Past research has demonstrated a causal relationship between power and dominant behavior, motivated in part by the desire to maintain the social distinctiveness created by one’s position of power. In this article, we test the novel idea that some individuals respond to high-power roles by displaying not dominance but instead submissiveness. We theorize that high-power individuals who are also high in the need to belong experience the social distinctiveness associated with power as threatening, rather than as an arrangement to protect and maintain. We predict that such individuals will counter their feelings of threat with submissive behaviors to downplay their power and thereby reduce their distinctiveness. We found support for this hypothesis across three studies using different operationalizations of power, need to belong, and submissiveness. Furthermore, Study 3 illustrated the mediating role of fear of (positive) attention in the relationship between power, need to belong, and submissive behavior.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
2.
AndersonC. L.SrivastavaS.BeerJ. S.SpataroS. E.ChatmanJ. A. (2006). Knowing your place: Self-perceptions of status in face-to-face groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1094-1110.
3.
AndersonC. L.WillerR.KilduffG. J.BrownC. E. (2012). The origins of deference: When do people prefer lower status?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 1077-1088.
4.
ArcherJ. (1988). The behavioural biology of aggression. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5.
AshtonM. C.LeeK. (2005). Honesty-humility, the Big Five, and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality, 73, 1321-1354.
6.
BaumeisterR. F.LearyM. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529.
7.
BrewerM. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475-482.
8.
CarylP. G. (1988). Escalated fighting and the war of nerves: Games theory and animal combat. In BatesonP. H.KlopferP. H. (Eds.), Perspectives in Ethology: Vol. 4. Advantages of diversity (pp. 199-224). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
9.
ChenS.LangnerC.Mendoza-DentonR. (2009). When dispositional and role power fit: Implications for self-expression and self-other congruence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 710-727.
10.
ChoY.FastN. J. (2012). Power, defensive denigration, and the assuaging effect of gratitude expression. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 778-782.
11.
De DreuC. K. W.van KnippenbergD. (2005). The possessive self as a barrier to conflict resolution: Effects of mere ownership, process accountability, and self-concept clarity on competitive cognitions and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 345-357.
12.
EaglyA. H.KarauS. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573-596.
13.
EmersonR. E. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27, 31-41.
14.
FastN. J.ChenS. (2009). When the boss feels inadequate: Power, incompetence and aggression. Psychological Science, 20, 1406-1413.
15.
FiskeS. T. (1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48, 621-628.
16.
FiskeS. T. (2010). Interpersonal stratification: Status, power, and subordination. In FiskeS. T.GilbertD. T.LindseyG. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 941-982). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
17.
FongC. T.TiedensL. Z. (2002). Dueling experiences and dual ambivalences: Emotional and motivational ambivalence of women in high status positions. Motivation and Emotion, 26, 105-121.
18.
GalinskyA. D.GruenfeldD. H.MageeJ. C. (2003). From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 453-466.
19.
GalinskyA. D.MageeJ. C.InesiM. E.GruenfeldD. H. (2006). Power and perspectives not taken. Psychological Science, 17, 1068-1074.
20.
GeorgesenJ. C.HarrisM. J. (1998). Why’s my boss always holding me down? A meta-analysis of power effects on performance evaluations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 184-195.
21.
GilbertP. (1992). Depression: The evolution of powerlessness. New York, NY: Guilford.
22.
GilbertP.AllanS. (1994). Assertiveness, submissive behavior and social comparison. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 33, 295-306.
23.
GoodwinS. A.OperarioD.FiskeS. T. (1998). Situational power and interpersonal dominance facilitate bias and inequality. Journal of Social Issues, 54, 677-698.
24.
GruenfeldD. H.InesiM. E.MageeJ.GalinskyA. D. (2008). Power and the objectification of social targets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 111-127.
25.
GruenfeldD. H.TiedensL. Z. (2010). Organizational preferences and their consequences. In FiskeS. T.GilbertD. T.LindseyG. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 1251-1287). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
26.
HayesA. F.MatthesJ.EvelandW. P. (2013). Stimulating the quasi-statistical organ: Fear of social isolation motivates the quest for knowledge of the opinion climate. Communication Research, 40, 439-462.
27.
HorcajoJ.PettyR. E.BriñolP. (2010). The effects of majority versus minority source status on persuasion: A self-validation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 498-512.
28.
InesiM. E.RiosK. (2013). Fighting for independence: Significant others’ goals for oneself incite reactance among the powerful. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 1168-1176.
29.
KeltnerD.GruenfeldD. H.AndersonC. A. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265-284.
30.
KiferY.HellerD.PerunovicW. Q. E.GalinskyA. D. (2013). The good life of the powerful: The experience of power and authenticity enhances subjective well-being. Psychological Science, 24, 280-288.
31.
KipnisD. (1972). Does power corrupt?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 33-41.
32.
KnowlesM. L.GardnerW. L. (2008). Benefits of membership: The activation and amplification of group identities in response to social rejection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1200-1213.
33.
LammersJ.GalinskyA. D.GordjinE. H.OttenS. (2012). Power increases social distance. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 3, 282-290.
34.
LearyM. R. (1983). A brief version of the Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 371-375.
35.
LearyM. R. (2010). Affiliation, acceptance, and belonging: The pursuit of interpersonal connection. In FiskeS. T.GilbertD. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 864-897). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
36.
LearyM. R.KellyK. M.CottrellC. A.SchreindorferL. S. (2013). Construct validity of the Need to Belong Scale: Mapping the nomological network. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95, 610-624.
37.
LeeF.TiedensL. Z. (2001). Is it lonely at the top? The independence and interdependence of power holders. Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, 43-91.
38.
LeonardelliG. J.PickettC. L.BrewerM. B. (2010). Optimal distinctiveness theory: A framework for social identity, social cognition, and intergroup relations. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 63-113.
39.
MageeJ. C.SmithP. K. (2013). The social distance theory of power. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 158-186.
40.
ManerJ. K.DeWallC. N.BaumeisterR. F.SchallerM. (2007). Does social exclusion motivate interpersonal reconnection? Resolving the “porcupine problem.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 42-55.
41.
MorrisonK. R.MatthesJ. (2011). Socially motivated projection: Need to belong increases perceived opinion consensus on important issues. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 707-719.
42.
NarayananJ.TaiK.KiniasZ. (2013). Power motivates interpersonal connection following social exclusion. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 122, 257-266.
43.
PreacherK. J.RuckerD. D.HayesA. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185-227.
44.
PrislinR.SawickiV.WilliamsK. (2011). New majorities’ abuse of power: Effects of perceived control and social support. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14, 489-504.
45.
RiosK.ChenZ. (2014). Experimental evidence for minorities’ hesitancy in reporting their opinions: The roles of optimal distinctiveness needs and normative influence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 872-883.
46.
RiosK.DeMarreeK. G.StatzerJ. (2014). Attitude certainty and conflict style: Divergent effects of correctness and clarity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 819-830.
47.
SchenkelR. (1967). Submission: Its features and function in the wolf and dog. American Zoologist, 7, 319-329.
48.
SommerK. L.BaumeisterR. F. (2002). Self-evaluation, persistence, and performance following implicit rejection: The role of trait self-esteem. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 926-938.
49.
TiedensL. Z.FragaleA. R. (2003). Power moves: Complementarity in dominant and submissive nonverbal behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 558-568.
50.
WeeksJ. W.HeimbergR. G.RodebaughT. L. (2008). The Fear of Positive Evaluation Scale: Assessing a proposed cognitive component of social anxiety. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 22, 44-55.
51.
WeeksJ. W.HeimbergR. G.RodebaughT. L.NortonP. J. (2008). Exploring the relationship between fear of positive evaluation and social anxiety. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 22, 386-400.
52.
WeeksJ. W.JakatdarT. A.HeimbergR. G. (2010). Comparing and contrasting fears of positive and negative evaluation as facets of social anxiety. Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 29, 68-94.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
