The present research examined the consequences of physical distance on beliefs about common goals, which have been implicated in judgments of entitativeness (“groupness”) of social entities. A central feature of task groups is the degree to which its members are driven by common goals. According to construal level theory, as stimuli are removed psychologically (e.g., physically), people construe stimuli in more abstract terms, focusing more on central features of stimuli. Adopting this framework, four studies demonstrated that people are more likely to assume the behavior of task group members is driven by common goals for physically distant rather than near groups. This effect occurred when perceived identification and similarity to others were held constant. Implications for intergroup relations are discussed.
Abelson, R., Dasgupta, N., Park, J., & Banaji, M. ( 1998). Perceptions of the collective other. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 243-250.
2.
Ackerman, J., Shapiro, J., Neuberg, S., Kenrick, D., Becker, D., Griskevicius, V., et al. (2006). They all look the same to me (unless they’re angry): From out-group homogeneity to out-group heterogeneity. Psychological Science, 17, 836-840.
3.
Best, S.J., & Krueger, B.S. ( 2005). Analyzing the representativeness of Internet political participation. Political Behavior, 27, 183-216.
4.
Campbell, D. ( 1958). Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioral Science , 3, 14-25.
5.
Cohen, G. ( 2000). Hierarchical models in cognition: Do they have psychological reality? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology , 12, 1-36.
6.
Dasgupta, N., Banaji, M., & Abelson, R. ( 1999). Group entitativity and group perception: Associations between physical features and psychological judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 991-1003.
7.
Festinger, L., Schachter, S., & Back, K. ( 1950). Social pressures in informal groups: A study of human factors in housing. New York: Harper .
8.
Fiske, S.T. ( 1998). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In D. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, 4th ed., pp. 357-411). New York: McGraw-Hill.
9.
Fujita, K., Henderson, M.D., Eng, J., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. ( 2006). Spatial distance and mental construal of social events . Psychological Science, 17, 278-282.
10.
Griffin, D.W., Dunning, D., & Ross, L. ( 1990). The role of construal processes in overconfident predictions about self and others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 59, 1128-1139.
11.
Hamilton, D.L., & Sherman, J.W. ( 1994). Stereotypes. In R. S. Wyer Jr. & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 2, 2nd ed., pp. 1-68). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
Haslam, N., Rothschild, L., & Ernst, D. ( 2000). Essentialist beliefs about social categories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 113-127.
13.
Henderson, M.D., Fujita, K., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. ( 2006). Transcending the "here": The effect of spatial distance on social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 91, 845-856.
14.
Horrigan, J. ( 2008). Mobile access to data and information: Data memo 202-419-4500 (PEW Internet & American Life Project). Retrieved June 12, 2009, from http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2008/PIP_Mobile.Data.Access.pdf.pdf
15.
Idson, L.C., & Mischel, W. ( 2001). The personality of familiar and significant people: The lay perceived as a social-cognitive theorist. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 585-596.
16.
Ip, G., Chiu, C., & Wan, C. ( 2006). Birds of a feather and birds flocking together: Physical versus behavioral cues may lead to trait- versus goal-based group perception . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 90, 368-381.
17.
Judd, C.M., & Park, B. ( 1988). Out-group homogeneity: Judgments of variability at the individual and group levels. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 778-788.
18.
Kenny, D., Kashy, D., & Bolger, N. ( 1998). Data analysis in social psychology. The handbook of social psychology (Vols. 1 & 2, 4th ed., pp. 233-265). New York: McGraw-Hill.
19.
Klar, Y., Bar-Tal, D., & Kruglanski, A.W. (1988). Conflict as a cognitive schema: Toward a social cognitive analysis of conflict and conflict termination . In W. Stroebe, A. Krugjanski, D. Bar-Tal , & M. Hewstone (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup conflict (pp. 149-171). New York/ Berlin: Springer-Verlag .
20.
Knowles, E.S., & Bassett, R.L. ( 1976). Groups and crowds as social entities: Effects of activity, size, and member similarity on non-members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 837-845.
21.
Latané, B., Liu, J., Nowak, A., & Bonevento, M. ( 1995). Distance matters: Physical space and social impact . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 795-805.
22.
Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Stephan, E. ( 2007). Psychological distance. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 353-383). New York: Guilford .
23.
Lickel, B., Hamilton, D., Wieczorkowska, G., Lewis, A., Sherman, S., & Uhles, A. ( 2000). Varieties of groups and the perception of group entitativity . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 78, 223-246.
24.
Lickel, B., Schmader, T., & Hamilton, D.L. (2003). A case of collective responsibility: Who else was to blame for the Columbine High School shootings ? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 194-204.
25.
Linville, P.W., Fischer, G.W., & Salovey, P. ( 1989). Perceived distributions of the characteristics of in-group and out-group members: Empirical evidence and a computer simulation . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 165-188.
26.
Liviatan, I., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. ( 2008). Interpersonal similarity as a social distance dimension: Implications for perception of others’ actions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1256-1269.
27.
Magee, J., & Tiedens, L. ( 2006). Emotional ties that bind: The roles of valence and consistency of group emotion in inferences of cohesiveness and common fate. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1703-1715.
Mohr, D.C., Vella, L., Hart, S., Heckman, T., & Simon, G. ( 2008). The effect of telephone-administered psychotherapy on symptoms of depression and attrition: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 15, 243-253.
30.
Park, B., & Hastie, R. ( 1987). Perception of variability in category development: Instance- versus abstraction-based stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 621-635.
31.
Park, B., & Judd, C.M. ( 1990). Measures and models of perceived group variability . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 173-191.
32.
Posner, M., & Keele, S. ( 1968). On the genesis of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 353-363.
33.
Posner, M., & Keele, S. ( 1970). Retention of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 304-308.
34.
Reyna, V.F., & Brainerd, C.J. (1995). Fuzzy-trace theory: An interim synthesis. Learning and Individual Differences, 7, 1-75.
35.
Rydell, R., & McConnell, A. ( 2005). Perceptions of entitativity and attitude change . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 99-110.
36.
Schul, Y. ( 1983). Integration and abstraction in impression formation . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 45-54.
37.
Semin, G.R., & Fiedler, K. ( 1988). The cognitive functions of linguistic categories in describing persons: Social cognition and language. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 558-568.
38.
Sherman, S.J. ( 1980). On the self-erasing nature of errors of prediction . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 211-221.
39.
Sherman, S.J., Castelli, L., & Hamilton, D.L. (2002). The spontaneous use of a group typology as an organizing principle in memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 328-342.
40.
Smith, E.R. ( 1998). Mental representation and memory. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 391-445). New York: McGraw-Hill.
41.
Smith, J.D., & Minda, J.P. ( 2001). Journey to the center of the category: The dissociation in amnesia between categorization and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, Cognition, 27, 984-1002.
42.
Sobel, M.E. ( 1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 290-312). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
43.
Spencer-Rodgers, J., Hamilton, D.L., & Sherman, S.J. ( 2007). The central role of entitativity in stereotypes of social categories and task groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 369-388.
44.
Tallent-Runnels, M.K., Thomas, J.A., Lan, W.Y., Cooper, S., Ahern, T.C., Shaw, S.M., et al. (2006). Teaching courses online: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 76, 93-135.
45.
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. ( 2000). Temporal construal and time-dependent changes in preference . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 79, 876-889.
Vallacher, R.R., & Wegner, D.M. ( 1987). What do people think they are doing? Action identification theory and human behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 3-15.
48.
Wicklund, R. ( 2004). The role of distance in valuing another person . In R. A. Wright, J. Greenberg, & S. S. Brehm (Eds.), Motivational analyses of social behavior: Building on Jack Brehm’s contributions to psychology (pp. 97-106). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
49.
Wilder, D.A. ( 1984). Predictions of belief homogeneity and similarity following social categorization. British Journal of Social Psychology , 23, 323-333.
50.
Yzerbyt, V., Corneille, O., & Estrada, C. ( 2001). The interplay of subjective essentialism and entitativity in the formation of stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 141-155.
51.
Yzerbyt, V., Judd, C.M., & Corneille, O. ( 2004). The psychology of group perception: Perceived variability, entitativity, and essentialism. New York: Psychology Press.
