This article reveals how people strategically use justice assertions when attempting to persuade others. In three studies participants communicated about a negative situation they or someone else had experienced and did so in a persuasive manner (Studies 1-3), an accurate manner (Study 1), by asking for an opinion (Study 2), or without a communication goal (Studies 1 and 3). Communicators who had a persuasion goal used more justice-related words than communicators who had a goal to be accurate, asked for an opinion, or had no goal. This was particularly the case when communications were about someone else rather than the participants themselves and for those high in self-monitoring whose identities were known (vs. anonymous). The article concludes that people use justice-related words in attempts to persuade others, but only when they know there is no doubt about their personal involvement. Implications are discussed.
Aiken, L.S., & West, S.G. ( 1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions . Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
Alves, H., & Correia, I. ( 2008). On the normativity of expressing the belief in a just world: Empirical evidence. Social Justice Research, 21, 106-118.
3.
Bobocel, D.R., Agar, S.E., Meyer, J.P., & Irving, P.G. ( 1998). Managerial accounts and fairness perceptions in conflict resolution: Differentiating the effects of minimizing responsibility and providing justification. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 20, 133-143.
4.
Clark, H.H. ( 1996). Using language. New York: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Clark, H.H., & Murphy, G.L. ( 1982). Audience design in meaning and reference. In J. F. Le Ny & W. Kintsch (Eds.), Language and comprehension (pp. 287-299). New York: North Holland.
6.
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S.G., & Aiken, L.S. ( 2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
Cook, R.D. ( 1977). Detection of influential observations in linear regression . Technometrics, 19, 15-18.
8.
Douglas, K.M., & Sutton, R.M. ( 2006). When what you say about others says something about you: Language abstraction and inferences about describers’ attitudes and goals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 500-508.
9.
Epley, N., & Caruso, E.M. ( 2004). Egocentric ethics. Social Justice Research , 17, 171-188.
10.
Finkel, N.J. ( 2000). But it’s not fair! Commonsense notions of unfairness . Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 6, 898-952.
11.
Finkel, N.J. ( 2001). Not fair! The typology of common sense unfairness. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association .
12.
Flavell, J.H. ( 1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906-911.
13.
Flavell, J.H. ( 1992). Perspectives on perspective taking. In B. D. Pufall & H. Beilin (Eds.), Piaget’s theory: Prospects and possibilities (pp. 107-139). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
Folger, R. ( 1977). Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of "voice" and peer opinions on responses to inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 108-119.
15.
Folger, R. (1984). (Ed.). The sense of injustice: Social psychological perspectives. New York: Plenum.
16.
Folger, R., & Cropanzano, R. (1998). Organizational justice and human resource management. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
Friestad, M., & Wright, P. ( 1994). The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 1-31.
18.
Frith, C.D., & Frith, U. ( 1999). Interacting minds: A biological basis. Science, 286, 1692-1695.
19.
Fussell, S.R., & Krauss, R.N. ( 1989). The effects of intended audience design on message production and comprehension: Reference in a common ground framework. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 203-219.
20.
Fussell, S.R., & Krauss, R.N. ( 1992). Coordination of knowledge in communication: Effects of speakers’ assumptions about what others know. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 378-391.
21.
Gangestad, S.W., & Snyder, M. ( 2000). Self-monitoring: Appraisal and reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 530-555.
22.
Hafer, C.L. ( 2000). Do innocent victims threaten the belief in a just world? Evidence from a modified Stroop task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 165-173.
23.
Ham, J., & Van den Bos, K. (2008). Not fair for me! The influence of personal relevance on social justice inferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 699-705.
24.
Higgins, E.T. ( 1981). The "communication game": Implications for social cognition and persuasion. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Social cognition: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 1, pp. 343-392). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25.
Hovland, C., & Mandell, W. ( 1952). An experimental comparison of conclusion-drawing by the communicator and by the audience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47, 581-588.
26.
Huo, Y.J., Smith, H.J., Tyler, T.R., & Lind, E.A. ( 1996). Superordinate identification, subgroup identification, and justice concerns: Is separatism the problem; is assimilation the answer?Psychological Science, 7, 40-45.
27.
Jost, J.T., Kruglanski, A.W., & Nelson, T.O. ( 1998). Social metacognition: An expansionist review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 137-154.
28.
Kaiser, C.R., & Miller, C.T. ( 2001). Reacting to impending discrimination: Compensation for prejudice and attributions to discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1357-1367.
29.
Klein, O., Snyder, M., & Livingston, R.W. (2004). Prejudice on the stage: Self-monitoring and the public expression of group attitudes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 299-314.
30.
Knowles, E. S., & Linn, J. A. (Eds.). (2004). Resistance and persuasion . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31.
Leventhal, G.S. ( 1980). What should be done with equity theory? In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg , & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27-55). New York: Plenum.
32.
Lind, E.A. ( 2001). Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. In J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational behavior (pp. 56-88). Stanford, CA : Stanford University Press.
33.
Lind, E.A., Greenberg, J., Scott, K.S., & Welchans, T.D. (2000). The winding road from employee to complainant: Situational and psychological determinants of wrongful termination claims. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 557-590.
34.
Lind, E.A., Kulik, C.T., Ambrose, M., & De Vera Park, M.V. (1993). Individual and corporate dispute resolution: Using procedural fairness as a decision heuristic. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 224-251.
35.
Lind, E.A., & Tyler, T.R. ( 1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.
36.
Messick, D.M., & Sentis, K. ( 1983). Fairness, preference, and fairness biases. In D. M. Messick & K. S. Cook (Eds.), Equity theory: Psychological and sociological perspectives (pp. 61-94). New York: Praeger .
37.
Mikula, G., & Wenzel, M. ( 2000). Justice and social conflict. International Journal of Psychology, 35, 126-135.
38.
Miller, D.T. ( 1999). The norm of self-interest. American Psychologist , 54, 1053-1060.
39.
Miller, D.T. ( 2001). Disrespect and the experience of injustice. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 527-553.
40.
Miller, D.T., & Ratner, R.K. ( 1998). The disparity between the actual and assumed power of self-interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 74, 53-62.
41.
Petty, R.E., & Briñol, P. (2008). Persuasion: From single to multiple to metacognitive processes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 137-147.
42.
Pornpitakpan, C. ( 2004) The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades’ evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 243-281.
43.
Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. ( 1978). Chimpanzee problem-solving: A test for comprehension . Science, 202, 532-535.
44.
Rawls, J. ( 1992). A theory of justice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1971)
45.
Reis, H.T. ( 1984). The multidimensionality of justice. In R. Folger (Ed.), The sense of injustice: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 25-61). New York: Plenum.
46.
Ross, M., & Miller, D. T. (Eds.). (2001). The justice motive in everyday life. New York: Cambridge University Press.
47.
Schreier, M., Groeben, N., & Blickle, G. ( 1995). The effects of (un-) fairness and (im-)politeness on the evaluation of argumentative communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 14, 260-288.
48.
Sears, D.O. ( 1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology’s view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51, 515-530.
49.
Semin, G.R. ( 2000). Agenda 2000-Communication: Language as an implementational device for cognition. European Journal of Social Psychology , 30, 595-612.
50.
Semin, G.R., & Fiedler, K. ( 1991). The linguistic category model, its bases, applications and range. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 1-30). Hove , UK: Psychology Press.
Snyder, M. ( 1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 526-537.
53.
Snyder, M., & Gangestad, S.W. (1986). On the nature of self-monitoring: Matters of assessment, matters of validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 125-139.
54.
Tyler, T.R. ( 1990). Why do people obey the law? Procedural justice, legitimacy, and compliance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
55.
Tyler, T.R. ( 2001). Procedural strategies for gaining deference: Increasing social harmony or creating false consciousness? In J. M. Darley, D. M. Messick, & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Social influences on ethical behavior in organizations (pp. 69-87). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
56.
Van den Bos, K. ( 2001). Uncertainty management: The influence of uncertainty salience on reactions to perceived procedural fairness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 931-941.
57.
Van den Bos, K., Brockner, J., Stein, J.H., Steiner, D.D., Van Yperen, N.W., & Dekker, D.M. ( 2009). On the psychology of voice and performance capabilities: Competitive achievement, nurturing the less capable, and cross-cultural implications . Manuscript submitted for publication.
58.
Van den Bos, K., & Lind, E.A. ( 2002). Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments . Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 1-60.
59.
Vermunt, R., Wit, A., Van den Bos, K., & Lind, A. ( 1996). The effect of inaccurate procedure on protest: The mediating role of perceived unfairness and situational self-esteem. Social Justice Research, 9, 109-119.
60.
Wijn, R., & Van den Bos, K. (2009). When things are unfair you direct your attention there: On the attention bias for justice information . Manuscript submitted for publication.
