People often weight information about the self more heavily than information about other people when making social comparative judgments. One possible explanation for this egocentrism is that information about the self is more accessible than information about others. We examine this egocentrism in samples from the United States and Taiwan. Study 1 finds egocentrism in comparisons of the self with the average other person in both cultures. Study 2 measured reaction times, demonstrating that (a) information about the self is more accessible than information about the average other and (b) as the accessibility of self-information increases, so does the influence of that information. Study 3 replicates Study 2, using comparisons with a specific other person. Egocentrism occurred in both cultures, suggesting that heavier weighting of self-information occurs across the traditional East–West cultural divide.
AlickeM. D.GovorunO. (2005). The better-than-average effect. In AlickeM. D.DunningD. A.KruegerJ. (Eds.), The self in social judgment (pp. 85-106). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
2.
AlickeM. D.KlotzM. L.BreitenbecherD. L.YurakT. J.VredenburgD. S. (1995). Personal contact, individuation, and the better-than-average effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 804-825.
3.
BarghJ. A.FergusonM. J. (2000). Beyond behaviorism: On the automaticity of higher mental processes. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 925-945.
4.
BresnahanM. J.ChiuH. C.LevineT. R. (2004). Self-construal as a predictor of communal and exchange orientation in Taiwan and the USA. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 7, 187-203. doi:10.1111/j.1467-839x.2004.00144.x
5.
BrewerM. B.ChenY. (2007). Where (who) are collectives in collectivism? Toward conceptual clarification of individualism and collectivism. Psychological Review, 114, 133-151. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.133
6.
CatramboneR.BeikeD.NiedenthalP. (1996). Is the self-concept a habitual referent in judgments of similarity?Psychological Science, 7, 158-163.
7.
ChambersJ. R.WindschitlP. D. (2004). Biases in social comparative judgments: The role of nonmotivated factors in above-average and comparative-optimism effects. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 813-838. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.5.813
8.
ChanS.ChambersJ. R.KrugerJ. (2013). Out of sight, out of mind: On the irrational side of egocentrism in social comparisons. Unpublished manuscript.
9.
CrossS. E.BaconP. L.MorrisM. L. (2000). The relational-interdependent self-construal and relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 791-808. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.791
10.
DunningD.HayesA. F. (1996). Evidence for egocentric comparison in social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 213-229.
11.
FernándezI.PaezD.GonzálezJ. L. (2005). Independent and interdependent self-construals and socio-cultural factors in 29 nations. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 18, 35-63.
12.
HeineS. J. (2005). Where is the evidence for pancultural self-enhancement? A reply to Sedikides, Gaertner, and Toguchi (2003). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 531-538. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.531
13.
HeineS. J.HamamuraT. (2007). In search of East Asian self-enhancement. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 4-27. doi:10.1177/1088868306294587
14.
HeineS. J.LehmanD. R. (1997). The cultural construction of self-enhancement: An examination of group-serving biases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1268-1283.
15.
HeineS. J.LehmanD. R.MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1999). Is there a universal need for positive self-regard?Psychological Review, 106, 766-794.
16.
HenrichJ.HeineS.NorenzayanA. (2010). The weirdest people in the world?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 1-75. doi:10.1017/S0140525X0999152X
17.
HofstedeG. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
18.
HofstedeG.HofstedeG. J.MinkovM. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
19.
HoxJ. (2002). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20.
JarvisB. G. (2008). MediaLab (Version 2008.1.13) [Computer software]. New York, NY: Empirisoft Corporation.
21.
KlarY.GiladiE. (1999). Are most people happier than their peers, or are they just happy?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 586-595. doi:10.1177/0146167299025005004
22.
KoopmansL. H.OwenD. B.RosenblattJ. I. (1964). Confidence intervals for the coefficient of variation for the normal and log normal distributions. Biometrika, 51, 25-32. doi:10.1093/biomet/51.1-2.25
23.
KrugerJ. (1999). Lake Wobegon be gone! The “below-average effect” and the egocentric nature of comparative ability judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 221-232.
24.
KrugerJ.WindschitlP. D.BurrusJ.FesselF.ChambersJ. R. (2008). The rational side of egocentrism in social comparisons. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 220-232. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2007.04.001
25.
KrullD. S.LoyM. H.LinJ.WangC.ChenS.ZhaoX. (1999). The fundamental fundamental attribution error: Correspondence bias in indvidualist and collectivist cultures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1208-1219. doi:10.1177/0146167299258003
26.
KuiperN. A.RogersT. B. (1979). Encoding of personal information: Self-other differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 499-514. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.4.499
27.
KurmanJ. (2001). Self-enhancement: Is it restricted to individualistic cultures?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12, 1705-1716.
28.
LeeI. (2013). National Chengchi University. Unpublished raw data.
29.
MenonG.RaghubirP. (2003). Ease-of-retrieval as an automatic input in judgments: A mere-accessibility framework?Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 230-243.
30.
MenonG.RaghubirP.SchwarzN. (1995). Behavioral frequency judgments: An accessibility-diagnosticity framework. Journal of Consumer Research, 22, 212-228.
31.
MooreD. A. (2007). Not so above average after all: When people believe they are worse than average and its implications for theories of bias in social comparison. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102, 42-58. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.09.005
32.
MooreD. A.SmallD. A. (2007). Error and bias in comparative judgment: On being both better and worse than we think we are. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 972-989. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.972
33.
NisbettR. E. (2003). The geography of thought: How Asians and Westerners think differently . . . and why. New York, NY: Free Press.
34.
OishiS. (2000). Goals as cornerstones of subjective well-being: Linking individuals with cultures. In DienerE. F.SuhE. M. (Eds.), Subjective well-being across cultures (pp. 87-112). Cambridge: MIT Press.
35.
OysermanD.CoonH. M.KemmelmeierM. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 3-72. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.3
36.
SedikidesC.GaertnerL.ToguchiY. (2003). Pancultural self-enhancement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 60-79.
37.
SedikidesC.GaertnerL.VeveaJ. L. (2005). Pancultural self-enhancement reloaded: A meta-analytic reply to Heine (2005). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 539-551. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.539
38.
WhelanR. (2008). Effective analysis of reaction time data. The Psychological Record, 58, 475-482.
39.
WuS.KeysarB. (2007). The effect of culture on perspective-taking. Psychological Science, 18, 600-606. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01946.x
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
