Individuals in ongoing romantic relationships incorporate attributes from their partner into their own self-concepts. However, little research has investigated what happens to these attributes should the relationship end. Across three studies, the present research sought to examine factors that predicted whether individuals retain or reject attributes from their self-concept that they initially gained during a relationship. We predicted that individuals would be more likely to reject attributes from their self post-dissolution if their ex-partner was influential in them adding those attributes to the self in the first place. However, we expected this effect to be moderated such that individuals who exerted greater, versus lesser, effort in maintaining relevant attributes would retain them as part of the self, regardless of whether the attribute originated from the partner. In addition, in two of our three studies, we explored the roles of partner influence, effort, and attribute rejection on individuals’ post-dissolution self-concept clarity.
AgnewC. R.Van LangeP. A. M.RusbultC. E.LangstonC. A. (1998). Cognitive interdependence: Commitment and the mental representation of close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 939-954.
2.
AndersenS. M.ChenS. (2002). The relational self: An interpersonal social-cognitive theory. Psychological Review, 109, 619-645.
3.
AronA. (2003). The self and relationships. In LearyM. R.TangneyJ. (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 442-461). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
4.
AronA.AronE. N. (1997). Self-expansion motivation and including other in the self. In DuckS. (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research, and interventions (2nd ed., pp. 251-270). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
5.
AronA.AronE. N.SmollanD. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596-612.
6.
AronA.AronE. N.TudorM.NelsonG. (1991). Close relationships as including other in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 241-253.
7.
AronsonE.MillsJ. (1959). The effect of severity of initiation on liking for a group. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59, 177-181.
8.
BiglerM.NeimeyerG. J.BrownE. (2001). The divided self revisited: Effects of self-concept clarity and self-concept differentiation on psychological adjustment. Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 20, 396-415.
9.
BoelenP. A.KeijsersL.Van Den HoutM. (2012). The role of self-concept clarity in prolonged grief disorder. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 200, 56-62.
10.
BoelenP. A.Van Den HoutM. A. (2010). Inclusion of other in the self and breakup-related grief following relationship dissolution. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 15, 534-547.
11.
BuhrmesterM.KwangT.GoslingS. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3-5.
12.
CampbellJ. D. (1990). Self-esteem and the clarity of the self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 538-549.
13.
CampbellJ. D.TrapnellP. D.HeineS. J.KatzI. M.LavalleeL. F.LehmanD. R. (1996). Self-concept clarity: Measurement, personality correlates, and cultural boundaries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 141-156.
14.
DavisD.ShaverP. R.VernonM. L. (2003). Physical, emotional, and behavioral reactions to breaking up: The roles of gender, age, emotional involvement, and attachment style. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 871-884.
15.
EastwickP. W.FinkelE. J.KrishnamurtiT.LoewensteinG. (2008). Mispredicting distress following romantic breakup: Revealing the time course of the affective forecasting error. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 800-807.
16.
EpsteinS. (1977). Traits are alive and well. In MagnussonS.EndlerN. S. (Eds.), Personality at the crossroads: Current issues in interactional psychology (pp. 83-98). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
FestingerL.CarlsmithJ. M. (1959). Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 203-210.
18.
FieldN. P.SundinE. C. (2001). Attachment style in adjustment to conjugal bereavement. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18, 347-361.
19.
GagnéF. M.LydonJ. E. (2004). Bias and accuracy in close relationships: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 322-338.
20.
JamesW. (1890). The principles of psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21.
KennyD. A.KashyD. A.CookW. L. (2006). Analysis of dyadic data. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
22.
LeeL. A.SbarraD. A. (2013). The predictors and consequences of relationship dissolution. In HazanC.CampaM. (Eds.), Human bonding: The science of affectional ties (pp. 308-324). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
23.
LewandowskiG. W.AronA.BassisS.KunakJ. (2006). Losing a self-expanding relationship: Implications for the self-concept. Personal Relationships, 13, 317-331.
24.
LewandowskiG. W.BizzocoN. M. (2007). Addition through subtraction: Growth following the dissolution of a low quality relationship. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 2, 40-54.
25.
LewandowskiG. W.SahnerD. F. (2005). The influence of past relationships on subsequent relationships: The role of the self. Individual Differences Research, 3, 269-275.
26.
LuhmannM.HofmannW.EidM.LucasR. E. (2012). Subjective well-being and adaptation to life events: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 592-615.
27.
MarkusH. (1977). Self-schemata and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 63-78.
28.
MarkusH.WurfE. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 299-337.
29.
MashekD. J.AronA.BonciminoM. (2003). Confusions of self with close others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 382-392.
30.
MasonA. E.LawR. W.BryanA. E. B.PortleyR. M.SbarraD. A. (2012). Facing a breakup: Electromyographic responses moderate self-concept recovery following a romantic separation. Personal Relationships, 19, 551-568.
31.
McConnellA. R. (2011). The multiple self-aspects framework: Self-concept representation and its implications. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 3-27.
32.
MettsS.SprecherS.CupachW. R. (1991). Retrospective self-reports. In MontgomeryB. M.DuckS. (Eds.), Studying interpersonal interaction (pp. 162-178). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
33.
PontinJ. (2007, March). Artificial intelligence, with help from the humans. New York Times.
34.
RosenbergM. (1979). Conceiving the self. New York, NY: Basic Books.
35.
SbarraD. A. (2006). Predicting the onset of emotional recovery following nonmarital relationship dissolution: Survival analyses of sadness and anger. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 298-312.
36.
SbarraD. A.FerrerE. (2006). The structure and process of emotional experience following nonmarital relationship dissolution: Dynamic factor analyses of love, anger, and sadness. Emotion, 6, 224-238.
37.
SlotterE. B.GardnerW. L. (2009). Where do you end and I begin? Evidence for anticipatory, motivated self-other integration between relationship partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1137-1151.
38.
SlotterE. B.GardnerW. L. (2012). The dangers of dating the “bad boy” (or girl): Romantic desire encourages the adoption of even negative qualities of potential partners. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 1173-1178.
39.
SlotterE. B.GardnerW. L.FinkelE. J. (2010). Who am I without you? The influence of romantic breakup on the self-concept. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 147-160.
40.
SlotterE. B.LuchiesL. B. (2013). Relationship quality promotes the desire for closeness among distressed avoidantly attached individuals. Personal Relationships. Advance online publication.
41.
SmithH. S.CohenL. H. (1993). Self-complexity and reactions to a relationship breakup. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 12, 367-384.
42.
SprecherS.FelmleeD.MettsS.FehrB.VanniD. (1998). Factors associated with distress following the breakup of a close relationship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 791-809.
43.
Tejada-VeraB.SuttonP. D. (2010). Births, marriages, divorces, and deaths: Provisional data for 2009. National Vital Statistics Reports, 58(25), 1-6. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr58/nvsr58_25.htm
44.
WatermanA. S. (2005). When effort is enjoyed: Two studies of intrinsic motivation for personally salient activities. Motivation and Emotion, 29, 165-188.
45.
WilsonT. D.GilbertD. T. (2003). Affective forecasting. In ZannaM. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 35, pp. 345-411). New York, NY: Elsevier.
46.
WoffordJ. C.GoodwinV. L.PremackS. (1992). Meta-analysis of the antecedents of personal goal level and of the antecedents and consequences of goal commitment. Journal of Management, 18, 595-615.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
