Previous research demonstrated that perceived relationship value is a strong predictor of forgiveness. Here we suggest that relationship value may not be sufficient. Given that executive control is an important facilitator of forgiveness, we predicted that relationship value and executive control should interact toward promoting forgiveness. Using different indicators of executive control, including adults and children samples, measured or experimentally varied relationship value, and both self-report and behavioral forgiveness measures, across four studies we found support for our main prediction: Relationship value was positively associated with forgiveness; however, this association was mostly pronounced among individuals high (vs. low) in executive control. In addition, executive control was positively associated with forgiveness, but particularly in relationships of high (vs. low) relationship value. These findings suggest that relationship value and executive control in combination are associated with higher interpersonal forgiveness. Implications for the extant literature on forgiveness, and interpersonal relationships more broadly, are discussed.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
2.
AronA.AronE. N.SmollanD. (1992). Inclusion of Other in the Self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596-612.
3.
AureliF.De WaalF. B. M. (2000). Natural conflict resolution. Berkeley: University California Press.
4.
BallietD.LiN. P.JoiremanJ. (2011). Relating trait self-control and forgiveness within prosocials and proselfs: Compensatory versus synergistic models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1090-1105.
5.
BaumeisterR. F.BratslavskyE.MuravenM.TiceD. M. (1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1252-1265.
6.
BaumeisterR. F.VohsK. D.FunderD. C. (2007). Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements: Whatever happened to actual behavior?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 396-403.
7.
BezdjianS.BakerL. A.LozanoD. I.RaineA. (2009). Assessing inattention and impulsivity in children during the Go/NoGo task. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27, 365-383.
8.
BurnetteJ. L.McCulloughM. E.Van TongerenD. R.DavisD. E. (2012). Forgiveness results from integrating information about relationship value and exploitation risk. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 345-356.
9.
ChaikenS.TropeY. (Eds.). (1999). Dual process theories in social psychology. New York, NY: Guilford.
10.
DavidsonM. C.AmsoD.AndersonL. C.DiamondA. (2006). Development of cognitive control and executive functions from 4 to 13 years: Evidence from manipulations of memory, inhibition, and task switching. Neuropsychologia, 44, 2037-2078.
11.
DencklaM. B. (1996). A theory and model of executive function: A neuropsychological perspective. In LyonG. R.KrasnegorN. A. (Eds.), Attention, memory, and executive function (pp. 263-278). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
EigstiI.ZayasV.MischelW.ShodaY.AydukO.DadlaniM. B.. . . CaseyB. J. (2006). Predicting cognitive control from preschool to late adolescence and young adulthood. Psychological Science, 17, 478-484.
14.
EriksenC. W.SchultzD. W. (1979). Information processing in visual search: A continuous flow conception and experimental results. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 25, 249-263.
15.
ExlineJ. J.BaumeisterR. F.BushmanB. J.CampbellW. K.FinkelE. J. (2004). Too proud to let go: Narcissistic entitlement as a barrier to forgiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 894-912.
16.
FehrR.GelfandM. J.NagM. (2010). The road to forgiveness: A meta-analytic synthesis of its situational and dispositional correlates. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 894-914.
17.
FennisB. M.JanssenL. (2010). Mindlessness revisited: Sequential request techniques foster compliance by draining self-control resources. Current Psychology, 29, 235-246.
18.
FinkelE. J.CampbellW. K. (2001). Self-control and accommodation in close relationships: An interdependence analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 263-277.
19.
FinkelE. J.CampbellW. K.BuffardiL. E.KumashiroM.RusbultC. E. (2009). The metamorphosis of narcissus: Communal activation promotes relationship commitment among narcissists. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1271-1284.
20.
FinkelE. J.DeWallC. N.SlotterE. B.McNultyJ. K.PondR. S.Jr.AtkinsD. C. (2012). Using I3 theory to clarify when dispositional aggressiveness predicts intimate partner violence perpetration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 533-549.
21.
FinkelE. J.RusbultC. E.KumashiroM.HannonP. A. (2002). Dealing with betrayal in close relationships: Does commitment promote forgiveness?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 956-974.
22.
FlanaganK. S.Van den HoekK. K.RanterJ. M.ReichH. A. (2012). The potential of forgiveness as a response for coping with negative peer experiences. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 1215-1223.
23.
HaggerM. S.WoodC.StiffC.ChatzisarantisN. L. D. (2010). Ego depletion and the strength model of self-control: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 495-525.
24.
HubbardJ. A.SmithmyerC. M.RamsdenS. R.ParkerE. H.FlanaganK. D.DearingK. F.. . . SimonsR. F. (2002). Observational, physiological, and self-report measures of children’s anger: Relations to reactive versus proactive aggression. Child Development, 73, 1320-1329.
25.
JobV.DweckC. S.WaltonG. M. (2010). Ego depletion—Is it all in your head? Implicit theories about willpower affect self-regulation. Psychological Science, 21, 1686-1693.
26.
KachadourianL. K.FinchamF. D.DavilaJ. (2004). The tendency to forgive in dating and married couples: The role of attachment and relationship satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 11, 373-393.
27.
KarremansJ. C.AartsH. (2007). The role of automaticity in forgiving close others. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 902-917.
28.
KarremansJ. C.RegaliaC.PaleariF. G.FinchamF. D.CuiM.TakadaN.. . . UskulA. K. (2011). Maintaining harmony across the globe: The cross-cultural association between closeness and interpersonal forgiveness. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 2, 443-451.
29.
KarremansJ. C.Van LangeP. A. M.OuwerkerkJ. W.KluwerE. S. (2003). When forgiving enhances psychological well-being: The role of interpersonal commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1011-1026.
30.
KelleyH. H.ThibautJ. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York, NY: Wiley.
31.
LiebermanM. D. (2007). Social cognitive neuroscience: A review of core processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 259-289.
32.
LuchiesL. B.FinkelE. J.McNultyJ. K.KumashiroM. (2010). The doormat effect: When forgiving erodes self-respect and self-concept clarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 734-749.
33.
MaioG. R.ThomasG.FinchamF. D.CarnelleyK. (2008). Unraveling the role of forgiveness in family relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 307-319.
34.
McCulloughM. E. (2008). Beyond revenge: The evolution of the forgiveness instinct. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
35.
McCulloughM. E.KurzbanR.TabakB. A. (2013). Cognitive systems for revenge and forgiveness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 1-15.
36.
McCulloughM. E.LunaL. R.BerryJ. W.TabakB. A.BonoG. (2010). On the form and function of forgiving: Modeling the time–forgiveness relationship and testing the valuable relationships hypothesis. Emotion, 10, 358-376.
37.
McCulloughM. E.RachalK. C.SandageS. J.WorthingtonE. L.Jr.BrownS. W.HightT. L. (1998). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships: II. Theoretical elaboration and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1586-1603.
38.
McNultyJ. K. (2008). Tendencies to forgive in marriage: Putting the benefits into context. Journal of Family Psychology, 22, 171-175.
39.
MiyakeA.FriedmanN. P.EmersonM. J.WitzkiA. H.HowertonA. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49-100.
40.
PaleariF. G.RegaliaC.FinchamF. (2005). Marital quality, forgiveness, empathy, and rumination: A longitudinal analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 368-378.
41.
ParkY. O.EnrightR. D. (1997). The development of forgiveness in the context of the adolescent friendship conflict in Korea. Journal of Adolescence, 20, 393-402.
42.
PeetsK.HodgesE. V. E.SalmivalliC. (2013). Forgiveness and its determinants depending on the interpersonal context of hurt. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 114, 131-145.
43.
PronkT. M.KarremansJ. C. (in press). Does executive control relate to sacrificial behavior during conflicts of interests?Personal Relationships.
44.
PronkT. M.KarremansJ. C.OverbeekG.VermulstA. A.WigboldusD. H. J. (2010). What it takes to forgive: When and why executive functioning facilitates forgiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 119-131.
45.
PronkT. M.KarremansJ. C.WigboldusD. H. J. (2011). How can you resist? Executive control helps romantically involved individuals to stay faithful. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 827-837.
46.
RidderinkhofK. R.Van der MolenM. W.BandG. P. H.BashoreT. R. (1997). Sources of interference from irrelevant information: A developmental study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 65, 315-341.
47.
RighettiF.FinkenauerC.FinkelE. J. (2013). Low self-control promotes the willingness to sacrifice in close relationships. Psychological Science, 24, 1533-1540.
48.
RoseA. J.AsherS. R. (1999). Children’s goals and strategies in response to conflicts within friendship. Developmental Psychology, 35, 69-79.
RusbultC. E.MartzJ. M.AgnewC. R. (1998). The Investment Model Scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357-391.
51.
SchmeichelB. J.ZellA. (2007). Trait self-control predicts performance on behavioral tests of self-control. Journal of Personality, 75, 743-756.
52.
SchulzK. P.FanJ.MagidinaO.MarksD. J.HahnB.HalperinJ. M. (2007). Does the emotional Go/No-Go task really measure behavioral inhibition? Convergence with measures on a non-emotional analog. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 22, 151-160.
53.
SlotterE. B.FinkelE. J.DeWallC. N.PondR. S.LambertN. M.BodenhausenG. V.FinchamF. D. (2012). Putting the brakes on aggression toward a romantic partner: The executive influence of relationship commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 291-305.
54.
SmithE. E.JonidesJ. (1999). Storage and executive processes in the frontal lobes. Science, 283, 1657-1661.
55.
SmithE. R.DeCosterJ. (2000). Dual-process models in social and cognitive psychology: Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 108-131.
56.
StantonS. C.FinkelE. J. (2012). Too tired to take offense: When depletion promotes forgiveness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 587-590.
57.
StroopJ. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.
58.
Troop-GordonW.AsherS. R. (2005). Modifications in children’s goals when encountering obstacles to conflict resolution. Child Development, 76, 568-582.
59.
WilkowskiB. M.RobinsonM. D.Troop-GordonW. (2010). How does cognitive control reduce anger and aggression? The role of conflict monitoring and forgiveness processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 830-840.
60.
WitvlietC. V. O.LudwigT. E.Van der LaanK. L. (2001). Granting forgiveness or harboring grudges: Implication for emotion, physiology, and health. Psychological Science, 121, 117-123.
61.
YovetichN. A.RusbultC. E. (1994). Accommodative behavior in close relationships: Exploring transformation of motivation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 136-164.
