Research suggests that high levels of interpersonal power can promote enhanced executive functioning capabilities. The present work explored whether this effect is contingent upon expectancies concerning power’s downstream cognitive consequences. Study 1 showed that social dominance orientation (SDO) predicted idiosyncratic expectancies of mental energy change toward interpersonal power. Study 2 showed that SDO moderated the executive functioning changes associated with interpersonal power and that this moderation effect was contingent upon changes in perceived mental depletion. Study 3 showed that directly manipulating expectancies of mental energy change concerning interpersonal power moderated the executive functioning consequences of power and that this moderation effect was contingent upon SDO and changes in perceived mental depletion. Together, the present findings underscore the importance of expectancies and individual differences in understanding the effects of interpersonal power.
AltemeyerB. (1998). The other “authoritarian personality.” In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 47-92). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
2.
AtlasL. Y.WagerT. D.DahlK.SmithE. E. (2009). Placebo effects. In CacioppoJ. T.BerntsonG. G. (Eds.), Handbook of neuroscience for behavioral psychologists (pp. 1236-1259). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
3.
BaddeleyA. D. (1986). Working memory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
4.
BarghJ. A.RaymondP. (1995). The naive misuse of power: Nonconscious sources of sexual harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 85-96.
5.
BaumeisterR. F.BratslavskyE.MuravenM.TiceD. M. (1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1252-1265.
6.
BaumeisterR. F.VohsK. D.TiceD. M. (2007). The strength model of self-control. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 351-355.
7.
ChenS.Lee-ChaiA. Y.BarghJ. A. (2001). Relationship orientation as a moderator of the effects of social power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 173-187.
8.
ClarksonJ. J.HirtE. R.ChapmanD. A.JiaL. (2011). The impact of illusory fatigue on executive control: Do perceptions of depletion impair working memory capacity?Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 231-238.
9.
DeWallC. N.BaumeisterR. F.MeadN. L.VohsK. D. (2011). How leaders self-regulate their task performance: Evidence that power promotes diligence, depletion, and disdain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 47-65.
10.
DovidioJ. F.SaguyT.ShnabelN. (2009). Cooperation and conflict within groups: Bridging intragroup and intergroup processes. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 429-449.
11.
DuckittJ. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 41-113). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
12.
EganP. M.HirtE. R.KarpenS. C. (2012). Taking a fresh perspective: Vicarious restoration as a means of recovering self-control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 457-465.
13.
FragaleA. R.OverbeckJ. R.NealeM. A. (2011). Resources versus respect: Social judgments based on targets’ power and status positions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 767-775.
14.
FujitaK.TropeY.LibermanN.Levin-SagiM. (2006). Construal levels and self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 351-367.
15.
GalinskyA. D.GruenfeldD. H.MageeJ. C. (2003). From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 453-466.
16.
GalinskyA. D.MageeJ. C.GruenfeldD. H.WhitsonJ.LiljenquistK. A. (2008). Social power reduces the strength of the situation: Implications for creativity, conformity, and dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1450-1466.
17.
GalinskyA. D.MageeJ. C.InesiM. E.GruenfeldD. H. (2006). Power and perspectives not taken. Psychological Science, 17, 1068-1074.
18.
GuinoteA. (2007a). Power affects basic cognition: Increased attentional inhibition and flexibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 685-697.
19.
GuinoteA. (2007b). Power and goal pursuit. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1076-1087.
20.
GuinoteA. (2010). The situated focus theory of power. In GuinoteA.VescioT. K. (Eds.), The social psychology of power (pp. 141-173). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
21.
HandleyI. M.AlbarracínD.BrownR. D.LiH.KumkaleE. C.KumkaleG. T. (2009). When the expectations from a message will not be realized: Naïve theories can eliminate expectation–congruent judgments via correction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 933-939.
22.
HingS. L. S.BobocelD. R.ZannaM. P.McBrideM. V. (2007). Authoritarian dynamics and unethical decision making: High social dominance orientation leaders and high right-wing authoritarianism followers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 67-81.
23.
HofmannW.SchmeichelB. J.BaddeleyA. D. (2012). Executive functions and self-regulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 174-180.
24.
InzlichtM.GutsellJ. N. (2007). Running on empty: Neural signals for self-control failure. Psychological Science, 18, 933-937.
25.
InzlichtM.SchmeichelB. J. (2012). What is ego depletion? Toward a mechanistic revision of the resource model of self-control. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 450-463.
26.
JobV.DweckC. S.WaltonG. M. (2010). Ego depletion—Is it all in your head? Implicit theories about willpower affect self-regulation. Psychological Science, 21, 1-8.
27.
JostJ. T.ThompsonE. P. (2000). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 209-232.
28.
JudgeT. A.BonoJ. E. (2001). Relationship of core self-evaluations traits-self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability-with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 80-92.
29.
KaneM. J.EngleR. W. (2003). Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 47-70.
30.
KruglanskiA. W.BélangerJ. J.ChenX.KöpetzC.PierroA.MannettiL. (2012). The energetics of motivated cognition: A force-field analysis. Psychological Review, 119, 1-20.
31.
KurzbanR.DuckworthA.KableJ. W.MyersJ. (2013). An opportunity cost model of subjective effort and task performance. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 661-726.
32.
LammersJ.GalinskyA. D.GordijnE. H.OttenS. (2008). Illegitimacy moderates the effects of power on approach. Psychological Science, 19, 558-564.
33.
MageeJ. C.LangerC. A. (2008). How personalized and socialized power motivation facilitate antisocial and prosocial decision-making. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1547-1559.
34.
MageeJ. C.SmithP. K. (2013). The social distance theory of power. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 158-186.
35.
ManerJ. K.GailliotM. T.MenzelA. J.KunstmanJ. W. (2012). Dispositional anxiety blocks the psychological effects of power. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1383-1395.
36.
ManerJ. K.MeadN. L. (2010). The essential tension between leadership and power: When leaders sacrifice group goals for the sake of self-interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 482-497.
37.
MartijnC.TenbültP.MerckelbachH.DreezensE.de VriesN. K. (2002). Getting a grip on ourselves: Challenging expectancies about loss of energy after self-control. Social Cognition, 20, 441-460.
38.
MeissnerK.BingelU.CollocaL.WagerT. D.WatsonA.FlatenM. A. (2011). The placebo effect: Advances from different methodological approaches. The Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 16117-16124.
39.
MuravenM.GagneM.RosmanH. (2008). Helpful self-control: Autonomy support, vitality, and depletion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 573-585.
40.
NisbettR. E.WilsonT. D. (1977). The halo effect: Evidence for unconscious alteration of judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 250-256.
41.
PrattoF.SidaniusJ.StallworthL. M.MalleB. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763.
42.
SassenbergK.EllemersN.ScheepersD. (2012). The attraction of social power: The influence of construing power as opportunity versus responsibility. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology, 48, 550-555.
43.
SchmeichelB. J. (2007). Attention control, memory updating, and emotion regulation temporarily reduce the capacity for executive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 241-255.
44.
SchmeichelB. J.VohsK. (2009). Self-affirmation and self-control: Affirming core values counteracts ego depletion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 770-782.
45.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF.SinclairS.van LaarC. (1996). Mother Teresa meets Genghis Khan: The dialectics of hierarchy-enhancing and hierarchy-attenuating career choices. Social Justice Research, 9, 145-170.
46.
SlabuL.GuinoteA. (2010). Getting what you want: Power increases the accessibility of active goals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 344-349.
47.
SmithP. K.JostmannN.GalinskyA. D.van DijkW. W. (2008). Lacking power impairs executive functions. Psychological Science, 16, 785-791.
48.
TorelliC. J.ShavittS. (2010). Culture and concepts of power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 703-723.
49.
van DijkeM.PoppeM. (2006). Striving for personal power as a basis for social power dynamics. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 537-556.
50.
WillisG. B.Rodríguez-BailónR.LupiáñezJ. (2011). The boss is paying attention: Power affects the functioning of the attentional networks. Social Cognition, 29, 166-181.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
