Women remain under-represented in the leadership of corporate America. According to stereotype threat theory, this under-representation may persist because women are concerned about being stereotyped in business settings. Three studies investigated whether an entity (fixed), compared with an incremental (malleable), organizational lay theory is threatening for women evaluating a consulting company. Men and women viewed a company mission statement or website containing an entity or incremental theory. Results revealed that women—more so than men—trusted the entity company less than the incremental company. Furthermore, only women’s mistrust of the entity company was driven by their expectations about being stereotyped by its management. Notably, when combined with high or low representations of female employees, only organizational lay theories predicted trust. Finally, people’s—particularly women’s—mistrust of the entity company led them to disengage more before interacting with a representative. Implications for women’s experiences and outcomes in workplace settings are discussed.
AronsonJ.FriedC. B.GoodC. (2002). Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on African American college students by shaping theories of intelligence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 113-125. doi:10.1006/jesp.2001.1491
2.
BergeronD. M.BlockC. J.EchtenkampB. A. (2006). Disabling the able: Stereotype threat and women’s work performance. Human Performance, 19, 133-158. doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1902_3
3.
BlackwellL. S.TrzesniewskiK. H.DweckC. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78, 246-263. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x
4.
BrennerO. C.TomkiewiczJ.ScheinV. E. (1989). The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics revisited. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 662-669. doi:10.2307/256439
5.
BurhansK. K.DweckC. S. (1995). Helplessness in early childhood: The role of contingent worth. Child Development, 66, 1719-1738. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1995.tb00961.x
CohenG. L.GarciaJ. (2008). Identity, belonging, and achievement: A model, interventions, implications. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 365-369. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00607.x
8.
CohenG. L.SteeleC. M.RossL. D. (1999). The mentor’s dilemma: Providing critical feedback across the racial divide. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1302-1318. doi:10.1177/0146167299258011
CrockerJ.VoelklK.TestaM.MajorB. (1991). Social stigma: The affective consequences of attributional ambiguity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 218-228. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.2.218
11.
DaviesP. G.SpencerS. J.QuinnD. M.GerhardsteinR. (2002). Consuming images: How television commercials that elicit stereotype threat can restrain women academically and professionally. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1615-1628. doi:10.1177/014616702237644
12.
DaviesP. G.SpencerS. J.SteeleC. M. (2005). Clearing the air: Identity safety moderates the effects of stereotype threat on women’s leadership aspirations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 276-287. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.2.276
13.
DicksonM. W.SmithD. B.GrojeanM. W.EhrhartM. (2001). An organizational climate regarding ethics: The outcome of leader values and the practices that reflect them. Leadership Quarterly, 12, 197-217. doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(01)00069-8
14.
DirksK. T.FerrinD. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 611-628. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.611
15.
DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS. L. (2004). Aversive racism. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 36, pp. 1-52). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic.
16.
DweckC. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
17.
DweckC. S.LeggettE. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256-273. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256
18.
EaglyA. H.KarauS. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573-598. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573
19.
EaglyA. H.MladinicA. (1994). Are people prejudiced against women? Some answers from research on attitudes, gender stereotypes, and judgments of competence. European Review of Social Psychology, 5, 1-35. doi:10.1080/14792779543000002
20.
EaglyA. H.WoodW.DiekmanA. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In EckesT.TrautnerH. M. (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123-174). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21.
ElliottE. S.DweckC. S. (1988). Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 5-12. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.1.5
22.
EmersonK. T. U.MurphyM. C. (2014). Identity threat at work: How social identity threat and situational cues contribute to racial and ethnic disparities in the workplace. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 20, 508-520. doi:10.1037/a0035403
FiskeS. T. (1998). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In GilbertD. T.FiskeS. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 357-411). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
25.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J. C.GlickP.XuJ. (2002). A model of (often mixed)stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.82.6.878
26.
GeorgeW. W.McLeanA. N. (2005). Anne Mulcahy: Leading Xerox through the perfect storm (Harvard Business School Case 405-050). Boston, MA: Harvard Business Publishing.
27.
GoodC.AronsonJ.InzlichtM. (2003). Improving adolescents’ standardized test performance: An intervention to reduce the effects of stereotype threat. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 24, 645-662. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2003.09.002
28.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford.
29.
HendersonV. L.DweckC. S. (1990). Motivation and achievement. In. S. Feldman & G. R. Elliott (Eds.), At the threshold: The developing adolescent (pp. 308-329). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30.
HongY.-Y.ChiuC.-Y.DweckC. S.LinD. M.-S.WanW. (1999). Implicit theories, attributions, and coping: A meaning system approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 588-599. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.588
31.
InzlichtM.Ben-ZeevT. (2000). A threatening intellectual environment: Why females are susceptible to experiencing problem-solving deficits in the presence of males. Psychological Science, 11, 365-371. doi:0.1111/1467-9280.00272
32.
McLeanB.ElkindP. (2003). Smartest guys in the room: The amazing rise and scandalous fall of Enron. New York, NY: Penguin Group.
33.
MurphyM. C.DweckC. S. (2010). A culture of genius: How an organization’s lay theory shapes people’s cognition, affect, and behavior. Personality and Psychology Bulletin, 36, 283-296. doi:10.1177/0146167209347380.
34.
MurphyM. C.DweckC. S. (in press). Mindsets and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research.
35.
MurphyM. C.SteeleC. M.GrossJ. J. (2007). Signaling threat: How situational cues affect women in math, science, and engineering settings. Psychological Science, 18, 879-885. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01995.x
36.
NguyenH.-H. D.RyanA. M. (2008). Does stereotype threat affect test performance of minorities and women? A meta-analysis of experimental evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1314-1334. doi:10.1037/a0012702
37.
NussbaumA. D.DweckC. S. (2008). Defensiveness versus remediation: Self-theories and modes of self-esteem maintenance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 599-612. doi:10.1177/0146167207312960
38.
OsborneJ. W. (1995). Academics, self-esteem, and race: A look at the underlying assumptions of the disidentification hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 449-455. doi:10.1177/0146167295215003
39.
PettigrewT. F.MeertensR. W. (1995). Subtle and blatant prejudice in Western Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 57-75. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420250106
40.
Purdie-VaughnsV.SteeleC. M.DaviesP. G.DitlmannR.CrosbyJ. R. (2008). Social identity contingencies: How diversity cues signal threat or safety for African Americans in mainstream institutions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 615-630. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.615
41.
RobersonL.KulikC. T. (2007). Stereotype threat at work. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21, 24-40. doi:10.5465/AMP.2007.25356510
42.
RosenkrantzP.VogelS.BeeH.BrovermanI.BrovermanD. M. (1968). Sex-role stereotypes and self-concepts in college students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 32, 287-295. doi:10.1037/h0025909
43.
RynesS.RosenB. (1995). A field survey of factors affecting the adoption and perceived success of diversity training. Personnel Psychology, 48, 247-270. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01756.x
44.
SchmaderT.JohnsM.ForbesC. (2008). An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance. Psychological Review, 115, 336-356. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.336
45.
SekaquaptewaD.ThompsonM. (2002). The differential effects of solo status on members of high- and low-status groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 694-707. doi:10.1177/0146167202288013
46.
ShapiroJ. R.NeubergS. L. (2007). From stereotype threat to stereotype threats: Implications of a multi-level framework for causes, moderators, mediators, consequences, and interventions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 107-130. doi:10.1177/1088868306294790
SteeleC. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613-629. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.52.6.613
49.
SteeleC. M.AronsonJ. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797-811. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797
50.
SteeleC. M.SpencerS. J.AronsonJ. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 379-440). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
51.
U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Population Survey. (2013). Employment by detailed occupation, sex, race, and Hispanic ethnicity, 2013 annual averages. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat11.pdf
52.
VorauerJ. D.MainK. J.O’ConnellG. B. (1998). How do individuals expect to be viewed by members of lower status groups? Content and implications of meta-stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 917-937. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.4.917
53.
WilliamsJ. E.BestD. L. (1982). Measuring sex stereotypes: A thirty-nation study. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
54.
WoutD. A.MurphyM. C.SteeleC. M. (2010). When your friends matter: The effect of White students’ racial friendship networks on meta-perceptions and perceived identity contingencies. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 1035-1041. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.06.003
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
