The authors tested the prediction that women prefer clothing that is more revealing and sexy when fertility is highest within the ovulatory cycle. Eighty-eight women reported to the lab twice: once on a low-fertility day of the cycle and once on a high-fertility day (confirmed using hormone tests). In each session, participants posed for full-body photographs in the clothing they wore to the lab, and they drew illustrations to indicate an outfit they would wear to a social event that evening. Although each data source supported the prediction, the authors found the most dramatic changes in clothing choice in the illustrations. Ovulatory shifts in clothing choice were moderated by sociosexuality, attractiveness, relationship status, and relationship satisfaction. Sexually unrestricted women, for example, showed greater shifts in preference for revealing clothing worn to the laboratory near ovulation. The authors suggest that clothing preference shifts could reflect an increase in female—female competition near ovulation.
Alexander, R.D., & Noonan, K. (1979). Concealment of ovulation, parental care, and human social evolution. In N. A. Chagnon & W. Irons (Eds.), Evolutionary biology and human behavior: An anthropological perspective (pp. 402-435). North Scituate, MA: Duxbury.
2.
Benshoof, L., & Thornhill, R. (1979). The evolution of monogamy and loss of estrus in humans. Journal of Social and Biological Structures, 2, 95-106.
3.
Brumbaugh, C.C., & Fraley, R.C. (2006). The evolution of attachment in romantic relationships . In M. Mikulincer & G. Goodman (Eds.), The dynamics of romantic love: Attachment, caregiving, and sex. New York: Guilford.
4.
Bullivant, S.B., Sellergren, S.A., Stern, K., Spencer, N.A., Jacob, S., Mennella, J.A., et al. (2004). Women's sexual experience during the menstrual cycle: Identification of the sexual phase by noninvasive measurement of luteinizing hormone. Journal of Sex Research, 41, 82-93.
5.
Burt, A. (1992). Concealed ovulation and sexual signals in primates . Folia Primatologica, 58, 1-6.
6.
Buss, D.M. (1988). The evolution of human intrasexual competition: Tactics of mate attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 616-628.
7.
Dabbs, J.M., Cate, K., Brower, A., Emery, C., Leander, P., & Zachery, M. (2003). Testosterone treatment, affect, and appearance: Slight effects in normal subjects. Social Behavior and Personality , 31, 387-394.
8.
Dion, K. (2002). Cultural perspectives on facial attractiveness . In G. Rhodes & L. A. Zebrowitz (Eds.), Facial attractiveness: Evolutionary, cognitive, and social perspectives (pp. 239-259). Westport, CT: Ablex.
9.
Dreher, J., Schmidt, P.J., Kohn, P., Furman, D., Rubinow, D., & Berman, K.F. (2007). Menstrual cycle phase modulates reward-related neural function in women. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 2465-2470.
10.
Eichner, S.F., & Timpe, E.M. (2004). Urinary-based ovulation and pregnancy: Point-of-case testing. Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 38, 325-331.
11.
Etcoff, N. (1999). Survival of the prettiest. New York: Doubleday.
12.
Fessler, D.M.T. (2003). No time to eat: An adaptationist account of periovulatory behavioral changes. Quarterly Review of Biology, 78, 3-21.
13.
Fisher, M.L. (2004). Female intrasexual competition decreases female facial attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Biology Letters, 271, 283-285.
14.
Gangestad, S.W., Garver-Apgar, C.E., Simpson, J.A., & Cousins, A.J. (2007). Changes in women's mate preferences across the ovulatory cycle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 92, 151-163.
15.
Gangestad, S.W., Thornhill, R., & Garver, C.E. (2002). Changes in women's sexual interests and their partner's mate-retention tactics across the menstrual cycle: Evidence for shifting conflicts of interest. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 269, 975-982.
16.
Gangestad, S.W., Thornhill, R., & Garver-Apgar, C.E. (2005a). Adaptations to ovulation . In D. M. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 344-371). Hoboken, NJ : John Wiley.
17.
Gangestad, S.W., Thornhill, R., & Garver-Apgar, C.E. (2005b). Women's sexual interests across the ovulatory cycle depend on primary partner development instability . Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 272, 2023-2027.
18.
Garver-Apgar, C.E., Gangestad, S.W., Thornhill, R., Miller, R.D., & Olp, J.J. (2006). Major histocompatibility complex alleles, sexual responsivity, and unfaithfulness in romantic couples. Psychological Science, 17, 830-835.
19.
Grammer, K., Renninger, L., & Fischer, B. (2004). Disco clothing, female sexual motivation, and relationship status: Is she dressed to impress?Journal of Sex Research, 41, 66-74.
20.
Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J.M., Sundie, J.M., Cialdini, R.B., Miller, G.F., & Kenrick, D.T. (2007). Blatant benevolence and conspicuous consumption: When romantic motives elicit strategic costly signals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 85-102.
21.
Haselton, M.G. (2003). The sexual overperception bias: Evidence of a systematic bias in men from a survey of naturally occurring events. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 43-47.
22.
Haselton, M.G., & Gangestad, S.W. (2006). Conditional expression of women's desires and men's mate guarding across the ovulatory cycle. Hormones and Behavior, 49, 509-518.
23.
Haselton, M.G., Mortezaie, M., Pillsworth, E.G., Bleske, A.E., & Frederick, D.A. (2007). Ovulatory shifts in human female ornamentation: Near ovulation, women dress to impress. Hormones and Behavior, 51, 40-45.
24.
Havlicek, J., Roberts, S.C., & Flegr, J. (2005). Women's preference for dominant male odour: Effects of menstrual cycle and relationship status. Biology Letters , 1, 256-259.
25.
Langlois, J.H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A.J., Larson, A., Hallam, M., & Smoot, M. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 390-423.
26.
Little, A.C., Jones, B.C., Penton-Voak, I.S., Burt, D.M., & Perrett, D.I. (2002). Partnership status and the temporal context of relationships influence human female preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, 269, 1095-1100.
27.
Lucas, M., Koff, E., & Skeath, S. (2007). A pilot study of relationship between fertility and bargaining. Psychological Reports, 101, 302-310.
28.
Miller, G.F., Tybur, J., & Jordan, B. (2007). Ovulatory cycle effects on tip earnings by lap-dancers: Economic evidence for human estrus? Evolution and Human Behavior , 28, 375-381.
Pillsworth, E.G., & Haselton, M.G. (2006). Male sexual attractiveness predicts differential ovulatory shifts in female extra-pair attraction and male mate retention. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 247-258.
31.
Pillsworth, E.G., Haselton, M.G., & Buss, D.M. (2004). Ovulatory shifts in female sexual desire. Journal of Sex Research, 41, 55-65.
32.
Roberts, S.C., Havlicek, J., Flegr, J., Hruskova, M., Little, A.C., Jones, B.C., et al. (2004). Female facial attractiveness increases during the fertile phase of the menstrual cycle. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B (Suppl.), 271, S270-S272.
33.
Simpson, J.A., & Gangestad, S.W. (1991). Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 870-883.
34.
Singh, D., & Bronstad, P.M. (2001). Female body odor is a potential cue to ovulation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Biology, 268, 797-801.
35.
Thornhill, R. (2007). The evolution of women's estrus, extended sexuality, and concealed ovulation, and their implications for human sexuality research . In S. W. Gangestad & J. A. Simpson (Eds.), The evolution of mind: Fundamental question and controversies (pp. 391-396). New York: Guilford.
36.
Thornhill, R., Gangestad, S.W., Miller, R., Scheyd, G., McCollough, J.K., & Franklin, M. (2003). Major histocompatibility complex genes, symmetry, and body scent attractiveness in men and women. Behavioral Ecology, 14, 668-678.
37.
van Anders, S.M., Hamilton, L.D., & Watson, N.V. (2007). Multiple partners are associated with higher testosterone in North American men and women. Hormones and Behavior, 51, 454-459.
