Based on social projection research, four studies investigated whether people rely on their own regulatory focus when making predictions about others. Chronic (Study 1) and induced (Study 2) regulatory focus shaped estimations of others’ strategic promotion or prevention inclinations and choices between enriched (fitting promotion) and impoverished options (fitting prevention). Providing indirect process evidence via boundary conditions, participants only relied on their induced regulatory focus in predictions of others’ inclinations to seek romantic alternatives to the extent that this did not run counter to stereotypic gender beliefs (Study 3). In addition, participants only relied on their induced regulatory focus in preference predictions concerning promotion and prevention products when they lacked idiosyncratic target knowledge (Study 4). These effects were not mediated by mood, judgment-certainty, perceived task-enjoyment, or task-difficulty. Implications of these findings for social projection research as well as possible interpersonal consequences are delineated.
AakerJ. L.LeeA. Y. (2006). Understanding regulatory fit. Journal of Marketing Research, 43, 15-19.
2.
AlickeM.DunningD.KruegerJ. (Eds.). (2005). The self and social judgment. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
3.
AmesD. R. (2004a). Inside the mind-reader’s toolkit: Projection and stereotyping in mental state inferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 340-353.
4.
AmesD. R. (2004b). Strategies for social inference: A similarity contingency model of projection and stereotyping in attitude prevalence estimates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 573-585.
5.
AmesD. R.IyengarS. S. (2005). Appraising the unusual: Framing effects and moderators of uniqueness-seeking and social projection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 271-282.
6.
AmesD. R.WeberE. U.ZouX. (2011). Mind-reading in strategic interaction: The impact of perceived similarity on projection and stereotyping. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117, 96-110.
7.
BatsonC. D.O’QuinK.FultzJ.VanderplasM.IsenA. M. (1983). Influence of self-reported distress and empathy on egoistic versus altruistic motivation to help. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 706-718.
8.
BergerA.KrahéB. (2013). Negative attributes are gendered too: Conceptualizing and measuring positive and negative facets of sex-role identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 516-531.
9.
BergkvistL.RossiterJ. R. (2007). The predictive validity of multiple-item versus single-item measures of the same constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 44, 175-184.
10.
BottomW. P.PaeseP. W. (1997). False consensus, stereotypic cues, and the perception of integrative potential in negotiation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 1919-1940.
11.
BrileyD. A.AakerJ. L. (2006). When does culture mater? Effects of personal knowledge on the correction of culture-based judgments. Journal of Marketing Research, 43, 395-408.
12.
BuhrmesterM.KwangT.GoslingS. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3-5.
13.
CadinuM.GaldiS. (2012). Gender differences in implicit gender self-categorization lead to stronger gender self-stereotyping by women than by men. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 546-551.
14.
CesarioJ.HigginsE. T.ScholerA. A. (2008). Regulatory fit and persuasion: Basic principles and remaining questions. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 444-463.
15.
ChowdhuryT. G.RatneshwarS.DesaiK. K. (2009). The role of exploratory buying behavior tendencies in choices made for others. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19, 517-525.
16.
ClementR. W.KruegerJ. (2002). Social categorization moderates social projection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 219-231.
17.
CohenJ.CohenP.WestS. G.AikenL. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
CritcherC. R.DunningD. (2009). Egocentric pattern projection: How implicit personality theories recapitulate the geography of the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1-16.
19.
CroweE.HigginsE. T. (1997). Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69, 117-132.
20.
DeauxK.LewisL. L. (1984). Structure of gender stereotypes: Inter-relationships among components and gender label. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 991-1004.
21.
DunningD.HayesA. F. (1996). Evidence for egocentric comparison in social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 213-229.
22.
EpleyN.KeysarB.Van BovenL.GilovichT. (2004). Perspective taking as egocentric anchoring and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 3, 327-339.
23.
FaddegonK.ScheepersD.EllemersN. (2008). If we have the will, there will be a way: Regulatory focus as group identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 880-895.
24.
FayantM.-P.MullerD.NurraC.AlexopoulosT.Palluel-GermainR. (2011). Moving forward is not only a metaphor: Approach and avoidance lead to self-evaluative assimilation and contrast. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 241-245.
25.
FinkelE. J.MoldenD. C.JohnsonS. E.EastwickP. W. (2009). Regulatory focus and romantic alternatives. In ForgasJ. P.BaumeisterR. F.TiceD. M. (Eds.), Self-regulation: Cognitive, affective, and motivational processes (pp. 319-335). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
26.
FlorackA.HartmannJ. (2007). Regulatory focus and investment decisions in small groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 626-632.
27.
FörsterJ.HigginsE. T.BiancoA. T. (2003). Speed/accuracy decisions in task performance: Built-in trade-off or separate strategic concerns?Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 90, 148-164.
28.
FörsterJ.HigginsE. T.IdsonL. C. (1998). Approach and avoidance strength during goal attainment: Regulatory focus and the “goal looms larger” effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1115-1131.
29.
FörsterJ.LibermanN.KuschelS. (2008). The effect of global versus local processing styles on assimilation versus contrast in social judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 579-599.
30.
FreitasA. L.HigginsE. T. (2002). Enjoying goal-directed action: The role of regulatory fit. Psychological Science, 13, 1-6.
31.
FriedmanR. S.FörsterJ. (2001). The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1001-1013.
32.
GilovichT. (1990). Differential construal and the false consensus effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 623-634.
33.
GovorunO.FuegenK.PayneB. K. (2006). Stereotypes focus defensive projection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 781-793.
34.
GreenJ. D.SedikidesC. (2001). When do self-schemas shape social perception? The role of descriptive ambiguity. Motivation and Emotion, 25, 67-83.
35.
HigginsE. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280-1300.
36.
HigginsE. T. (1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 1-46). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
37.
HigginsE. T. (2000). Making a good decision: Value from fit. American Psychologist, 52, 1217-1230.
38.
HigginsE. T. (2005). Value from regulatory fit. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 209-213.
39.
HigginsE. T.FriedmanR. S.HarlowR. E.IdsonL. C.AydukO. N.TaylorA. (2001). Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: Promotion pride versus prevention pride. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 3-23.
40.
HigginsE. T.GrantH.ShahJ. (1999). Self-regulation and quality of life: Emotional and non-emotional life experiences. In KahnemanD.DienerE.SchwartzN. (Eds.), Hedonic psychology: New perspectives on subjective well-being (pp. 244-266). New York, NY: Russell Sage.
41.
HigginsE. T.RholesW. S.JonesC. R. (1977). Category accessibility and impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 141-154.
42.
HigginsE. T.RoneyC. J. R.CroweE.HymesC. (1994). Ideal versus ought predilections for approach and avoidance: Distinct self-regulatory systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 276-286.
43.
HigginsE. T.ShahJ.FriedmanR. S. (1997). Emotional responses to goal attainment: Strength of regulatory focus as moderator. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 515-525.
44.
HigginsE. T.SpiegelS. (2004). Promotion and prevention strategies for self-regulation: A motivated cognition perspective. In BaumeisterR. F.VohsK. D. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and application (pp. 171-187). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
45.
HochS. J. (1987). Perceived consensus and predictive accuracy: The pros and cons of projection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 221-233.
46.
HolmesD. S. (1978). Projection as a defense mechanism. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 677-688.
47.
HoustonD. A. (1990). Empathy and the self: Cognitive and emotional influences on the evaluation of negative affect in others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 859-868.
48.
HundhammerT.MussweilerT. (2012). How sex puts you in gendered shoes: Sexuality-priming leads to gender-based self-perception and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 176-193.
49.
IgouE. R. (2008). “How long will I suffer?” versus “How long will you suffer?” A self-other effect in affective forecasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 899-917.
50.
KarniolR. (2003). Egocentrism versus protocentrism: The status of the self in social prediction. Psychological Review, 110, 564-580.
KawadaC. L. K.OettingenG.GollwitzerP. M.BarghJ. A. (2004). The projection of implicit and explicit goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 545-559.
53.
KeysarB.BarrD. J.BalinJ. A.BraunerJ. S. (2000). Taking perspective in conversations: The role of mutual knowledge in comprehension. Psychological Science, 11, 32-38.
54.
KruegerJ. I. (2000). The projective perception of the social world. In SulsJ.WheelerL. (Eds.), Handbook of social comparison: Theory and research (pp. 323-351). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic.
55.
KruegerJ. I. (2007). From social projection to social behaviour. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 1-35.
56.
KruglanskiA. W.ThompsonE. P.HigginsE. T.AtashN. M.PierroA.ShahJ. Y.SpiegelS. (2000). To “do the right thing” or to “just do it”: Locomotion and assessment as distinct self-regulatory imperatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 793-815.
57.
KuhlJ. (1985). Volitional mediation of cognition-behavior consistency: Self-regulatory processes and action versus state orientation. In KuhlJ.BeckmanJ. (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 101-128). Berlin, Germany: Springer Verlag.
58.
LambertA. J.WedellD. H. (1991). The self and social judgment: Effects of affective reaction and “own position” on judgments of unambiguous and ambiguous information about others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 884-897.
59.
LatrofaM.VaesJ.CadinuM.CarnaghiA. (2010). The cognitive representation of self-stereotyping. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 911-922.
60.
LeeA. Y.AakerJ. L. (2004). Bringing the frame into focus: The influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 205-218.
61.
LentonA. P.BryanA.HastieR.FischerO. (2007). We want the same thing: Projection in judgments of sexual intent. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 975-988.
62.
LisjakM.MoldenD. C.LeeA. Y. (2012). Primed interference: The cognitive and behavioral costs of an incongruity between chronic and primed motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 889-909.
63.
ManerJ. K.KenrickD. T.BeckerD. V.RobertsonT. E.HoferB.NeubergS. L.. . .SchallerM. (2005). Functional projection: How fundamental social motives can bias interpersonal perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 63-78.
64.
MarksG.MillerN. (1987). Ten years of research on the false-consensus effect: An empirical and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 72-90.
65.
MillerR. S. (1997). Inattentive and contented: Relationship commitment and attention to alternatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 758-766.
66.
MoldenD. C.LeeA. Y.HigginsE. T. (2008). Motivations for promotion and prevention. In ShahJ.GardnerW. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation science (pp. 169-187). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
67.
MoldenD. C.LucasG. M.FinkelE. J.KumashiroM.RusbultC. (2009). Perceived support for promotion-focused and prevention-focused goals: Associations with well-being in unmarried and married couples. Psychological Science, 20, 787-793.
68.
NewmanL. S.DuffK. J.BaumeisterR. F. (1997). A new look at defensive projection: Thought suppression, accessibility, and biased person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 980-1001.
69.
NickersonR. S. (1999). How we know—And sometimes misjudge—What others know: Imputing one’s own knowledge to others. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 737-759.
70.
OettingenG.AhnJ. N.GollwitzerP. M.KappesA.KawadaC. (2014). Goal projection and giving help. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 54, 204-214.
71.
OppenheimerD.MeyvisT.DavidenkoN. (2009). Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 867-872.
72.
PolmanE. (2012). Effects of self-other decision making on regulatory focus and choice overload. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120, 980-993.
73.
RighettiF.FinkenauerC.RusbultC. (2011). The benefits of interpersonal regulatory fit for individual goal pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 720-736.
74.
RobbinsJ. M.KruegerJ. I. (2005). Social projection to ingroups and outgroups: A review and meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 32-47.
75.
RossL.GreeneD.HouseP. (1977). The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 279-301.
76.
SassenbergK.JonasK. J.ShahJ.BrazyP. C. (2007). Why some groups just feel better: The regulatory fit of group power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 249-267.
77.
SassenbergK.WoltinK.-A. (2008). Group-based self-regulation: The effects of regulatory focus. European Review of Social Psychology, 19, 126-164.
78.
SassenbergK.WoltinK.-A. (2009). Self-regulation of group members: The case of regulatory focus. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 3, 118-132.
79.
SchulY.VinokurA. D. (2000). Projection in person perception among spouses as a function of the similarity in their shared experiences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 987-1001.
80.
ShahG. R.HigginsE. T.FriedmanR. S. (1998). Performance incentives and means: How regulatory focus influences goal attainment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 285-293.
81.
SpencerS. J.ZannaM. P.FongG. T. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 845-851.
82.
TeixeiraC. P.DemoulinS.YzerbytV. Y. (2011). Choosing the best means to an end: The influence of ingroup goals and the selection of representatives in intergroup negotiations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 228-234.
83.
TomaC.YzerbytV. Y.CorneilleO. (2010). Anticipated cooperation vs. competition moderates interpersonal projection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 375-381.
84.
van den EijndenR. J. J. M.BuunkB. P.BosveldW. (2000). Feeling similar or feeling unique: How men and women perceive their own sexual behaviors. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1540-1549.
85.
van StekelenburgJ. (2006). Promoting or preventing social change: Instrumentality, identity, ideology and groups-based anger as motives of protest participation (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
86.
WangJ.LeeA. Y. (2006). The role of regulatory focus in preference construction. Journal of Marketing Research, 43, 28-38.
87.
WerthL.FörsterJ. (2007). How regulatory focus influences consumer behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 33-51.
88.
ZhangY.MittalV. (2007). The attractiveness of enriched and impoverished options: Culture, self-construal, and regulatory focus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 588-598.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
