Three studies examined the consequences of subtyping ingroup members for evaluations of the self. The first study examined the impact of subtyping high-performing or low-performing ingroup members on self-evaluations. Study 2 employed an alternative manipulation of subtyping. Given the observed benefits of subtyping low-performing ingroup members for the group and the benefits of subtyping high-performing ingroup members for the self, Study 3 investigated participants’ subtyping target selection (i.e., high-performing vs. low-performing ingroup members) when the focus of the sorting task was on self-evaluations or group evaluations. In sum, these studies suggest that subtyping ingroup members can serve a self-protective function.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
2.
BranscombeN. R.WannD. L.NoelJ. G.ColemanJ. (1993). In-group or out-group extremity: Importance of the threatened social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 381-388.
3.
BrewerM. B.MillerN. (1988). Contact and cooperation: When do they work? In KatzP.TaylorD. (Eds.), Eliminating racism: Means and controversies (pp. 315-326). New York, NY: Plenum.
4.
BrewerM. B.WeberJ. G. (1994). Self-evaluation effects of interpersonal versus intergroup social comparison. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 268-275.
5.
BrickmanP.BulmanR. J. (1977). Pleasure and pain in social comparison. In SulsJ. M.MillerR. L. (Eds.), Social comparison processes: Theoretical and empirical perspectives (pp. 149-186). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
6.
BrownJ. D.NovickN. J.LordK. A.RichardsJ. M. (1992). When Gulliver travels: Social context, psychological closeness, and self-appraisals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 717-727.
7.
BurkleyM.BlantonH. (2008). Endorsing a negative in-group stereotype as a self-protective strategy: Sacrificing the group to save the self. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 37-49.
8.
BuunkB. P. (1994). Social comparison processes under stress: Towards an integration of classic and recent perspectives. In StoebeW.HewstoneM. (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 211-241). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
9.
CashT.CashD.ButtersJ. (1983). “Mirror, mirror, on the wall…?” Contrast effects and self-evaluations of physical attractiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 351-358.
10.
CoxT. H.LobelS. A.McLeodP. L. (1991). Effects of ethnic group cultural differences on cooperative and competitive behavior on a group task. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 827-847.
11.
CrockerJ.LuhtanenR. (1990). Collective self-esteem and ingroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 60-67.
12.
CrockerJ.MajorB. (1989). Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. Psychological Review, 96, 608-630.
13.
EidelmanS.SilviaP. J.BiernatM. (2001). Responding to deviance: Target exclusion and differential devaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1153-1164.
14.
FestingerL. (1954). A theory of social comparison. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
15.
GardnerW. L.GabrielS.LeeA. Y. (1999). “I” value freedom, but “we” value relationships: Self-construal priming mirrors cultural differences in judgment. Psychological Science, 10, 321-326.
16.
GilbertD. T.GieslerR. B.MorrisK. A. (1995). When comparisons arise. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 227-236.
17.
KiteM. E.DeauxK.MieleM. (1991). Stereotypes of young and old: Does age outweigh gender?Psychology and Aging, 6, 19-27.
18.
KundaZ.OlesonK. C. (1995). Maintaining stereotypes in the face of disconfirmation: Constructing grounds for subtyping deviants. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 565-579.
19.
LockwoodP.KundaZ. (1997). Superstars and me: Predicting the impact of role models on the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 91-103.
20.
MajorB.SciacchitanoA.CrockerJ. (1993). Ingroup vs. outgroup comparisons and self-esteem. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 711-721.
21.
MarkusH. (1977). Self-schemata and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 63-78.
22.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
23.
MarquesJ. M.PaezD. (1994). The “black sheep effect”: Social categorization, rejection of ingroup deviates, and perception of group variability. In StroebeW.HewstoneM. (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 287-292). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
24.
MarquesJ. M.YzerbytV. Y.LeyensJ. P. (1988). The “black sheep effect”: Extremity of judgments towards ingroup members as a function of group identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 1-16.
25.
MartinotD.RedersdorffS.GuimondS.DifS. (2002). Ingroup versus outgroup comparisons and self-esteem: The role of group status and ingroup identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1586-1600.
26.
MaurerK. L.ParkB.RothbartM. (1995). Subtyping versus subgrouping processes in stereotype representation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 812-824.
27.
OakesP. J.TurnerJ. C.HaslamS. A. (1991). Perceiving people as group members: The role of fit in the salience of social categorizations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 125-144.
28.
ParkB.JuddC. M. (1990). Measures and models of perceived group variability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 173-191.
29.
ParkB.RyanC. S.JuddC. M. (1992). Role of meaningful subgroups in explaining differences in perceived variability for in-groups and out-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 553-567.
30.
ParkB.WolskoC.JuddC. M. (2001). Measurement of subtyping in stereotype change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 325-332.
31.
Parks-StammE. J.HeilmanM. E.HearnsK. A. (2008). Motivated to penalize: Women’s strategic rejection of successful women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 237-247.
32.
PlebanR.TesserA. (1981). The effects of relevance and quality of another’s performance on interpersonal closeness. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44, 278-285.
33.
RichardsZ.HewstoneM. (2001). Subtyping and subgrouping: Processes for the prevention and promotion of stereotype change. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 52-73.
34.
RyanC. S.ParkB.JuddC. M. (1996). Assessing stereotype accuracy: Implications for understanding the stereotyping process. In MacraeN.HewstoneM.StangorC. (Eds.), Foundations of stereotypes and stereotyping (pp. 121-157). New York, NY: Guilford.
35.
SchmittM. T.SilviaP. J.BranscombeN. R. (2000). The intersection of self-evaluation maintenance and social identity theories: Intragroup judgment in interpersonal and intergroup contexts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1598-1606.
36.
SteeleC. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613-629.
37.
SteeleC. M.AronsonJ. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African-Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797-811.
38.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 94-109). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
39.
TajfelH.WilkesA. L. (1963). Classification and quantitative judgement. British Journal of Psychology, 54, 101-114.
40.
TaylorS. E. (1981). A categorization approach to stereotyping. In HamiltonD. L. (Ed.), Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup behavior (pp. 145-182). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
41.
TesserA. (1988). Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behavior. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 181-227). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
42.
TesserA.CampbellJ. (1980). Self-definition: The impact of the relative performance and similarity of others. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43, 341-347.
43.
TesserA.CampbellJ. (1983). Self-definition and self-evaluation maintenance. In SulsJ.GreenwaldA. G. (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 2, pp. 1-31). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
44.
WallaceD. S.LordC. G.RamseyS. L. (1995). Relationship between self-typicality and the in-group subtypes effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 581-587.
45.
WeberR.CrockerJ. (1983). Cognitive processes in the revision of stereotypic beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 961-977.
46.
WillsT. A. (1981). Downward comparison principles in social psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 245-271.
