Although people and events that disconfirm observers’ expectancies can increase their creativity, sometimes such social schema violations increase observers’ rigidity of thought and undermine creative cognition. Here we examined whether individual differences in the extent to which people prefer structure and predictability determine whether social schema violations facilitate or hamper creativity. Participants in Study 1 formed impressions of a schema-inconsistent female mechanic (vs. a schema-consistent male mechanic). Following schema-inconsistent rather than -consistent information, participants low (high) in need for structure showed better (impeded) creative performance. Participants in Study 2 memorized a series of images in which individuals were placed on a schema-inconsistent (vs. consistent) background (e.g., an Eskimo on the desert vs. on a snowy landscape). Following schema-inconsistent imagery, participants low (high) in need for structure increased (decreased) divergent thinking.
AmabileT. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 357-376. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357
2.
BaasM.De DreuC. K. W.NijstadB. A. (2008). A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus?Psychological Bulletin, 134, 779-806. doi:10.1037/a0012815
3.
BaasM.De DreuC. K. W.NijstadB. A. (2012). Emotions that associate with uncertainty lead to structured ideation. Emotion, 12, 1004-1014. doi:10.1037/a0027358
4.
BushmanB. J.GiancolaP. R.ParrottD. J.RothR. M. (2012). Failure to consider future consequences increases the effects of alcohol on aggression. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 591-595. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.11.013
5.
CrispR. J.TurnerR. N. (2011). Cognitive adaptation to the experience of social and cultural diversity. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 242-266. doi:10.1037/a0021840
6.
De DreuC. K. W.BaasM.NijstadB. A. (2008). Hedonic tone and activation level in the mood-creativity link: Toward a dual pathway to creativity model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 739-756. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.5.739
7.
De DreuC. K. W.BaasM.RoskesM.SligteD. J.EbsteinR. P.ChewS. H.. . . Shamay-TsooryS. G. (2013). Oxytonergic circuitry sustains and enables creative cognition in humans. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. Advance online publication. doi:10.1093/scan/nst094
8.
De DreuC. K. W.NijstadB. A.BaasM. (2010). Behavioral activation links to creativity because of increased cognitive flexibility. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 2, 72-80. doi:10.1177/1948550610381789
9.
DijksterhuisA.MeursT. (2006). Where creativity resides: The generative power of unconscious thought. Consciousness and Cognition, 15, 135-146. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2005.04.007
10.
FörsterJ.FriedmanR. S.ButterbachE. B.SassenbergK. (2005). Automatic effects of deviancy cues on creative cognition. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 345-359. doi:10.1002/ejsp.253
11.
GocłowskaM. A.CrispR. J. (2013). On counter-stereotypes and creative cognition: When interventions for reducing prejudice can boost divergent thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8, 72-79. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2012.07.001
HarkinsS. G. (2006). Mere effort as the mediator of the evaluation-performance relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 436-455. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.3.436
14.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
15.
HutterR. R. C.CrispR. J. (2005). The composition of category conjunctions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 647-657. doi:10.1177/0146167204271575
KruglanskiA. W.ShteynbergG. (2012). Cognitive consistency as means to an end: How subjective logic affords knowledge. In GawronskiB.StrackF. (Eds.), Cognitive consistency: A unifying concept in social psychology (pp. 245-264). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
18.
LeichtC.CrispR. J.Randsley de MouraG. (2013). Need for structure predicts leadership preference. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 17, 53-66. doi:10.1037/a0031476
19.
LeungA. K.-Y.ChiuC.-Y.-Y. (2010). Multicultural experience, idea receptiveness, and creativity. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41, 723-741. doi:10.1177/0022022110361707
20.
MadduxW. W.AdamH.GalinskyA. D. (2010). When in Rome. Learn why the Romans do what they do: How multicultural learning experiences facilitate creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 731-741. doi:10.1177/0146167210367786
21.
MarshR. L.WardT. B.LandauJ. D. (1999). The inadvertent use of prior knowledge in a generative cognitive task. Memory & Cognition, 27, 94-105.
22.
MayerJ. D.GaschkeY. N. (1988). The experience and meta-experience of mood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 102-111. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.55.1.102
23.
MendesW. B.BlascovichJ.HunterS. B.LickelB.JostJ. T. (2007). Threatened by the unexpected: Physiological responses during social interactions with expectancy-violating partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 698-716. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.4.698
24.
MednickS. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69(3), 220–232. doi:10.1037/h0048850
25.
Miron-SpektorE.GinoF.ArgoteL. (2011). Paradoxical frames and creative sparks: Enhancing individual creativity through conflict and integration. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116, 229-240. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.03.006
26.
NeubergS. L.NewsomJ. T. (1993). Personal need for structure: Individual differences in the desire for simple structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 113-131. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.1.113
27.
NijstadB. A.De DreuC. K. W.RietzschelE. F. (2010). The dual pathway to creativity model: Creative ideation as a function of flexibility and persistence. European Review of Social Psychology, 21, 37-41.
28.
OppenheimerD. M.MeyvisT.DavidenkoN. (2009). Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 867-872. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.009
29.
PorathC. L.ErezA. (2009). Overlooked but not untouched: How rudeness reduces onlookers’ performance on routine and creative tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109, 29-44. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.01.003
30.
Reiter-PalmonR.MumfordM. D.O’Connor BoesJ.RuncoM. A. (1997). Problem construction and creativity: The role of ability, cue consistency, and active processing. Creativity Research Journal, 10, 9-23.
31.
RietzschelE. F.De DreuC. K. W.NijstadB. A. (2007). Personal need for structure and creative performance: The moderating influence of fear of invalidity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 855-866. doi:10.1177/0146167207301017
32.
RietzschelE. F.SlijkhuisJ. M.Van YperenN. W. (2014). Close monitoring as a contextual stimulator: How need for structure affects the relation between close monitoring and work outcomes. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 23, 394-404. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2012.752897
33.
RitterS. M.DamianR. I.SimontonD. K.Van BaarenR. B.StrickM.DerksJ.DijksterhuisA. (2012). Diversifying experiences enhance cognitive flexibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 961-964. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.02.009
34.
RoeseN. J.ShermanJ. W. (2007). Expectancy. In HigginsE. T.KruglanskiA. W. (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 91-115). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
35.
RubinM.PaoliniS.CrispR. J. (2013). Linguistic description moderates the evaluations of counterstereotypical people. Social Psychology, 44, 289-298. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000114
36.
SassenbergK.MoskowitzG. B. (2005). Don’t stereotype, think different! Overcoming automatic stereotype activation by mindset priming. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 506-514. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2004.10.002
37.
SchallerM.BoydC.YohannesJ.O’BrienM. (1995). The prejudiced personality revisited: Personal need for structure and formation of erroneous group stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 544-555. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.68.3.544
SlijkhuisJ. M.RietzschelE. F.Van YperenN. W. (2013). How evaluation and need for structure affect motivation and creativity. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22, 15-25. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2011.626244
40.
SternbergR. J.LubartT. I. (2002). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York, NY: Free Press.
41.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2007). Using Multivariate Statistics. Organization (5th ed., pp. 60–116). Pearson Education Inc.
42.
TierneyP.FarmerS. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1137-1148. doi:10.2307/3069429
43.
VasiljevicM.CrispR. J. (2013). Tolerance by surprise: Evidence for a generalized reduction in prejudice and increased egalitarianism through novel category combination. PLoS ONE, 8(3), e57106. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0057106
44.
WanW. W. N.ChiuC.-Y. (2002). Effects of novel conceptual combination on creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 36, 227-240. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2002.tb01066.x
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
