We examined whether sexual similarity, complementarity, and perceptual accuracy exist within a large sample of heterosexual couples. Partners exhibited similarity and complementarity of sexual preferences, and they perceived each other’s preferences with a considerable degree of accuracy; these effects were greater than found in randomly assigned pseudocouples. In addition, people overperceived sexual similarity and complementarity, and they overperceived the accuracy with which their partner knew their preferences. We suggest these three forms of overperception are the result of motivated cognitive processes in service of sexual relationship maintenance. Using actor–partner interdependence modeling (Kenny, Kashy, & Cook, 2006), overperception predicted sexual satisfaction, as did complementarity, but similarity and accuracy did not. These findings indicate that motivated cognition may foster sexual satisfaction, as theories of motivated relationship cognitions suggest.
AcitelliL. K.KennyD. A.WeinerD. (2001). The importance of similarity and understanding of partners’ marital ideals to relationship satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 8, 167-185.
2.
AndersonC.KeltnerD.JohnO. P. (2003). Emotional convergence between people over time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1054.
3.
BassonR. (2005). Women’s sexual dysfunction: Revised and expanded definitions. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 172, 1327-1333.
4.
BerscheidE.ReisH. T. (1998). Attraction and close relationships. In GilbertD.FiskeS. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 193-281). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
5.
BothS.EveraerdW.LaanE.JanssenE. (2007). Desire emerges from excitement: A psychophysiological perspective on sexual motivation. In JanssenE. (Ed.), The psychophysiology of sex (pp. 327-339). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
6.
CohenJ.CohenP.WestS. G.AikenL. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
ConleyT. D.ZieglerA.MoorsA. C.MatsickJ. L.ValentineB. (2013). A critical examination of popular assumptions about the benefits and outcomes of monogamous relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 124-141.
8.
DecuyperM.De BolleM.De FruytF. (2012). Personality similarity, perceptual accuracy, and relationship satisfaction in dating and married couples. Personal Relationships, 19, 128-145.
9.
de JongD. C. (2009). The role of attention in sexual arousal: Implications for treatment of sexual dysfunction. Journal of Sex Research, 46, 237-248.
10.
de JongD. C.ReisH. T. (2014). We have the best sex! Commitment and positive construals of sex. Manuscript submitted for publication.
11.
DunneM. P. (2002). Sampling considerations. In WiedermanM. W.WhitleyB. E. (Eds.), Handbook for conducting research on human sexuality (pp. 85-112). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
EdwardsJ. N.BoothA. (1994). Sexuality, marriage, and well-being: The middle years. In RossiA. S. (Ed.), Sexuality across the life course (pp. 233-259). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
13.
FinkenauerC.RighettiF. (2011). Understanding in close relationships: An interpersonal approach. European Review of Social Psychology, 22, 316-363.
14.
FletcherG. J. O.KerrP. S. G. (2010). Through the eyes of love: Reality and illusion in intimate relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 627-658.
15.
FunkJ. L.RoggeR. D. (2007). Testing the ruler with item response theory: Increasing precision of measurement for relationship satisfaction with the Couples Satisfaction Index. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 572-583.
16.
GillM. J.SwannW. B. (2004). On what it means to know someone: A matter of pragmatics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 405-418.
17.
GurtmanM. B. (2001). Interpersonal complementarity: Integrating interpersonal measurement with interpersonal models. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48, 97-110.
18.
IckesW.SimpsonJ. A. (1997). Managing empathic accuracy in close relationships. In IckesW. (Ed.), Empathic accuracy (pp. 218-250). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
19.
JanssenE.EveraerdW.SpieringM.JanssenJ. (2000). Automatic processes and the appraisal of sexual stimuli: Toward an information processing model of sexual arousal. Journal of Sex Research, 37, 8-23.
20.
JanssenE.McBrideK. R.YarberW.HillB. J.ButlerS. M. (2008). Factors that influence sexual arousal in men: A focus group study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 252-265.
21.
KarneyB. R.BradburyT. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, methods, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 3-34.
22.
KennyD. A. (2004). PERSON: A general model of interpersonal perception. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 265-280.
23.
KennyD. A.KashyD. A.CookW. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
24.
LaumannE. O.NicolosiA.GlasserD. B.PaikA.GingellC.MoreiraE.WangT. (2004). Sexual problems among women and men aged 40-80 y: Prevalence and correlates identified in the Global Study of Sexual Attitudes and Behaviors. International Journal of Impotence Research, 17, 39-57.
25.
LawranceK.ByersE. S. (1998). Interpersonal exchange model of sexual satisfaction questionnaire. In DavisC. M.YarberW. L.BausermanR. (Eds.), Handbook of sexuality-related measures (pp. 514-519). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
26.
LemayE. P. J.ClarkM. S.FeeneyB. C. (2007). Projection of responsiveness to needs and the construction of satisfying communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 834-853.
27.
LetzringT. D.NoftleE. E. (2010). Predicting relationship quality from self-verification of broad personality traits among romantic couples. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 353-362.
28.
LoPiccoloJ.StegerJ. C. (1974). The Sexual Interaction Inventory: A new instrument for assessment of sexual dysfunction. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 3, 585-595.
29.
LuoS. H.KlohnenE. C. (2005). Assortative mating and marital quality in newlyweds: A couple-centered approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 304-326.
30.
MarkeyP. M.MarkeyC. N. (2009). Complementarity. In ReisH. T.SprecherS. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of human relationships (pp. 286-288). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
31.
McGrawK. O.WongS. P. (1996). Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods, 1, 30-46.
32.
MontoyaR. M.HortonR. S.KirchnerJ. (2008). Is actual similarity necessary for attraction? A meta-analysis of actual and perceived similarity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25, 889-922.
33.
MuiseA.ImpettE. A.KoganA.DesmaraisS. (2013). Keeping the spark alive: Being motivated to meet a partner’s sexual needs sustains sexual desire in long-term romantic relationships. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 4, 267-273.
34.
MurrayS. L. (1999). The quest for conviction: Motivated cognition in romantic relationships. Psychological Inquiry, 10, 23-34.
35.
MurrayS. L.GriffinD. W.DerrickJ. L.HarrisB.AloniM.LederS. (2011). Tempting fate or inviting happiness? Unrealistic idealization prevents the decline of marital satisfaction in newlyweds. Psychological Science, 22, 619-626.
36.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.AloniM.PinkusR. T.DerrickJ. L.LederS. (2009). Commitment insurance: Compensating for the autonomy costs of interdependence in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 256-278.
37.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.BellaviaG.GriffinD. W.DoldermanD. (2002). Kindred spirits? The benefits of egocentrism in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 563-581.
38.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.CollinsN. L. (2006). Optimizing assurance: The risk regulation system in relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 641-666.
39.
OgginsJ.LeberD.VeroffJ. (1993). Race and gender differences in Black and White newlyweds’ perceptions of sexual and marital relations. Journal of Sex Research, 30, 152-160.
40.
OverallN. C.FletcherG. J. O. (2010). Perceiving regulation from intimate partners: Reflected appraisal and self-regulation processes in close relationships. Personal Relationships, 17, 433-456.
41.
PeplauL. A. (2003). Human sexuality: How do men and women differ?Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 37-40.
42.
PollmannM. M.FinkenauerC. (2009). Investigating the role of two types of understanding in relationship well-being: Understanding is more important than knowledge. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1512-1527.
43.
PurnineD. M.CareyM. P. (1997). Interpersonal communication and sexual adjustment: The roles of understanding and agreement. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 1017-1025.
44.
PurnineD. M.CareyM. P. (1999). Dyadic coorientation: Reexamination of a method for studying interpersonal communication. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 28, 45-62.
45.
ReganP. C. (2004). Sex and the attraction process: Lessons from science (and Shakespeare) on lust, love, chastity, and fidelity. In HarveyJ. H.WenzelA.SprecherS. (Eds.), The handbook of sexuality in close relationships (pp. 115-133). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
46.
ReisH. T.ClarkM. S.HolmesJ. G. (2004). Perceived partner responsiveness as an organizing construct in the study of intimacy and closeness. In MashekD.AronA. (Eds.), Handbook of closeness and intimacy (pp. 201-225). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
47.
ReisH. T.ShaverP. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. In MashekD. J.AronA. (Eds.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research and interventions (pp. 367-389). Oxford, UK: John Wiley.
48.
RubinH.CampbellL. (2012). Day-to-day changes in intimacy predict heightened relationship passion, sexual occurrence, and sexual satisfaction: A dyadic diary analysis. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 3, 224-231.
49.
RusbultC. E.OlsenN.DavisJ. L.HannonP. A. (2001). Commitment and relationship maintenance mechanisms. In HarveyJ. H.WenzelA. (Eds.), Close romantic relationships: Maintenance and enhancement (pp. 87-113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
50.
SadlerP.EthierN.WoodyE. (2011). Interpersonal complementarity. In HorowitzL. M.StrackM. (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal psychology: Theory, research, assessment, and therapeutic interventions (pp. 123-142). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
51.
ScheibehenneB.MataJ.ToddP. M. (2011). Older but not wiser—Predicting a partner’s preferences gets worse with age. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21, 184-191.
52.
SprecherS. (2002). Sexual satisfaction in premarital relationships: Associations with satisfaction, love, commitment, and stability. Journal of Sex Research, 39, 190-196.
53.
TomlinsonJ. M.AronA.CarmichaelC. L.ReisH. T.HolmesJ. G. (2014). The costs of being put on a pedestal: Effects of feeling over-idealized. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 384-409.
54.
WatsonD.KlohnenE. C.CasillasA.Nus SimmsE.HaigJ.BerryD. S. (2004). Match makers and deal breakers: Analyses of assortative mating in newlywed couples. Journal of Personality, 72, 1029-1068.
55.
WegnerD. M.ErberR.RaymondP. (1991). Transactive memory in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 923-929.
56.
WhiteS. G.HatcherC. (1984). Couple complementarity and similarity: A review of the literature. American Journal of Family Therapy, 12, 15-25.
57.
WinchR. F.KtsanesT.KtsanesV. (1954). The theory of complementary needs in mate-selection: An analytic and descriptive study. American Sociological Review, 19, 241-249.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
