Ethical dilemmas pose a self-control conflict between pursuing immediate benefits through behaving dishonestly and pursuing long-term benefits through acts of honesty. Therefore, factors that facilitate self-control for other types of goals (e.g., health and financial) should also promote ethical behavior. Across four studies, we find support for this possibility. Specifically, we find that only under conditions that facilitate conflict identification—including the consideration of several decisions simultaneously (i.e., a broad decision frame) and perceived high connectedness to the future self—does anticipating a temptation to behave dishonestly in advance promote honesty. We demonstrate these interaction patterns between conflict identification and temptation anticipation in negotiation situations (Study 1), lab tasks (Study 2), and ethical dilemmas in the workplace (Studies 3-4). We conclude that identifying a self-control conflict and anticipating a temptation are two necessary preconditions for ethical decision making.
ArielyD. (2012). The honest truth about dishonesty: How we lie to everyone—Especially ourselves. London, England: Harper Collins.
2.
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. (2012). Report to the nations on occupational fraud and abuse. Retrieved from http://www.acfe.com/rttn.aspx
3.
AyalS.GinoF. (2011). Honest rationales for dishonest behavior. In MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (Eds.), The social psychology of morality: Exploring the causes of good and evil (pp. 149-166). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
4.
BanduraA. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 193-209.
5.
BarnesC. M.SchaubroeckJ.HuthM.GhummanS. (2011). Lack of sleep and unethical conduct. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115, 169-180.
6.
BartelsD. M.RipsL. J. (2010). Psychological connectedness and intertemporal choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 49-69.
7.
BartelsD. M.UrminskyO. (2011). On intertemporal selfishness: The perceived instability of identity underlies impatient consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 38, 182-198.
8.
BatsonC. D.KobrynowiczD.DinnersteinJ. L.KampfH. C.WilsonA. D. (1997). In a very different voice: Unmasking moral hypocrisy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1335-1348.
9.
BatsonC. D.ThompsonE. R.SeuferlingG.WhitneyH.StrongmanJ. (1999). Moral hypocrisy: Appearing moral to oneself without being so. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 525-537.
10.
BaumeisterR. F.HeathertonT. F. (1996). Self-regulation failure: An overview. Psychological Inquiry, 7, 1-15.
11.
BazermanM. H.GinoF. (2012). Behavioral ethics: Toward a deeper understanding of moral judgment and dishonesty. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 8, 85-104.
12.
BazermanM. H.TenbrunselA. E. (2012). Blind spots: Why we fail to do what’s right and what to do about it. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13.
BeckerG. S. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76, 169-217.
14.
Buyukcan-TetikA.FinkenauerC.KuppensS.VohsK. D. (2013). Both trust and self-control are necessary to prevent intrusive behaviors: Evidence from a longitudinal study of married couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 27, 671-676.
15.
ChughD.BanajiM.BazermanM. (2005). Bounded ethicality as a psychological barrier to recognizing conflicts of interest. In MooreD.CainD.LoewensteinG.BazermanM. (Eds.), Conflicts of interest: Challenges and solutions in business, law, medicine, and public policy (pp. 74-95). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
16.
DavisN.CappelloJ. C. (2013). Does FIFA’s corruption hurt the beautiful game?Americas Quarterly, 7, 22-25.
17.
Dispute Resolution Research Center. (2008). The Bullard houses. Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
18.
FinkelE. J.CampbellW. K. (2001). Self-control and accommodation in close relationships: An interdependence analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 263-277.
19.
FishbachA.FriedmanR. S.KruglanskiA. W. (2003). Leading us not unto temptation: Momentary allurements elicit overriding goal activation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 296-309.
20.
FishbachA.TropeY. (2005). The substitutability of external control and self-control in overcoming temptation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 256-270.
21.
FishbachA.TropeY. (2007). Implicit and explicit mechanisms of counteractive self-control. In ShahJ.GardnerW. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation science (pp. 281-294), New York, NY: Guilford Press.
22.
FujitaK.TropeY.LibermanN.Levin-SagiM. (2006). Construal levels and self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 351-367.
23.
GinoF.MooreD. A.BazermanM. H. (2009). See no evil: Why we fail to notice unethical behavior. In KramerR. M.TenbrunselA. E.BazermanM. H. (Eds.), Social decision making: Social dilemmas, social values, and ethical judgments (pp. 241-263). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
24.
GinoF.SchweitzerM.MeadN.ArielyD. (2011). Unable to resist temptation: How self-control depletion promotes unethical behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115, 191-203.
25.
GinoF.SheaC. (2012). Deception in negotiation: The influence of emotion. In BoltonG.CrosonR. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of economic conflict resolution (pp. 47-60). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
26.
GottfredsonM. R.HirschiT. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
27.
GovernJ. M.MarschL. A. (2001). Development and validation of the Situational Self-Awareness Scale. Consciousness and Cognition, 10, 366-378.
28.
HershfieldH. E.CohenT.ThompsonL. (2012). Short horizons and shady situations: When lack of continuity to our future selves leads to unethical behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117, 298-310.
29.
HofmannW.BaumeisterR. F.ForsterG.VohsK. D. (2012). Everyday temptations: An experience sampling study of desire, conflict, and self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 1318-1335.
30.
HofmannW.FrieseM.StrackF. (2009). Impulse and self-control from a dual-systems perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 162-176.
31.
JayM. (2010). The virtues of mendacity: On lying in politics. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
32.
JonesT. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16, 366-395.
33.
KahnemanD.LovalloD. (1993). Timid choices and bold forecasts: A cognitive perspective on risk-taking. Management Science, 39, 17-31.
34.
Kish-GephartJ. J.HarrisonD. A.TreviñoL. K. (2010). Bad apples, bad cases, or bad barrels? Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 1-31.
35.
KohlbergL. (1981). Essays on moral development: The philosophy of moral development (Vol. I). San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.
36.
KrayL. J.KennedyJ. A.Van ZantA. B. (2014). Not competent enough to know the difference? Gender stereotypes about women’s ease of being misled predict negotiator deception. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 125, 61-72.
37.
KrossE.AydukO. (2011). Making meaning out of negative experiences by self-distancing. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 187-191.
38.
LoewensteinG. (1996). Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 272-292.
39.
MacurJ. (2013, January17). For Armstrong, a confession without explanation. The New York Times, Section B, p. 11.
40.
MazarN.AmirO.ArielyD. (2008). The dishonesty of honest people: A theory of self-concept maintenance. Journal of Marketing Research, 45, 633-644.
41.
MeadN.BaumeisterR. F.GinoF.SchweitzerM.ArielyD. (2009). Too tired to tell the truth: Self-control resource depletion and dishonesty. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 594-597.
42.
MillerD. T.EffronD. A. (2010). Psychological license: When it is needed and how it functions. In ZannaM. P.OlsonJ. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 43, pp. 117-158). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
43.
MischelW.ShodaY.RodriguezM. L. (1989). Delay of gratification in children. Science, 244, 933-988.
44.
MoninB.PizzaroD.BeerJ. S. (2007). Deciding versus reacting: Conceptions of moral judgment and the reason-affect debate. Review of General Psychology, 11, 99-111.
45.
MullerD.JuddC. M.YzerbytV. Y. (2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 852-863.
46.
MyrsethK. O. R.FishbachA. (2009). Self-control: A function of knowing when and how to exercise restraint. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 247-252.
47.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717-731.
48.
PriesterJ. R.PettyR. E. (1996). The gradual threshold model of ambivalence: Relating the positive and negative bases of attitudes to subjective ambivalence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 431-449.
49.
RachlinH. (2000). The science of self-control. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
50.
ReadD.LoewensteinG.RabinM. (1999). Choice bracketing. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19, 171-197.
51.
RestJ. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York, NY: Praeger.
52.
ReynoldsS. J. (2006). Moral awareness and ethical predispositions: Investigating the role of individual differences in the recognition of moral issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 233-243.
53.
SheldonO. J.FishbachA. (2011). Resisting the temptation to compete: Self-control promotes cooperation in mixed-motive interactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 403-410.
54.
ShuL.GinoF.BazermanM. H. (2011). Ethical discrepancy: Changing our attitudes to resolve moral dissonance. In De CremerD.TenbrunselA. E. (Eds.), Behavioral business ethics: Ideas on an emerging field (pp. 221-240). Taylor & Francis.
55.
SimmonsJ. P.NelsonL. D.SimonsohnU. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows pressing anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22, 1359-1366.
56.
SimonsonI. (1990). The effect of purchase quantity and timing on variety-seeking behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 150-162.
57.
TenbrunselA. E.DiekmannK. A.Wade-BenzoniK.BazermanM. H. (2010). The ethical mirage: A temporal explanation as to why we aren’t as ethical as we think we are. Research in Organizational Behavior, 30, 153-173.
58.
TenbrunselA. E.MessickD. M. (2004). Ethical fading: The role of self-deception in unethical behavior. Social Justice Research, 17, 223-236.
59.
Touré-TilleryM.FishbachA. (2012). The end justifies the means, but only in the middle. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 570-583.
60.
TropeY.FishbachA. (2000). Counteractive self-control in overcoming temptation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 493-506.
61.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A. (1994). The PANAS-X: Manual for the positive and negative affect schedule—Expanded Form. Iowa City: University of Iowa.
62.
WicklandR. A. (1979). The influence of self-awareness on human behavior: The person who becomes self-aware is more likely to act consistently, be faithful to societal norms, and give accurate reports about himself. American Scientist, 67, 187-193.
63.
WiltermuthS. S.FlynnF. J. (2013). Power, moral clarity, and severity of punishment in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 1002-1023.
64.
ZhangY.HuangS.BroniarczykS. M. (2010). Counteractive construal in consumer goal pursuit. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 129-142.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
