegelJ. (1997). Status, ideology, and dimensions of Whites’ racial beliefs and attitudes: Progress and stagnation. In TuchS. A.MartinJ. K. (Eds.), Racial attitudes in the 1990s: Continuity and change (pp. 93-120). Westport, CT: Praeger
6.
CorrellJ.ParkB. (2005). A model of the ingroup as a social resource. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 341-359.
7.
CottrellC. A.NeubergS. L. (2005). Different emotional reactions to different groups: A sociofunctional threat-based approach to “prejudice.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 770-789.
8.
CozzarelliC.WilkinsonA. V.TaglerM. J. (2001). Attitudes toward the poor and attributions of poverty. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 207-228.
9.
CrandallC. S.EshlemanA.O’BrienL. (2002). Social norms and the expression and suppression of prejudice: The struggle for internalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 359-378.
10.
CrockerJ.MajorB. (1989). Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. Psychological Review, 96, 608-630.
11.
EaglyA. H.ChenS.ChaikenS.Shaw-BarnesK. (1999). The impact of attitudes on memory: An affair to remember. Psychology Bulletin, 125, 64-89.
12.
EhrenreichB. (2001). Nickel and dimed: On (not) getting by in America. New York, NY: Metropolitan Books.
13.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA. G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191.
14.
FiskeS. T. (1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48, 621-628.
15.
FiskeS. T. (2010). Envy up, scorn down: How comparison divides us. American Psychologist, 65, 698-706.
16.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J. C.GlickP.XuJ. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902.
17.
FiskeS. T.MarkusH. R. (Eds.). (2012). Facing social class: How societal rank influences interaction. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
18.
FreemanJ. B.PennerA. M.SapersteinA.ScheutzM.AmbadyN. (2011). Looking the part: Social status cues shape race perception. PLoS ONE, 6, e25107.
19.
GalinskyA. D.MageeJ. C.GruenfeldD. H.WhitsonJ. A.LiljenquistK. A. (2008). Power reduces the press of the situation: Implications for creativity, conformity, and dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1450-1466.
20.
GriskeviciusV.AckermanJ. M.CantúS. M.DeltonA. W.RobertsonT. E.SimpsonJ. A.. . . TyburJ. M. (2013). When the economy falters, do people spend or save? Responses to resource scarcity depend on childhood environments. Psychological Science, 24, 197-205.
21.
HollingsheadA. B. (1965). Two factor index of social position. New Haven, CT: Yale Station.
22.
HornseyM. J.HoggM. A. (2002). The effects of status on subgroup relations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 203-218.
23.
HornseyM. J.van LeeuwenE.Van SantenW. (2003). Dragging down and dragging up: How relative group status affects responses to common fate. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 7, 275-288.
24.
HuffcuttA. I.RothP. L. (1998). Racial group differences in employment interview evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 179-189.
25.
ItoT. A.UrlandG. R. (2003). Race and gender on the brain: Electrocortical measures of attention to the race and gender of multiply categorizable individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 616-626.
26.
JohnsonJ. D.WhitestoneE.JacksonL. A.GattoL. (1995). Justice is still not colorblind: Differential racial effects of exposure to inadmissible evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 893-898.
27.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R.NosekB. A. (2004). A decade of system-justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881-919.
28.
KayA.JostJ. T.YoungS. (2005). Victim derogation and victim enhancement as alternate routes to system justification. Psychological Science, 16, 240-246.
29.
KnowlesE. D.PengK. (2005). White selves: Conceptualizing and measuring a dominant-group identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 223-241.
30.
KrausM. W.HorbergE. J.GoetzJ. L.KeltnerD. (2011). Social class rank, threat vigilance, and hostile reactivity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1376-1388.
31.
KrausM. W.PiffP. K.Mendoza-DentonR.RheinschmidtM. L.KeltnerD. (2012). Social class, solipsism, and contextualism: How the rich are different than the poor. Psychological Review, 19, 546-572.
32.
KrausM. W.StephensN. M. (2012). A road map for an emerging psychology of social class. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6, 642-656.
33.
LareauA. (2015). Cultural knowledge and social inequality. American Sociological Review, 80, 1-27.
34.
LareauA.ConleyD. (Eds.). (2008). Social class: How does it work?New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
35.
LottB. (2002). Cognitive and behavioral distancing from the poor. American Psychologist, 57, 100-110.
36.
LottB. (2012). The social psychology of class and classism. American Psychologist, 67, 650-658.
37.
LuhtanenR.CrockerJ. (1992). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one’s social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(3), 302-318.
38.
MallettR. K.HuntsingerJ. R.SwimJ. K. (2011). The role of system-justification motivation, group status and system threat in directing support for hate crimes legislation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 384-390.
39.
MarquesJ. M.YzerbytV. Y.LeyensJ. P (1988). The black sheep effect: Judgment extremity towards ingroup members in inter- and intra-group situations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 287-292.
40.
McIntoshP. (2004). White privilege: Unpacking the invisible knapsack. In RothenbergP. (Ed.), Race, class, and gender in the United States (6th ed., pp. 188-192). New York, NY: Worth Publishers.
41.
Mendoza-DentonR.DowneyG.PurdieV. J.DavisA.PietrzakJ. (2002). Sensitivity to status-based rejection: Implications for African-American students’ college experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 896-918.
42.
MillerS. L.ManerJ. K.BeckerD. V. (2010). Self-protective biases in group categorization: Threat cues shape the psychological boundary between “us” and “them.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 62-77.
43.
MillerS. L.ZielaskowskiK.PlantE. A. (2012). The basis of shooter biases beyond cultural stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(10), 1358-1366.
44.
PiffP. K.KrausM. W.CôtéS.ChengB. H.KeltnerD. (2010). Having less, giving more: The influence of social class on prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 771-784.
45.
PinelE. C. (1999). Stigma consciousness: The psychological legacy of social stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 114-128.
46.
PintoI. R.MarquesJ. M.LevineJ. M.AbramsD. (2010). Membership status and subjective group dynamics: Who triggers the black sheep effect?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 107-119.
47.
PrattoF.SidaniusJ.LevinS. (2006). Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward. European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 271-320.
48.
RichesonJ. A.AmbadyN. (2003). Effects of situational power on automatic racial prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 177-183.
49.
RotellaK. N.RichesonJ. A. (2013). Motivated to “forget” the effects of in-group wrongdoing on memory and collective guilt. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(6) 730-737.
50.
SchallerM.ParkJ. H.MuellerA. (2003). Fear of the dark: Interactive effects of beliefs about danger and ambient darkness on ethnic stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 637-649.
51.
ScheepersD.BranscombeN. R.SpearsR.DoosjeB. (2002). The emergence and effect of deviants in low and high status groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 611-617.
52.
ShriverE. R.HugenbergK. (2010). Power, individuation, and the cross-race recognition deficit. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 767-774.
53.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
54.
SivanathanN.PettitN. C. (2010). Protecting the self through consumption: Status goods as affirmational commodities. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 564-570.
55.
SnibbeA. C.MarkusH. R. (2005). You can’t always get what you want: Educational attainment, agency, and choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 703-720.
56.
StephensN. M.BrannonT. N.MarkusH. R.NelsonJ. E. (2015). Feeling at home in college: Fortifying school-relevant selves to reduce social class disparities in higher education. Social Issues and Policy Review, 9, 1-24.
57.
StoneJ.PerryW.DarleyJ. M. (1997). “White men can’t jump”: Evidence for the perceptual confirmation of racial stereotypes following a basketball game. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 19(3), 291-306.
58.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In WorschelS.AustinW. G. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
VorauerJ. D.MainK. J.O’ConnellG. B. (1998). How do individuals expect to be viewed by members of lower status groups? Content and implications of meta-stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 917-937.
61.
WaltonG. M.CohenG. L. (2007). A question of belonging: Race, social fit, and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 82-96.
62.
WoolfS. H.JohnsonR. E.FryerG. E.Jr.RustG.SatcherD. (2004). The health impact of resolving racial disparities: An analysis of US mortality data. American Journal of Public Health, 94, 2078-2081.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
