When affective experiences are inconsistent with activated evaluative concepts, people experience what is called affective incoherence; when affective experiences are consistent with activated evaluative concepts, people experience affective coherence. The present research asked whether incidental feelings of affective coherence and incoherence would regulate persuasion. Experiences of affective coherence and incoherence were predicted and found to influence the processing of persuasive messages when evoked prior to receipt of such messages (Experiments 1 and 3), and to influence the confidence with which thoughts generated by persuasive messages were held when evoked after presentation of such messages (Experiments 2 and 3). These results extend research on affective coherence and incoherence by showing that they exert a broader impact on cognitive activity than originally assumed.
AlterA. L.OppenheimerD. M.EpleyN.EyreR. N. (2007). Overcoming intuition: Metacognitive difficulty activates analytic reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 569-576.
2.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
3.
BlessH.BohnerG.SchwarzN.StrackF. (1990). Mood and persuasion: A cognitive response analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 331-345.
4.
BlessH.MackieD. M.SchwarzN. (1992). Mood effects on attitude judgments: The independent effects of mood before and after message elaboration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 885-895.
5.
BriñolP.PettyR. E. (2009). Persuasion: Insights from the self-validation hypothesis. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 41, pp. 69-118). New York, NY: Elsevier.
6.
BriñolP.PettyR. E.BardenJ. (2007). Happiness versus sadness as a determinant of thought confidence in persuasion: A self-validation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 711-727.
7.
BriñolP.PettyR. E.ValleC.RuckerD. D.BecerraA. (2007). The effects of message recipients’ power before and after persuasion: A self-validation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 1040-1053.
8.
BriñolP.PettyR. E.WheelerS. C. (2006). Discrepancies between explicit and implicit self-concepts: Consequences for information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 154-170.
9.
BriñolP.TormalaZ. L.PettyR. E. (2013). Ease and persuasion: Multiple processes, meanings, and effects. In UnkelbachC.GreifenederR. (Eds.), The experience of thinking: How the fluency of mental processes influences cognition and behaviour (pp. 101-118). London, England: Psychology Press.
10.
CenterbarD. B.SchnallS.CloreG. L.GarvinE. (2008). Affective incoherence: When affective concepts and embodied reactions clash. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 560-578.
11.
CesarioJ.GrantH.HigginsE. T. (2004). Regulatory fit and persuasion: Transfer from “feeling right.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 388-404.
12.
CloreG. L.SchnallS. (2005). The influences of affect on attitude. In AlbarracínD.JohnsonB. T.ZannaM. P. (Eds.), Handbook of attitudes and attitude change: Basic principles (pp. 437-490). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
CloreG. L.SchnallS. (2008). Affective coherence: Affect as embodied evidence in attitude, advertising, and art. In SeminG.SmithE. R. (Eds.), Embodied grounding: Social, cognitive, affective, and neuroscientific approaches (pp. 211-236). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
14.
EaglyA.ChaikenS. (1993). Psychology of attitudes. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
15.
FabrigarL. R.PettyR. E. (1999). The role of the affective and cognitive bases of attitudes in susceptibility to affectively and cognitively based persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 363-381.
16.
GrossS.HoltzR.MillerN. (1995). Attitude certainty. In PettyR. E.KrosnickJ. A. (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 215-245). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
HuntsingerJ. R. (2011). Mood and trust in intuition interactively orchestrate correspondence between implicit and explicit attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1245-1258.
18.
HuntsingerJ. R. (in press). Affective incoherence reduces reliance on activated stereotypes. Social Cognition.
19.
HuntsingerJ. R.CloreG. L. (2012). Emotion and social metacognition. In BriñolP.DeMarreeK. (Eds.), Social metacognition (Frontiers of Social Psychology Series) (pp. 199-217). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
20.
JonasK.DiehlM.BrömerP. (1997). Effects of attitudinal ambivalence on information processing and attitude-intention consistency. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 190-210.
21.
KaplanK. J. (1972). On the ambivalence-indifference problem in attitude theory and measurement: A suggested modification of the semantic differential technique. Psychological Bulletin, 77, 361-372.
22.
KoenigA. M.CesarioJ.MoldenD. C.KosloffS.HigginsE. T. (2009). Incidental experiences of regulatory fit and the processing of persuasive appeals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1342-1355.
23.
KoriatA.Levy-SadotR. (1999). Processes underlying metacognitive judgments: Information-based and experience-based monitoring of one’s own knowledge. In ChaikenS.TropeY. (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 483-502). New York, NY: Guilford.
24.
LeeA. Y.AakerJ. L. (2004). Bringing the frame into focus: The influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 205-218.
25.
MackieD. M.WorthL. T. (1989). Processing deficits and the mediation of positive affect in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 27-40.
26.
MaioG. R.BellD. W.EssesV. M. (1996). Ambivalence and persuasion: The processing of messages about immigrant groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 513-536.
27.
OppenheimerD. M. (2008). The secret life of fluency. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 237-241.
28.
PettyR. E.BriñolP.TormalaZ. L.WegenerD. T. (2007). The role of meta-cognition in social judgment. In HigginsE. T.KruglanskiA. W. (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 254-284). New York, NY: Guilford.
29.
PettyR. E.CacioppoJ. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
30.
PettyR. E.FabrigarL. R.WegenerD. T. (2003). Emotional factors in attitudes and persuasion. In DavidsonR. J.SchererK. R.GoldsmithH. H. (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 752-772). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
31.
PettyR. E.SchumannD. W.RichmanS. A.StrathmanA. J. (1993). Positive mood and persuasion: Different roles for affect under high and low elaboration conditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 5-20.
32.
PettyR. E.WegenerD. T. (1998). Attitude change: Multiple roles for persuasion variables. In GilbertD.FiskeS.LindzeyG. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 323-390). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
33.
PettyR. E.WheelerS. C.BizerG. (2000). Matching effects in persuasion: An elaboration likelihood analysis. In MaioG.OlsonJ. (Eds.), Why we evaluate: Functions of attitudes (pp. 133-162). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34.
SinclairR. C.MarkM. M.CloreG. L. (1994). Mood-related persuasion depends on (mis)attributions. Social Cognition, 12, 309-326.
35.
SmithC. A.EllsworthP. C. (1985). Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 813-838.
36.
SnyderM.DeBonoK. G. (1985). Appeals to image and claims about quality: Understanding the psychology of advertising. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 586-597.
37.
StrackF.NeumannR. (1996). “The spirit is willing, but the flesh is weak”: Beyond mind-body interaction in human decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 300-304.
38.
ThompsonM. M.ZannaM. P.GriffinD. W. (1995). Let’s not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence. In PettyR. E.KrosnickJ. A. (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 361-386). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
39.
TiedensL. Z.LintonS. (2001). Judgment under emotional certainty and uncertainty: The effects of specific emotions on information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 973-988.
40.
TormalaZ. L.FalcesC.BriñolP.PettyR. E. (2007). Ease of retrieval effects in social judgment: The role of unrequested cognitions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 143-157.
41.
TormalaZ. L.PettyR. E.BriñolP. (2002). Ease of retrieval effects in persuasion: A self-validation analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1700-1712.
42.
van HarreveldF.van der PligtJ.de LiverY. (2009). The agony of ambivalence and ways to resolve it: Introducing the MAID model. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 45-61.
43.
WegenerD. T.PettyR. E. (1994). Mood management across affective states: The hedonic contingency hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 1034-1048.
44.
WegenerD. T.PettyR. E.SmithS. M. (1995). Positive mood can increase or decrease message scrutiny: The hedonic contingency view of mood and message processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 5-15.
45.
WinkielmanP.SchwarzN.FazendeiroT.ReberR. (2003).The hedonic marking of processing fluency: Implications for evaluative judgment. In MuschJ.KlauerK. C. (Eds.), The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 189-217). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
46.
WorthL. T.MackieD. M. (1987). Cognitive mediation of positive mood in persuasion. Social Cognition, 5, 76-94.
