Seven studies demonstrate that threats to moral identity can increase how definitively people think they have previously proven their morality. When White participants were made to worry that their future behavior could seem racist, they overestimated how much a prior decision of theirs would convince an observer of their non-prejudiced character (Studies 1a-3). Ironically, such overestimation made participants appear more prejudiced to observers (Study 4). Studies 5 to 6 demonstrated a similar effect of threat in the domain of charitable giving—an effect driven by individuals for whom maintaining a moral identity is particularly important. Threatened participants only enhanced their beliefs that they had proven their morality when there was at least some supporting evidence, but these beliefs were insensitive to whether the evidence was weak or strong (Study 2). Discussion considers the role of motivated reasoning, and implications for ethical decision making and moral licensing.
AquinoK.ReedAII. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1423-1440.
2.
BalcetisE. (2009). Where the motivation resides and self-deception hides: How motivated cognition accomplishes self-deception. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 361-381.
Bradley-GeistJ. C.KingE. B.SkorinkoJ.HeblM. R.McKennaC. (2010). Moral credentialing by association: The importance of choice and relationship closeness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1564-1575.
5.
CameronJ. J.VorauerJ. D. (2008). Feeling transparent: On metaperceptions and miscommunications. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1093-1108.
6.
CarlsonE. N.VazireS.FurrR. M. (2011). Meta-insight: Do people really know how others see them?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 831-846.
7.
ConwayP.PeetzJ. (2012). When does feeling moral actually make you a better person? Conceptual abstraction moderates whether past moral deeds motivate consistency or compensatory behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 907-919.
8.
CrandallC. S.EshlemanA. (2003). A justification-suppression model of the expression and experience of prejudice. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 414-446.
9.
DawsonE.GilovichT.ReganD. T. (2002). Motivated reasoning and performance on the Wason selection task. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1379-1387.
10.
DittoP. H.LopezD. F. (1992). Motivated skepticism: Use of differential decision criteria for preferred and non-preferred conclusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 568-584.
11.
DittoP. H.ScepanskyJ. A.MunroG. D.ApanovitchA. M.LockhartL. K. (1998). Motivated sensitivity to preference-inconsistent information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 53-69.
12.
EdwardsJ. R.LambertL. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytic framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12, 1-22.
13.
EffronD. A.CameronJ. S.MoninB. (2009). Endorsing Obama licenses favoring Whites. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 590-593.
14.
EffronD. A.MillerD. T.MoninB. (2012). Inventing racist roads not taken: The licensing effect of immoral counterfactual behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 916-932.
15.
EffronD. A.MoninB. (2010). Letting people off the hook: When do good deeds excuse transgressions?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1618-1634.
16.
EffronD. A.MoninB.MillerD. T. (2013). The unhealthy road not taken: Licensing indulgence by exaggerating counterfactual sins. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 573-578.
17.
GilovichT. (1991). How we know what isn’t so: The fallibility of human reason in everyday life. New York, NY: Free Press.
18.
GneezyA.ImasA.BrownA.NelsonL. D.NortonM. I. (2012). Paying to be nice: Consistency and costly prosocial behavior. Management Science, 58, 179-187.
19.
JonesE. E.DavisK. E. (1965). A theory of correspondent inferences: From acts to dispositions. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 219-266). New York, NY: Academic Press.
20.
JonesE. E.NisbettR. E. (1972). The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the cause of behavior. In JonesE. E.KanouseE.KelleyH. H.NisbettR. E.ValinsS.WeinerB. (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 79-94). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
21.
JordanJ.MullenE.MurnighanJ. K. (2011). Striving for the moral self: The effects of recalling past moral actions on future moral behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 701-713.
22.
KelleyH. H. (1973). The process of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28, 107-128.
23.
KennyD. A.DePauloB. M. (1993). Do people know how others view them? An empirical and theoretical account. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 145-161.
24.
KhanU.DharR. (2006). Licensing effect in consumer choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 43, 259-266.
25.
KrugerJ.GilovichT. (2004). Actions, intentions, and self-assessment: The road to self-enhancement is paved with good intentions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 328-339.
26.
KundaZ. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480-498.
27.
LordC. G.RossL.LepperM. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098-2109.
28.
MalleB. F. (2006). The actor-observer asymmetry in attribution: A (surprising) meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 895-919.
29.
MannN. H.KawakamiK. (2012). The long, steep path to equality: Progressing on egalitarian goals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 187-197.
30.
MazarN.AmirO.ArielyD. (2008). The dishonesty of honest people: A theory of self-concept maintenance. Journal of Marketing Research, 45, 633-644.
31.
MazarN.ZhongC.-B. (2010). Do green products make us better people?Psychological Science, 21, 494-498.
32.
MerrittA. C.EffronD. A.FeinS.SavitskyK.TullerD. M.MoninB. (2012). The strategic pursuit of moral credentials. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 774-777.
33.
MerrittA. C.EffronD. A.MoninB. (2010). Moral self-licensing: When being good frees us to be bad. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 344-357.
34.
MillerD. T.EffronD. A. (2010). Psychological license: When it is needed and how it functions. In ZannaM. P.OlsonJ. M. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 43, pp. 117-158). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
35.
MoninB.MillerD. T. (2001). Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 33-43.
36.
MulderL. B.AquinoK. (2013). The role of moral identity in the aftermath of dishonesty. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 121, 219-230.
37.
PillutlaM. M.MurnighanJ. K. (1995). Being fair or appearing fair: Strategic behavior in ultimatum bargaining. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1408-1426.
38.
PolmanE.PettitN. C.WiesenfeldB. M. (2013). Effects of wrongdoer status on moral licensing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 614-623.
39.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891.
40.
PreacherK. J.RuckerD. D.HayesA. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185-227.
41.
PyszcynskiT.GreenbergJ. (1987). Toward an integration of cognitive and motivational perspectives on social inference: A biased hypothesis-testing model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 297-340.
42.
RossL.WardA. (1996). Naive realism in everyday life: Implications for social conflict and misunderstanding. In BrownT.ReedE.TurielE. (Eds.), Values and knowledge (pp. 103-135). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
43.
RossM.McFarlandC.FletcherG. J. (1981). The effect of attitude on the recall of personal histories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 627-634.
44.
RuckerD. D.PreacherK. J.TormalaZ. L.PettyR. E. (2011). Mediation analysis in social psychology: Current practices and new recommendations. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 5, 359-371.
45.
SachdevaS.IlievR.MedinD. L. (2009). Sinning saints and saintly sinners: The paradox of moral self-regulation. Psychological Science, 20, 523-528.
46.
SchweitzerM. E.HseeC. K. (2002). Stretching the truth: Elastic justification and motivated communication of uncertain information. The Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 25, 185-201.
47.
ShalviS.DanaJ.HandgraafM. J. J.De DreuC. K. W. (2011). Justified ethicality: Observing desired counterfactuals modifies ethical perceptions and behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115, 181-190.
48.
ShermanS. J.GorkinL. (1980). Attitude bolstering when behavior is inconsistent with central attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 388-403.
49.
ShroutP. E.BolgerN. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422-445.
50.
ShuL. L.EffronD. A. (in press). Ethical decision-making: Insights from contemporary behavioral research on the role of the self. In ScottR.KosslynS. (Eds.), Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
51.
ShuL. L.GinoF. (2012). Sweeping dishonesty under the rug: How unethical actions lead to forgetting of moral rules. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 1164-1177.
SpencerS. J.SteeleC. M.QuinnD. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4-28.
54.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
55.
TenbrunselA. E.DiekmannK. A.Wade-BenzoniK. A.BazermanM. H. (2010). The ethical mirage: A temporal explanation as to why we are not as ethical as we think we are. Research in Organizational Behavior, 30, 153-173.
56.
UhlmannE. L.PizarroD. A.TannenbaumD.DittoP. H. (2009). The motivated use of moral principles. Judgment and Decision Making, 4, 476-491.
57.
ValdesoloP.DeStenoD. (2007). Moral hypocrisy: Social groups and the flexibility of virtue. Psychological Science, 18, 689-690.
58.
VerardiV.CrouxC. (2009). Robust regression in Stata. The Stata Journal, 9, 439-453.
59.
Von HippelW.LakinJ. L.ShakarchiR. L. (2005). Individual differences in motivated social cognition: The case of self-serving information processing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1347-1357.
60.
YohaiV. J. (1987). High breakdown-point and high efficiency robust estimates for regression. Annals of Statistics, 15, 642-656.
61.
ZhaoX.LynchJ. G.ChenQ. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 197-206.
62.
ZhongC.-B.LiljenquistK.CainD. M. (2009). Moral self-regulation: Licensing and compensation. In De CremerD. (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on ethical behavior and decision making (pp. 75-89). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
