Henrich, Heine, and Norenzayan summarized cultural differences in psychology and argued that people from one particular culture are outliers: people from societies that are Western, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic (WEIRD). This study shows that liberals think WEIRDer than conservatives. In five studies with more than 5,000 participants, we found that liberals think more analytically (an element of WEIRD thought) than moderates and conservatives. Study 3 replicates this finding in the very different political culture of China, although it held only for people in more modernized urban centers. These results suggest that liberals and conservatives in the same country think as if they were from different cultures. Studies 4 to 5 show that briefly training people to think analytically causes them to form more liberal opinions, whereas training them to think holistically causes shifts to more conservative opinions.
AdlerN. E.EpelE. S.CastellazzoG.IckovicsJ. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy White women. Health Psychology, 19, 586-592.
2.
AnsonJ. M.MotylM.CoolidgeF. L. (under review). The AMPOS: A four-factor scale predicting political orientation, party affiliation, and voting behavior.
3.
BurdenB. C.KlofstadC. A. (2005). Affect and cognition in party identification. Political Psychology, 26, 869-886.
4.
ChiuL.-H. (1972). A cross-cultural comparison of cognitive styles in Chinese and American children. International Journal of Psychology, 7, 235-242.
5.
ChoiI.DalalR.Kim-PrietoC.ParkH. (2003). Culture and judgement of causal relevance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 46-59.
6.
CohenG. L. (2003). Party over policy: The dominating impact of group influence on political beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 808-822.
7.
FrederickS. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 25-42.
8.
GrahamJ.HaidtJ.NosekB. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1029-1046.
9.
GrossN. (2013). Why are professors liberal and why do conservatives care?Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
HaidtJ. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
11.
HawkinsC. B.NosekB. A. (2012a). [Libertarian response options]. Unpublished raw data.
12.
HawkinsC. B.NosekB. A. (2012b). Motivated independence? Implicit party identity predicts political judgment among self-proclaimed independents. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1437-1452.
13.
HenrichJ.HeineS. J.NorenzayanA. (2010). The weirdest people in the world?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61-135.
14.
HunterJ. D. (1991). Culture wars: The struggle to define America. New York, NY: Basic Books.
15.
IyerR.KolevaS.GrahamJ.DittoP. H.HaidtJ. (2012). Understanding libertarian morality: The psychological dispositions of self-identified libertarians. PLoS ONE, 7(8), e42366.
16.
Janoff-BulmanR. (2009). To provide or protect: Motivational bases of political liberalism and conservatism. Psychological Inquiry, 20, 120-128.
17.
JiL. J.ZhangZ.NisbettR. E. (2004). Is it culture or is it language? Examination of language effects in cross-cultural research on categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 57-65.
18.
JohnO. P.SrivastavaS. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In PervinL. A.JohnO. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality theory and research (pp. 102-138). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
19.
JostJ. T. (2006). The end of the end of ideology. American Psychologist, 61, 651-670.
20.
JostJ. T.FedericoC. M.NapierJ. L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307-333.
21.
JostJ. T.GlaserJ.KruglanskiA. W.SullowayF. (2003). Exceptions that prove the rule: Using a theory of motivated social cognition to account for ideological incongruities and political anomalies. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 383-393.
22.
JostJ. T.NosekB. A.GoslingS. D. (2008). Ideology: Its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 126-136.
23.
KashimaY.KokuboT.KashimaE. S.BoxallD.YamaguchiS.MacraeK. (2004). Culture and self: Are there within-culture differences in self between metropolitan areas and regional cities. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 816-823.
24.
KaufmannK. M.PetrocikJ. R. (1999). The changing politics of American men: Understanding the sources of the gender gap. American Journal of Political Science, 43, 864-887.
25.
KitayamaS.DuffyS.KawamuraT.LarsenJ. T. (2003). Perceiving an object and its context in different cultures: A cultural look at new look. Psychological Science, 14, 201-206.
26.
KuhnenU.OysermanD. (2002). Thinking about the self influences thinking in general: Cognitive consequences of salient self-concept. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 492-499.
27.
LevenduskyM. (2009). The partisan sort: How liberals became Democrats and conservatives became Republicans. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
28.
MasudaT.NisbettR. E. (2001). Attending holistically versus analytically: Comparing the context sensitivity of Japanese and Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 922-934.
29.
MorrisM. W.PengK. (1994). Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 949-971.
30.
NaJ.GrossmannI.VarnumM. E. W.KitayamaS.GonzalezR.NisbettR. E. (2010). Cultural differences are not always reducible to individual differences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107, 6192-6197.
31.
NisbettR. E.PengK.ChoiI.NorenzayanA. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108, 291-310.
32.
OysermanD.LeeS. (2008). Does culture influence what and how we think? Effects of priming individualism and collectivism. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 311-342.
33.
SidaniusJ. (1984). Political interest, political information search, and ideological homogeneity as a function of sociopolitical ideology: A tale of three theories. Human Relations, 37, 811-828.
34.
SkitkaL. J.MullenE.GriffinT.HutchinsonS.ChamberlinB. (2002). Dispositions, scripts, or motivated correction? Understanding ideological differences in explanations for social problems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 470-487.
35.
TalhelmT.ZhangX.OishiS.ChenS.DuanD.LanX.KitayamaS. (2014). Discovery of large-scale psychological differences within China explained by rice vs. wheat agriculture. Science, 344, 603-608.
36.
TetlockP. E. (2000). Cognitive biases and organizational correctives: Do both disease and cure depend on the politics of the beholder?Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 293-326.
37.
TetlockP. E.BoettgerR. (1989). Cognitive and rhetorical styles of traditionalist and reformist Soviet politicians: A content analysis study. Political Psychology, 10, 209-232.
38.
TetlockP. E.HannumK. A.MichelettiP. M. (1984). Stability and change in the complexity of senatorial debate: Testing the cognitive versus rhetorical style hypotheses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 979-990.
39.
TrafimowD.TriandisH.GotoS. (1991). Some tests of the distinction between the private self and the collective self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 649-655.
40.
TriandisH. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
41.
Van HielA.OnraetE.De PauwS. (2010). The relationship between social-cultural attitudes and behavioral measures of cognitive style: A meta-analytic integration of studies. Journal of Personality, 78, 1765-1799.
42.
VarnumM. E. W.GrossmanI.KitayamaS.NisbettR. E. (2010). The origin of cultural differences in cognition: The social orientation hypothesis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 9-13.
43.
WitkinH. A.GoodenoughD. R. (1977). Field dependence and interpersonal behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 661-689.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
