Self-presentation via favorable self-descriptions may not lead to the desired impression, whereas positive descriptions by others may be more effective because they seem less susceptible to motivated bias. In four experiments, we investigated whether person descriptions have more impact on impressions when provided by third parties than by targets themselves. Results showed that target impressions were consistently more in line with the target description when positive sociability-related or positive competency-related information was given by a third party than by the target. This source effect always occurred for ratings of claimed traits. In addition, ratings of the target's sociability were also affected when the claim was about competency. Source effects were not obtained for negative self-descriptions. The results are discussed in terms of the presumed underlying process on the basis of mediation data.
Baumgardner, A.H., & Brownlee, E.A. (1987). Strategic failure in social interaction: Evidence for expectancy disconfirmation processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 525-535.
2.
Cialdini, R.B., Wosinska, W., Dabul, A.J., Whetstone-Dion, R., & Heszen, I. (1998). When social role salience leads to social role rejection: Modest self-presentations among women and men in two cultures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 473-481.
3.
Dunbar, R.I.M., Duncan, N.D.C., & Marriott, A. (1997). Human conversational behavior. Human Nature, 8, 231-246.
4.
Emler, N. (1994). Gossip, reputation, and social adaptation. In R. F. Goodman & A. Ben-Zeíev (Eds.), Good gossip (pp. 117-138). Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
5.
Fein, S. (1996). Effects of suspicion on attributional thinking and the correspondence bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1164-1184.
Hilton, J.L., Fein, S., & Miller, D.T. (1993). Suspicion and dispositional inference. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 501-512.
8.
Jones, E.E. (1964). Ingratiation. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
9.
Jones, E.E. (1990). Interpersonal perception. New York: W. H. Freeman.
10.
Jones, E.E., & Davis, K.E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 219-266). New York: Academic Press.
11.
Jones, E.E., & Pittman, T.S. (1982). Toward a general theory of strategic self-presentation . In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 1, pp. 231-262). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12.
Jones, E.E., & Wortman, C. (1973). Ingratiation: An attributional approach. Morristown, NJ: General Learning.
13.
Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 1121-1134.
14.
Leary, M.R. (1995). Self-presentation: Impression management and interpersonal behavior. Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark.
15.
Leary, M.R., & Kowalski, R.M. (1990). Impression management: A literature review and two-factor model. Psychological Bulletin , 107, 34-47.
16.
Nisbett, R.E., & Wilson, T.D. (1977). The halo effect: Evidence for the unconscious alteration of judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 450-456.
17.
Pontari, B.A., & Schlenker, B.R. (2004). Providing and withholding impression management support for romantic partners: Gender of the audience matters. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 41-51.
18.
Pontari, B.A., & Schlenker, B.R. (2006). Helping friends manage impressions: We like helpful liars but respect nonhelpful truth tellers. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 28, 177-183.
19.
Reeder, G.D., & Brewer, M.B. (1979). A schematic model of dispositional attribution in interpersonal perception. Psychological Review, 86, 61-79.
20.
Reeder, G.D., & Fulks, J.L. (1980). When actions speak louder than words: Implicational schemata and the attribution of ability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 33-46.
21.
Reeder, G.D., & Spores, J.M. (1983). The attribution of morality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 736-745.
22.
Rosenberg, S., Nelson, C., & Vivekananthan, P.S. (1968). A multidimensional approach to the structure of personality impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 283-294.
23.
Schlenker, B.R. (1980). Impression management: The self-concept, social identity, and interpersonal relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/ Cole.
24.
Schlenker, B.R., & Britt, T.W. (1999). Beneficial impression management: Strategically controlling information to help friends. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 559-573.
25.
Schlenker, B.R., & Leary, M.R. (1982). Audiences reactions to self-enhancing, self-denigrating, and accurate self-presentations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 89-104.
26.
Schlenker, B.R., Lifka, A., & Wowra, S.A. (2004). Helping new acquaintances make the right impression: Balancing image concerns of others and self. Self & Identity , 3, 191-206.
27.
Schneider, D.J. (1981). Tactical self-presentations: Toward a broader conception. In J. T. Tedeschi (Ed.), Impression management theory and social psychological research (pp. 23-40). New York: Academic Press.
28.
Shepperd, J.A., & Socherman, R.E. (1997). On the manipulative behavior of low Machiavellians: Feigning incompetence to "sandbag" an opponent. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1448-1459.
29.
Thorndike, E.L. (1920). A constant error in psychological ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 4, 25-29.
30.
Vonk, R. (1993). The negativity effect in trait ratings and open-ended descriptions of persons. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 269-278.
31.
Vonk, R. (1999). Impression formation and impression management: Motives, traits, and inferred from self-promoting and self-deprecating behavior . Social Cognition, 17, 390-412.
32.
Vonk, R. (2001). Aversive self-presentations. In R. M. Kowalski (Ed.), Behaving badly: Aversive interpersonal behaviors (pp. 79-155). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
33.
Vonk, R., & Van Knippenberg, A. (1994). The sovereignty of negative inferences: Suspicion of ulterior motives does not reduce the negativity effect . Social Cognition, 12, 169-186.
34.
Zuckerman, M., DePaulo, B.M., & Rosenthal, R. (1981). Verbal and non-verbal communication of deception . In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental and social psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 1-59). New York: Academic Press.
