Prefactual thoughts typically take the form of implied or explicit if–then statements that represent mental simulations of alternatives to what is expected to occur in the future. The authors propose that the multiplicative combination of “if likelihood” (the degree to which the antecedent condition of the prefactual is perceived to be likely) and “then likelihood” (the perceived conditional likelihood of the outcome of the prefactual, given the antecedent condition) determine the influence of prefactuals. This construct, termed prefactual potency, is a reliable predictor of the degree of influence of prefactual thinking on judgments of anticipated negative affect. Through three experiments, the authors demonstrate the predictive power of this construct and show that it plays a causal role in determining the strength of the effects of prefactual thought. Implications of prefactual potency as a central factor of prefactual influence are discussed.
AlbarracínD.KumkaleG. T. (2003). Affect as information in persuasion: A model of affect identification and discounting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 453-469.
2.
AlickeM. D.BuckinghamJ.ZellE.DavisT. (2008). Culpable control and counterfactual reasoning in the psychology of blame. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1371-1381.
3.
ArchibaldW. P. (1974). Alternative explanations for self-fulfilling prophecy. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 74-84.
4.
BlessH.MackieD. M.SchwarzN. (1992). Mood effects on attitude judgments: Independent effects of mood before and after message elaboration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 585-595.
5.
ByrneR. M. J.EganS. M. (2004). Counterfactual and prefactual conditionals. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 113-120.
6.
ByrneR. M. J.McEleneyA. (2000). Counterfactual thinking about actions and failures to act. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1318-1331.
7.
CatanzaroS. J. (1996). Negative mood regulation expectancies, emotional distress, and examination performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1023-1029.
8.
CervoneD.KoppD. A.SchaumannL.ScottW. D. (1994). Mood, self-efficacy, and performance standards: Lower moods induce higher standards for performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 499-512.
9.
CrawfordM. T.McConnellA. R.LewisA. C.ShermanS. J. (2002). Reactance, compliance, and anticipated regret. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 56-63.
10.
Criado del ValleC. H.MateosP. M. (2008). Dispositional pessimism, defensive pessimism and optimism: The effect of induced mood on prefactual and counterfactual thinking and performance. Cognition & Emotion, 22, 1600-1612.
11.
Dal CinS.ZannaM. P.FongG. T. (2004). Narrative persuasion and overcoming resistance. In KnowlesE. S.LinnJ. A. (Eds.), Resistance and persuasion (pp. 175-191). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
12.
EpstudeK.RoeseN. (2008). The functional theory of counterfactual thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 168-192.
13.
EvansJ. St. B. T. (2007). Hypothetical thinking: Dual processes in reasoning and judgement. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
14.
EvansJ. St. B. T.OverD. E.HandleyS. J. (2003). A theory of hypothetical thinking. In HardmanD.MaachiL. (Eds.), Thinking: Psychological perspectives on reasoning, judgment and decision making (pp. 3-21). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
15.
ForgasJ. P. (1991). Affective influences on partner choice: Role of mood in social decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 708-720.
16.
ForgasJ. P. (1992). Affect in social judgments and decisions: A multiprocess model. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 227-275). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
17.
GleicherF.BoningerD. S.StrathmanA.ArmorD.HettsJ.AhnM. (1995). With an eye toward the future: The impact of counterfactual thinking on affect, attitudes, and behavior. In RoeseN. J.OlsonJ. M. (Eds.), What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking (pp. 283-304). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
GoldingerS. D.KleiderH. M.AzumaT.BeikeD. R. (2003). Blaming the victim under memory load. Psychological Science, 14, 81-85.
19.
GraupmannV.ErberR.PoeJ. (2011). Affect regulation and decision making: Risk as a social constraint. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 33, 16-23.
20.
GreenM. C. (2005). Transportation into narrative worlds: Implications for the self. In TesserA.WoodJ. V.StapelD. A. (Eds.), On building, defending and regulating the self: A psychological perspective (pp. 53-75). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
21.
GreenM. C.BrockT. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 701-721.
22.
GreenM. C.BrockT. C.KaufmanG. F. (2004). Understanding media enjoyment: The role of transportation into narrative worlds. Communication Theory, 14, 311-327.
23.
HesseF. W.SpiesK. (1996). Effects of negative mood on performance: Reduced capacity or changed processing strategy?European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 163-168.
24.
HiltonD. J. (1988). Logic and causal attribution. In HiltonD. J. (Ed.), Contemporary science and natural explanation (pp. 33-65). New York: New York University Press.
25.
HirtE. R.MeltonR. J.McDonaldH. E.HarackiewiczJ. M. (1996). Processing goals, task interest, and the mood-performance relationship: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 245-261.
26.
HochS. J. (1985). Counterfactual reasoning and accuracy in predicting personal events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 719-731.
27.
HofstadterD. R. (1979). Gödel, Escher, Bach: An eternal golden braid. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
28.
JacobyL. L. (1983). Perceptual enhancement: Persistent effects of an experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 21-38.
29.
JacobyL. L.DallasM. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 306-340.
30.
JarvisW. B. G. (2006). MediaLab [Computer software]. New York, NY: Empirisoft.
31.
JohnsonJ. T. (1986). The knowledge of what might have been: Affective and attributional consequences of near outcomes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12, 51-62.
32.
Johnson-LairdP. N.ByrneR. M. J. (1991). Deduction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
33.
KahnemanD.MillerD. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136-153.
34.
KahnemanD.TverskyA. (1982). The simulation heuristic. In KahnemanD.SlovicP.TverskyA. (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 201-208). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
35.
KardesF. R. (1994). Consumer judgment and decision processes. In WyerR. S.SrullT. K. (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition, Vol. 2: Applications (2nd ed., pp. 399-466). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
36.
LandmanJ. (1987). Regret and elation following action and inaction: Affective responses to positive versus negative outcomes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 524-536.
37.
LarrickR. P.BolesT. L. (1995). Avoiding regret in decisions with feedback: A negotiation example. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63, 87-97.
38.
MandelD. R. (2003). Judgment dissociation theory: An analysis of differences in causal, counterfactual, and covariational reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 419-434.
39.
MandelD. R.HiltonD. J.CatellaniP. (Eds.). (2005). The psychology of counterfactual thinking. New York, NY: Routledge.
40.
MarkmanK. D.GavanskiI.ShermanS. J.McMullenM. N. (1993). The mental simulation of better and worse possible worlds. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 87-109.
41.
McConnellA. R.NiedermeierK. E.LeiboldJ. M.El-AlayliA. G.ChinP. P.KuiperN. M. (2000). What if I find it cheaper someplace else? Role of prefactual thinking and anticipated regret in consumer behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 17, 281-298.
42.
McEleneyA.ByrneR. M. J. (2006). Spontaneous causal and counterfactual thoughts. Thinking & Reasoning, 12, 235-255.
43.
McGuireW. J. (1968). Personality and attitude change: An information processing theory. In GreenwaldA. G.BrockT. C.OstromT. M. (Eds.), Psychological foundations of attitudes (pp. 171-196). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
44.
MedvecV. H.MadeyS. F.GilovichT. (1995). When less is more: Counterfactual thinking and satisfaction among Olympic medalists. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 603-610.
45.
MillerD. T.TaylorB. R. (1995). Counterfactual thought, regret, and superstition: How to avoid kicking yourself. In RoeseN. J.OlsonJ. M. (Eds.), What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking (pp. 305-331). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
46.
MullerD.JuddC. M.YzerbytV. Y. (2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 852-863.
47.
NoremJ. K.CantorN. (1986). Anticipatory and post hoc cushioning strategies: Optimism and defensive pessimism in “risky” situations. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 10, 347-362.
48.
PetrocelliJ. V.CryselL. C. (2009). Counterfactual thinking and confidence in blackjack: A test of the counterfactual inflation hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1312-1315.
49.
PetrocelliJ. V.PercyE. J.ShermanS. J.TormalaZ. L. (2011). Counterfactual potency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 30-46.
50.
PetrocelliJ. V.ShermanS. J. (2010). Event detail and confidence in gambling: The role of counterfactual thought reactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 61-72.
51.
ReberR.WinkielmanP.SchwarzN. (1998). Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments. Psychological Science, 9, 45-48.
52.
RitovI. (1996). Probability of regret: Anticipation of uncertainty resolution in choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 66, 228-236.
53.
RitovI.BaronJ. (1995). Outcome knowledge, regret, and omission bias. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 64, 119-127.
54.
RoeseN. J. (1997). Counterfactual thinking. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 132-148.
55.
RoeseN. J.OlsonJ. M. (Eds.). (1995). What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
56.
RoeseN. J.OlsonJ. M. (1997). Counterfactual thinking: The intersection of affect and function. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 1-59). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
57.
RoeseN. J.SannaL. J.GalinskyA. D. (2005). The mechanics of imagination: Automaticity and control in counterfactual thinking. In HassinR. R.UlemanJ. S.BarghJ. A. (Eds.), The new unconscious (pp. 138-170). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
58.
SannaL. J. (1996). Defensive pessimism, optimism, and simulating alternatives: Some ups and downs of prefactual and counterfactual thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1020-1036.
59.
SannaL. J. (1998). Defensive pessimism and optimism: The bitter-sweet influence of mood on performance and prefactual and counterfactual thinking. Cognition & Emotion, 12, 635-665.
60.
SannaL. J.Turley-AmesK. J. (2000). Counterfactual intensity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 273-296.
61.
SannaL. J.TurleyK. J.MarkM. M. (1996). Expected evaluation, goals, and performance: Mood as input. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 323-335.
62.
ShermanS. J.McConnellA. R. (1995). Dysfunctional implications of counterfactual thinking: When alternatives to reality fail us. In RoeseN. J.OlsonJ. M. (Eds.), What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking (pp. 199-231). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
63.
ShermanS. J.SkovR. B.HervitzE. F.StockC. B. (1981). The effect of explaining hypothetical future events: From possibility to probability to actuality and beyond. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 142-158.
64.
SimonsonI. (1992). The influence of anticipating regret and responsibility on purchase decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 105-117.
65.
SpellmanB. A. (1997). Crediting causality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 323-348.
66.
SpielbergerC. A. (1983). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Form Y). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
67.
Van den BosK. (2003). On the subjective quality of social justice: The role of affect as information in the psychology of justice judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 482-498.
68.
WegenerD. T.FabrigarL. R. (2000). Analysis and design for nonexperimental data: Addressing causal and noncausal hypotheses. In ReisH. T.JuddC. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 412-450). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
69.
WellsG. L.GavanskiI. (1989). Mental simulation of causality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 161-169.
70.
WittmaierB. C. (1974). Test anxiety, mood, and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 664-669.
71.
ZeelenbergM.BeattieJ. (1997). Consequences of regret aversion 2: Additional evidence for effects of feedback on decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 72, 63-78.
72.
ZeelenbergM.BeattieJ.van der PligtJ.de VriesN. K. (1996). Consequences of regret aversion: Effects of expected feedback on risky decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 148-158.
