The degree to which self-esteem hinges on feedback in a domain is known as a contingency of self-worth, or engagement. Although previous research has conceptualized engagement as stable, it would be advantageous for individuals to dynamically regulate engagement. The current research examined whether the tendency to disengage from negative feedback accounts for variability in self-esteem. We created the Adaptive Disengagement Scale (ADS) to capture individual differences in the tendency to disengage self-esteem from negative outcomes. Results demonstrated that the ADS is reliable and valid (Studies 1 and 2). Furthermore, in response to negative social feedback, higher scores on the ADS predicted greater state self-esteem (Study 3), and this relationship was mediated by disengagement (Study 4). These findings demonstrate that adaptive disengagement protects self-esteem from negative outcomes and that the ADS is a valid measure of individual differences in the implementation of this process.
AronA.MelinatE.AronE. N.ValloneR. D.BatorR. J. (1997). The experimental generation of interpersonal closeness: A procedure and some preliminary findings. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 363-377.
2.
BaumeisterR. F.BratslavskyE.FinkenauerC.VohsK. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323-370.
3.
BongersK. C. A.DijksterhuisA.SpearsR. (2009). Self-esteem regulation after success and failure to attain unconsciously activated goals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 468-77.
4.
BlockJ.KremenA. M. (1996). IQ and ego-resiliency: Conceptual and empirical connections and separateness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 349-361.
5.
BrownJ. M.MillerW. R.LawendowskiL. A. (1999). The Self-Regulation Questionnaire. In VandeCreekL.JacksonT. L. (Eds.), Innovations in clinical practice: A source book (Vol. 17, pp. 281-292). Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.
6.
CarverC. S.ScheierM. F.WeintraubJ. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 267-283.
7.
CostaP. T.Jr.McCraeR. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI): Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
8.
CramerP. (2000). Development of identity: Gender makes a difference. Journal of Research in Personality, 34, 42-72.
9.
CrockerJ. (2002). The costs of seeking self-esteem. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 597-615.
10.
CrockerJ.KarpinskiA.QuinnD. M.ChaseS. K. (2003). When grades determine self-worth: Consequences of contingent self-worth for male and female engineering and psychology majors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 507-516.
11.
CrockerJ.LuhtanenR. K.CooperM. L.BouvretteA. (2003). Contingencies of self-worth in college students: Theory and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 894-908.
12.
CrockerJ.MajorB. (1989). Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. Psychological Review, 96, 608-630.
13.
CrockerJ.SommersS. R.LuhtanenR. K. (2002). Hopes dashed and dream fulfilled: Contingencies of self-worth and graduate school admissions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1275-1286.
14.
CrockerJ.WolfeC. T. (2001). Contingencies of self-worth. Psychological Review, 108, 593-623.
15.
EdwardsJ. R.LambertL. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12, 1-22.
16.
FitzsimonsH. M.BarghJ. A. (2004). Automatic self-regulation. In BaumeisterR. F.VohsK. D. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (pp. 150-170). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
17.
FreemanJ. B.AmbadyN. (2010). MouseTracker: Software for studying real-time mental processing using a computer mouse-tracking method. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 226-241.
18.
FreemanJ. B.DaleR.FarmerT. A. (2011). Hand in motion reveals mind in motion. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 1-6.
19.
GrabeS.HydeJ. S. (2006). Ethnicity and body dissatisfaction among women in the United States: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 622-640.
20.
GramzowR. H.WillardG.MendesW. B. (2008). Big tales and cool heads: Academic exaggeration is related to cardiac vagal reactivity. Emotion, 8, 138-144.
21.
GratzK. L.RoemerL. (2004). Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26, 41-54.
22.
GyurakA.GrossJ. J.EtkinA. (2011). Explicit and implicit emotion regulation: A dual-process framework. Cognition and Emotion, 25, 400-412.
23.
HeathertonT. F.PolivyJ. (1991). Development and validation of a scale for measuring state self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 895-910.
24.
HepperE. G.GramzowR. H.SedikidesC. (2010). Individual differences in self-enhancement and self-protection strategies: An integrative analysis. Journal of Personality, 78, 781-814.
25.
HorbergE. J.ChenS. (2010). Significant others and contingencies of self-worth: Activation and consequences of relationship-specific contingencies of self-worth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 77-91.
26.
JohnsonK. L.FreemanJ. B.PaukerK. (2012). Race is gendered: How covarying phenotypes and stereotypes bias sex categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 116-131.
27.
LearyM. R.GallagherB.ForsE.ButtermoreN.BaldwinE.KennedyK.MillsA. (2003). The invalidity of disclaimers about the effects of social feedback on self-esteem. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 623-636.
28.
LeitnerJ. B.ForbesC. E. (in press). The role of implicit mechanisms in buffering self-esteem from social threats. In JinZ. (Ed.), Exploring implicit cognition: Learning, memory, and social-cognitive processes. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
29.
LeitnerJ. B.HehmanE.JonesJ. M.ForbesC. E. (2014). Self-enhancement influences medial frontal cortex alpha power to social rejection feedback. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. Advance online publication. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00645
30.
LeitnerJ. B.JonesJ. M.HehmanE. (2013). Succeeding in the face of threat: The adaptive role of engagement regulation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 17-27.
31.
MajorB.SchmaderT. (1998). Coping with stigma through psychological disengagement. In SwimJ.StangorC. (Eds.), Prejudice: The target’s perspective (pp. 220-243). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
32.
MajorB.SpencerS.SchmaderT.WolfeC.CrockerJ. (1998). Coping with negative stereotypes about intellectual performance: The role of psychological disengagement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 34-50.
33.
MuravenM.BaumeisterR. F. (2000). Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle?Psychological Bulletin, 126, 247-259.
34.
NezlekJ. B.GableS. L. (2001). Depression as a moderator of relationships between positive daily events and day-to-day psychological adjustment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1692-1704.
35.
NussbaumA. D.SteeleC. M. (2007). Situational disengagement and persistence in the face of adversity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 127-134.
36.
O’KeefeP. A.Ben-EliyahuA.Linnenbrink-GarciaL. (2013). Shaping achievement goal orientations in a mastery-structured environment and concomitant changes in related contingencies of self-worth. Motivation and Emotion, 37, 50-64.
37.
ParkL. E.CrockerJ.KieferA. K. (2007). Contingencies of self-worth, academic failure, and goal pursuit. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1503-1517.
38.
ParkL. E.CrockerJ.MickelsonK. D. (2004). Attachment styles and contingencies of self-worth. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1243-1254.
39.
PearlinL. I.SchoolerC. (1978). The structure of coping. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 19, 2-21.
40.
PelhamB. W.SwannW. B. (1989). From self-conceptions to self-worth: On the sources and structure of global self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 672-680.
41.
RosenbergM. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
42.
RyffC. D.KeyesC. L. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719-727.
43.
SanitiosoR. B.WlodarskiR. (2004). In search of information that confirms a desired self-perception: Motivated processing of social feedback and choice of social interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 412-422.
44.
ScheierM. F.CarverC. S.BridgesM. W. (1994). Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): A reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1063-1078.
45.
SchmaderT.MajorB.GramzowR. H. (2001). Coping with ethnic stereotypes in the academic domain: Perceived injustice and psychological disengagement. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 93-111.
46.
SivoS. A.FanX.WittaE. L.WillseJ. T. (2006). The search for “optimal” cutoff properties: Fit index criteria in structural equation modeling. The Journal of Experimental Education, 74, 267-288.
47.
StrahanE. J.LafranceA.WilsonA. E.EthierN.SpencerS. J.ZannaM. P. (2008). Victoria’s dirty secret: How sociocultural norms influence adolescent girls and women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 288-301.
48.
TaylorS. E.BurklundL. J.EisenbergerN. I.LehmanB. J.HilmertC. J.LiebermanM. D. (2008). Neural bases of moderation of cortisol stress responses by psychosocial resources. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 197-211.
49.
TaylorS. E.LernerJ. S.ShermanD. K.SageR. M.McDowellN. K. (2003). Are self-enhancing cognitions associated with healthy or unhealthy biological profiles?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 605-615.
50.
TesserA.CrepazN.CollinsJ. C.CornellD.BeachS. R. (2000). Confluence of self-esteem regulation mechanisms: On integrating the self-zoo. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1476-1489.
51.
TwengeJ. M.CrockerJ. (2002). Race and self-esteem: Meta-analyses comparing whites, blacks, Hispanics, Asians, and American Indians and comment on Gray-Little and Hafdahl (2000). Psychological Bulletin, 128, 371-408.
52.
WilliamsK. D.CheungC. K. T.ChoiW. (2000). Cyberostracism: Effects of being ignored over the Internet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 748-762.
53.
WroschC.AmirE.MillerG. E. (2011). Goal adjustment capacities, coping, and subjective well-being: The sample case of caregiving for a family member with mental illness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 934-936.
54.
WroschC.ScheierM. F.CarverC. S.SchulzR. (2003). The importance of goal disengagement in adaptive self-regulation: When giving up is beneficial. Self and Identity, 2, 1-20.
55.
WroschC.ScheierM. F.MillerG. E.SchulzR.CarverC. S. (2003). Adaptive self-regulation of unattainable goals: Goal disengagement, goal reengagement, and subjective well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1494-1508.
56.
YuZ.WangF.WangD.BastinM. (2012). Beyond reacting times: Incorporating mouse-tracking measures into the implicit association test to examine its underlying process. Social Cognition, 30, 289-306.
57.
ZadroL.BolandC.RichardsonR. (2006). How long does it last? The persistence of the effects of ostracism in the socially anxious. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 692-697.
58.
ZadroL.WilliamsK. D.RichardsonR. (2004). How low can you go? Ostracism by a computer is sufficient to lower self-reported levels of belonging, control, self-esteem, and meaningful existence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 560-567.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
