Researchers have long recognized the utility of the diary method for studying variations in thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. Drawing on the idea that daily events have consequences that are realized both “in the moment” and prospectively over time, we describe a conceptual and statistical framework emphasizing the temporal aspect of diary data. Including temporal effects (i.e., Lagged and concurrent × Lagged terms) expands the scope of the hypothesis being tested by allowing the researcher to examine the association between prior day’s event on the current day’s outcome, as well as the extent to which a prior day’s event makes an individual more or less responsive to an event today. Finally, we provide a detailed description of the procedures necessary to prepare the dataset, and secondary analysis of data from a recently published study illustrates our recommendations.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
2.
ArbuckleJ. L. (1996). Full information estimation in the presence of incomplete data. In MarcoulidesG. A.SchumackerR. E. (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques (pp. 243-275). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3.
BolgerN.ShroutP. E. (2007). Accounting for statistical dependency in longitudinal data on dyads. In LittleT.D.BovairdJ. A.CardN. A. (Eds.), Modeling contextual effects in longitudinal studies (pp.285-298). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
BollenK. A.CurranP. J. (2006). Latent curve models: A structural equation perspective. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
HoxJ. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
HoxJ. (2011). Panel modeling: Random coefficients and covariance structures. In HoxJ. J.KyleR. J. (Eds.), Handbook for advanced multilevel analysis (pp. 85-96). New York, NY: Routledge.
8.
IidaM.StephensM. A. P.RookK. S.FranksM. M.SalemJ. K. (2010). When the going gets tough, does support get going? Determinants of spousal support provision to type 2 diabetic patients. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 780-791.
9.
KennyD. A.KashyD. A.CookW. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis (1st ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
10.
KwokO.WestS. G.GreenS. B. (2007). The impact of misspecifying the within-subject covariance structure in multiwave longitudinal models: A Monte Carlo study. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 557-592. doi:10.1080/00273170701540537
11.
LarsonD. G.ChastainR. L. (1990). Self-concealment: Conceptualization, measurement, and health implications. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9, 439-455.
12.
LaurenceauJ.BolgerN. (2005). Using diary methods to study marital and family processes. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 86-97. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.19.1.86
13.
LiuS.RovineM. J.MolenaarP. C. M. (2012). Selecting a linear mixed model for longitudinal data: Repeated measures analysis of variance, covariance pattern model, and growth curve approaches. Psychological Methods, 17, 15-30. doi:10.1037/a0026971
14.
MehtaP. D.NealeM. C. (2005). People are variables too: Multilevel structural equations modeling. Psychological Methods, 10, 259-284. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.10.3.259
15.
MolenaarP. C. M. (2004). A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: Bringing the person back into scientific psychology, this time forever. Measurement, 2, 201-218. doi:10.1207/s15366359mea0204_1
16.
MolenaarP. C. M.CampbellC. G. (2009). The new person-specific paradigm in psychology. Psychological Science, 18, 112-117. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01619.x
17.
MurrayS. M.BellaviaG. M.RoseP.GriffinD. W. (2003). Once hurt, twice hurtful: How perceived regard regulates daily marital interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 126-147. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.126
18.
NezlekJ. B. (2001). Multilevel random coefficients analyses of event- and interval-contingent data in social and personality psychology research. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 771-786. doi:10.1177/0146167201277001
19.
NezlekJ. B. (2003). Using multilevel random coefficient modeling to analyze social interaction diary data. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20, 437-469. doi:10.1177/02654075030204002
20.
ReisH. T.GableS. L. (2000). Event-sampling and other methods for studying everyday experience. In ReisH. T.JuddC. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 190-222). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
21.
RusbultC. E. (1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 172-186.
22.
RusbultC. E.MartzJ. M.AgnewC. R. (1998). The Investment Model Scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357-391. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00177.x
23.
SAS Institute. (2011). SAS documentation, Version 9.3. Cary, NC: Author.
24.
ShroutP. E.HermanC. M.BolgerN. (2006). The costs and benefits of practical and emotional support on adjustment: A daily diary study of couples experiencing acute stress. Personal Relationships, 13, 115-134. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2006.00108.x
25.
SimmonsJ. P.NelsonL. D.SimonsohnU. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows present anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22, 1359-1366. doi:10.1177/0956797611417632
26.
SingerJ. D.WillettJ. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
27.
SnijdersT. A. B.BoskerR. J. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London, England: SAGE.
28.
UysalA.LinH. L.KneeC. R.BushA. L. (2012). The association between self-concealment from one’s partner and relationship well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 39-51. doi:10.1177/0146167211429331
29.
WestS. G.RyuE.KwokO.-M.ChamH. (2011). Multilevel modeling: Current and future applications in personality research. Journal of Personality, 79, 2-50. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00681
