To study mediation, investigators sometimes examine the effect of an independent variable on an unrelated filler task that precedes the focal task. This approach assumes that the same psychological process drives performance on both tasks. The authors tested this assumption in a stereotype threat paradigm by manipulating whether or not the intervening task was described as relevant to the gender-math stereotype. When performance was relevant to the stereotype, females outperformed controls on an intervening Stroop task, but not when it was irrelevant (Experiment 1). In fact, females anticipating taking a math test under threat withdrew effort and performed more poorly on the intervening task when performance was irrelevant (Experiment 2). These findings suggest that different processes may drive performance on irrelevant and relevant intervening tasks. As a result, performance on irrelevant filler tasks may actually tell scholars little about mediating mechanisms.
Ashcraft, M.H., & Kirk, E.P. ( 2001). The relationship between working memory, math anxiety, and performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General , 130, 224-237.
2.
Ben-Zeev, T., Fein, S., & Inzlicht, M. ( 2005). Arousal and stereotype threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 174-181.
3.
Bosson, J.K., Haymovitz, E.L., & Pinel, E.C. ( 2004). When saying and doing diverge: The effects of stereotype threat on self-reported versus non-verbal anxiety. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 247-255.
4.
Brown, R.P., & Pinel, E.C. ( 2003). Stigma on my mind: Individual differences in the experience of stereotype threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 39, 626-633.
5.
Bullock, J.G., Green, D.P., & Ha, S.E. ( 2010). Yes, but what’s the mechanism? (Don’t expect an easy answer). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 98, 550-558.
6.
Carr, P.B., & Steele, C.M. (in press). Stereotype threat and inflexible perseverance in problem solving . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.
7.
Engle, R.W. ( 2002). Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 19-23.
8.
Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R.S. ( 1985). If it changes, it must be a process: Study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 150-170.
9.
Forbes, C.E., & Schmader, T. ( 2010). Retraining attitudes and stereotypes to affect motivation and cognitive capacity under stereotype threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 740-754.
10.
Harkins, S. ( 2006). Mere effort as the mediator of the evaluation-performance relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 91, 436-455.
11.
Hess, T.M., Hinson, J.T., & Hodges, E.A. ( 2009). Moderators of and mechanisms underlying stereotype threat effects on older adults’ memory performance. Experimental Aging Research, 35, 153-177.
12.
Inzlicht, M., & Ben-Zeev, T. ( 2000). A threatening intellectual environment: Why females are susceptible to experiencing problem-solving deficits in the presence of males . Psychological Science, 11, 365-371.
13.
Inzlicht, M., McKay, L., & Aronson, J. ( 2006). Stigmas as ego depletion. Psychological Science, 17, 262-269.
14.
Jamieson, J.P., & Harkins, S.G. ( 2007). Mere effort and stereotype threat performance effects . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 544-564.
15.
Jamieson, J.P., & Harkins, S.G. ( 2009). The effect of stereotype threat on quantitative GRE problems: A mere effort interpretation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1301-1314.
16.
Jamieson, J.P., & Harkins, S.G. ( 2010). Evaluation is necessary to produce stereotype threat performance effects. Social Influence, 5, 75-86.
17.
Kane, M.J., Bleckley, M.K., Conway, A.R.A., & Engle, R.W. ( 2001). A controlled-attention view of working memory capacity . Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 169-183.
18.
Karau, S.J., & Williams, S.D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 681-706.
19.
Keller, J. ( 2002). Blatant stereotype threat and women’s math performance: Self-handicapping as a strategic means to cope with obtrusive negative performance expectations. Sex Roles, 47, 193-198.
20.
Kirk, R. ( 1995). Experimental design. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
21.
Kray, L.J., Thompson, L., & Galinsky, A. ( 2001). Battle of the sexes: Gender stereotype confirmation and reactance in negotiations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 942-958.
22.
Lang, P., & Bradley, M. ( 2008). Appetitive and defensive motivation is the substrate of emotion. In A. Elliot (Ed.), Handbook of approach and avoidance motivation (pp. 51-65). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
23.
MacLeod, C.M. ( 1991). A half century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203.
24.
Maier, M.A., Elliot, A.J., & Lichtenfeld, S. (2008). Mediation of the negative effect of red on intellectual performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,34, 1530-1540.
25.
McFall, S.R., Jamieson, J.P., & Harkins, S.G. ( 2009). Testing the mere effort account of the evaluation-performance relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 96, 135-154.
26.
Muraven, M., Shmueli, D., & Burkley, E. ( 2006). Conserving self-control strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 524-537.
27.
O’Brien, L.T., & Crandall, C.S. (2003). Stereotype threat and arousal: Effects on women’s math performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 782-789.
28.
Roberts, R.J., Hagar, L.D., & Heron, C. ( 1994). Prefrontal cognitive processes: Working memory and inhibition in the antisaccade task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 374-393.
29.
Schmader, T., & Johns, M. ( 2003). Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 85, 440-452.
30.
Schmader, T., Johns, M., & Forbes, C. ( 2008). An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance. Psychological Review, 115, 336-356.
31.
Seibt, B., & Forster, J. ( 2004). Stereotype threat and performance: How self-stereotypes influence processing by inducing regulatory foci. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 38-56.
32.
Sommers, S.R., Warp, L.S., & Mahoney, C.C. ( 2008). Cognitive effects of racial diversity: White individuals’ information processing in heterogeneous groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1129-1136.
33.
Spencer, S.J., Steele, C.M., & Quinn, D.M. ( 1999). Stereotype threat and women’s math performance . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4-28.
34.
Spencer, S.J., Zanna, M., & Fong, G.T. ( 2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 845-851.
35.
Steele, C.M., & Aronson, J. ( 1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 69, 797-811.
36.
Steele, C.M., Spencer, S.J., & Aronson, J. ( 2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 379-440). New York, NY: Academic Press.
37.
Stone, J. ( 2002). Battling doubt by avoiding practice: The effects of stereotype threat on self-handicapping in White athletes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1667-1678.
38.
Stone, J., Lynch, C.I., Sjomeling, M., & Darley, J.M. ( 1999). Stereotype threat effects on Black and White athletic performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 77, 1213-1227.
39.
Wout, D., Danso, H., Jackson, J., & Spencer, S. ( 2008). The many faces of stereotype threat: Group- and self-threat . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 792-799.
