The current research tests the hypothesis that face processing is attuned to high-status faces. Across three experiments, faces of high-status targets were better recognized than faces of low-status targets. In Experiment 2, this memory advantage for high-status targets also extended to an attentional bias toward high-status targets and to stronger sociospatial memory (identity—location link) for high-status targets. Finally, Experiment 3 finds that high-status faces received more expert-style holistic processing than did low-status faces. This suggests that high-status faces also benefit more from the strategic deployment of expert face processing resources than low-status faces. Taken together, these data indicate that perceivers strategically allocate face processing resources to targets perceived to be high in status.
Becker, D.V., Kenrick, D.T., Guerin, S., & Maner, J.K. ( 2005). Concentrating on beauty: Sexual selection and sociospatial memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1643-1652.
2.
Bernstein, M.J., Young, S.G., & Hugenberg, K. ( 2007). The cross-category effect: Mere social categorization is sufficient to elicit an own-group bias in face recognition. Psychological Science, 18, 706-712.
3.
Bindemann, M., Burton, A.M., Hooge, I.T.C., Jenkins, R., & de Haan, E.H.F. (2005). Faces retain attention . Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 1048-1053.
4.
Blair, I.V., Judd, C.M., & Chapleau, K.M. (2004). The influence of Afrocentric facial features in criminal sentencing. Psychological Science , 15, 674-679.
5.
Brewer, M.B. ( 1988). A dual process model of impression formation. In T. K. Srull & R. S. Wyer Jr., (Eds.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 1-36). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6.
Correll, J., & Park, B. ( 2005). A model of the ingroup as a social resource. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 341-359.
7.
Cross, J.F., Cross, J., & Daly, J. ( 1971). Sex, race, age, and beauty as factors in recognition of faces. Perception and Psychophysics, 10, 393-396.
8.
Curby, K.M., & Gauthier, I. ( 2010). To the trained eye: Perceptual expertise alters visual processing. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2, 189-201. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01058.x
9.
DeWall, C.N., & Maner, J.K. ( 2008) High status men (but not women) capture the eye of the beholder. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 328-341.
10.
Fiske, S.T. ( 1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping . American Psychologist, 48, 621-628.
11.
Fiske, S.T. ( 2004). Intent and ordinary bias: Unintended thought and social motivation create casual prejudice. Social Justice Research , 17, 117-127.
12.
Fiske, S.T., & Neuberg, S.L. ( 1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 1-74). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
13.
Goodwin, S.A., Gubin, A., Fiske, S.T., & Yzerbyt, V.Y. ( 2000). Power can bias impression processes: Stereotyping subordinates by default and by design. Group Processes and Inter-group Relations, 3, 227-256.
14.
Green, D.M., & Swets, J.A. ( 1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York, NY: Wiley.
15.
Guinote, A., & Vescio, T.K. ( 2010). The social psychology of power. New York, NY: Guilford.
16.
Hehman, E., Mania, E.W., & Gaertner, S.L. (2010). Where the division lies: Common ingroup identity moderates the cross-race facial-recognition effect . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 445-448.
17.
Horry, R., & Wright, D.B. ( 2008). I know your face but not where I saw you: Context memory is impaired for other race faces. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 610-614.
18.
Horry, R., Wright, D.B., & Tredoux, C.G. ( 2010). Recognition and context memory for faces from own and other ethnic groups: A remember-know investigation. Memory & Cognition, 38, 134-141.
19.
Hugenberg, K., & Corneille, O. ( 2009). Holistic processing is tuned for ingroup faces. Cognitive Science, 33, 1173-1181.
20.
Hugenberg, K., Miller, J., & Claypool, H.M. (2007). Categorization and individuation in the cross-race recognition deficit: Toward a solution to an insidious problem . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 334-340.
21.
Hugenberg, K., & Sacco, D.F. ( 2008). Social categorization and stereotyping: How social categorization biases person perception and face memory. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1052-1072.
22.
Hugenberg, K., & Wilson, J.P. ( 2010). The social face. Manuscript submitted for publication.
23.
Hugenberg, K., Young, S.G., Bernstein, M.J., & Sacco, D.F. ( 2010). The categorization-individuation model: An integrative account of the other race recognition deficit. Psychological Review, 117, 1168-1187.
Macrae, C.N., & Quadflieg, S. ( 2010). Perceiving people. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (5th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
26.
Maddox, K.B. ( 2004). Perspectives on racial phenotypicality bias. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 383-401.
27.
Maner, J.K., DeWall, C.N., & Gailliot, M.T. (2008). Selective attention to signs of success: Social dominance and early stage interpersonal perception . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 488-501.
28.
Maner, J.K., Kenrick, D.T., Becker, D.V., Delton, A.W., Hofer, B., Wilbur, C.J., & Neuberg, S.L. ( 2003). Sexually selective cognition: Beauty captures the mind of the beholder. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 85, 1107-1120.
29.
Maurer, D., Le Grand, R., & Mondloch, C.J. (2002). The many faces of configural processing. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 255-260.
30.
Meissner, C.A., & Brigham, J.C. ( 2001). Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 3-35.
31.
Michel, C., Rossion, B., Han, J., Chung, C., & Caldara, R. ( 2006). Holistic processing is finely tuned for faces of one’s own race. Psychological Science, 17, 608-615.
32.
Neuberg, S.L., & Fiske, S.T. ( 1987). Motivational influences on impression formation: Outcome dependency, accuracy-driven attention, and individuating processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 431-444.
33.
Palermo, R., & Rhodes, G. ( 2002). The influence of divided attention on holistic face perception . Cognition, 82, 225-257.
34.
Papsdorf, J.D., Himle, D.P., McCann, B.S., & Thyer, B.A. ( 1982). Anagram solution time and effects of distraction, sex differences, and anxiety. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 55, 215-222.
35.
Richler, J.J., Mack, M.L., Gauthier, I., & Palmeri, T.J. ( 2009). Holistic processing of faces happens at a glance. Vision Research, 49, 2856-2861.
36.
Rodin, M.J. ( 1987). Who is memorable to whom: A study of cognitive disregard . Social Cognition, 5, 144-165.
37.
Rule, N.O., Ambady, N., Adams, R.B., & Macrae, C.N. ( 2007). Us and them: Memory advantages in perceptually ambiguous groups. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 687-692.
38.
Ruscher, J.B., & Fiske, S.T. ( 1990). Interpersonal competition can cause individuating processes . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 832-843.
39.
Sacco, D.F., & Hugenberg, K. ( 2009). The look of fear and anger: Facial maturity modulates the recognition of fearful and angry expressions. Emotion , 9, 39-49.
40.
Sacco, D.F., Hugenberg, K., & Sefcek, J.A. ( 2009). Sociosexuality and face perception: Unrestricted sexual orientation facilitates sensitivity to female facial cues. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 777-783.
41.
Shriver, E.R., & Hugenberg, K. ( 2010). Power, individuation, and the cross-race recognition deficit. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 767-774.
42.
Shriver, E.R., Young, S.G., Hugenberg, K., Bernstein, M.J., & Lanter, J.R. ( 2008). Class, race, and the face: Social context moderates the cross-race effect in face recognition. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 260-278.
43.
Townsend, J.M., & Levy, G.D. ( 1990). Effects of potential partner’s costume and physical attractiveness on sexuality and partner selection: Sex differences in reported preferences in university students. Journal of Psychology , 124, 371-376.
44.
Willis, J., & Todorov, A. ( 2006). First impressions: Making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17, 592-598.
45.
Wright, D.B., & Sladden, B. ( 2003). An own gender bias and the importance of hair in face recognition. Acta Psychologica, 114, 101-114.
46.
Yardley, L., McDermott, L., Pisarski, S., Duchaine, B., & Nakayama, K. ( 2008). Psychosocial consequences of developmental prosopagnosia: A problem of recognition. Journal of Psychosomatic Research , 65, 445-451.
47.
Young, S.G., Bernstein, M.J., & Hugenberg, K. ( 2010). When do own-group biases in face recognition occur? Encoding versus post-encoding. Social Cognition, 28, 240-250.
48.
Young, S., & Hugenberg, K. ( 2010). Mere social categorization modulates identification of facial expressions of emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 964-977.
