Previous studies show that close friends improve at lie detection over time. However, is this improvement due to an increase in the ability to decode the feelings of close friends or a change in how close friends communicate their true and deceptive emotions? In a study of 45 pairs of friends, one friend from each pair (the “sender”) was videotaped showing truthful and faked affect in response to pleasant and unpleasant movie clips. The other friend from each pair (the “judge”) guessed the true emotions of both the friend and a stranger 1 month and 6 months into the friendship. Judges were better at guessing the true emotions of friends than strangers, and this advantage in judging friends increased among close friends over time. Surprisingly, improvement over time was due mostly to a change in the sender’s communication, rather than an increase in judges’ ability to decode their friends’ feelings.
AndersonD. E. (1999). Cognitive and motivational processes underlying truth bias (Doctoral dissertation). University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
2.
AndersonD. E.AnsfieldM. E.DePauloB. M. (1999). Love’s best habit: Deception in the context of relationships. In PhilippotP.FeldmanR. S.CoatsE. J. (Eds.), The social context of nonverbal behavior (pp. 372-409). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3.
AndersonD. E.DePauloB. M.AnsfieldM. E. (2002). The development of deception detection skill: A longitudinal analysis of same-sex friends. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 536-545. doi:10.1177/0146167202287010
4.
AnsfieldM. E.DePauloB. M.BellK. L. (1995). Familiarity effects in nonverbal understanding: Recognizing our own facial expressions and our friends’. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 19, 135-149. doi:10.1007/BF02175501
5.
AronA.AronE. N.SmollanD. (1992). Inclusion of the other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 592-612. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596
6.
AronA.CoupsE. J.AronE. N. (2013). Statistics for psychology. Boston, MA: Pearson.
7.
BanduraA.WoodR. (1989). Effect of perceived controllability and performance standards on self-regulation of complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 805-814. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.5.805
8.
BondC. F.Jr.DePauloB. M. (2006). Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 214-234. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_2
9.
BondC. F.Jr.DePauloB. M. (2008). Individual differences in judging deception: Accuracy and bias. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 477-492. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.477
10.
BrandtD. R.MillerG. R.HockingJ. E. (1982). Familiarity and lie detection: A replication and extension. The Western Journal of Speech Communication, 46, 276-290.
11.
BullerD. B.AuneR. K. (1987). Nonverbal cues to deception among intimates, friends, and strangers. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 11, 269-290. doi:10.1007/BF00987257
12.
ClarkM. S.FitnessJ.BrissetteI. (2000). Understanding people’s perceptions of relationships is crucial to understanding their emotional lives. In FletcherG.ClarkM. S. (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Interpersonal processes (pp. 253-278). London, England: Blackwell.
13.
ColvinC. R.VogtD.IckesW. (1997). Why do friends understand each other better than strangers do? In IckesW. (Ed.), Empathic accuracy (pp. 169-193). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
14.
DePauloB. M. (1994). Spotting lies: Can humans learn to do better?Current Directions in Psychological Science, 3, 83-86. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.ep10770433
15.
DePauloB. M. (2004). The many faces of lies. In MillerA. G. (Ed.), The social psychology of good and evil (pp. 303-326). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
16.
DePauloB. M.BrittinghamG. L.KaiserM. K. (1983). Receiving competence-relevant help: Effects on reciprocity, affect, and sensitivity to the helper’s nonverbally expressed needs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 1045-1060. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.5.1045
17.
DePauloB. M.CharltonK.CooperH.LindsayJ. J.MuhlenbruckL. (1997). The accuracy-confidence correlation in the detection of deception. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 346-357. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0104_5
18.
DePauloB. M.KashyD. A. (1998). Everyday lies in close and casual relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 63-79. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.1.63
19.
DePauloB. M.KashyD. A.KirkendolS. E.WyerM. M.EpsteinJ. A. (1996). Lying in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 979-995. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.5.979
20.
DePauloB. M.MorrisW. L. (2004). Discerning lies from truths: Behavioural cues to deception and the indirect pathway of intuition. In GranhagP. A.StromwollL. (Eds.), The detection of deception in forensic contexts (pp. 15-40). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21.
DePauloB. M.RosenthalR.GreenC. R.RosenkrantzJ. (1982). Diagnosing deceptive and mixed messages from verbal and nonverbal cues. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 433-446. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(82)90064-6
22.
DePauloB.M.WetzelC.SternglanzR.W.Walker WilsonM. (2003). Verbal and nonverbal dynamics of privacy, secrecy, and deceit. Journal of Social Issues, 59, 391-410. doi: 10.1111/1540-4560.00070
23.
FlemingJ. H.DarleyJ. M.HiltonJ. L.KojetinB. A. (1990). Multiple audience problem: A strategic communication perspective on social perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 593-609. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.4.593
24.
FunderD. C. (2012). Accurate personality judgment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 177-182. doi:10.1177/0963721412445309
25.
FunderD. C.ColvinC. R. (1988). Friends and strangers: Acquaintanceship, agreement, and the accuracy of personality judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 149-158. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.55.1.149
26.
FunderD. C.KolarD. C.BlackmanM. C. (1995). Agreement among judges of personality: Interpersonal relations, similarity, and acquaintanceship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 656-672. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.656
27.
HumanL. J.BiesanzJ. C. (2011). Target adjustment and self-other agreement: Utilizing trait observability to disentangle judgeability and self-knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 202-216. doi:10.1037/a0023782
28.
HurdK.NollerP. (1988). Decoding deception: A look at the process. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 12, 217-233. doi:10.1007/bf00987489
29.
IckesW.SimpsonJ. A. (1997). Managing empathic accuracy in close relationships. In IckesW. (Ed.), Empathic accuracy (pp. 218-250). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
30.
LevineT. R. (2010). A few transparent liars: Explaining 54% accuracy in deception detection experiments. In SalmonC. (Ed.), Communication yearbook 34 (pp. 40-61). London, England: Routledge.
31.
LevineT. R.BondC. F.Jr. (2014). Direct and indirect measures of lie detection tell the same story: A reply to ten Brinke, Stimson, and Carney (2014). Psychological Science, 25, 1960-1961. doi:10.1177/0956797614536740
32.
LevineT. R.McCornackS. A. (1992). Linking love and lies: A formal test of the McCornack and Parks model of deception detection. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9, 143-154. doi:10.1177/0265407592091008
33.
LevineT. R.SerotaK. B.ShulmanH.ClareD. D.ParkH. S.ShawA. S.ShimJ. C.LeeJ. H. (2011). Sender demeanor: Individual differences in sender believability have a powerful impact on deception detection judgments. Human Communication Research, 37, 377-403. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2011.01407.x
34.
McCornackS. A.LevineT. R. (1990). When lovers become leery: The relationship between suspicion and accuracy in detecting deception. Communication Monographs, 57, 219-230. doi:10.1080/03637759009376197
35.
McCornackS. A.ParksM. R. (1986). Deception detection and relationship development: The other side of trust. In McLaughlinM. L. (Ed.), Communication yearbook 9 (pp. 377-389). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
36.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G. (1999). The (mental) ties that bind: Cognitive structures That predict relationship resilience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1228-1244. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1228
37.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.GriffinD. W. (1996). The benefits of positive illusions: Idealization and the construction of satisfaction in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 79-98. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.1.79
38.
PaulhusD. L.BruceM. N. (1992). The effect of acquaintanceship on the validity of personality impressions: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 816-824. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.5.816
39.
RosenthalR.DePauloB. M. (1979). Sex differences in eavesdropping on nonverbal cues. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 273-285. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.2.273
40.
RosenthalR.RosnowR. L. (1991). Essentials of behavioral research (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill
41.
SnedecorJ. C.CochranW. G. (1967). Statistical methods (6th ed.). Ames: Iowa State University Press.
42.
SnodgrassS. E.HechtM. A.Ploutz-SnyderR. (1998). Interpersonal sensitivity: Expressivity or perceptivity?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 238-249. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.1.238
43.
SternglanzR. W.DePauloB. M. (2004). Reading nonverbal cues to emotions: The advantages and liabilities of relationship closeness. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 28, 245-266. doi:10.1007/s10919-004-4158-7
44.
StinsonL.IckesW. (1992). Empathic accuracy in the interactions of male friends versus male strangers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 787-797. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.62.5.787
45.
ten BrinkeL.StimsonD.CarneyD. R. (2014). Some evidence for unconscious lie detection. Psychological Science, 25, 1098-1105. doi:10.1177/0956797614524421
46.
ThomasG.FletcherG. J. O. (2003). Mind-reading accuracy in intimate relationships: Assessing the roles of the relationship, the target, and the judge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 1079-1094. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.6.1079
47.
VrijA.EdwardK.BullR.Police officers’ ability to detect deceit: The benefit of indirect deception detection measures. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 6, 185-196. doi: 10.1348/135532501168271
48.
WagnerH. L.MacDonaldC. J.MansteadA. S. R. (1986). Communication of individual emotions by spontaneous facial expressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 737-743. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.4.737
49.
WinerB. J. (1971). Statistical principles in experimental design (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
50.
ZakiJ.BolgerN.OchsnerK. (2008). It takes two: The interpersonal nature of empathic accuracy. Psychological Science, 19, 399-404. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02099.x
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
