Previous research has conceptualized dispositional envy as a unitary construct. Recently however, episodic envy has been shown to emerge in two qualitatively different forms. Benign envy is related to the motivation to move upward, whereas malicious envy is related to pulling superior others down. In four studies (N = 1,094)—using the newly developed Benign and Malicious Envy Scale (BeMaS)—we show that dispositional envy is also characterized by two independent dimensions related to distinct motivational dynamics and behavioral consequences. Dispositional benign and malicious envy uniquely predict envious responding following upward social comparisons. Furthermore, they are differentially connected to hope for success and fear of failure. Corresponding to these links, dispositional benign envy predicted faster race performance of marathon runners mediated via higher goal setting. In contrast, dispositional malicious envy predicted race goal disengagement. The findings highlight that disentangling the two sides of envy opens up numerous research avenues.
BuhrmesterM.KwangT.GoslingS. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3-5. doi:10.1177/1745691610393980
5.
CorcoranK.CrusiusJ.MussweilerT. (2011). Social comparison: Motives, standards, and mechanisms. In ChadeeD. (Ed.), Theories in social psychology (pp. 119-139). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
6.
CrusiusJ.LangeJ. (2014). What catches the envious eye? Attentional biases within malicious and benign envy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 1-11. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2014.05.007
7.
CrusiusJ.MussweilerT. (2012). When people want what others have: The impulsive side of envious desire. Emotion, 12, 142-153. doi:10.1037/a0023523
8.
DelPrioreD. J.HillS. E.BussD. M. (2012). Envy: Functional specificity and sex-differentiated design features. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 317-322. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2012.03.029
9.
DuffyM. K.ScottK. L.ShawJ. D.TepperB. J.AquinoK. (2012). A social context model of envy and social undermining. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 643-666. doi:10.5465/amj.2009.0804
10.
FaulmüllerN.CrusiusJ. (2014). The social costs of cognitive enhancement. Manuscript in preparation.
11.
FosterG. M. (1972). The anatomy of envy: A study in symbolic behavior. Current Anthropology, 13, 165-202. doi:10.1086/201267
12.
GibbonsF. X.BuunkB. P. (1999). Individual differences in social comparison: Development of a scale of social comparison orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 129-142. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.1.129
13.
GoldB. T. (1996). Enviousness and its relationship to maladjustment and psychopathology. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 311-321. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(96)00081-5
14.
HepperE. G.GramzowR. H.SedikidesC. (2010). Individual differences in self-enhancement and self-protection strategies: An integrative analysis. Journal of Personality, 78, 781-814. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00633.x
15.
HillS. E.DelPrioreD. J.VaughanP. W. (2011). The cognitive consequences of envy: Attention, memory, and self-regulatory depletion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 653-666. doi:10.1037/a0023904
16.
HofstedeG.HofstedeG. J.MinkovM. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
17.
KrizanZ.JoharO. (2012). Envy divides the two faces of narcissism: Narcissism and envy. Journal of Personality, 80, 1415-1451. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00767.x
18.
KühnenU.HannoverB. (2000). Assimilation and contrast in social comparisons as a consequence of self-construal activation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 799-811. doi:10.1002/1099-0992(200011/12)30:6<799::AID-EJSP16>3.0.CO;2-2
19.
LangJ. W. B.FriesS. (2006). A revised 10-item version of the Achievement Motives Scale. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22, 216-224. doi:10.1027/1015-5759.22.3.216
20.
LangeJ.CrusiusJ.HagemeyerB. (2014). Bringing light into envy’s darkness: On the relation of dispositional envy and the Dark Triad. Manuscript in preparation.
21.
LangeJ.HagemeyerB.CrusiusJ. (2014). The Evil Queen’s dilemma: Linking narcissistic admiration and rivalry to benign and malicious envy. Manuscript in preparation.
22.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
23.
McClellandD. C.AtkinsonJ. W.ClarkR.LowellE. L. (1953). The achievement motive. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
24.
MeadeA. W.CraigS. B. (2012). Identifying careless responses in survey data. Psychological Methods, 17, 437-455. doi:10.1037/a0028085
25.
MoranS.SchweitzerM. E. (2008). When better is worse: Envy and the use of deception. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 1, 3-29. doi:10.1111/j.1750-4716.2007.00002.x
26.
MussweilerT. (2003). Comparison processes in social judgment: Mechanisms and consequences. Psychological Review, 110, 472-489. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.472
27.
MussweilerT.RüterK.EpstudeK. (2004). The man who wasn’t there: Subliminal social comparison standards influence self-evaluation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 689-696. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2004.01.004
28.
ParksC. D.RumbleA. C.PoseyD. C. (2002). The effects of envy on reciprocation in a social dilemma. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 509-520. doi:10.1177/0146167202287008
29.
ParrottW. G.SmithR. H. (1993). Distinguishing the experiences of envy and jealousy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 906-920. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.6.906
30.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
31.
RawlsJ. (1999). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32.
SaloveyP.RodinJ. (1984). Some antecedents and consequences of social-comparison jealousy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 780-792. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.47.4.780
33.
SayersD. L. (1969). The other six deadly sins. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & World.
34.
SchaubroeckJ.LamS. S. K. (2004). Comparing lots before and after: Promotion rejectees’ invidious reactions to promotees. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 94, 33-47. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2004.01.001
SmithR. H.ParrottW. G.DienerE. F.HoyleR. H.KimS. H. (1999). Dispositional envy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1007-1020. doi:10.1177/01461-672992511008
37.
SmithR. H.TurnerT. J.GaronzikR.LeachC. W.Urch-DruskatV.WestonC. M. (1996). Envy and Schadenfreude. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 158-168. doi:10.1177/0146167296222005
38.
TeuberH. L. (1955). Physiological psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 6, 267-296. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.06.020155.001411
39.
Van de VenN.HooglandC.SmithR. H.Van DijkW. W.BreugelmansS. M.ZeelenbergM. (2014). When envy leads to Schadenfreude. Cognition and Emotion. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/02699931.2014.961903
40.
Van de VenN.ZeelenbergM.PietersR. (2009). Leveling up and down: The experiences of benign and malicious envy. Emotion, 9, 419-429. doi:10.1037/a0015669
41.
Van de VenN.ZeelenbergM.PietersR. (2011a). Appraisal patterns of envy and related emotions. Motivation and Emotion, 36, 195-204. doi:10.1007/s11031-011-9235-8
42.
Van de VenN.ZeelenbergM.PietersR. (2011b). The envy premium in product evaluation. The Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 984-998. doi:10.1086/657239
43.
Van de VenN.ZeelenbergM.PietersR. (2011c). Why envy outperforms admiration. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 784-795. doi:10.1177/0146167211400421
44.
Van DijkW. W.OuwerkerkJ. W.GoslingaS.NiewegM.GallucciM. (2006). When people fall from grace: Reconsidering the role of envy in Schadenfreude. Emotion, 6, 156-160. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.6.1.156
45.
VeselkaL.GiammarcoE. A.VernonP. A. (2014). The Dark Triad and the seven deadly sins. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 75-80. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.055
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
