A preference for “naturals” over “strivers” in performance judgments was investigated to test whether the effect is generalizable across domains, as well as to ascertain any costs imposed on decision quality by favoring naturals. Despite being presented with entrepreneurs equal in achievement, participants judged the natural and his business proposal to be superior to the striver and his proposal on multiple dimensions of performance and success (Study 1a and Study 1b). These findings were extended in Study 2, which quantified the costs of the naturalness bias using conjoint analysis to measure specific decision tradeoffs. Together, these three studies show that people tend to pass over better-qualified individuals in favor of apparent naturals.
AmabileT. M. (2001). Beyond talent: John Irving and the passionate craft of creativity. American Psychologist, 56, 333-336.
2.
ArsenaultA.DolanS. L.van AmeringenM. (1991). Stress and mental strain in hospital work: Exploring the relationship beyond personality. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 12, 483-493.
3.
BaronR. A.BrushC. G. (1999). The role of social skills in entrepreneur’s success: Evidence from videotapes of entrepreneurs’ presentations. In ReynoldsP. D.BygraveW. B.ManigartS.MasonC. M.MeyerG. D.SapienzeH. J.ShaverK. G. (Eds.), Frontiers of entrepreneurship research (pp. 79-91). Babson Park, MA: Babson College.
4.
BaronR. A.MarkmanG. D. (2000). Beyond social capital: How social skills can enhance entrepreneurs’ success. Academy of Management Executive, 14(1), 106-116.
5.
BenbowC. P.LubinskiD. (1993). Psychological profiles of the mathematically talented: Some sex differences and evidence supporting their biological basis. In BockG. R.AckrillK. (Eds.), Ciba foundation symposium 178: The origins and development of high ability (pp. 44-66). New York, NY: Wiley.
6.
BhideA. (2000). The origin and evolution of new ventures. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
7.
BloomB. S. (Ed.). (1985). Developing talent in young people. New York, NY: Ballantine Books.
8.
CarusoE. M.RahnevD. A.BanajiM. R. (2009). Using conjoint analysis to detect discrimination: Revealing covert preferences from overt choices. Social Cognition, 27, 128-137.
9.
ChenX. P.YaoX.KothaS. (2009). Entrepreneur passion and preparedness in business plan presentations: A persuasion analysis of venture capitalists’ funding decision. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 199-214.
10.
ChiM.GlaserR.FarrM. J. (Eds.). (1988). The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
ClarkC. (2008). The impact of entrepreneurs’ oral “pitch” presentation skills on business angels’ initial screening investment decisions. Venture Capital, 10, 257-279.
12.
CooperA.WooC.DunkelbergW. (1988). Entrepreneurs’ perceived chances for success. The Journal of Business Venturing, 3, 97-108.
13.
DaviesJ. B. (1994). Seeds of a false consciousness. The Psychologist, 7, 355-656.
14.
DuckworthA. L.KirbyT.TsukayamaE.BersteinH.EricssonK. (2010). Deliberate practice spells success: Why grittier competitors triumph at the National Spelling Bee. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 2, 174-181.
15.
DuckworthA. L.PetersonC.MatthewsM. D.KellyD. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1087-1101.
16.
DweckC. S.ChiuC.HongY. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A world from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 267-285.
17.
ElsbachK. D.KramerR. M. (2003). Assessing creativity in Hollywood pitch meetings: Evidence for a dual-process model of creativity judgments. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 283-301.
18.
EricssonK. A.CharnessN. (1994). Expert performance: Its structure and acquisition. American Psychologist, 49, 725-747.
19.
EricssonK. A.CharnessN. (1995). Abilities: Evidence for talent or characteristics acquired through engagement in relevant activities. American Psychologist, 50, 803-804.
20.
EricssonK. A.KrampeR.Tesch-RömerC. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363-406.
21.
EysenckH. J.BarrettP. T. (1993). Brain research related to giftedness. In HellerK. A.MonksF. J.PassowA. H. (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 115-131). New York, NY: Pergamon.
22.
FeldmanD. (1988). Creativity: Dreams, insights, and transformations. In SternbergR. J. (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 271-297). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23.
FriedV. H.HisrichR. D. (1994). Toward a model of venture capital investment decision-making. Financial Management, 23, 28-37.
24.
GrantH.DweckC. S. (2003). Clarifying achievement goals and their impact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 541-553.
25.
GrayH.PluckerJ. A. (2010). “She’s a natural”: Identifying and developing athletic talent. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 33, 361-380.
26.
GreenP. E.KriegerA. M.WindY. (2001). Thirty years of conjoint analysis: Reflections and prospects. Interfaces, 31, 56-73.
27.
GreenwaldA. G.McGheeD. E.SchwartzL. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.
28.
GroysbergB.LeeL. (2009). Hiring stars and their colleagues: Exploration and exploitation in professional service firms. Organization Science, 20(4), 740-758.
29.
GroysbergB.LeeL.NandaA. (2008). Can they take it with them? The portability of star knowledge workers’ performance: Myth or reality. Management Science, 54(7), 1213-1230.
30.
HelmreichR. L.SawinL. L.CarsrudA. L. (1986). The honeymoon effect in job performance: Temporal increases in the predictive power of achievement motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 185-188.
31.
HoweM. A.DavidsonJ. W.SlobodaJ. A. (1998). Natural born talents undiscovered. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 432-442.
32.
KammrathL. K.PeetzJ. (2011). You promised you’d change: How incremental and entity theorists react to a romantic partner’s promised change attempts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 570-574.
33.
KatzI.HassR. (1988). Racial ambivalence and American value conflict: Correlational and priming studies of dual cognitive structures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 893-905.
34.
KnauberA. J. (1931). A study of the art ability found in very young children. Child Development, 2, 266-271.
35.
KuncelN. R.HezlettS. A. (2010). Fact and fiction in cognitive ability testing for admissions and hiring decisions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 339-345.
36.
LathamG. P.PinderC. C. (2005). Work motivation theory and research at the dawn of the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 485-516.
37.
LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57, 705-717.
38.
LuceR. D.TukeyJ. W. (1964). Simultaneous conjoint measurement. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1, 1-27.
39.
MaxwellA. L.JeffreyS. A.LevesqueM. (2009). Business angel early stage decision making. Journal of Business Venturing, 26, 212-225.
40.
MedinD. L. (1989). Concepts and conceptual structure. American Psychologist, 44, 1469-1481.
41.
NicholasT.StepickA.StepickC. (2008). “Here’s your diploma, Mom!” Family obligation and multiple pathways to success. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 620, 237-252.
42.
NicolaouN.ShaneS.CherkasL.SpectorT. (2009). Opportunity recognition and the tendency to be an entrepreneur: A bivariate genetics perspective. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 110, 108-117.
43.
OnesD. S.ViswesvaranC.DilchertS. (2005). Cognitive ability in personnel selection decisions. In EversA.AndersonN.VoskuijlO. (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of personnel selection (pp. 143-173). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
44.
O’ReillyC.ChatmanJ. (1994). Working smarter and harder: A longitudinal study of managerial success. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 603-627.
45.
OrmeB. (2006). Getting started with conjoint analysis: Strategies for product design and pricing research. Madison, WI: Research Publishers.
46.
PettyJ.GruberM. (2011). In pursuit of the real deal: A longitudinal study of VC decision making. Journal of Business Venturing, 26, 172-188.
47.
PfeifferS. I. (2002, March). Serving the gifted student: Best practices as school psychology enters the 21st century. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association of School Psychologists, Chicago, IL.
48.
PhelanJ. E.Moss-RacusinC. A.RudmanL. A. (2008). Competent yet out in the cold: Shifting criteria for hiring reflect backlash towards agentic women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 406-413.
49.
PriemR. L. (1992). An application of metric conjoint analysis for the evaluation of top managers’ individual strategic decision making processes. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 143-151.
50.
RadfordJ. (1990). Child prodigies and exceptional early achievers. New York, NY: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
51.
RahnevD. (2007). Conjoint analysis: A new method for investigating stereotypes (Unpublished thesis). Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
52.
RichardsJ.EncelJ.ShuteR. (2003). The emotional and behavioural adjustment of intellectually gifted adolescents: A multi-dimensional, multi-informant approach. High Ability Studies, 14, 153-164.
53.
SalamourisI. (2013). How overconfidence influences entrepreneurship. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 2, 8.
SchevitzJ. M. (1967). The do-gooder as status striver. Phylon, 28, 386-398.
56.
SchneiderW. (2000). Giftedness, expertise, and (exceptional) performance: A developmental perspective. In HellerK.MonksF.SternbergR.SubotnikR. (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 165-177). London, England: Elsevier.
57.
ShanteauJ.StewartT. R. (1992). Why study expert decision making? Some historical perspectives and comments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 53, 95-106.
58.
ShepherdD. A.ZacharakisA. L. (1999). Conjoint analysis: A new methodological approach for researching the decision policies of venture capitalists. Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 1, 197-217.
59.
Shuter-DysonR.GabrielC. (1981). The psychology of musical ability (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Methuen.
60.
SlobodaJ. A. (1985). The musical mind. New York, NY: Clarendon Press.
61.
SlobodaJ. A.DavidsonJ. W.HoweM. J. A. (1994a). Is everyone musical?The Psychologist, 7, 349-354.
62.
SlobodaJ. A.DavidsonJ. W.HoweM. J. A. (1994b). Musicians: Experts, not geniuses. The Psychologist, 7, 363-364.
63.
StaffordT.DewarM. (2014). Tracing the trajectory of skill learning with a very large sample of online game players. Psychological Science, 25, 511-518.
64.
StawB. M.BarsadeS. G. (1993). Affect and managerial performance. A test of the sadder-but-wiser vs. happier-and-smarter hypotheses. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 304-333.
65.
StevensC.KristoffA. (1995). Making the right impression: A field study of impression management during job interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 587-606.
66.
TerryA. W.BohnenbergerJ. E. (2003). Service learning: Fostering a cycle of caring in our gifted youth. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 15, 23-32.
67.
TormalaZ.JiaJ.NortonM. (2012). The preference for potential. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 567-583.
68.
TsayC.BanajiM. (2011). Naturals and strivers: Preferences and beliefs about sources of achievement. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 460-465.
69.
TyebjeeT. T.BrunoA. V. (1984). A model of venture capitalist investment activity. Management Science, 30, 305-322.
70.
UhlmannE. L.CohenG. L. (2007). “I think it, therefore it’s true”: Effects of self perceived objectivity on hiring discrimination. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 104, 207-223.
71.
WardM.MacRaeH.SchlachtaC.MamazzaJ.PoulinE.ReznickR.RegehrG. (2003). Resident self-assessment of operative performance. American Journal of Surgery, 185, 521-524.
72.
WeberM. (1958). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism (ParsonsT. Trans.). New York, NY: Scribner.
73.
WuB.KnottA. M. (2006). Entrepreneurial risk and market entry. Management Science, 52, 1315-1330.
74.
ZottC.HuyQ. (2007). How entrepreneurs use symbolic management to acquire resources. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52, 70-105.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
