After failure, individuals frequently turn to others for support. The current research examined the process through which individuals utilize interpersonal relationships to stabilize threatened self-views. We may seek support to reassure us with warmth and acceptance after a self-threat, or to provide support for threatened self-knowledge. We proposed that although both types of support are likely to repair the affective consequences of a self-threat, only interacting with others who can provide evidence from the individuals’ past that reconfirms a threatened self-aspect would help stabilize the self-concept. Two studies demonstrated that, for individuals who have suffered a self-threat, receiving specific evidentiary support for the threatened self-aspect was more effective at restoring confidence in both the specific self-aspect and at recovering self-concept clarity than was receiving emotional support, whether the interaction was imagined (Study 1), or offered in person (Study 2) after the threat.
AlickeM.SedikidesC. (2009). Self-enhancement and self-protection: What they are and what they do. European Review of Social Psychology, 20, 1-48.
2.
AndersonN. H. (1968). Likableness ratings of 555 personality-trait words. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 272-279.
3.
AronA. (2003). Self and close relationships. In LearyM. R.TangneyJ. P. (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 442-461). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
4.
AronsonJ.BlantonH.CooperJ. (1995). From dissonance to disidentification: Selectivity in the self-affirmation process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 986-996.
5.
BaumeisterR. F. (2010). The self. In BaumeisterR. F.FinkelE. J. (Eds.), Advanced social psychology: The state of the science (pp. 139-176). London, England: Oxford University Press.
6.
BaumeisterR. F.LearyM. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529.
7.
BemD. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (6th ed.). New York, NY: Academic.
8.
BiglerM.NeimeyerG. J.BrownE. (2001). The divided self revisited: Effects of self-concept clarity and self-concept differentiation on psychological adjustment. Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 20, 396-415.
9.
BrammerL. M. (1992). Coping with life transitions. International Journal for the Advancement of Counseling, 15, 239-253.
10.
BrownJ. D.SmartS. A. (1991). The self and social conduct: Linking self-representations to prosocial conduct. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 368-375.
11.
CampbellJ. D. (1990). Self-esteem and the clarity of the self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 538-549.
12.
CampbellJ. D.AssanandS.PaulaA. D. (2003). The structure of the self-concept and its relations to psychological adjustment. Journal of Personality, 71, 115-140.
13.
CampbellJ. D.TrapnellP. D.HeineS. J.KatzI. M.LavalleeL. F.LehmanD. R. (1996). Self-concept clarity: Measurement, personality correlates, and cultural boundaries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 141-156.
14.
CaspiA.RobertsB. W. (2001). Personality development across the life course: The argument for change and continuity. Psychological Inquiry, 12, 49-66.
15.
CohenS.McKayG. (1984). Social support, stress, and the buffering hypothesis: A theoretical analysis. In BaumA.TaylorS. E.SingerJ. (Eds.) Handbook of psychology and health (Vol. 4, pp. 253-268). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
CohenS.MermelsteinR.KamarckT.HobermanH. M. (1985). Measuring the functional components of social support. In SarasonI. G.SarasonB. R. (Eds.), Social support: Theory, research and applications (pp. 73-94). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Springer.
17.
CresciM. K. (2001). The relationship between informational support and post-injury functional status in older women recovering from a hip fracture. Educational Gerontology, 27, 281-295.
18.
CrockerJ.NiiyaY.MischkowskiD. (2008). Why does writing about important values reduce defensiveness? Self-affirmation and the role of positive, other-directed feelings. Psychological Science, 19, 740-747.
19.
CutronaC. E. (1990). Stress and social support: In search of optimal matching. Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 9, 3-14.
20.
CutronaC. E.RussellD. W. (1990). Type of social support and specific stress: Toward a theory of optimal matching. In SarasonB. R.SarasonI. G.PierceG. R. (Eds.), Social support: An interactional view (pp. 319-366). New York, NY: Wiley.
21.
DeLaRondeC.SwannW. B.Jr. (1998). Partner verification: Restoring shattered images of our intimates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 374-382.
22.
EpsteinS. (1973). The self-concept revisited: Or a theory of a theory. American Psychologist, 28, 404-416.
23.
EriksonE. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and Crisis. NewYork, NY: Norton.
24.
FestingerL. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
25.
GoffmanE. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Oxford, UK: Doubleday.
26.
GollwitzerP. M.WicklundR. A. (1985). Self-symbolizing and the neglect of others’ perspectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 702-715.
27.
GreenbergJ.PyszczynskiT. (1985). Compensatory self-inflation: A response to the threat to self-regard of public failure. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 351-372.
28.
HarlowR. E.CantorN. (1995). To whom do people turn when things go poorly? Task orientation and functional social contacts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 329-340.
29.
HouseJ. (1981). Work stress and social support. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
30.
JamesW. (1890). The principles of psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31.
KwangT.SwannW. B.Jr. (2010). Do people embrace praise even when they feel unworthy? A review of critical tests of self enhancement versus self-verification. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 263-280.
32.
LearyM. R.BaumeisterR. F. (2000). The nature and function of self-esteem: Sociometer theory. In ZannaM. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 32, pp. 1-62). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
33.
MaleckiC. K.DemerayM. K. (2003). What type of support do they need? Investigating student adjustment as related to emotional, informational, appraisal, and instrumental support. School Psychology Quarterly, 18, 231-252.
34.
MarkusH. (1977). Self-schemata and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 63-78.
35.
MarkusH.WurfE. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: Social psychological perspective. Annual Reviews of Psychology, 38, 299-337.
36.
McConnellA. R. (2011). The multiple self-aspects framework: Self-concept representation, and its implications. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 3-27.
37.
MeadG. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
38.
NezlekJ. B.PleskoR. M. (2001). Day-to-day relationships among self-concept clarity, self-esteem, daily events, and mood. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 201-211.
39.
PickettC. L.GardnerW. L. (2005). The social monitoring system: Enhanced sensitivity to social cues as an adaptive response to social exclusion. In WilliamsK.ForgasJ.Von HippelW. (Eds.), The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying (pp. 213-226). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
40.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717-731.
41.
RitchieT. D.SedikidesC.WildschutT.ArndtJ.GidronY. (2011). Self-concept clarity mediates the relation between stress and subjective well-being. Self and Identity, 10, 493-508.
42.
SedikidesC.GreggA. P. (2008). Self-enhancement: Food for thought. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 102-116.
43.
SimmonsR. (1987). Social transition and adolescent development. New Directions in Child Development, 37, 33-61.
44.
SlotterE. B.GardnerW. L.FinkelE. J. (2010). Who am “I” without “you”? The influence of romantic breakup on self-concept clarity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 147-160.
45.
SteeleC. M. (1988). The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 261-302). New York, NY: Academic Press.
46.
SwannW. B. (1983). Self-verification: Bringing social reality into harmony with the self. In SulsJ.GreenwaldA. G. (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 2, pp. 33-66). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
47.
SwannW. B.Jr.HillC. A. (1982). When our identities are mistaken: Reaffirming self-conceptions through social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 59-66.
48.
SwannW. B.Jr.HixonJ. G.DeLaRondeC. (1992). Embracing the bitter truth: Negative self-concepts and marital commitment. Psychological Science, 3, 118-121.
49.
SwannW. B.Jr.PredmoreS. C. (1985). Intimates as agents of social support: Sources of consolation or despair?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1609-1617.
50.
TaylorS. E. (2007). Social support. In FriedmanH. S.SilverR. C. (Eds.), Foundations of health psychology (pp. 145-171). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
51.
TesserA. (2000). On the confluence of self-esteem maintenance mechanisms. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 290-299.
52.
TiceD. M.BaumeisterR. F. (2001). The primacy of the interpersonal self. In SedikidesC.BrewerM. B. (Eds.), Individual self, relational self, collective self (pp. 71-88). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
53.
WatsonD.ClarkA.TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
54.
WicklundR. A.GollwitzerP. M. (1982). Symbolic self-completion. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
