Semantic primes influence the impressions and evaluations people form of others. According to construal level theory (CLT), as stimuli get closer psychologically (e.g., physically, probabilistically), people construe stimuli in more concrete, localized, individuating terms. Across three studies, the authors present participants with individuals performing behaviors (skydiving, motor biking) that are ambiguous with respect to being either adventurous or reckless. Using a CLT framework, the authors show that people are more likely to assimilate their judgments of others to available semantic primes for psychologically close rather than distant targets (Studies 1 and 2). Conversely, they show that general, global attitudes drive evaluations more for distant rather than close targets (Study 3). Implications for priming more broadly are discussed.
Carey, B. ( 2007, July). Who’s minding the mind?New York Times, Science Desk, p. 1.
2.
DeCoster, J., & Claypool, H.M. (2004). A meta-analysis of priming effects on impression formation supporting a general model of informational biases. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 2-27.
3.
Dijksterhuis, A., & Knippenberg, A. (2000). Behavioral indecision: Effects of self-focus on automatic behavior. Social Cognition , 18(1), 55-74.
4.
Dijksterhuis, A., Spears, R., Postmes, T., Stapel, D., Koomen, W., Knippenberg, A., & Scheepers, D. ( 1998). Seeing one thing and doing another: Contrast effects in automatic behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 75, 862-871.
5.
Förster, J., Friedman, R., & Liberman, N. ( 2004). Temporal construal effects on abstract and concrete thinking: Consequences for insight and creative cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 177-189.
6.
Förster, J., & Liberman, N. ( 2007). Knowledge activation. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 201-231). New York, NY: Guilford.
7.
Förster, J., Liberman, N., & Kuschel, S. ( 2008). The effect of global versus local processing styles on assimilation versus contrast in social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 579-599.
8.
Fujita, K., Eyal, T., Chaiken, S., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. ( 2008). Influencing attitudes toward near and distant objects . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 562-572.
9.
Fujita, K., Henderson, M.D., Eng, J., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. ( 2006). Spatial distance and mental construal of social events . Psychological Science, 17, 278-282.
10.
Galinsky, A., Wang, C., & Ku, G. ( 2008). Perspective-takers behave more stereotypically. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 404-419.
11.
Gladwell, M. ( 2005). Blink: The power of thinking without thinking. New York, NY: Little, Brown.
12.
Henderson, M.D. ( 2009). Psychological distance and group judgments: The effect of physical distance on beliefs about common goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1330-1341.
13.
Henderson, M.D., de Liver, Y., & Gollwitzer, P. (2008). The effects of an implemental mind-set on attitude strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 396-411.
14.
Henderson, M.D., Fujita, K., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. ( 2006). Transcending the "here": The effect of spatial distance on social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 91, 845-856.
15.
Henderson, M., Trope, Y., & Carnevale, P. ( 2006). Negotiation from a near and distant time perspective . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 712-729.
16.
Herr, P.M., Sherman, S.J., & Fazio, R.H. ( 1983). On the consequences of priming: Assimilation and contrast effects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 323-340.
17.
Higgins, E. ( 1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133-168). New York, NY: Guilford.
18.
Higgins, E.T., Rholes, W.S., & Jones, C.R. ( 1977). Category accessibility and impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 141-154.
19.
Hinojosa, J., Carretié, L., Méndez-Bértolo, C., Míguez, A., & Pozo, M. (2009). Arousal contributions to affective priming: Electrophysiological correlates. Emotion , 9, 164-171.
20.
Kawakami, K., Dovidio, J., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2003). Effect of social category priming on personal attitudes. Psychological Science, 14, 315-319.
21.
Kay, A.C., Wheeler, S.C., Bargh, J.A., & Ross, L. ( 2004). Material priming: The influence of mundane physical objects on situational construal and competitive behavioral choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 95, 83-96.
22.
Kay, A., Wheeler, S., & Smeesters, D. ( 2008). The situated person: Effects of construct accessibility on situation construals and interpersonal perception. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 275-291.
23.
Kross, E., & Ayduk, O. ( 2008). Facilitating adaptive emotional analysis: Distinguishing distanced-analysis of depressive experiences from immersed-analysis and distraction . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 924-938.
24.
Laran, J., Janiszewski, C., & Cunha, M. ( 2008). Context-dependent effects of goal primes. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 653-667.
25.
LeBoeuf, R., & Estes, Z. ( 2004). "Fortunately, I’m no Einstein": Comparison relevance as a determinant of behavioral assimilation and contrast. Social Cognition, 22(6), 607-636.
26.
Ledgerwood, A., & Trope, Y. ( 2010). Attitudes as global and local action guides. In J. Forgas, J. Cooper, & W. Crano (Eds.), The 12th annual Sydney symposium of social psychology: The psychology of attitudes and attitude change. New York: Psychology Press.
27.
Libby, L., Shaeffer, E., & Eibach, R. ( 2009). Seeing meaning in action: A bidirectional link between visual perspective and action identification level. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 503-516.
28.
Liberman, N., & Förster, J. (2008). The effect of psychological distance on perceptual level of construal. Cognitive Science , 33, 1330-1341.
29.
Liberman, N., Förster, J., & Higgins, E. ( 2007). Completed vs. interrupted priming: Reduced accessibility from post-fulfillment inhibition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 258-264.
30.
Liberman, N., Sagristano, M., & Trope, Y. ( 2002). The effect of temporal distance on level of mental construal . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 523-534.
31.
Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. ( 1998). The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 5-18.
32.
Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Stephan, E. ( 2007). Psychological distance. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 353-381). New York, NY: Guilford.
33.
Liviatan, I., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. ( 2008). Interpersonal similarity as a social distance dimension: Implications for perception of others’ actions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1256-1269.
34.
Maio, G., Bell, D., & Esses, V. ( 1996). Ambivalence in persuasion: The processing of messages about immigrant groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 32, 513-536.
35.
Martin, L.L. ( 1986). Set/reset: Use and disuse of concepts in impression formation . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 493-504.
36.
Mussweiler, T., & Damisch, L. ( 2008). Going back to Donald: How comparisons shape judgmental priming effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 95, 1295-1315.
37.
Mussweiler, T., & Neumann, R. ( 2000). Sources of mental contamination: Comparing the effects of self-generated versus externally provided primes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 194-206.
38.
Nelson, L., & Norton, M. ( 2005). From student to superhero: Situational primes shape future helping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 423-430.
39.
Petty, R.E., DeMarree, K.G., Briñol, P., Horcajo, J., & Strathman, A.J. (2008). Need for cognition can magnify or attenuate priming effects in social judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 900-912.
40.
Rim, S., Uleman, J., & Trope, Y. ( 2009). Spontaneous trait inference and construal level theory: Psychological distance increases nonconscious trait thinking. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1088-1097.
41.
Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. ( 1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 513-523.
42.
Smeesters, D., Warlop, L., Van Avermaet, E., Corneille, O., & Yzerbyt, V. ( 2003). Do not prime hawks with doves: The interplay of construct activation and consistency of social value orientation on cooperative behavior . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 972-987.
43.
Smith, P., & Trope, Y. ( 2006). You focus on the forest when you’re in charge of the trees: Power priming and abstract information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 578-596.
44.
Srull, T., & Wyer, R. ( 1979). The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons: Some determinants and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1660-1672.
45.
Stapel, D.A., Koomen, W., & van der Pligt, J. (1997). Categories of category accessibility: The impact of trait concept versus exemplar priming on person judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 47-76.
46.
Tierney, J. ( 2009, May). Message in what we buy, but nobody’s listening . New York Times, Science Desk, p. 1.
47.
Todorov, A., Goren, A., & Trope, Y. ( 2007). Probability as a psychological distance: Construal and preference. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 473-482.
48.
Wakslak, C., Nussbaum, S., Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. ( 2008). Representations of the self in the near and distant future . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 757-773.
49.
Wakslak, C.J., Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Alony, R. ( 2006). Seeing the forest when entry is unlikely: Probability and the mental representation of events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 641-653.
50.
Wheeler, S.C., DeMarree, K.G., & Petty, R.E. ( 2007). Understanding the role of the self in prime to behavior effects: The active self account. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 234-261.
51.
Wheeler, S., Jarvis, W., & Petty, R. ( 2001). Think unto others: The self-destructive impact of negative racial stereotypes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 37, 173-180.
