We examine whether individuals respond to comparisons involving romantic partners as they would to comparisons involving the self. Four studies (N = 2,210) using recalled (Studies 1-3) and actual (Study 4) comparisons about attractiveness (Study 1) and relationship skills (Studies 2-4) demonstrated that individuals high in self-other overlap decrease domain relevance following upward but not downward comparisons to protect their positive partner perceptions. This strategy was absent among those low in self-other overlap. Study 2 demonstrated that this effect extends to best friends, but not casual friends, due to the degree of self-other overlap. Furthermore, when reminded of their partner’s inferiority in a domain, high overlap participants maintained positive global partner perceptions, whereas low overlap participants’ global perceptions were negatively affected (Study 3). These results suggest that individuals do experience partner-other comparisons as if they were directly involved, but only if their partner is incorporated into their self-identity.
AlickeM. D.KlotzM. L.BreitenbecherD. L.YurakT. J.VredenburgD. S. (1995). Personal contact, individuation, and the better-than-average effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 804-825.
4.
AronA.AronE. N. (1986). Love and the expansion of self: Understanding attraction and satisfaction. New York, NY: Hemisphere Publishing.
5.
AronA.AronE. N.SmollanD. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596-612.
6.
AronA.AronE. N.TudorM.NelsonG. (1991). Close relationships as including other in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 241-253.
7.
AronA.FraleyB. (1999). Relationship closeness as including other in the self: Cognitive underpinnings and measures. Social Cognition, 17, 140-160.
8.
BuunkA. P.GibbonsF. X. (2007). Social comparison: The end of a theory and the emergence of a field. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102, 3-21.
9.
BuunkB. P.CollinsR. L.TaylorS. E.VanYperenN. W.DakofG. A. (1990). The affective consequences of social comparison: Either direction has its ups and downs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1238-1249.
10.
CampbellL.SimpsonJ. A.KashyD. A.FletcherG. J. (2001). Ideal standards, the self, and flexibility of ideals in close relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 447-462.
11.
CohenB. H. (2007). Explaining psychological statistics (3rd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley.
12.
CollinsR. L. (1996). For better or worse: The impact of upward social comparison on self-evaluations. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 51-69.
13.
CummingG. (2014). The new statistics: Why and how. Psychological Science, 25, 7-29.
14.
EmeryL. F.MuiseA.DixE. L.LeB. (2014). Can you tell that I’m in a relationship? Attachment and relationship visibility on Facebook. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 1466-1479.
15.
FestingerL. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
16.
FrancisG. (2012). The psychology of replication and replication in psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 585-594.
17.
GagnéF. M.LydonJ. E. (2001). Mind-set and relationship illusions: The moderating effects of domain specificity and relationship commitment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1144-1155.
18.
GoodmanJ. K.CryderC. E.CheemaA. (2013). Data collection in a flat world: The strengths and weaknesses of Mechanical Turk samples. Behavioral Decision Making, 26, 213-224.
19.
HedgesL. V.VeveaJ. L. (1998). Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 3, 486-504.
20.
HerrP. M. (1986). Consequences of priming: Judgment and behaviour. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1106-1115.
21.
IoannidisJ. P. A.TrikalinosT. A. (2007). An exploratory test for an excess of significant findings. Clinical Trials, 4, 245-253.
22.
JohnsonD. J.RusbultC. E. (1989). Resisting temptation: Devaluation of alternative partners as a means of maintaining commitment in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 967-980.
23.
JuddC. M.McClellandG. H.RyanC. S. (2009). Data analysis: A model comparison approach (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
24.
KenrickD. T.GutierresS. E. (1980). Contrast effects and judgments of physical attractiveness: When beauty becomes a social problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 131-140.
25.
KenrickD. T.GutierresS. E.GoldbergL. L. (1989). Influence of popular erotica on judgments of strangers and mates. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 159-167.
26.
LockwoodP.DoldermanD.SadlerP.GerchakE. (2004). Feeling better about doing worse: Social comparisons within romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 80-95.
27.
LockwoodP.KundaZ. (1997). Superstars and me: Predicting the impact of role models on the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 91-103.
28.
LockwoodP.KundaZ. (1999). Salience of best selves undermines inspiration by outstanding role models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 214-228.
29.
ManiaciM. R.RoggeR. D. (2014). Caring about carelessness: Participant inattention and its effects on research. Journal of Research in Personality, 48, 61-83.
30.
MeadeA. W.CraigS. B. (2012). Identifying careless responses in survey data. Psychological Methods, 17, 437-455.
31.
MorryM. M.KitoM.OrtizL. (2011). The attraction-similarity model in dating couples: Projection, perceived similarity, and psychological benefits. Personal Relationships, 18, 125-143.
32.
MorryM. M.ReichT.KitoM. (2010). How do I see you relative to myself? Relationship quality as a predictor of self- and partner-enhancement within cross-sex friendships, dating relationships, and marriages. The Journal of Social Psychology, 150, 369-392.
33.
MullerD.FayantM. P. (2010). On being exposed to superior others: Consequences of self-threatening upward social comparisons. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 621-634.
34.
MullerD.JuddC. M.YzerbytV. Y. (2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 852-863.
35.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.GriffinD. W. (1996). The self-fulfilling nature of positive illusions in romantic relationships: Love is not blind, but prescient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1155-1180.
36.
MussweilerT. (2003). Comparison processes in social judgment: Mechanisms and consequences. Psychological Review, 110, 472-489.
37.
MussweilerT.RüterK.EpstudeK. (2004). The ups and downs of social comparison: Mechanisms of assimilation and contrast. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 832-844.
38.
NeffL. A.KarneyB. R. (2002). Judgments of a relationship partner: Specific accuracy but global enhancement. Journal of Personality, 70, 1079-1112.
39.
NeffL. A.KarneyB. R. (2005). To know you is to love you: The implications of global adoration and specific accuracy for marital relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 480-497.
40.
NisbettR. E.CaputoC.LegantP.MarecekJ. (1973). Behavior as seen by the actor and as seen by the observer. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 154-164.
41.
OppenheimerD. M.MeyvisT.DavidenkoN. (2009). Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 867-872.
42.
PinkusR. T.LockwoodP.SchimmackU.FournierM. A. (2008). For better and for worse: Everyday social comparisons between romantic partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1180-1201.
43.
PlantE. A.KunstmanJ. W.ManerJ. K. (2010). You do not only hurt the one you love: Self-protective responses to attractive relationship alternatives. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 474-477.
44.
PlebanR.TesserA. (1981). The effects of relevance and quality of another’s performance on interpersonal closeness. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44, 278-285.
45.
RusbultC. E.Van LangeP. A. M.WildschutT.YovetichN. A.VeretteJ. (2000). Perceived superiority in close relationships: Why it exists and persists. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 521-545.
46.
SandeG. N.GoethalsG. R.RadloffC. E. (1988). Perceiving one’s own traits and others’: The multifaceted self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 13-20.
47.
SchimmackU. (2012). The ironic effect of significant results on the credibility of multiple-study articles. Psychological Methods, 17, 551-556.
48.
SchmaderT.MajorB. (1999). The impact of ingroup vs. outgroup performance on personal values. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 47-67.
49.
TesserA. (1988). Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behavior. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 181-227). New York, NY: Academic Press.
50.
TesserA.PaulhusD. (1983). The definition of self: Private and public self-evaluation management strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 672-682.
51.
WheelerL.MiyakeK. (1992). Social comparison in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 760-773.
52.
WoodJ. V. (1989). Theory and research concerning social comparisons of personal attributes. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 231-248.
53.
WoodJ. V. (1996). What is social comparison and how should we study it?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 520-537.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
