The Implicit Association Test (IAT) was designed to measure automatically activated attitudinal associations, free of the influence of processes that affect their expression. Subsequent research has shown that IAT performance also is influenced by non-associative processes, but the extent to which these non-associative processes are content-specific or if they operate similarly regardless of the attitude being measured has largely gone unexamined. In the current research, participants completed pairs of IATs that varied in conceptual overlap: Tests shared a high, moderate, or low degree of overlap in the measured attitudes. The Quad model was applied to estimate the contributions of four processes to IAT performance. Evidence was found for two relatively general, non-attitudinal processes and two relatively attitude-specific processes. Implications are discussed for interpretation of IAT scores, individual differences in IAT scores, and IAT score malleability.
AmodioD. M.DevineP. G. (2006). Stereotyping and evaluation in implicit race bias: Evidence for independent constructs and unique effects on behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 652-661.
2.
AsendorpfJ. B.BanseR.MückeD. (2002). Double dissociation between implicit and explicit personality self-concept: The case of shy behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 380-393.
3.
BatchelderW. H.RieferD. M. (1999). Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modeling. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 57-86.
4.
BeerJ. S.StallenM.LombardoM. V.GonsalkoraleK.CunninghamW. A.ShermanJ. W. (2008). The Quadruple Process model approach to examining the neural underpinnings of prejudice. NeuroImage, 43, 775-783.
5.
BrendlC. M.MarkmanA. B.MessnerC. (2001). How do indirect measures of evaluation work? Evaluating the inference of prejudice in the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 760-773.
6.
CalanchiniJ.GonsalkoraleK.ShermanJ. W.KlauerK. C. (2013). Counter-prejudicial training reduces activation of biased associations and enhances response monitoring. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 321-325.
7.
ChangB. P. I.MitchellC. (2011). Discriminating between the effects of valence and salience in the implicit association test. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 2251-2275.
8.
CohenJ. (Ed.). (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
CohenJ. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.
10.
ConnellyS. L.HasherL.ZacksR. T. (1991). Age and reading: The impact of distraction. Psychology and Aging, 6, 533-541.
11.
ConreyF. R.ShermanJ. W.GawronskiB.HugenbergK.GroomC. J. (2005). Separating multiple processes in implicit social cognition: The Quad Model of implicit task performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 469-487.
12.
De HouwerJ.GeldofT.De BruyckerE. (2005). The Implicit Association Test as a general measure of similarity. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 59, 228-239.
13.
DevineP. G.ElliotA. J. (1995). Are racial stereotypes really fading? The Princeton trilogy revisited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1139-1150.
14.
FazioR. H.JacksonJ. R.DuntonB. C.WilliamsC. J. (1995). Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1013-1027.
15.
ForehandM. R.PerkinsA. (2005). Implicit assimilation and explicit contrast: A set/reset model of response to celebrity voice-overs. Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 435-441.
16.
FriedmanN. P.MiyakeA. (2004). The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 101-135.
17.
GawronskiB. (2009). Ten frequently asked questions about implicit measures and their frequently supposed, but not entirely correct answers [Special issue: Developments in psychological measurement and assessment]. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 50, 141-150.
18.
GawronskiB.EhrenbergK.BanseR.ZukovaJ.KlauerK. C. (2003). It’s in the mind of the beholder: The impact of stereotypic associations on category-based and individuating impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 16-30.
19.
GawronskiB.PetersK. R.BrochuP. M.StrackF. (2008). Understanding the relations between different forms of racial prejudice: A cognitive consistency perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 648-665.
20.
GonsalkoraleK.ShermanJ. W.AllenT. J.KlauerK. C.AmodioD. M. (2011). Accounting for successful control of implicit racial bias: The roles of association activation, response monitoring, and overcoming bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1534-1545.
21.
GonsalkoraleK.ShermanJ. W.KlauerK. C. (2009). Aging and prejudice: Diminished regulation of automatic race bias among older adults. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 410-414.
22.
GonsalkoraleK.von HippelW.ShermanJ. W.KlauerK. C. (2009). Bias and regulation of bias in intergroup interactions: Implicit attitudes toward Muslims and interaction quality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 161-166.
23.
GreenwaldA. G.FarnhamS. D. (2000). Using the Implicit Association Test to measure self-esteem and self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 1022-1038.
24.
GreenwaldA. G.McGheeD. E.SchwartzJ. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.
25.
GreenwaldA. G.PoehlmanT. A.UhlmannE. L.BanajiM. R. (2009). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 17-41.
26.
HasherL.ZacksR. T. (1988). Working memory, comprehension, and aging: A review and a new view. In BowerG. H. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 22, pp. 193-225). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
27.
JarvisW. B. G.PettyR. E. (1996). The need to evaluate. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 172-194.
28.
KinoshitaS.Peek-O’LearyM. (2005). Does the compatibility effect in the race Implicit Association Test reflect familiarity or affect?Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 442-452.
29.
KinoshitaS.Peek-O’LearyM. (2006). Two bases of the compatibility effect in the Implicit Association Test (IAT). The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 2102-2120.
30.
KlauerK. C. (2010). Hierarchical multinomial processing tree models: A latent-trait approach. Psychometrika, 75, 70-98.
31.
KlauerK. C.SchmitzF.Teige-MocigembaS.VossA. (2010). Understanding the role of executive control in the implicit association test: Why flexible people have small IAT effects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 595-619.
32.
KlauerK. C.VossA.SchmitzF.Teige-MocigembaS. (2007). Process components of the Implicit Association Test: A diffusion-model analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 353-368.
33.
MaddoxK. B. (2004). Perspectives on racial phenotypicality bias. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 383-401.
34.
MeissnerF.RothermundK. (2013). Estimating the contributions of associations and recoding in the Implicit Association Test: The ReAL model for the IAT. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 45-69.
35.
MierkeJ.KlauerK. C. (2001). Implicit association measurement with the IAT: Evidence for effects of executive control processes. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 107-122.
36.
MierkeJ.KlauerK. C. (2003). Method-specific variance in the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 1180-1192.
37.
NisbettR. E.WilsonT. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231-259.
38.
NosekB. A.BanajiM.GreenwaldA. G. (2002). Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration web site. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6, 101-115.
39.
PayneB. K. (2001). Prejudice and perception: The role of automatic and controlled processes in misperceiving a weapon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 181-192.
40.
PayneB. K.ChengS. M.GovorunO.StewartB. D. (2005). An inkblot for attitudes: Affect misattribution as implicit measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 277-293.
41.
RothermundK.Teige-MocigembaS.GastA.WenturaD. (2009). Minimizing the influence of recoding in the Implicit Association Test: The Recoding-Free Implicit Association Test (IAT-RF). The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 84-98.
42.
RothermundK.WenturaD. (2001). Figure-ground asymmetries in the Implicit Association Test (IAT). Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 94-106.
43.
RothermundK.WenturaD. (2004). Underlying processes in the Implicit Association Test: Dissociating salience from associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 139-165.
44.
RothermundK.WenturaD.De HouwerJ. (2005). Validity of the salience asymmetry account of the Implicit Association Test: Reply to Greenwald, Nosek, Banaji, and Klauer (2005). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 426-430.
45.
ShermanJ. W. (2006). On building a better process model: It’s not only how many, but which ones and by which means?Psychological Inquiry, 17, 173-184.
46.
ShermanJ. W.GawronskiB.GonsalkoraleK.HugenbergK.AllenT. J.GroomC. J. (2008). The self-regulation of automatic associations and behavioral impulses. Psychological Review, 115, 314-335.
47.
TeachmanB. A.GreggA. P.WoodyS. R. (2001). Implicit associations for fear-relevant stimuli among individuals with snake and spider fears. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 226-235.
48.
WiersR. W.HoubenK.de KrakerJ. (2007). Implicit cocaine associations in active cocaine users and controls. Addictive Behaviors, 32, 1284-1289.
49.
WiersR. W.Van WoerdenN.SmuldersF. T. Y.De JongP. J. (2002). Implicit and explicit alcohol-related cognitions in heavy and light drinkers. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 648-658.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
