In health-promotional campaigns, positive and negative role models can be deployed to illustrate the benefits or costs of certain behaviors. The main purpose of this article is to investigate why, how, and when exposure to role models strengthens the persuasiveness of a message, according to regulatory fit theory. We argue that exposure to a positive versus a negative model activates individuals’ goals toward promotion rather than prevention. By means of two experiments, we demonstrate that high levels of persuasion occur when a message advertising healthy dietary habits offers a regulatory fit between its framing and the described role model. Our data also establish that the effects of such internal regulatory fit by vicarious experience depend on individuals’ perceptions of response-efficacy and self-efficacy. Our findings constitute a significant theoretical complement to previous research on regulatory fit and contain valuable practical implications for health-promotional campaigns.
AvnetT.HigginsE. T. (2003). Locomotion, assessment, and regulatory fit: Value transfer from “how” to “what.”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 525-530. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00027-1
2.
BanduraA. (1977). Social learning theory. New York, NY: General Learning Press.
3.
BanduraA. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122-147. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122
4.
BlockL. G.KellerP. A. (1995). When to accentuate the negative: The effects of perceived efficacy and message framing on intentions to perform a health-related behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, XXXII, 192-203. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3152047
5.
BrodschollJ. C.KoberH.HigginsE. T. (2007). Strategies of self-regulation in goal attainment versus goal maintenance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 628-648. doi:10.1002/ejsp.380
6.
CamachoC. J.HigginsE. T.LugerL. (2003). Moral value transfer from regulatory fit: What feels right is right and what feels wrong is wrong. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 498-510. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.3.498
7.
CesarioJ.GrantH.HigginsE. T. (2004). Regulatory fit and persuasion: Transfer from “feeling right.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 388-404. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.3.388
8.
CesarioJ.HigginsE. T.ScholerA. A. (2008). Regulatory fit and persuasion: Basic principles and remaining questions. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 444-463. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00055.x
9.
CoxD.CoxA. D. (2001). Communicating the consequences of early detection: The role of evidence and framing. Journal of Marketing, 65(3), 91-103. doi:10.1509/jmkg.65.3.91.18336
10.
FreitasA. L.HigginsE. T. (2002). Enjoying goal-directed action: The role of regulatory fit. Psychological Science, 13, 1-6. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00401
11.
GallagherK. M.UpdegraffJ. A. (2012). Health message framing effects on attitudes, intentions, and behavior: A meta-analytic review. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 43, 101-116. doi:10.1007/s12160-012-9446-6
12.
GibsonD. E. (2003). Developing the professional self-concept: Role model construals in early, middle, and late career stages. Organization Science, 14, 591-610. doi:10.1287/orsc.14.5.591.16767
13.
GreenE. C.WitteK. (2006). Can fear arousal in public health campaigns contribute to the decline of HIV prevalence?Journal of Health Communication, 11, 245-259. doi:10.1080/10810730600613807
14.
HammondD.ReidJ. L.DriezenP.BoudreauC. (2013). Pictorial health warnings on cigarette packs in the United States: An experimental evaluation of the proposed FDA warnings. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 15, 93-102. doi:10.1093/ntr/nts094
Henderson-KingE.Henderson-KingD. (1997). Media effects on women’s body esteem: Social and individual difference factors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 399-417. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb00638.x
17.
HigginsE. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319-340. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.94.3.319
18.
HigginsE. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280-1300. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.52.12.1280
19.
HigginsE. T. (2000). Making a good decision: Value from fit. American Psychologist, 5, 1217-1230. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.11.1217
20.
HigginsE. T. (2002). How self-regulation creates distinct values: The case of promotion and prevention decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12, 177-191. doi:10.1207/S15327663JCP1203_01
21.
HigginsE. T. (2006). Value from hedonic experience and engagement. Psychological Review, 113, 439-460. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.113.3.439
22.
HigginsE. T.IdsonL. C.FreitasA. L.SpiegelS.MoldenD. C. (2003). Transfer of value from fit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1140-1153. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.6.1140
23.
HinyardL. J.KreuterM. W. (2006). Using narrative communication as a tool for health behavior change: A conceptual, theoretical, and empirical overview. Health Education & Behavior, 34, 777-792. doi:10.1177/1090198106291963
24.
IdsonL. C.LibermanN.HigginsE. T. (2004). Imagining how you’d feel: The role of motivational experiences from regulatory fit. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 926-937. doi:10.1177/0146167204264334
25.
JoshiR.HermanC. P.PolivyJ. (2004). Self-enhancing effects of exposure to thin-body images. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 35, 333-341. doi:10.1002/eat.10253
26.
KellerP. A. (2006). Regulatory focus and efficacy of health messages. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(1), 109-114. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/504141
27.
LatimerA. E.Williams-PiehotaP.KatulakN. A.CoxA.MowadL.HigginsE. T.SaloveyP. (2008). Promoting fruit and vegetable intake through messages tailored to individual differences in regulatory focus. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 35, 363-369. doi:10.1007/s12160-008-9039-6
28.
LeeA. Y.AakerJ. L. (2004). Bringing the frame into focus: The influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 205-218. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.205
29.
LemalM.Van den BulckJ. (2010). Testing the effectiveness of a skin cancer narrative in promoting positive health behavior: A pilot study. Preventive Medicine, 51, 178-181. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.04.019
30.
LockwoodP.JordanC. H.KundaZ. (2002). Motivation by positive or negative role models: Regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 854-864. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.4.854
31.
LockwoodP.SadlerP.FymanK.TuckS. (2004). To do or not to do: Using positive and negative role models to harness motivation. Social Cognition, 22, 422-450. doi:10.1521/soco.22.4.422.38297
32.
PettyR. E.CacioppoJ. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. New York, NY: Springer.
33.
PlotnikoffR. C.LippkeS.TrinhL.CourneyaK. S.BirkettN.SigalR. J. (2010). Protection motivation theory and the prediction of physical activity among adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes in a large population sample. British Journal of Health Psychology, 15, 643-661. doi:10.1348/135910709X478826
34.
RogersR. W. (1983). Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: A revised theory of protection motivation. In CacioppoJ. T.PettyR. E. (Eds.), Social psychophysiology: A source book (pp. 153-176). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
35.
RothmanA. J.BartelsR. D.WlaschinJ.SaloveyP. (2006). The strategic use of gain- and loss-framed messages to promote healthy behavior: How theory can inform practice. Journal of Communication, 56(Suppl. 1), S202-S220. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00290.x
36.
RothmanA. J.SaloveyP. (1997). Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: The role of message framing. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 3-19. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.3
37.
ScholerA. A.FujitaK.ZouX.StroessnerS. J.HigginsE. T. (2010). When risk seeking becomes a motivational necessity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 215-231. doi:10.1037/a0019715
38.
ShaoW. (2012). Framing and efficacy: The effect of regulatory fit on skin cancer prevention and detection. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 24, 161-180. doi:10.1080/10495142.2012.705176
39.
SpiegelS.Grant-PillowH.HigginsE. T. (2004). How regulatory fit enhances motivational strength during goal pursuit. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 39-54. doi:10.1002/ejsp.180
40.
WinnykamenF. (1982). L’apprentissage par observation. [Learning by observation]. Revue française de pédagogie, 59, 24-29. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/41162029
41.
WinterbottomA.BekkerH. L.ConnerM.MooneyA. (2008). Does narrative information bias individual’s decision making? A systematic review. Social Science & Medicine, 67, 2079-2088. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.09.037
42.
WitteK. (1992). Putting the fear back into fear appeal: The extended parallel process model. Communication Monographs, 59, 329-349. doi:10.1080/03637759209376276
43.
WitteK.AllenM. (2000). A meta-analysis of fear appeals: Implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Education & Behavior, 27, 591-615. doi:10.1177/109019810002700506
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
