Dominance is a key feature on which romantic partners are evaluated, yet there is no clear consensus on its definition. In Study 1 (N = 305), the authors developed scales to measure three putatively distinct dimensions of dominance: social, financial, and physical. In Study 2 (N = 308), the authors used their scales in a mate-selection paradigm and found that women perceived physical dominance to be related to both attractiveness and social dominance. For both sexes, attractiveness predicted desirability for a one-night stand, whereas attractiveness and agreeableness were predictors of desirability for a serious relationship. In Study 3 (N = 124), the authors surveyed romantic partners in monogamous relationships and found that although aspects of a partner’s dominance—financial for women and social for men—played a bivariate role in relationship satisfaction, agreeableness was the strongest predictor of current and future relationship satisfaction and the only significant predictor of relationship dissolution.
Ackerman, R.A., Donnellan, M.B., & Kashy, D.A. ( 2011). Working with dyadic data in studies of emerging adulthood: Specific recommendations, general advice, and practical tips. In F. Fincham & M. Cui (Eds.), Romantic relationships in emerging adulthood (pp. 67-98). New YorkCambridge University Press.
2.
Baker, R.R., & Bellis, M.A. ( 1995). Human sperm competition. London, UK: Chapman and Hall.
Betzig, L.L. ( 1986). Despotism and differential reproduction: A Darwinian view of history. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.
5.
Botwin, M., Buss, D.M., & Shackelford, T.K. (1997). Personality and mate preferences: Five factors in mate selection and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality, 65, 107-136.
6.
Braun, M., & Bryan, A. ( 2006). Female waist-to-hip and male waist-to-shoulder ratios as determinants of romantic partner desirability. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23, 805-819.
7.
Buss, D.M. ( 1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses testing in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences , 12, 1-49.
8.
Buss, D.M. ( 1991). Conflict in married couples: Personality predictors of anger and upset. Journal of Personality, 59, 663-688.
9.
Buss, D.M., Abbott, M., Angleitner, A., Biaggio, A., Blanco-Villasenor, A., Bruchon-Schweitzer, M., . . . Yang, K.-S. ( 1990). International preferences in selecting mates: A study of 37 societies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21, 5-47.
10.
Buss, D.M., & Barnes, M. ( 1986). Preferences in human mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 559-570.
11.
Buss, D.M., & Schmitt, D. ( 1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204-232.
12.
Dijkstra, P., & Buunk, B.P. ( 2001). Sex differences in the jealousy-evoking nature of a rival’s body build. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 335-341.
13.
Eastwick, P.W., & Finkel, E.J. ( 2008). Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: Do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 245-264.
14.
Ellis, B. ( 1992). The evolution of sexual attraction: Evaluative mechanisms in women. In J. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 267-288). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
15.
Ellis, L. ( 1995). Dominance and reproductive success among non-human animals: A cross-species comparison. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 257-333.
16.
Fletcher, G.J.O., & Simpson, J.A. ( 2000). Ideal standards in close relationships: Their structure and functions. Current Directions in Psychological Science , 9, 102-105.
17.
Fletcher, G., Simpson, J., & Thomas, G. ( 2000). The measurement of perceived relationship quality components: A confirmatory factor analytic approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 340-354.
18.
Fletcher, G.J.O., Tither, J.M., O’Loughlin, C., Friesen, M., & Overall, N. ( 2004). Warm and homely or cold and beautiful? Sex differences in trading off traits in mate selection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 659-672.
19.
Franzoi, S.L., & Hertzog, M.E. ( 1987). Judging physical attractiveness: What body aspects do we use? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 19-33.
20.
Frisch, R.E., & McArthur, J.W. (1974). Menstrual cycles: Fatness as determinant of minimum weight necessary for their maintenance and onset . Science, 185, 554-556.
21.
Galton, F. ( 1879). Composite portraits, made by combining those of many different persons in a single resultant figure. Journal of the Anthropological Institute, 8, 132-144.
22.
Gangestad, S.W., & Simpson, J.A. ( 2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 573-587.
23.
Gangestad, S.W., & Thornhill, R. ( 1999). Individual differences in developmental precision and fluctuating asymmetry: A model and its implications. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 12, 402-416.
24.
Gangestad, S.W., Thornhill, R., & Garver-Apgar, C. (2005). Adaptations to ovulation . In D. M. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 344-371). Hoboken, NJ : John Wiley.
25.
Gangestad, S.W., Thornhill, R., & Yeo, R.A. ( 1994). Facial attractiveness, developmental stability, and fluctuating asymmetry. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15, 73-85.
26.
Garver-Apgar, C., Gangestad, S., Thornhill, R., Miller, R., & Olp, J. ( 2006). Major histocompatibility complex alleles, sexual responsivity, and unfaithfulness in romantic couples. Psychological Science , 17, 830-835.
27.
Gillis, J.S., & Avis, W.E. ( 1980). The male-taller norm in mate selection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 396-401.
28.
Grammer, K., Fink, B., Juette, A., Ronzal, G., & Thornhill, R. ( 2002). Female faces and bodies: N-dimensional feature space and attractiveness. In G. Rhodes & L. A. Zebrowitz (Eds.), Facial attractiveness: Evolutionary, cognitive, and social perspectives (pp. 91-125). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
29.
Gray, P.B., Kahlenber, S.M., Barrett, E.S., Lipson, S.F., & Ellison, P.T. ( 2002). Marriage and fatherhood are associated with lower testosterone in males. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 193-201.
30.
Graziano, W.G., Jensen-Campbell, L.A., Todd, M., & Finch, J.F. ( 1997). Interpersonal attraction from an evolutionary psychology perspective: Women’s reactions to dominant and prosocial men. In J. A. Simpson & D. T. Kenrick (Eds.), Evolutionary social psychology (pp. 141-167). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31.
Greiling, H., & Buss, D.M. ( 2000). Women’s sexual strategies: The hidden dimension of extra-pair mating. Personality and Individual Differences , 28, 929-963.
32.
Henrich, J., & Gil-White, F.J. (2001). The evolution of prestige: Freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 165-196.
33.
Hillson, S. ( 1996). Dental anthropology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34.
Hinsz, V.B., Matz, D.C., & Patience, R.A. (2001). Does women’s hair signal reproductive potential? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 166-172.
35.
Horvarth, T. ( 1979). Correlates of physical beauty in men and women. Social Behavior and Personality, 7, 145-151.
36.
Hughes, S.M., & Gallup, G.G. ( 2002). Sex differences in morphological predictors of sexual behavior. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 173-178.
37.
Jensen-Campbell, L.A., Graziano, W.G., & West, S.G. ( 1995). Dominance, prosocial orientation, and female preferences: Do nice guys really finish last?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 427-440.
38.
Judd, C.M., McClelland, G.H., & Ryan, C.S. ( 2009). Data analysis: A model comparison approach. New York, NY: Routledge.
39.
Judge, T.A., & Cable, D.M. ( 2004). The effect of physical height on workplace success and income: Preliminary test of a theoretical model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 428-441.
40.
Kashy, D.A., & Donnellan, M.B. (in press). Conceptual and methodological issues in the analysis of data from dyads and groups. In K. Deaux & M. Snyder (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of personality and social psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
41.
Kenny, D.A., Kashy, D.A., & Cook, W.L. ( 2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY : Guilford.
42.
Kenrick, D.T., Neuberg, S.L., Zierk, K.L., & Krones, J.M. ( 1994). Evolution and social cognition: Contrast effects as a function of sex, dominance, and physical attractiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 210-217.
43.
Kinsey, A.C., Pomeroy, W.B., Martin, C.E. ( 1948). Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders.
44.
Kline, R.B. ( 2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
45.
Langlois, J.H., & Roggman, L.A. ( 1990). Attractive faces are only average. Psychological Science, 1, 115-121.
46.
Li, N.P., Bailey, M.J., Kenrick, D.T., & Linsenmeier, J.A.W. (2002). The necessities and luxury of mate preferences: Testing the trade offs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 947-955.
47.
Li, N.P., & Kenrick, D.T. ( 2006). Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates: What, whether and why. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 468-489.
48.
Locke, K.D. ( 2000). Circumplex Scales of Interpersonal Values: Reliability, validity, and applicability to interpersonal problems and personality disorders . Journal of Personality Assessment, 75, 249-267.
49.
Manning, J.T., Scutt, D., Whitehouse, G.H., & Leinster, S.J. (1997). Breast asymmetry and phenotypic quality in women. Evolution and Human Behavior, 18, 223-236.
50.
McCann, S.J. ( 2001). Height, societal threat, and the victory margin in presidential elections (1824-1992). Psychological Reports, 88, 741-742.
51.
Møller, A.P., Soler, M., & Thornhill, R. ( 1995). Breast asymmetry, sexual selection and human reproductive success. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 207-219.
52.
Montepare, J.M., Zebrowitz, M., & McArthur, L. ( 1988). Impressions of people created by age-related qualities and their gates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 55, 547-556.
53.
Penton-Voak, I.S., Little, A.C., Jones, B.C., Burt, D.M., Tiddeman, B.P., & Perrett, D. ( 2003). Female condition influences preferences for sexual dimorphism in faces of male humans (Homo sapiens). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 117, 264-271.
54.
Perilloux, H.K., Webster, G.D., & Gaulin, S.J.C. (2010). Signals of genetic quality and maternal investment capacity: The dynamic effects of fluctuating asymmetry and waist-to-hip ratio on men’s ratings of women’s attractiveness . Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1, 34-42.
55.
Perusse, D. ( 1993). Cultural and reproductive success in industrial societies: Testing the relationship at proximate and ultimate levels. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 267-322.
56.
Regan, P.C. ( 1998). What if you can’t get what you want? Willingness to compromise ideal mate selection standards as a function of sex, mate value, and relationship context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1294-1303.
Sadalla, E.K., Kenrick, D.T., & Vershure, B. ( 1987). Dominance and heterosexual attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 730-738.
59.
Singh, D. ( 1993). Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: Role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 293-307.
60.
Singh, D. ( 1995). Female health, attractiveness, and desirability for relationships: Role of breast asymmetry and waist-to-hip ratio. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 465-481.
61.
Stevenage, S.V., Nixon, M.S., & Vince, K. ( 1999). Visual analysis of gait as a cue to identity. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 513-526.
62.
Symons, D. ( 1979). The evolution of human sexuality. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
63.
Symons, D. ( 1995). Beauty is in the adaptations of the beholder. In P. R. Abramson & S. D. Pinkerson (Eds.), Sexual nature, sexual culture (pp. 80-118). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
64.
Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S.W. (1993). Human facial beauty: Averageness, symmetry, and parasite resistance. Human Nature, 4, 237-269.
65.
Tovée, M.J., & Cornelissen, P.L. (1999). The mystery of female beauty . Nature, 399, 215-216.
66.
Tovée, M.J., Reinhardt, S., Emery, J.L., & Cornelissen, P.L. (1998). Optimal BMI and maximum sexual attractiveness. Lancet, 352, 548.
67.
Townsend, J.M. ( 1993). Sexuality and partner selection: Sex differences among college students. Ethology and Sociobiology, 14, 305-329.
68.
Townsend, J.M., & Wasserman, T. ( 1998). Sexual attractiveness: Sex differences in assessment and criteria. Evolution of Human Behavior, 19, 171-191.
69.
Watson, P.J., & Thornhill, R. ( 1994). Fluctuating asymmetry and sexual selection. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 9, 21-25.
