Existing research has established the effects of mood on processing of clearly mood-elevating proattitudinal messages and clearly mood-threatening counterattitudinal messages (i.e., mood-relevant messages). Little is known, however, about mood effects on processing of less mood-elevating proattitudinal messages and less mood-threatening counterattitudinal messages (i.e., mood-irrelevant messages). The present research tested hypotheses regarding processing of mood-irrelevant messages based on a mood-congruent expectancies approach. Specifically, two studies were conducted in which prior attitudes were measured (Study 1) or manipulated (Study 2). As predicted, results showed higher scrutiny in negative mood given a proattitudinal message and in positive mood given a counterattitudinal message than in negative mood given a counterattitudinal message and in positive mood given a proattitudinal message. Discussion focuses on implications regarding the accumulated literature, different accounts proposed to understand mood effects on processing effort, and further research.
BlessH. (2001). Mood and the use of general knowledge structures. In MartinL. L.CloreG. L. (Eds.), Theories of mood and cognition: A user’s guidebook (pp. 9-26). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
BlessH.BohnerG.SchwarzN.StrackF. (1990). Mood and persuasion: A cognitive response analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 332-346.
3.
ChungG.TuckerD. M.WestP.PottsG. F.LiottiM.LuuP.HartryA. L. (1996). Emotional expectancy: Brain electrical activity associated with an emotional bias in interpreting life events. Psychophysiology, 33, 218-233.
4.
CloreG. L.WyerR. S.Jr.DienesB.GasperK.GohmC.IsbellL. (2001). Affective feelings as feedback: Some cognitive consequences. In CloreG. L.MartinL. L. (Eds.), Theories of mood and cognition: A user’s guidebook (pp. 27-62). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
DasE.FennisB. M. (2008). In the mood to face the facts: When a positive mood promotes systematic processing of self-threatening information. Motivation and Emotion, 32, 221-230.
6.
EaglyA. H.WoodW.ChaikenS. (1978). Causal inferences about communicators and their effect on opinion change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 424-435.
7.
EgidiG.GerrigR. J. (2009). How valence affects language processing: Negativity bias and mood congruence in narrative comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 37, 547-555.
8.
EgidiG.NusbaumH. C. (2012). Emotional language processing: How mood affects integration processes during discourse comprehension. Brain & Language, 122, 199-210.
9.
HandleyI. M.LassiterG. D. (2002). Mood and information processing: When happy and sad look the same. Motivation and Emotion, 26, 223-255.
10.
KruglanskiA. W.MackieC. M. (1990). Majority and minority influence: A judgmental process analysis. European Review of Social Psychology, 1, 229-261.
11.
KruglanskiA. W.ThompsonE. P. (1999). Persuasion by a single route: A view from the unimodel. Psychological Inquiry, 10, 83-109.
12.
MackieD. M.WorthL. T. (1989). Processing deficits and the mediation of positive affect in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 27-40.
13.
MackieD. M.WorthL. T. (1991). Feeling good, but not thinking straight: The impact of positive mood on persuasion. In ForgasJ. P. (Ed.), Emotion and social judgment (pp. 201-219). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
14.
MayerJ. D.GaschkeY. N.BravermanD. L.EvansT. W. (1992). Mood-congruent judgment is a general effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 119-132.
15.
PettyR. E.CacioppoJ. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer.
16.
PettyR. E.DeStenoD.RuckerD. D. (2001). The role of affect in attitude change. In ForgasJ. P. (Ed.), Handbook of affect and social cognition (pp. 212-233). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
RaghunathanR.TropeY. (2002). Walking the tightrope between feeling good and being accurate: Mood as a resource in processing persuasive messages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 510-525.
18.
SchallerM.CialdiniR. B. (1990). Happiness, sadness, and helping: A motivational integration. In SorrentinoR.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 265-296). New York, NY: Guilford.
19.
SchwarzN. (1990). Feelings as information: Informational and motivational functions of affective states. In SorrentinoR. M.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior ( Vol.2, pp. 527-561). New York, NY: Guilford.
20.
SchwarzN. (2001). Feelings as information: Implications for affective influences on information processing. In MartinL. L.CloreG. L. (Eds.), Theories of mood and cognition: A user’s guidebook (pp. 159-176). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21.
SchwarzN.CloreG. L. (2007). Feelings and phenomenal experiences. In KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 385-407). New York, NY: Guilford.
22.
SinclairR. C.MarkM. M.CloreG. L. (1994). Mood-related persuasion depends on (mis)attributions. Social Cognition, 12, 309-326.
23.
TropeY.FergusonM.RaghunathanR. (2001). Mood as a resource in processing self-relevant information. In ForgasJ. P. (Ed.), Handbook of affect and social cognition (pp. 256-274). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24.
WegenerD. T.PettyR. E. (1994). Mood management across affective states: The hedonic contingency hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 1034-1048.
25.
WegenerD. T.PettyR. E. (2001). Understanding effects of mood through the elaboration likelihood and flexible correction models. In MartinL. L.CloreG. L. (Eds.), Theories of mood and cognition: A user’s guidebook (pp. 177-210). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26.
WegenerD. T.PettyR. E.SmithS. M. (1995). Positive mood can increase or decrease message scrutiny: The hedonic contingency view of mood and message processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 5-15.
27.
WorthL. T.MackieD. M. (1987). Cognitive mediation of positive affect in persuasion. Social Cognition, 5, 76-94.
28.
ZieglerR. (2010). Mood, source characteristics, and message processing: A mood-congruent expectancies approach. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 743-752.
29.
ZieglerR.BurgerA. (2011). Mood and the impact of individuating information on the evaluation of ingroup and outgroup members: The role of mood-based expectancies. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 1000-1006.
30.
ZieglerR.DiehlM. (2011). Mood and multiple source characteristics: Mood congruency of source consensus status and source trustworthiness as determinants of message scrutiny. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1016-1030.
31.
ZieglerR.DiehlM.RutherA. (2002). Multiple source characteristics and persuasion: Source inconsistency as a determinant of message scrutiny. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 496-508.
