Juvenile delinquency has long been associated with birth order in popular culture. While images of the middle child acting out for attention or the rebellious youngest child readily spring to mind, little research has attempted to explain why. Drawing from Adlerian birth order theory and Sulloway’s born-to-rebel hypothesis, I examine the relationship between birth order and a variety of delinquent outcomes during adolescence. Following some recent research on birth order and intelligence, I use new methods that allow for the examination of between-individual and within-family differences to better address the potential spurious relationship. My findings suggest that contrary to popular belief, the relationship between birth order and delinquency is spurious. Specifically, I find that birth order effects on delinquency are spurious and largely products of the analytic methods used in previous tests of the relationship. The implications of this finding are discussed.
AdamsB. N. (1972). Birth order: A critical review. Sociometry, 35, 411-439.
2.
AdamsR. L.PhillipsB. N. (1972). Motivational and achievement differences among children of various ordinal birth positions. Child Development, 43, 155-164.
3.
AdlerA. (1928). Characteristics of the first, second, third child. Children, 3, 24 and 52.
AltusW. D. (1966). Birth order and its sequelae. Science, 151, 44-49.
6.
ArgysL. M.ReesD. I.AverettS. L.WitoonchartB. (2006). Birth order and risky adolescent behavior. Economic Inquiry, 44, 215-233.
7.
BarnesG. M.HoffmanJ. H.WelteJ. W.FarrellM. P.DintcheffB. A. (2006). Effects of parental monitoring and peer deviance on substance use and delinquency. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 1084-1104.
8.
BaskettL. M. (1984). Ordinal position differences in children’s family interactions. Developmental Psychology, 20, 1026-1031.
9.
BeckerS. W.CarrollJ. (1962). Ordinal position and conformity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65, 129-131.
10.
BègueL.RochéS. (2005). Birth order and youth delinquent behavior testing the differential parental control hypotheses in a French representative sample. Psychology, Crime & Law, 11, 73-85.
11.
BlackS. E.DevereuxP. J.SalvanesK. G. (2005). The more the merrier? The effect of family size and birth order on children’s education. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120, 669-700.
12.
BlackS. E.DevereuxP. J.SalvanesK. G. (2007). Older and wiser? Birth order and IQ of young men. NBER Working Paper Series, 13237, 1-25.
13.
BlauP. M.DuncanO. D. (1967). The American occupational structure. New York, NY: Wiley.
14.
BoothA. L.KeeH. J. (2009). Birth order matters: The effect of family size and birth order on educational attainment. Journal of Population Economics, 22, 367-397.
15.
BraggB. W.AllenV. L. (1970). Ordinal position and conformity: A role theory analysis. Sociometry, 33, 371-381.
16.
CapraP. C.DittesJ. E. (1962). Birth order as a selective factor among volunteer subjects. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 64, 302.
17.
CongerK. J.HeylenE.SlomkowskiC.RendeR. (2003). Adolescent girls’ problem behaviors: Evaluating the influence of older siblings. Manuscript in preparation.
18.
EdwardsJ. N.KlemmackD. L. (1973). Birth order and the conservators of tradition hypothesis. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 619-626.
19.
EisenmanR. (1987). Creativity, birth order, and risk taking. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 252, 87-88.
20.
ErnstC.AngstJ. (1983). Birth order: Its influence on personality. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
21.
FalboT. (1984). The single-child family. New York, NY: Guilford.
22.
ForerL. K. (1969). Birth order and life roles. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
23.
ForerL. K.StillH. (1976). Birth order factor: How your personality is influenced by your place in the family. New York, NY: David McKay Company.
24.
FreeseJ.PowellB.SteelmanL. C. (1999). Rebel without a cause or effect: Birth order and social attitudes. American Sociological Review, 64, 207-231.
25.
HarrisK. M. (2008). The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health), Waves I & II, 1994–1996; Wave III, 2001–2002 [Machine-readable data file and documentation]. Chapel Hill: Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
26.
HarrisK. M.HalpernC. T.EntzelP.TaborJ.BearmanP. S.UdryJ. R. (2008). The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health: Research design [WWW document]. Retrieved from http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/addhealth/design
27.
HauserR. M.SewellW. H. (1985). Birth order and educational attainment in full sibships. American Educational Research Journal, 22, 1-23.
28.
HausmanJ. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46, 1251-1271.
29.
HaynieD. L. (2001). Delinquent peers revisited: Does network structure matter. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 1013-1057.
30.
HaynieD. L. (2002). Friendship networks and delinquency: The relative nature of peer delinquency. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18, 99-134.
31.
HaynieD. L.OsgoodD. W. (2005). Reconsidering peers and delinquency: How do peers matter?Social Forces, 84, 1109-1130.
32.
HealeyM. D.EllisB. J. (2007). Birth order, conscientiousness, and openness to experience: Tests of the family-niche model of personality using a within-family methodology. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 55-59.
33.
JohnsonD. R.YoungR. (2011). Toward best practices in analyzing datasets with missing data: Comparisons and recommendations. Journal of Marriage and Family, 73, 926-945.
34.
KammeyerK. (1967). Birth order as a research variable. Social Forces, 46, 71-80.
35.
KanazawaS. (2012). Intelligence, birth order, and family size. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1157-1164.
36.
KatsiyannisA.RyanJ. B.ZhangD.SpannA. (2008). Juvenile delinquency and recidivism: The impact of academic achievement. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 24, 177-196.
37.
KesslerD. (1991). Birth order, family size, and achievement: Family structure and wage determination. Journal of Labor Economics, 9, 413-426.
38.
LarzelereR. E.PattersonG. R. (1990). Parental management: Mediator of the effect of socioeconomic status on early delinquency. Criminology, 28, 301-324.
39.
NisbettR. E. (1968). Birth order and participation in dangerous sports. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 351-353.
40.
PampelF. C. (2000). Logistic regression: A primer. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
41.
PaulhusD. L.TrapnellP. D.ChenD. (1999). Birth order effects on personality and achievement within families. Psychological Science, 10, 482-488.
42.
PolitD. F.FalboT. (1987). Only children and personality development: A quantitative review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, 309-325.
43.
RahavG. (1980). Birth order and delinquency. British Journal of Criminology, 20, 385-395.
44.
RetherfordR. D.SewellW. H. (1991). Birth order and intelligence: Further tests of the confluence model. American Sociological Review, 56, 141-158.
45.
RodgersJ. L. (2001). What causes birth order-intelligence patterns? The admixture hypothesis, revived. American Psychologist, 56, 505-510.
46.
RodgersJ. L.ClevelandH. H.van den OordE.RoweD. C. (2000). Resolving the debate over birth order, family size, and intelligence. American Psychologist, 55, 599-612.
47.
RoystonP. (2005). Multiple imputation of missing values: Update. Stata Journal, 5, 1-14.
48.
RuncoM. A.BahledaM. D. (1987). Birth-order and divergent thinking. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 148, 119-125.
49.
SalmonC. A.DalyM. (1998). Birth order and familial sentiment: Middleborns are different. Evolution and Human Behavior, 19, 299-312.
50.
SampsonE. E. (1962). Birth order, need achievement, and conformity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 64, 155-159.
51.
SchoolerC. (1972). Birth order effects: Not here, not now!Psychological Bulletin, 78, 161-175.
52.
SeffM. A.GrecasV.FreyJ. H. (1993). Birth order, self-concept and participation in dangerous sports. Journal of Psychology, 127, 221-232.
53.
SlomkowskiC.RendeR.CongerK. J.SimonsR. L.CongerR. D. (2001). Sisters, brothers, and delinquency: Evaluating social influence during early and middle adolescence. Child Development, 72, 271-283.
54.
SteelmanL. C.PowellB. (1985). The social and academic consequences of birth order: Real, artifactual, or both?Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 117–124.
55.
SullowayF. J. (1996). Born to rebel: Birth order, family dynamics, and creative lives. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
56.
SullowayF. J. (2007). Birth order and intelligence. Science, 317, 1711-1712.
57.
SullowayF. J.ZweigenhaftR. L. (2010). Birth order and risk taking in athletics: A meta-analysis and study of major league baseball. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 402-416.
58.
TomanW. (1993). Family constellation: Its effects on personality and social behavior. New York, NY: Springer.
59.
TownsendF. (2000). Birth order and rebelliousness: Reconstructing the research in Born to Rebel. Politics and the Life Sciences, 19, 135-156.
60.
TygartC. E. (1991). Juvenile delinquency and number of children in a family: Some empirical and theoretical updates. Youth & Society, 22, 525-536.
61.
WichmanA. L.RodgersJ. L.MacCallumR. C. (2006). A multilevel approach to the relationship between birth order and intelligence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 117-127.
62.
WichmanA. L.RodgersJ. L.MacCallumR. C. (2007). Birth order has no effect on intelligence: A reply and extension of previous findings. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1195-1200.
63.
WidmerE. D. (1997). Influence of older siblings on initiation of sexual intercourse. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 928-938.
64.
ZajoncR. B.SullowayF. J. (2007). The confluence model: Birth order as a within-family or between-family dynamic?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1187-1194.
65.
ZweigenhaftR. L. (2002). Birth order effects and rebelliousness: Political activism and involvement with marijuana. Political Psychology, 23, 219-233.
66.
ZweigenhaftR. L.Von AmmonJ. (2000). Birth order and civil disobedience: A test of Sulloway’s “Born to rebel” hypothesis. Journal of Social Psychology, 140, 624-627.
