Five studies tested four hypotheses on the drivers of punitive judgments. Study 1 showed that people imposed covertly retributivist physical punishments on extreme norm violators when they could plausibly deny that is what they were doing (attributional ambiguity). Studies 2 and 3 showed that covert retributivism could be suppressed by subtle accountability manipulations that cue people to the possibility that they might be under scrutiny. Studies 4 and 5 showed how covert retributivism can become self-sustaining by biasing the lessons people learn from experience. Covert retributivists did not scale back punitiveness in response to feedback that the justice system makes false-conviction errors but they did ramp up punitiveness in response to feedback that the system makes false-acquittal errors. Taken together, the results underscore the paradoxical nature of covert retributivism: It is easily activated by plausible deniability and persistent in the face of false-conviction feedback but also easily deactivated by minimalist forms of accountability.
AlickeM. D. (2000). Culpable control and the psychology of blame. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 556-574.
2.
AlickeM. D.YurakT. J. (1995). Perpetrator personality and judgments of acquaintance rape. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 1900-1921.
3.
AtranS.GingesJ. (2012). Religious and sacred imperatives in human conflict. Science, 336, 855-857.
4.
AxelrodR.HamiltonW. D. (1981). The evolution of cooperation. Science, 211, 1390.
5.
BarghJ. A.ChartrandT. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54(7), 462.
6.
BersoffD. M. (1999). Why good people sometimes do bad things: Motivated reasoning and unethical behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(1), 28-39.
7.
BlackstoneS. W. (1875). Commentaries on the Laws of England (Sharswood’s Edition).
8.
BuehlerR.GriffinD.MacDonaldH. (1997). The role of motivated reasoning in optimistic time predictions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 238-247.
9.
BurnhamT. C.HareB. (2007). Engineering human cooperation. Human Nature, 18(2), 88-108.
10.
CarlsmithK. M. (2006). The roles of retribution and utility in determining punishment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 437-451.
11.
DarleyJ. M.PittmanT. S. (2003). The psychology of compensatory and retributive justice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 324-336.
12.
DawsonE.GilovichT.ReganD. T. (2002). Motivated reasoning and performance on the Wason selection task. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1379-1387.
13.
DurkheimE. (1933). The division of labor in society (SimpsonG.Trans.). New York, NY: The Free Press.
14.
EdwardsL. P. (1995). Corporal punishment and the legal system. Santa Clara Law Review, 36, 983-1093.
15.
EliasN. (1969). The civilizing process, vol. I. The history of manners. New York, NY.
16.
EllsworthP. C.GrossS. R. (1994). Hardening of the attitudes: Americans; views on the death penalty. Journal of Social Issues, 50, 19-52.
17.
FehrE.FischbacherU. (2004). Third-party punishment and social norms. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25(2), 63-87.
18.
FehrE.GächterS. (2002). Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature, 415(6868), 137-140.
19.
FoucaultM. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York, NY: Random House LLC.
20.
GarlandD. (1991). Sociological perspectives on punishment. Crime and Justice, 115-165.
21.
GarlandD. (1993). Punishment and modern society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
22.
GingesJ.AtranS.MedinD.ShikakiK. (2007). Sacred bounds on rational resolution of violent political conflict. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 7357-7360.
23.
GoldbergJ. H.LernerJ. S.TetlockP. E. (1999). Rage and reason: The psychology of the intuitive prosecutor. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29(56), 781-795.
24.
GoodwinG. P.LandyJ. F. (2014). Valuing different human lives. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 778-803.
25.
HaidtJ.GrahamJ. (2009). Planet of the Durkheimians, where community, authority, and sacredness are foundations of morality. In JostJ.KayA. C.ThorisdottirH. (Eds.), Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification (pp. 371-401). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
26.
HaleyK. J.FesslerD. M. (2005). Nobody’s watching? Subtle cues affect generosity in an anonymous economic game. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26(3), 245-256.
27.
HartmanJ. F. (1983). Unusual punishment: The domestic effects of international norms restricting the application of the death penalty. University of Cincinnati Law Review, 52, 655-699.
28.
HeiderF. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York, NY: John Wiley.
29.
HenrichJ.McElreathR.BarrA.EnsmingerJ.BarrettC.BolyanatzA.. . .ZikerJ. (2006). Costly punishment across human societies. Science, 312(5781), 1767-1770.
30.
HoganR.BlickleG. (2013). Socioanalytic theory. In ChristiansenN. D.TettR. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality at work (pp. 53-70). New York, NY: Routledge.
31.
JonesE. E.SigallH. (1971). The bogus pipeline: A new paradigm for measuring affect and attitude. Psychological Bulletin, 76(5), 349.
32.
KahnemanD.FredricksonB. L.SchreiberC. A.RedelmeierD. A. (1993). When more pain is preferred to less. Psychological Science, 4, 401-405.
33.
KaminL. J. (1969). Predictability, surprise, attention, and conditioning. In CampbellB. A.ChurchR. M. (Eds.), Punishment and aversive behavior (pp. 279-296). New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
34.
KayA. C.JostJ. T. (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of “poor but happy” and “poor but honest” stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 823-837.
35.
KayA. C.JostJ. T.YoungS. (2005). Victim derogation and victim enhancement as alternate routes to system justification. Psychological Science, 16, 240-246.
36.
KleinW. M.KundaZ. (1992). Motivated person perception: Constructing justifications for desired beliefs. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 145-168.
37.
KundaZ. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480.
38.
KundaZ. (1999). Social cognition: Making sense of people. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39.
LangerE. J.BlankA.ChanowitzB. (1978). The mindlessness of ostensibly thoughtful action: The role of “placebic” information in interpersonal interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 635-642.
40.
LangerE. J.FiskeS.TaylorS. E.ChanowitzB. (1976). Stigma, staring, and discomfort: A novel-stimulus hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 451-463.
41.
LasswellH. D. (1986). Psychopathology and politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1930)
42.
LernerJ. S.TetlockP. E. (1999). Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 255.
43.
LernerM. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
44.
LernerM. J.LernerS. C. (Eds.). (1981). The justice motive in social behavior: Adapting to times of scarcity and change. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
45.
LivelyP. C.RozinP.GoodwinG. P. (2014). The lively sex bump. Manuscript under revision.
46.
LoewensteinG.SmallD. A. (2007). The scarecrow and the tin man: The vicissitudes of human sympathy and caring. Review of General Psychology, 11, 112-126.
47.
MalleB. F.GuglielmoS. (2012). Are intentionality judgments fundamentally moral. In LangdonR.MackenzieC. (Eds.), Emotions, imagination, and moral reasoning (pp. 275-293). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
48.
MalleB. F.GuglielmoS.MonroeA. E. (2012). B lame is a moral judgment that has a cognitive and a social nature. We first focus on the cognitive side and introduce a theoretical model of blame. Social Thinking and Interpersonal Behavior, 313.
49.
McKeeI. R.FeatherN. T. (2008). Revenge, retribution, and values: Social attitudes and punitive sentencing. Social Justice Research, 21, 138-163.
50.
MertonR. K. (1949). On sociological theories of the middle range [1949]. New York, NY: Free Press.
51.
MoninB.MillerD. T. (2001). Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 33-43.
52.
MoskosP. (2011). In defense of flogging. Basic Books.
53.
MullenE.SkitkaL. J. (2006). Exploring the psychological underpinnings of the moral mandate effect: Motivated reasoning, group differentiation, or anger?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 629-643.
54.
NortonM. I.VandelloJ. A.DarleyJ. M. (2004). Casuistry and social category bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 817-831.
55.
NowakM. A. (2006). Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science, 314, 1560-1563.
56.
NowakM. A.MayR. M. (1993). The spatial dilemmas of evolution. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 3, 826-829.
57.
OkimotoT. G.WenzelM. (2009). Punishment as restoration of group and offender values following a transgression: Value consensus through symbolic labelling and offender reform. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 346-367.
58.
OkimotoT. G.WenzelM. (2011). Third-party punishment and symbolic intragroup status. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 709-718.
59.
PezzoM. V.PezzoS. P. (2007). Making sense of failure: A motivated model of hindsight bias. Social Cognition, 25, 147-164.
60.
PinkerS. (2011). The better angels of our nature: The decline of violence in history and its causes. New York, NY: Penguin UK.
61.
PolinskyA. M.ShavellS. (1998). Punitive damages: An economic analysis. Harvard Law Review, 869-962.
62.
RedlawskD. P. (2002). Hot cognition or cool consideration? Testing the effects of motivated reasoning on political decision making. The Journal of Politics, 64, 1021-1044.
63.
RescorlaR. A. (1970). Reduction in the effectiveness of reinforcement after prior excitatory conditioning. Learning and Motivation, 1, 372-381.
64.
RescorlaR. A. (1988). Pavlovian conditioning: It’s not what you think it is. American Psychologist, 43, 151-160.
65.
RousseauD. M.TijoriwalaS. A. (1999). What’s a good reason to change? Motivated reasoning and social accounts in promoting organizational change. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 514-528.
66.
SellA.ToobyJ.CosmidesL. (2009). Formidability and the logic of human anger. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 15073-15078.
67.
SkitkaL. J.HoustonD. A. (2001). When due process is of no consequence: Moral mandates and presumed defendant guilt or innocence. Social Justice Research, 14, 305-326.
68.
SpierenburgP. C. (1984). The spectacle of suffering: Executions and the evolution of repression: From a preindustrial metropolis to the European experience. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
69.
SkitkaL. J.MullenE. (2002). The dark side of moral conviction. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 2, 35-41.
70.
SnidermanP.BrodyR.TetlockP. (1991). Reasoning and choice: Explorations in political psychology. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
71.
SnidermanP. M.PiazzaT.TetlockP. E.KendrickA. (1991). The new racism. American Journal of Political Science, 35, 423-447.
72.
SnyderM. L.KleckR. E.StrentaA.MentzerS. J. (1979). Avoidance of the handicapped: An attributional ambiguity analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2297-2306.
73.
SunsteinC. R.SchkadeD.KahnemanD. (2000). Do people want optimal deterrence?The Journal of Legal Studies, 29, 237-253.
74.
TetlockP. E.MansteadA. S. (1985). Impression management versus intrapsychic explanations in social psychology: A useful dichotomy?Psychological Review, 92(1), 59.
75.
TetlockP. E.VisserP. S.SinghR.PolifroniM.ScottA.ElsonS. B.. . .RescoberP. (2007). People as intuitive prosecutors: The impact of social-control goals on attributions of responsibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(2), 195-209.
76.
TykocinskiO. E.SteinbergN. (2005). Coping with disappointing outcomes: Retroactive pessimism and motivated inhibition of counterfactuals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 551-558.
77.
TylerT. R.BoeckmannR. J. (1997). Three strikes and you are out, but why? The psychology of public support for punishing rule breakers. Law & Society Review, 31, 237-265.
78.
Van den HaagE. (1991). Punishing criminals.
79.
VidmarN.MillerD. T. (1980). Socialpsychological processes underlying attitudes toward legal punishment. Law & Society Review, 14, 565-602.
80.
WeberM. (2009). The theory of social and economic organization. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
81.
WeinerB.GrahamS.PeterO.ZmuidinasM. (1991). Public confession and forgiveness. Journal of Personality, 59, 281-312.
82.
WeinerB.GrahamS.ReynaC. (1997). An attributional examination of retributive versus utilitarian philosophies of punishment. Social Justice Research, 10, 431-452.
83.
WeisbergR.MillsD. (2003, October1). Violence silence: Why no one really cares about prison rape. Slate.
84.
WenzelM.OkimotoT. G.FeatherN. T.PlatowM. J. (2008). Retributive and restorative justice. Law and Human Behavior, 32, 375-389.
85.
WenzelM.ThielmannI. (2006). Why we punish in the name of justice: Just desert versus value restoration and the role of social identity. Social Justice Research, 19, 450-470.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
