Humans are essentialists: They believe hidden “essences” underlie membership in natural and social kinds. Although essentialism has well-established implications for important societal issues (e.g., discrimination), little is known about its origins. According to a recent proposal, essentialism emerges from a broader inherence heuristic—an intuitive tendency to explain patterns in terms of the inherent properties of their constituents (e.g., we have orange juice for breakfast [pattern] because citrus aromas [inherent feature] wake us up). We tested two predictions of this proposal—that reliance on the inherence heuristic predicts endorsement of essentialist beliefs, even when adjusting for potentially confounding variables (Studies 1 and 2), and that reducing reliance on the inherence heuristic produces a downstream reduction in essentialist thought (Studies 3 and 4). The results were consistent with these predictions and thus provided evidence for a new theoretical perspective on the cognitive underpinnings of psychological essentialism.
BastianB.HaslamN. (2006). Psychological essentialism and stereotype endorsement. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 228-235.
3.
BentlerP. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
4.
BentlerP. M. (1995). EQS structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
5.
BloomP. (2004). Descartes’ baby: How the science of child development explains what makes us human. New York, NY: Basic Books.
6.
BryanC. J.DweckC. S.RossL.KayA. C.MislavskyN. O. (2009). Political mindset: Effects of schema priming on liberal–conservative political assessments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 890-895.
7.
ByrneA.HilbertD. R. (2003). Color realism and color science. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 26, 3-21.
8.
CacioppoJ. T.PettyR. E.KaoC. F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Measurement, 48, 306-307.
9.
ChandlerJ.MuellerP.PaolacciG. (2013). Nonnaïveté among Amazon Mechanical Turk workers: Consequences and solutions for behavioral researchers. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 112-130.
10.
CimpianA.SalomonE. (2014). The inherence heuristic: An intuitive means of making sense of the world, and a potential precursor to psychological essentialism. Behavioral & Brain Sciences. Advance online publication. doi:10.1017/S0140525X13002197
11.
CimpianA.SalomonE. (in press). Refining and expanding the proposal of an inherence heuristic in human understanding. Behavioral & Brain Sciences.
12.
CouchA.KenistonK. (1960). Yeasayers and naysayers: Agreeing response set as a personality variable. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 60, 151-174.
13.
CrowneD. P.MarloweD. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349.
14.
CummingG. (2012). Understanding the new statistics. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
15.
CummingG. (2014). The new statistics: Why and how. Psychological Science, 25, 7-29.
16.
Dar-NimrodI.HeineS. J. (2011). Genetic essentialism: On the deceptive determinism of DNA. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 800-818.
17.
DosherB. A. (1984). Degree of learning and retrieval speed: Study time and multiple exposures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 541-574.
18.
EpleyN.GilovichT. (2006). The anchoring-and-adjustment heuristic: Why the adjustments are insufficient. Psychological Science, 17, 311-318.
19.
FieldA. P.GillettR. (2010). How to do a meta-analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 63, 665-694.
20.
FinucaneM. L.GullionC. M. (2010). Developing a tool for measuring the decision-making competence of older adults. Psychology and Aging, 25, 271-288.
21.
FletcherG. F.DanilovicsP.FernandezG.PetersonD.ReederG. D. (1986). Attributional complexity: An individual differences measure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 875-884.
22.
FrederickS. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 25-42.
23.
GelmanS. A. (2003). The essential child: Origins of essentialism in everyday thought. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
24.
GilbertD. T.MaloneP. S. (1995). The correspondence bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 21-38.
25.
GilovichT.GriffinD.KahnemanD. (2002). Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
26.
GopnikA. (1998). Explanation as orgasm. Minds and Machines, 8, 101-118.
27.
GoughH. G. (1979). A creative personality scale for the Adjective Check List. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1398-1405.
HaslamN.RothschildL.ErnstD. (2000). Essentialist beliefs about social categories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 113-127.
30.
HaslamN.RothschildL.ErnstD. (2002). Are essentialist beliefs associated with prejudice?British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 87-100.
31.
HaslamN.WhelanJ. (2008). Human natures: Psychological essentialism in thinking about differences between people. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1297-1312.
32.
HayesA. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76, 408-420.
33.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
34.
HedgesL. V.VeveaJ. L. (1998). Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 3, 486-504.
35.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
36.
HussakL. J.CimpianA. (2014). Why do people think they live in a fair society? A new perspective on the cognitive origins of system justification. Manuscript in preparation.
37.
JonesE. E.HarrisV. A. (1967). The attribution of attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3, 1-24.
38.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R.NosekB. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881-919.
39.
KahnemanD. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
40.
KahnemanD.FrederickS. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In GilovichT.GriffinD.KahnemanD. (Eds.), Heuristics of intuitive judgment: Extensions and applications (pp. 49-81). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
41.
KayA. C.JostJ. T.YoungS. (2005). Victim derogation and victim enhancement as alternate routes to system justification. Psychological Science, 16, 240-246.
42.
KellerJ. (2005). In genes we trust: The biological component of psychological essentialism and its relationship to mechanisms of motivated social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 686-702.
43.
KennyD. A.KashyD. A. (1992). Analysis of the multitrait-multimethod matrix by confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 165-172.
44.
KruglanskiA. W.WebsterD. M.KlemA. (1993). Motivated resistance and openness to persuasion in the presence or absence of prior information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 861-876.
45.
LaszloP. (2007). Citrus: A history. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
46.
LeeI. A.PreacherK. J. (2013, September). Calculation for the Test of the Difference Between Two Dependent Correlations With One Variable in Common [Computer software]. Available from http://quantpsy.org
47.
LeslieS. J. (2013). Essence and natural kinds: When science meets preschooler intuition. In GendlerT.HawthorneJ. (Eds.), Oxford studies in epistemology (Vol. 4, pp. 108-166). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
48.
LevyS. R.StroessnerS. J.DweckC. S. (1998). Stereotype formation and endorsement: The role of implicit theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1421-1436.
LiberaliJ. M.ReynaV. F.FurlanS.SteinL. M.PardoS. T. (2011). Individual differences in numeracy and cognitive reflection, with implications for biases and fallacies in probability Judgment. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 25, 361-381.
51.
MacCallumR. C.BrowneM. W.SugawaraH. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130-149.
52.
MagloK. N. (2011). The case against biological realism about race: From Darwin to the post-genomic era. Perspectives on Science, 19, 361-390.
53.
MarshH. W. (1989). Confirmatory factor analyses of multitrait–multimethod data: Many problems and a few solutions. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13, 335-361.
54.
McRaeK.CreeG. S.SeidenbergM. S.McNorganC. (2005). Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 547-559.
55.
MedinD. L.OrtonyA. (1989). Psychological essentialism. In VosniadouS.OrtonyA. (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 179-195). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
56.
MehrabianA.SteflC. A. (1995). Basic temperament components of loneliness, shyness, and conformity. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 23, 253-263.
57.
MurphyG. L. (2004). The big book of concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
58.
MurphyG. L.MedinD. L. (1985). The role of theories in conceptual coherence. Psychological Review, 92, 289-316.
59.
NeedhamP. (2011). Microessentialism: What is the argument?Noûs, 45, 1-21.
60.
NewmanG. E.HerrmannP.WynnK.KeilF. C. (2008). Biases towards internal features in infants’ reasoning about objects. Cognition, 107, 420-432.
61.
NoS.HongY.LiaoH.LeeK.WoodD.ChaoM. M. (2008). Lay theory of race affects and moderates Asian Americans’ responses toward American culture. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 991-1004.
62.
PrattoF.SidaniusJ.StallworthL.MalleB. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763.
63.
RavenJ. C. (1960). Guide to the standard progressive matrices: Sets A, B, C, D and E.H. K. London, England: Lewis.
64.
RhodesM.GelmanS. A. (2009). A developmental examination of the conceptual structure of animal, artifact, and human social categories across two cultural contexts. Cognitive Psychology, 59, 244-274.
65.
RoetsA.Van HielA. (2011). The role of need for closure in essentialist entitativity beliefs and prejudice: An epistemic needs approach to racial categorization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 52-73.
66.
RoschE.MervisC. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573-605.
67.
RossL. D. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 173-220.
68.
RubinZ.PeplauL. A. (1975). Who believes in a just world?Journal of Social Issues, 31, 65-89.
69.
RuckerD. D.PreacherK. J.TormalaZ. L.PettyR. F. (2011). Mediation analysis in social psychology: Current practices and new recommendations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5, 359-371.
70.
SetohP.WuD.BaillargeonR.GelmanR. (2013). Young infants have biological expectations about animals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110, 15937-15942.
71.
SoberE. (1994). From a biological point of view. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
72.
StanovichK. E. (2011). Rationality and the reflective mind. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
73.
StanovichK. E.WestR. F. (1997). Reasoning independently of prior belief and individual differences in actively open-minded thinking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 342-357.
74.
StanovichK. E.WestR. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 23, 645-665.
75.
SteigerJ. H. (1980). Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 245-251.
76.
SteigerJ. H. (2007). Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modeling. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 893-898.
77.
StellmacherJ.PetzelT. (2005). Authoritarianism as a group phenomenon. Political Psychology, 26, 245-274.
78.
SutherlandS.CimpianA. (2014). Essentialism is an offshoot of a broader, earlier-developing inherence heuristic. Manuscript in preparation.
79.
TadmorC. T.ChaoM. M.HongY. Y.PolzerJ. T. (2013). Not just for stereotyping anymore: Racial essentialism reduces domain-general creativity. Psychological Science, 24, 99-105.
80.
ToplakM. E.WestR. F.StanovichK. E. (2011). The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks. Memory & Cognition, 39, 1275-1289.
WidamanK. F. (1985). Hierarchically nested covariance structure models for multitrait–multimethod data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 1-26.
85.
WilliamsM. J.EberhardtJ. L. (2008). Biological conceptions of race and the motivation to cross racial boundaries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1033-1047.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
